Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland

Received: 4 November 2025     Accepted: 18 November 2025     Published: 26 December 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Corruption is commonly defined as the misuse of public office for private gain, and encompasses a range of practices, including bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, patronage, and state capture. In contrast, good governance refers to the transparent, accountable, equitable, and participatory management of a nation’s resources and affairs to promote development and public welfare. This article investigates the nature, causes, and consequences of corruption in Somaliland, highlighting its profound implications for achieving good governance. Drawing on an extensive review of secondary literature, government reports, and empirical evidence, the study situates Somaliland’s experience within the broader governance-corruption nexus characteristic of fragile and hybrid political systems. The findings reveal that corruption in Somaliland is both a manifestation and a driver of weak governance, arising from limited accountability mechanisms, politicized appointments, fiscal opacity, resource constraints, and the enduring influence of clan-based networks. The coexistence of formal and traditional governance institutions further complicates governance, producing to overlapping mandates and blurred lines of accountability. Consequently, corruption erodes public trust, undermines the rule of law, diminishes transparency, and hampers effective service delivery. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive anti-corruption and institutional reform strategies, that emphasize capacity building, fiscal transparency, participatory accountability, and the harmonization of formal and customary governance frameworks as foundational pillars for advancing sustainable good governance in Somaliland.

Published in Social Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16
Page(s) 622-628
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Corruption, Good Governance, Institutional Capacity, Accountability Mechanisms, Transparency, Hybrid Governance, Somaliland

References
[1] Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Business.
[2] Bradbury, M. (2020). Somaliland: Identity and political reconstruction in a failed state. James Currey.
[3] Elder, C. (2021). Somaliland’s authoritarian turns: Oligarchic–corporate power and the political economy of de facto states. International Affairs, 97(6), 1749–1765.
[4] Eubank, N. (2012). Taxation, political accountability and foreign aid: Lessons from Somaliland. Journal of Development Studies, 48(4), 465–480.
[5] Farah, A. H. (2023). Governance, corruption and hybrid political orders in Somaliland. African Journal of Public Administration, 15(2), 78–95.
[6] Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Commission. (2010). Establishment of the Good Governance and Anti-Corruption Commission (GGACC). Hargeisa, Somaliland: Government of Somaliland.
[7] Guerrero, M. A., & Castañeda, N. (2019). Combating corruption in Latin America: Reforms and challenges. Routledge.
[8] Guerrero, O. A., & Castañeda, G. (2019). Does better governance guarantee less corruption? Evidence of loss in effectiveness of the rule of law. arXiv.
[9] Hagmann, T., & Hoehne, M. V. (2009). Failures of the state failure debate: Evidence from the Somali territories. Journal of International Development, 21(1), 42–57.
[10] Hammond, L. (2013). Somali transnational politics and state-building in Somaliland and Puntland. African Affairs, 112(448), 202–224.
[11] International Monetary Fund. (2022). Fiscal transparency handbook. IMF Publications.
[12] Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2020). Worldwide governance indicators: 2020 update. World Bank Group.
[13] Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and analytical issues (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430). World Bank.
[14] Khosrowjerdi, M. (2022). Good governance and national information transparency: A comparative study of 117 countries. arXiv.
[15] Khosrowjerdi, M. (2022). Public sector corruption and governance effectiveness: A comparative analysis. Public Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 75–96.
[16] La Rocca, M., La Rocca, T., & Sánchez-Vidal, J. (2023). Corruption, governance, and institutional performance: Evidence from developing economies. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19(2), 305–327e.
[17] Levine, S., & Ismail, A. (2022). Customary governance and accountability in hybrid political systems: Lessons from the Horn of Africa. African Governance Institute.
[18] Lewis, I. M. (2019). A modern history of the Somali: Nation and state in the Horn of Africa. Ohio University Press.
[19] Menkhaus, K. (2018). State failure, state-building, and prospects for a “functional failed state” in Somalia. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 656(1), 154–172.
[20] Muhumed, M. A. (2021). The challenges and opportunities of good governance in Somaliland. Somaliland Peace and Development Journal, 5, 77–81.
[21] Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press.
[22] North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
[23] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Public integrity handbook. OECD Publishing.
[24] Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2022). Integrity and anti-corruption reforms in fragile states. OECD Publishing.
[25] Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
[26] Saed, A. (2025). Governance and accountability challenges in Somaliland public institutions. Hargeisa Policy Review Journal, 7(2), 45–62.
[27] Saed, W. S. (2025). The impact of corruption on the economic growth of Somaliland in Hargeisa [Doctoral thesis]. Zenodo.
[28] Situngkir, H. (2004). Corruption: The behavior of individuals in bureaucratic structures. Journal of Indonesian Social Studies, 12(3), 45–58.
[29] Somaliland Chronicle. (2025). Political influence and meritocracy in Somaliland’s civil service: A governance analysis. Somaliland Chronicle Reports.
[30] Somaliland Sun. (2010). Survey on corruption and public service delivery in Somaliland. Somaliland Sun Reports.
[31] UNDP. (2022). Governance for peace and development in fragile states: Policy brief. United Nations Development Programme.
[32] United Nations. (2021). Promoting integrity and accountability in public institutions. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
[33] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2021). Governance for peace and sustainable development. UNDP Policy Brief.
[34] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (as cited in Muhumed, 2021). Governance and anti-corruption framework in fragile contexts. Hargeisa Governance Review, 4(1), 22–36.
[35] UNPO. (2010, December 13). Somaliland: Newly established commission to fight corruption.
[36] Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perceptions index 2023: Global analysis. Transparency International Secretariat.
[37] Transparency International. (2024). Corruption perceptions index 2024: Regional analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa. Transparency International Secretariat.
[38] Walls, M. (2009). The emergence of a Somali state: Building peace from civil war in Somaliland. African Affairs, 108(432), 371–389.
[39] World Bank. (2020). Enhancing public sector accountability and service delivery in fragile contexts. World Bank Publications.
[40] World Bank. (2022). Somaliland economic and governance assessment report. World Bank.
[41] World Bank. (2023). Governance and anti-corruption reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and challenges. World Bank Publications.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohamed, A. H. (2025). Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland. Social Sciences, 14(6), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohamed, A. H. Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland. Soc. Sci. 2025, 14(6), 622-628. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohamed AH. Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland. Soc Sci. 2025;14(6):622-628. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16,
      author = {Abdiaziz Harun Mohamed},
      title = {Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland},
      journal = {Social Sciences},
      volume = {14},
      number = {6},
      pages = {622-628},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20251406.16},
      abstract = {Corruption is commonly defined as the misuse of public office for private gain, and encompasses a range of practices, including bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, patronage, and state capture. In contrast, good governance refers to the transparent, accountable, equitable, and participatory management of a nation’s resources and affairs to promote development and public welfare. This article investigates the nature, causes, and consequences of corruption in Somaliland, highlighting its profound implications for achieving good governance. Drawing on an extensive review of secondary literature, government reports, and empirical evidence, the study situates Somaliland’s experience within the broader governance-corruption nexus characteristic of fragile and hybrid political systems. The findings reveal that corruption in Somaliland is both a manifestation and a driver of weak governance, arising from limited accountability mechanisms, politicized appointments, fiscal opacity, resource constraints, and the enduring influence of clan-based networks. The coexistence of formal and traditional governance institutions further complicates governance, producing to overlapping mandates and blurred lines of accountability. Consequently, corruption erodes public trust, undermines the rule of law, diminishes transparency, and hampers effective service delivery. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive anti-corruption and institutional reform strategies, that emphasize capacity building, fiscal transparency, participatory accountability, and the harmonization of formal and customary governance frameworks as foundational pillars for advancing sustainable good governance in Somaliland.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Corruption and the Challenges of Good Governance in Somaliland
    AU  - Abdiaziz Harun Mohamed
    Y1  - 2025/12/26
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16
    T2  - Social Sciences
    JF  - Social Sciences
    JO  - Social Sciences
    SP  - 622
    EP  - 628
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-988X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20251406.16
    AB  - Corruption is commonly defined as the misuse of public office for private gain, and encompasses a range of practices, including bribery, embezzlement, nepotism, patronage, and state capture. In contrast, good governance refers to the transparent, accountable, equitable, and participatory management of a nation’s resources and affairs to promote development and public welfare. This article investigates the nature, causes, and consequences of corruption in Somaliland, highlighting its profound implications for achieving good governance. Drawing on an extensive review of secondary literature, government reports, and empirical evidence, the study situates Somaliland’s experience within the broader governance-corruption nexus characteristic of fragile and hybrid political systems. The findings reveal that corruption in Somaliland is both a manifestation and a driver of weak governance, arising from limited accountability mechanisms, politicized appointments, fiscal opacity, resource constraints, and the enduring influence of clan-based networks. The coexistence of formal and traditional governance institutions further complicates governance, producing to overlapping mandates and blurred lines of accountability. Consequently, corruption erodes public trust, undermines the rule of law, diminishes transparency, and hampers effective service delivery. The study concludes by recommending comprehensive anti-corruption and institutional reform strategies, that emphasize capacity building, fiscal transparency, participatory accountability, and the harmonization of formal and customary governance frameworks as foundational pillars for advancing sustainable good governance in Somaliland.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Research Affiliate, Institute of Strategic Insights and Research (ISIR), Hargeisa, Somaliland

  • Sections