| Peer-Reviewed

The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example

Received: 9 January 2017     Accepted: 1 March 2017     Published: 22 March 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Curriculum criterion is the main basis of instructional design. Instructional design can guide classroom teaching activities? Classroom teaching activities can reflect the intention of teaching objectives? With the Achieve alignment analysis tools, this research analyzed the 20 cases of 2014 the National Chemical Quality Course from the centrality, challenge and balance. The alignment of teaching objectives and curriculum objectives in instructional design is not ideal. The presupposition problem’s learning level hierarchy of the teaching process is generally higher than the teaching objectives. The number of generative problems is higher than the presuppositions in classroom teaching activities. The generative problem’s direction can be expanded around the curriculum objectives and the level hierarchy is essentially flat with the curriculum objectives.

Published in Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11
Page(s) 1-9
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chemistry Classroom Teaching, Alignment, Instructional Design, Teaching Objectives, Achieve Analysis Tool

References
[1] The Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Chemistry Curriculum Criterion of Ordinary Senior High School [S]. Beijing: People's Education Press, 2003:5-6, 9-13.
[2] Dai-ping Duan, Guang-zhou Li & Juan Ni. Curriculum Aligning: Method Comparison, Problem Reflection and Localization [J]. Journal of The Chinese Society of Education, 2015, (06): 73-78.
[3] Marina Burger. The Alignment of Teaching, Learning and Assessment in English Home Language in Grade 10 in District 9, Johannesburg [D]. University of South Africa, 2008.
[4] Morgan S. Polikoff, Andrew C. Porter. Instructional Alignment as a Measure of Teaching Quality [J]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2014, 36(4): 399-416.
[5] Yu-qin Yang, Zu-hao Wang & Xin-yu Zhang. Evolution and Implications of American Curriculum Alignment Research [J]. Foreign Educational Research, 2012, (01): 113-121.
[6] Lei Zhang. Academic Evaluation and Curriculum Criterions Alignment Analysis Model and Case Study [D]. Northeast Normal University, 2011.
[7] Yu-qin Yang, Xin-yu Zhang & Xiao-hong Zhan. The United States of Achieve “Test - Standard” Analysis of the Alignment of the Tool of Research and Revelation [J]. Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad, 2011 (9): 22-27.
[8] Dai-ping Duan. High School Chemistry curricular Alignment Research [D]. Nanjing Normal University, 2015.
[9] Zhi-xin Liu. Chemistry Teaching Theory [M]. Fourth Edition. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009: 114.
[10] Zheng-xiang Zhou, Jia-gen Yang. Chemistry classroom teaching return to the true [J]. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION), 2014, (S5): 303-304.
[11] Cheng-yin Yang. Chemistry Curriculum and Teaching Theory [M]. Xi'an: Shaanxi Normal University Press, 2010:115.
[12] Cheng-yin Yang. Chemistry Instructional Design and Skill Practice [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007: 168.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Xiao-yan Zheng, Li-mei Ma, Cheng-yin Yang. (2017). The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example. Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Xiao-yan Zheng; Li-mei Ma; Cheng-yin Yang. The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example. Teach. Educ. Curric. Stud. 2017, 2(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Xiao-yan Zheng, Li-mei Ma, Cheng-yin Yang. The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example. Teach Educ Curric Stud. 2017;2(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11,
      author = {Xiao-yan Zheng and Li-mei Ma and Cheng-yin Yang},
      title = {The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example},
      journal = {Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-9},
      doi = {10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.tecs.20170201.11},
      abstract = {Curriculum criterion is the main basis of instructional design. Instructional design can guide classroom teaching activities? Classroom teaching activities can reflect the intention of teaching objectives? With the Achieve alignment analysis tools, this research analyzed the 20 cases of 2014 the National Chemical Quality Course from the centrality, challenge and balance. The alignment of teaching objectives and curriculum objectives in instructional design is not ideal. The presupposition problem’s learning level hierarchy of the teaching process is generally higher than the teaching objectives. The number of generative problems is higher than the presuppositions in classroom teaching activities. The generative problem’s direction can be expanded around the curriculum objectives and the level hierarchy is essentially flat with the curriculum objectives.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Alignment Analysis Between Classroom Teaching and National Curriculum Criterion—Taking National Quality Class of 2014 as Example
    AU  - Xiao-yan Zheng
    AU  - Li-mei Ma
    AU  - Cheng-yin Yang
    Y1  - 2017/03/22
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11
    T2  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JF  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    JO  - Teacher Education and Curriculum Studies
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 9
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-4971
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.tecs.20170201.11
    AB  - Curriculum criterion is the main basis of instructional design. Instructional design can guide classroom teaching activities? Classroom teaching activities can reflect the intention of teaching objectives? With the Achieve alignment analysis tools, this research analyzed the 20 cases of 2014 the National Chemical Quality Course from the centrality, challenge and balance. The alignment of teaching objectives and curriculum objectives in instructional design is not ideal. The presupposition problem’s learning level hierarchy of the teaching process is generally higher than the teaching objectives. The number of generative problems is higher than the presuppositions in classroom teaching activities. The generative problem’s direction can be expanded around the curriculum objectives and the level hierarchy is essentially flat with the curriculum objectives.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China

  • School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China

  • School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China

  • Sections