This study examines the dynamic and asymmetric interrelationships between climate factors, agricultural performance, and economic growth in this country over the period 1974-2023. We use an advanced econometric approach combining ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag), NARDL (Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag), and QARDL (Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lag) models to analyze the nonlinear effects of climate variables (temperature and precipitation) on agricultural productivity and GDP per capita. The results highlight significant and heterogeneous climate effects, with notable asymmetry: a 1°C increase reduces agricultural GDP by 1.2% in the long term, while an equivalent decrease has no significant effect. Rainfall deficits have a greater impact on agricultural production than surpluses, with an amplified effect during periods of recession (2.3 times greater). Quantile analysis highlights structural disparities: small producers depend on imports to adapt, while large farms, although more productive, are vulnerable to heat and water stress. Robustness tests confirmed the validity of the models, with stable residuals and proven cointegration. These results highlight the need for differentiated policies, including: (1) progressive water pricing to limit overexploitation of groundwater; (2) targeted subsidies to encourage the adoption of water-efficient irrigation technologies; (3) training programs for smallholders to promote resilient practices. The study makes a significant contribution to the existing literature by proposing an innovative methodological framework for analyzing asymmetric climate effects in vulnerable agricultural economies, with direct implications for national resilience strategies, including.
| Published in | Science Discovery Agriculture (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13 |
| Page(s) | 27-42 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate, Agriculture, Economic Growth, Asymmetry, ARDL, NARDL, QARDL, Tunisia
| [1] | Abahous, A., El Fadili, A., & Benaabidate, L. (2023). Climate-irrigation interactions in arid zones: Evidence from Morocco. Agricultural Water Management, 280, 108260. |
| [2] | Abou Hadid, A. F. (2016). Climate change and Egyptian agriculture. Cairo University, Faculty of Agriculture. |
| [3] | Ait Ali, A., Ben Ali, M. S., & Driouchi, A. (2020). Climate change, food security and economic growth in the MENA region: A dynamic panel approach. Journal of African Development, 22(1), 93-110. |
| [4] | Ali, A., Eltahir, E. A. B., & Elshamy, M. (2018). Climate change impacts on crop yield and irrigation water demand in the Nile Basin. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4), 044006. |
| [5] | Amichi H, Jamin JY, Morardet S, Gharbi I, Azizi A, Faidani F et al. (2016). Le rôle du faire-valoir indirect dans le renouvellement générationnel des agriculteurs irrigants en Tunisie. Cahiers agricultures 25(3): 35004. |
| [6] | Auffhammer, Maximilian. (2018). Quantifying Economic Damages from Climate Change. Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (4): 33-52. |
| [7] | Bachta, M. S., & Ben Salem, M. (2021). Changements climatiques et agriculture en Tunisie. Institut National de Recherches en Génie Rural, Eaux et Forêts (INRGREF). |
| [8] | Belloumi, M. and Alrasheed, A. (2023). The Impact of Climate Change on Agricultural Production in MENA Region. Environmental Economics and Policy, 12(3), 123-145. |
| [9] | Ben Fraj, N., & Rejeb, K. B. (2021). International trade and agricultural development: The case of Tunisia. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 14(3), 245-260. |
| [10] | Ben Hassine, A., & Hachicha, M. (2023). Agroecological Practices in Southern Tunisia. Agricultural Systems. |
| [11] | Ben Mansour, B., & Bachta, M. S. (2015). Effets des changements climatiques sur la productivité céréalière en Tunisie. New Medit, 14(3), 27-34. |
| [12] | Ben Salah, H., Dridi, J., & Gharbi, A. (2023). Asymétries climatiques et croissance agricole en Tunisie: Une approche NARDL. Revue d’Économie du Développement. |
| [13] | Ben Salem, M., & Zaibet, L. (2020). Impact de la variabilité climatique sur les cultures pluviales en Tunisie. Revue Maghrébine d’Économie, 15(2), 85-101. |
| [14] | Ben Youssef, A., & Zouabi, S. (2022). Agricultural trade and productivity in Mediterranean countries: Evidence from dynamic panel data models. Agricultural Economics Review, 23(2), 112-129. |
| [15] | Boubacar, I., & Traoré, D. (2016). Changement climatique et sécurité alimentaire en Algérie: Une analyse ARDL. African Development Review, 28(2), 210-223. |
| [16] | Bourgeon, J.-M., & Huard, P. (2020). Trade liberalization and agricultural productivity: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71(2), 518-540. |
| [17] | Burke, M., Hsiang, S. M., & Miguel, E. (2015). Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature, 527(7577), 235-239. |
| [18] | Carleton, T. A., & Hsiang, S. M. (2016). Social and economic impacts of climate. Science, 353(6304), aad9837. |
| [19] | Chemingui, M. A., & Thabet, C. (2018). Climate Change and Agricultural Trade in Tunisia: A CGE Analysis. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, *23*(6), 709-724. |
| [20] | Chen, L., Nguyen, T., & Tran, H. (2024). Hybrid NARDL-Machine Learning Models for Climate Risk Assessment in Vietnamese Agriculture. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(1), 45-62. |
| [21] | El-Marsafawy, S. (2021). Regional disparities in agricultural productivity across Arab countries: A spatial econometric analysis. Journal of African Development, 23(1), 1-22. |
| [22] | Hsiang, S., Burke, M., & Mana, E. (2017). Economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356(6345), 1362-1369. |
| [23] | Khelifi, N., et al. (2024). Asymmetries in the impact of climate variability on agricultural productivity in Tunisia. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 26(1), 45-67. |
| [24] | Koundouri, P., et al. (2023). Assessment of climate risks for sustainable agriculture: A Mediterranean perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 142, 103-113. |
| [25] | Lobell, D. B., & Field, C. B. (2007). Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environmental Research Letters, 2(1), 014002. |
| [26] | Mahjoub, A., & Ghozzi, H. (2021). Climate change and economic growth in Tunisia: Evidence from ARDL approach. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(2), 385-392. |
| [27] | Mahmut Tekce, Pınar Deniz (2016). The Impacts of Climate Change on Agricultural Trade in the MENA Region. Research in World Economy 7(2). |
| [28] | Mendelsohn, R., & Dinar, A. (2021). Climate policy and agriculture: A review of the impacts on farm-level adaptation. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 13, 213-234. |
| [29] | Molotoks, A., et al. (2024). Climate, Conflict, and Food Security in Fragile Regions. Global Food Security. |
| [30] | Mougou, R., Ghorbel, A., & Hachicha, M. (2020). Salinisation des sols et productivité agricole en Tunisie. Science du Sol, 57(1), 33-42. |
| [31] | Nordhaus, W. D. (1991). To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. The Economic Journal, 101(407), 920-937. |
| [32] | Nordhaus, W. D. (2018). Projections and uncertainties about climate change in an era of minimal climate policies. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(3), 333-360. |
| [33] | Ouassou, A., El Mourid, M., & Belghiti, M. (2022). Variabilité pluviométrique et sécurité alimentaire au Maroc. Cahiers Agricultures, 31, 30. |
| [34] | Ouattara, B., & Strobl, E. (2013). The fiscal impact of weather shocks: Evidence from Africa. Climatic Change Economics, 4(1), 1350003. |
| [35] | Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. |
| [36] | Schlenker, W., & Roberts, M. J. (2009). Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15594-15598. |
| [37] | Sghaier, M., et al. (2023). Régional Disparités in Climate Impacts on Tunisian Barley Yields. Journal of Arid Environments. |
| [38] | Shabir, A., Dar, M. A., & Bhat, M. A. (2020). Asymmetric impact of climate variability on agricultural productivity: Evidence from panel non-linear ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(24), 30517-30531. |
| [39] | Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, 281-314. |
| [40] | Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65-94. |
| [41] | Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press. |
| [42] | Tesfaye, K., Aggarwal, P. K., Mequanint, F., Shirsath, P. B., Stirling, C. M., Khatri-Chhetri, A., & Rahut, D. B. (2023). Non-linear climate impacts on smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. Climate Risk Management, 40, 100523. |
| [43] | Trabelsi, M. (2018). Analyse de l’effet des précipitations sur la sécurité alimentaire en Tunisie: une approche VAR. Revue Tunisienne d’Économie et de Développement, 7(2), 45-61. |
| [44] | Zampieri, M., et al. (2023). On the Stationarity of the Global Spatial Dependency of Heat Risk on Drought. Geophysical Research Letters. Volume 51. |
| [45] | Zhang, X., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2024). Chocs climatiques et productivité agricole: données probantes des pays africains [Climate shocks and agricultural productivity: Evidence from African countries]. Économie écologique, 203, 107612. |
| [46] | Zohry, A., Abdel-Aty, M., & Khalifa, M. (2019). Water resources management and food security in Egypt. Journal of Environmental Management, 246, 196-205. |
APA Style
Cherif, M. R. (2026). Climate, Agriculture, and Economic Growth in Tunisia: A Dynamic and Asymmetric Analysis Covering the Period 1974–2023. Science Discovery Agriculture, 1(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13
ACS Style
Cherif, M. R. Climate, Agriculture, and Economic Growth in Tunisia: A Dynamic and Asymmetric Analysis Covering the Period 1974–2023. Sci. Discov. Agric. 2026, 1(1), 27-42. doi: 10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13
@article{10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13,
author = {Mohamed Riadh Cherif},
title = {Climate, Agriculture, and Economic Growth in Tunisia:
A Dynamic and Asymmetric Analysis Covering the Period 1974–2023},
journal = {Science Discovery Agriculture},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {27-42},
doi = {10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sda.20260101.13},
abstract = {This study examines the dynamic and asymmetric interrelationships between climate factors, agricultural performance, and economic growth in this country over the period 1974-2023. We use an advanced econometric approach combining ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag), NARDL (Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag), and QARDL (Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lag) models to analyze the nonlinear effects of climate variables (temperature and precipitation) on agricultural productivity and GDP per capita. The results highlight significant and heterogeneous climate effects, with notable asymmetry: a 1°C increase reduces agricultural GDP by 1.2% in the long term, while an equivalent decrease has no significant effect. Rainfall deficits have a greater impact on agricultural production than surpluses, with an amplified effect during periods of recession (2.3 times greater). Quantile analysis highlights structural disparities: small producers depend on imports to adapt, while large farms, although more productive, are vulnerable to heat and water stress. Robustness tests confirmed the validity of the models, with stable residuals and proven cointegration. These results highlight the need for differentiated policies, including: (1) progressive water pricing to limit overexploitation of groundwater; (2) targeted subsidies to encourage the adoption of water-efficient irrigation technologies; (3) training programs for smallholders to promote resilient practices. The study makes a significant contribution to the existing literature by proposing an innovative methodological framework for analyzing asymmetric climate effects in vulnerable agricultural economies, with direct implications for national resilience strategies, including.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Climate, Agriculture, and Economic Growth in Tunisia: A Dynamic and Asymmetric Analysis Covering the Period 1974–2023 AU - Mohamed Riadh Cherif Y1 - 2026/02/20 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13 DO - 10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13 T2 - Science Discovery Agriculture JF - Science Discovery Agriculture JO - Science Discovery Agriculture SP - 27 EP - 42 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sda.20260101.13 AB - This study examines the dynamic and asymmetric interrelationships between climate factors, agricultural performance, and economic growth in this country over the period 1974-2023. We use an advanced econometric approach combining ARDL (Autoregressive Distributed Lag), NARDL (Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag), and QARDL (Quantile Autoregressive Distributed Lag) models to analyze the nonlinear effects of climate variables (temperature and precipitation) on agricultural productivity and GDP per capita. The results highlight significant and heterogeneous climate effects, with notable asymmetry: a 1°C increase reduces agricultural GDP by 1.2% in the long term, while an equivalent decrease has no significant effect. Rainfall deficits have a greater impact on agricultural production than surpluses, with an amplified effect during periods of recession (2.3 times greater). Quantile analysis highlights structural disparities: small producers depend on imports to adapt, while large farms, although more productive, are vulnerable to heat and water stress. Robustness tests confirmed the validity of the models, with stable residuals and proven cointegration. These results highlight the need for differentiated policies, including: (1) progressive water pricing to limit overexploitation of groundwater; (2) targeted subsidies to encourage the adoption of water-efficient irrigation technologies; (3) training programs for smallholders to promote resilient practices. The study makes a significant contribution to the existing literature by proposing an innovative methodological framework for analyzing asymmetric climate effects in vulnerable agricultural economies, with direct implications for national resilience strategies, including. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -