This methodological innovation article provides a brief introduction of CLEAR Mapping (Capture–Lay Out–Examine–Align–Reflect) as a flexible framework designed to enhance transparent, bias-aware reasoning in qualitative and applied inquiry. CLEAR makes thinking visible by structuring how researchers, educators, and practitioners document evidence, interrogate assumptions, and align interpretations with theory, ethics, and situational context. Grounded in cognitive psychology, adult learning, and structured analytic tradecraft, CLEAR integrates intuitive and deliberative cognition to support decision-making under uncertainty while balancing creativity with methodological discipline and ethical restraint. The paper (a) specifies the five-stage CLEAR cycle and its cognitive aims; (b) demonstrates domain-specific applications in education, intelligence, healthcare, and organizational evaluation; and (c) outlines pedagogical uses—such as e-portfolios, bias audits, signature-mapping, and alignment matrices—that enhance rigor and reflexivity, and metacognitive growth. In addition to a diagram of the CLEAR cycle, the paper presents brief pilot studies and instructional prototypes that illustrate feasibility, utility, and scalability across contexts. CLEAR is method-agnostic and complements prevailing qualitative traditions by adding a traceable reasoning trail that strengthens credibility, confirmability, and ethical accountability. The article concludes with implementation guidance, adoption considerations for instructional and professional environments, and future research directions related to bias reduction, cognitive transparency, and the role of human–AI collaboration in reflective analysis and judgment formation.
| Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15 |
| Page(s) | 610-621 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
CLEAR Mapping, Metacognition, Structured Analytic Techniques, Reflexivity, Qualitative Rigor, Cognitive Transparency, Evidence-based Reasoning
| [1] | Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage; 1985. |
| [2] | Tracy, S. J. Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2010, 16(10), 837-851. |
| [3] | Glas, A., Soedirgo, J. Reflexive Methodologies and Methods. Oxford Handbook of Engaged Methodological Pluralism in Political Science. 2024, |
| [4] | Mauthner, N. S., Doucet, A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 2003, 37(3), 413-431. |
| [5] | Tomkins, L., Eatough, V. Towards an Integrative Reflexivity in Organisational Research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journey. 2010, 5(2), 162-181. |
| [6] | Ide, Y., Beddoe, L. Challenging Perspectives: Reflexivity as a Critical Approach to Qualitative Social Work Research. Qualitative Social Work. 2023, 23(4), 725-740. |
| [7] | Morton, J. Ethics Review, Reflective Equilibrium and Reflexivity. Nursing Ethics. 2021, 29(1), 49-62. |
| [8] | Veggel, N. V., Allison, J., Goldspink, S., Engward, H. The Presuppositional Interview as a Means of Transparent Reflexive Practice in Grounded Theory. Methodological Innovations. 2023, 17(1), 31-40. |
| [9] | Bauer, L., Sippel, S. R. Illustrating Qualitative Research Findings: The Reflexive and Epistemic Potential of Experimental Visualization. Geographica Helvetica. 2024, 79(4), 373-389. |
| [10] | Burchill, K. P., Anderson, D. E. The Role of Student Feedback in Building Reflexive Teachers. Handbook of Research on Critical Thinking and Teacher Education Pedagogy. 2019, |
| [11] | Skukauskaitė, A., Trout, İ. Y., Robinson, K. A. Deepening Reflexivity Through Art in Learning Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research. 2021, 22(3), 403-420. |
| [12] | Hilten, A. V. A Novice Reflects on the Research Interview: Reflective Practice and Reflexivity in Research Processes. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. 2018, 13(1), 121-122. |
| [13] | Flavell, J. H. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist. 1979, 34(10), 906-911. |
| [14] | Kahneman, D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011. |
| [15] | Knowles, M. S. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. New York: Cambridge; 1980. |
| [16] | Mezirow, J. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. Jossey-Bass; 1991 |
| [17] | Bruno, A., Dell’Aversana, G. Reflective Practice for Psychology Students: The Use of Reflective Journal Feedback in Higher Education. Psychology Learning & Teaching. 2016, 16(2), 248-260. |
| [18] | Garzon, J. R. Metacognitive Inquiry Via Reflective Tasking Methodology. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. 2023, VII (XI), 1737-1744. |
| [19] | Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983 |
| [20] | Teng, M. F., Qin, C., Wang, C. Validation of Metacognitive Academic Writing Strategies and the Predictive Effects on Academic Writing Performance in a Foreign Language Context. Metacognition and Learning. 2021, 17(1), 167-190. |
| [21] | Belenkova, Y. S. Metacognitive Skills and Reflection as Essential Components of Self-Education. MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices. 2021, 10(1), 30-46. |
| [22] | Cromley J. G., Kunze, A. Metacognition in Education: Translational Research. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 2020, 6(1), 15-20. |
| [23] | Jong, S. D., Hasson‐Ohayon, I., Donkersgoed, R. V., Alemán, A., Pijnenborg, G. H. M. A Qualitative Evaluation of the Effects of Metacognitive Reflection and Insight Therapy: ‘Living More Consciously’. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice. 2018, 93(2), 223-240. |
| [24] | Michel, A., Kamudoni, P., Marrel, A., Adiutori, R., Desvignes-Gleizes, C., Lanar, S., Schache, P., Spies, E., Park, J. Integrating Qualitative Interviews in Drug Development and the Use of Qualitative Evidence in Product Labelling and Health Technology Assessments: A Review. Frontiers in Medicine. 2023, 10. |
| [25] | Sterie, A., Potthoff, S., Erdmann, A., Burner-Fritsch, I., Aluh, D., Schneiders, M. Dimensions of Researcher Vulnerability in Qualitative Health Research and Recommendations for Future Practice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2023, 22. |
| [26] | Wolgemuth, J. R. Analyzing for Critical Resistance in Narrative Research. Qualitative Research. 2013, 14(5), 586-602. |
| [27] | Squires, A., Dorsen, C. Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation. Journal of Nursing Regulation. 2018, 9(3), 15-26. |
| [28] | Hammersley, M., Traianou, A. An Alternative Ethics? Justice and Care as Guiding Principles for Qualitative Research. Sociological Research Online. 2014, 19(3), 104-117. |
| [29] | Cutcliffe, J. R., Ramcharan, P. Leveling the Playing Field? Exploring the Merits of the Ethics-As-Process Approach for Judging Qualitative Research Proposals. Qualitative Health Research. 2002, 12(7), 1000-1010. |
| [30] | Heuer, R. J., Pherson, R., H. Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis. CQ Press, 2010. |
| [31] | Dunlap, J. C., Grabinger, S. Preparing Students for Lifelong Learning: A Review of Instructional Features and Teaching Methodologies. Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2008, 16(2), 6-25. |
| [32] | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. |
| [33] | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One Size Fits All? What Counts as Quality Practice in (Reflexive) Thematic Analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. |
| [34] | Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. C., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. |
| [35] | Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). |
| [36] | Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample Size in Qualitative Interview Studies: Guided by Information Power: Guided by Information Power. Qualitative Health Research. 2015; 26(13): 1753-1760. |
| [37] | Dodgson JE. Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Journal of Human Lactation. 2019; 35(2): 220-222. |
| [38] | Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher Positionality—A Consideration of its Influence. International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. |
| [39] | Efklides, A. (2014). How Does Metacognition Contribute to the Regulation of Learning? An Integrative Approach. Psihologijske teme, 23(1), 1-30. |
| [40] | Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A Review of Research on Metacognition in Sience Education: Current and Future Directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121–169. |
| [41] | Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (2013). Metacognition and Learning Technologies: An Overview of Current Interdisciplinary Research. In: Azevedo, R., Aleven, V. (eds) International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 28. Springer, New York, NY. |
| [42] | Hamati-Ataya, I. Reflectivity, Reflexivity, Reflexivism: IR’s ‘Reflexive Turn’ – and Beyond. 2012, 19(4), 669-694. |
| [43] | Tsekeris, C., Koskinas, K. A “Weak” Reflection on Unpredictability and Social Theory. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism, & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society. 2010, 8(1), 36-42. |
| [44] | Berger, R. Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research. 2013, 15(2), 219-234. |
| [45] | Vargas-Hernández, J. G., González, F. J., G., Vargas-González, O. C. Organizational Ethnography Research and its Implications in the Analysis of Organizational and Managerial Studies. Advances in Knowledge Acquisition, Transfer, and Management. 2024, 205-224. |
| [46] | Nair, L. B. From ‘Whodunit’ to ‘How’: Detective Stories and Auditability in Qualitative Business Ethics Research. Journal of Business Ethics. 2020, 172(2), 195-209. |
| [47] | Islam, M. S. Expanding the Qualitative Repertoire in Organizational Research: A Framework for Hybrid Reflexive Narrative Inquiry. Journal of Trade Science. 2025, 1-23. |
| [48] | Stronach, I., Garratt, D., Pearce, C. G., Piper, H. Reflexivity, the Picturing of Selves, the Forging of Method. Qualitative Inquiry. 2007, 13(2), 179-203. |
| [49] | Braund, H., Turnnidge, J., Cofie, N., Kuforiji, O., Greco, S., Hastings-Truelove, A., Hill, S., Dalgarno, N. Six Ways to Get a Grip on Developing Reflexivity Statements. Canadian Medical Journal. 2024, 15(5), 146-149. |
| [50] | Manen, M. V. But is it Phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research. 2017, 27(6), 775-779. |
| [51] | Öhlén, J., Friberg, F. Empirical Phenomenological Inquiry: Guidance in Choosing Between Different Methodologies. Global Qualitative Nursing Research. 2023, 10. |
| [52] | Mello, J., Flint, D. J. A Refined View of Grounded Theory and its Application to Logistics Research. Journal of Business Logistics. 2009, 30(1), 107-125. |
| [53] | Charmaz, K. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd Ed. London: Sage, 2014. |
| [54] | Charmaz, K. The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry. 2016, 23(1), 34-45. |
| [55] | Kelly, K. P., Knafl, K. A., Keller, S., Hinds, P. S. Thematic Expansion: A New Strategy for Theory Development. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2021, 43(10), 962-971. |
| [56] | Naem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K. E., Ranfagni, S. A Step-By-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2023, 22. |
| [57] | Miksza, P., Shaw, J. T., Richerme, L. K., Hash, P. M., Hodges, D. A., Parker, E. C. Additional Qualitative Approaches. Music Education Research. 2023, 183-216. |
| [58] | Eaves, Y. D. A Synthesis Technique for Grounded Theory Data Analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2001, 35(5), 654-663. |
| [59] | Leggo, C. Narrative Inquiry: Honoring the Complexity of the Stories We Live. Brock Education Journal. 2004, 14(1). |
| [60] | Lomborg, K., Kirkevold, M. Truth and Validity in Grounded Theory – A Reconsidered Realist Interpretation of the Criteria: Fit, Work, Relevance and Modifiability. Nursing Philosophy. 2003, 4(3), 189-200. |
| [61] | Cale, A., Hoffman, L. A., McNulty, M. A. Promoting Metacognition in an Allied Health Anatomy Course. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2022, 16(3), 473-485. |
| [62] | Lim, W. M. What is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2025, 33(2), 199-229. |
| [63] | Mitsea, E., Drigas, A. A Journey into the Metacognitive Learning Strategies. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering. 2019, 15(14), 4-20. |
| [64] | Argyris, C., Schön, D. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Addison-Wesley, 1978. |
| [65] | Cousin, G., Reflexivity: The New Reflective Practice. International Journal of Practice-Based Learning in Health and Social Care. 2013, 1(2), 3-7. |
APA Style
Taylor, W. (2025). CLEAR Mapping: A Meta-Cognitive Framework for Transparent, Reflexive, and Evidence-Aware Qualitative Analysis. Social Sciences, 14(6), 610-621. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15
ACS Style
Taylor, W. CLEAR Mapping: A Meta-Cognitive Framework for Transparent, Reflexive, and Evidence-Aware Qualitative Analysis. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 610-621. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15,
author = {Wayne Taylor},
title = {CLEAR Mapping: A Meta-Cognitive Framework for Transparent, Reflexive, and Evidence-Aware Qualitative Analysis},
journal = {Social Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
pages = {610-621},
doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20251406.15},
abstract = {This methodological innovation article provides a brief introduction of CLEAR Mapping (Capture–Lay Out–Examine–Align–Reflect) as a flexible framework designed to enhance transparent, bias-aware reasoning in qualitative and applied inquiry. CLEAR makes thinking visible by structuring how researchers, educators, and practitioners document evidence, interrogate assumptions, and align interpretations with theory, ethics, and situational context. Grounded in cognitive psychology, adult learning, and structured analytic tradecraft, CLEAR integrates intuitive and deliberative cognition to support decision-making under uncertainty while balancing creativity with methodological discipline and ethical restraint. The paper (a) specifies the five-stage CLEAR cycle and its cognitive aims; (b) demonstrates domain-specific applications in education, intelligence, healthcare, and organizational evaluation; and (c) outlines pedagogical uses—such as e-portfolios, bias audits, signature-mapping, and alignment matrices—that enhance rigor and reflexivity, and metacognitive growth. In addition to a diagram of the CLEAR cycle, the paper presents brief pilot studies and instructional prototypes that illustrate feasibility, utility, and scalability across contexts. CLEAR is method-agnostic and complements prevailing qualitative traditions by adding a traceable reasoning trail that strengthens credibility, confirmability, and ethical accountability. The article concludes with implementation guidance, adoption considerations for instructional and professional environments, and future research directions related to bias reduction, cognitive transparency, and the role of human–AI collaboration in reflective analysis and judgment formation.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - CLEAR Mapping: A Meta-Cognitive Framework for Transparent, Reflexive, and Evidence-Aware Qualitative Analysis AU - Wayne Taylor Y1 - 2025/12/26 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 610 EP - 621 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.15 AB - This methodological innovation article provides a brief introduction of CLEAR Mapping (Capture–Lay Out–Examine–Align–Reflect) as a flexible framework designed to enhance transparent, bias-aware reasoning in qualitative and applied inquiry. CLEAR makes thinking visible by structuring how researchers, educators, and practitioners document evidence, interrogate assumptions, and align interpretations with theory, ethics, and situational context. Grounded in cognitive psychology, adult learning, and structured analytic tradecraft, CLEAR integrates intuitive and deliberative cognition to support decision-making under uncertainty while balancing creativity with methodological discipline and ethical restraint. The paper (a) specifies the five-stage CLEAR cycle and its cognitive aims; (b) demonstrates domain-specific applications in education, intelligence, healthcare, and organizational evaluation; and (c) outlines pedagogical uses—such as e-portfolios, bias audits, signature-mapping, and alignment matrices—that enhance rigor and reflexivity, and metacognitive growth. In addition to a diagram of the CLEAR cycle, the paper presents brief pilot studies and instructional prototypes that illustrate feasibility, utility, and scalability across contexts. CLEAR is method-agnostic and complements prevailing qualitative traditions by adding a traceable reasoning trail that strengthens credibility, confirmability, and ethical accountability. The article concludes with implementation guidance, adoption considerations for instructional and professional environments, and future research directions related to bias reduction, cognitive transparency, and the role of human–AI collaboration in reflective analysis and judgment formation. VL - 14 IS - 6 ER -
Safety & Security, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, United States of America
Information