Since the study of microplastics has only emerged in the last few years, there is a gap in research in terms of the analysis and quantification of microplastics in cosmetic pastes. Consequently, the main aim of this project was to develop an optimal analytical method for the separation and quantification of microbeads from cosmetic pastes in order to address this emerging global issue. Liquid solid extraction of microplastics from cosmetic paste through filtration under vacuum was implemented. And quantification with standard addition and characterization via infrared spectroscopy and light microscopy were used. Optimal extraction conditions were established which consists of boiled distilled water and vacuum filtration using Büchner funnel of 125 mm diameter. Recovery from different pastes had 94.64%, 85.09% and 92.30% microbead recovery which indicated that the extraction method proved to be efficient. Repeatability was found to be supportive of findings. The microbeads were analyzed under light microscopy where it was established that the microplastics extracted from the cosmetic pastes were smaller than 1 mm in size. An ideal method was developed for the extraction and quantification of microbeads from pastes. From this research project it was also deduced that paste matrix affects the recovery of microbeads from the product. Thus, standard addition approach must be carried out for each paste for quantification with high trueness.
| Published in | Pharmaceutical Science and Technology (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15 |
| Page(s) | 53-61 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Microbeads, Microplastics, Pollution, Cosmetics, Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products, Infrared, Light Microscopy
| [1] | Jambeck J, Geyer R, Wilcox C, Siegler T, Perryman M, Andrady A et al. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science. 2015; 347 (6223): 768-771. |
| [2] | Wilkinson J, Hooda P, Barker J, Barton S, Swinden J. Occurrence, fate and transformation of emerging contaminants in water: An overarching review of the field. Environmental Pollution. 2017; 231: 954-970. |
| [3] | UNEP. Marine plastic debris and microplastics – Global lessons and research to inspire action and guide policy change. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi. 2016. |
| [4] | Bhattacharya P, Lin S, Turner J, Ke P. Physical Adsorption of Charged Plastic Nanoparticles Affects Algal Photosynthesis. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2010; 114 (39): 16556-16561. |
| [5] | Gambardella C, Morgana S, Ferrando S, Bramini M, Piazza V, Costa E et al. Effects of polystyrene microbeads in marine planktonic crustaceans. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2017; 145: 250-257. |
| [6] | Andrady A. Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2011; 62 (8): 1596-1605. |
| [7] | Imhof H, Ivleva N, Schmid J, Niessner R, Laforsch C. Contamination of beach sediments of a subalpine lake with microplastic particles. Current Biology. 2013; 23 (19): R867-R868. |
| [8] | Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson R, Thiel M. Microplastics in the Marine Environment: A Review of the Methods Used for Identification and Quantification. Environmental Science & Technology. 2012; 46 (6): 3060-3075. |
| [9] | Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AW, McGonigle D, Russell AE. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science. 2004 May 7; 304 (5672): 838. |
| [10] | Arthur, C., Baker, J., Bamford, H., 2009. In: Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects, and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris. September 9- 11, 2008. University of Washington Tacoma, Tacoma, WA. Group. 530. |
| [11] | Moore C. Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: A rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental Research. 2008; 108 (2): 131-139. |
| [12] | Duis K, Coors A. Microplastics in the aquatic and terrestrial environment: sources (with a specific focus on personal care products), fate and effects. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2016; 28 (1). |
| [13] | Gouin, T., Avalos, J., Brunning, I., Brzuska, K., de Graaf, J., Kaumanns, J et al. Use of micro-plastics beads in cosmetics products in Europe and their estimated emissions to the North Sea environment. SOFW J. 2015; 141, 40-46. |
| [14] | Zitko V, Hanlon M. Another source of pollution by plastics: Skin cleaners with plastic scrubbers. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1991; 22 (1): 41-42. |
| [15] | Patel MM, Goyal BR, Bhadada V, Bhatt JS, Amin AF. Getting into the brain: approaches to enhance brain drug delivery. CNS Drugs. 2009; 23 (1): 35–58. |
| [16] | Zbyszewski M, Corcoran PL, Hockin A. Comparison of the distribution and degradation of plastic debris along shorelines of the Great Lakes, North America. J Great Lakes Res. 2014; 40 (2): 288–299. |
| [17] | Galgani F, Hanke G, Maes T. Global distribution, composition and abundance of marine litter. In: Bergmann M, Gutov L, Klages M, editors. Marine anthropogenic litter. Berlin: Springer; 2015. pp. 29–57. |
| [18] | Koelmans AA, Besseling E, Shim WJ. Nanoplastics in the aquatic environment. Critical review. In: Bergmann M, Gutov L, Klages M, editors. Marine anthropogenic litter. Berlin: Springer; 2015. pp. 325–343. |
| [19] | Habib D, Locke DC, Cannone LJ. Synthetic fibers as indicators of municipal sewage sludge, sludge products, and sewage treatment plant effluents. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1998; 103: 1–8. |
| [20] | Napper I, Bakir A, Rowland S, Thompson R. Characterisation, quantity and sorptive properties of microplastics extracted from cosmetics. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2015; 99 (1-2): 178-185. |
| [21] | Hintersteiner I, Himmelsbach M, Buchberger WW. Characterization and quantitation of polyolefin microplastics in personal-care products using high-temperature gel-permeation chromatography. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015; 407: 1253–1259. |
| [22] | Zubris KA, Richards BK. Synthetic fibers as an indicator of land application of sludge. Environ Pollut. 2005; 138: 201–211. |
| [23] | Dris R, Imhof H, Sanchez W, Gasperi J, Galgani F, Tassin B et al. Beyond the ocean: contamination of freshwater ecosystems with (micro-)plastic particles. Environmental Chemistry. 2015; 12 (5): 539. |
| [24] | Wagner M, Scherer C, Alvarez-Muñoz D, Brennholt N, Bourrain X, Buchinger S, et al. Microplastics in freshwater ecosystems: what we know and what we need to know. Environ Sci Europe. 2014; 26: 12. |
| [25] | Lambert S, Sinclair CJ, Boxall AB. Occurrence, degradation and effect of polymer- based materials in the environment. Rev Environ Contamin Toxicol. 2014; 227: 1–53 |
| [26] | Hammer J, Kraak MH, Parsons JR. Plastics in the marine environment: the dark side of a modern gift. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012; 220: 1–44. |
APA Style
Mohammed Yaqob Shareef, Forkan Mohammed Yaqob Shareef. (2021). Determination of Microbeads from Paste in Some Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, 5(2), 53-61. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15
ACS Style
Mohammed Yaqob Shareef; Forkan Mohammed Yaqob Shareef. Determination of Microbeads from Paste in Some Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Pharm. Sci. Technol. 2021, 5(2), 53-61. doi: 10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15
AMA Style
Mohammed Yaqob Shareef, Forkan Mohammed Yaqob Shareef. Determination of Microbeads from Paste in Some Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products. Pharm Sci Technol. 2021;5(2):53-61. doi: 10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15,
author = {Mohammed Yaqob Shareef and Forkan Mohammed Yaqob Shareef},
title = {Determination of Microbeads from Paste in Some Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products},
journal = {Pharmaceutical Science and Technology},
volume = {5},
number = {2},
pages = {53-61},
doi = {10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.pst.20210502.15},
abstract = {Since the study of microplastics has only emerged in the last few years, there is a gap in research in terms of the analysis and quantification of microplastics in cosmetic pastes. Consequently, the main aim of this project was to develop an optimal analytical method for the separation and quantification of microbeads from cosmetic pastes in order to address this emerging global issue. Liquid solid extraction of microplastics from cosmetic paste through filtration under vacuum was implemented. And quantification with standard addition and characterization via infrared spectroscopy and light microscopy were used. Optimal extraction conditions were established which consists of boiled distilled water and vacuum filtration using Büchner funnel of 125 mm diameter. Recovery from different pastes had 94.64%, 85.09% and 92.30% microbead recovery which indicated that the extraction method proved to be efficient. Repeatability was found to be supportive of findings. The microbeads were analyzed under light microscopy where it was established that the microplastics extracted from the cosmetic pastes were smaller than 1 mm in size. An ideal method was developed for the extraction and quantification of microbeads from pastes. From this research project it was also deduced that paste matrix affects the recovery of microbeads from the product. Thus, standard addition approach must be carried out for each paste for quantification with high trueness.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Determination of Microbeads from Paste in Some Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products AU - Mohammed Yaqob Shareef AU - Forkan Mohammed Yaqob Shareef Y1 - 2021/10/12 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15 DO - 10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15 T2 - Pharmaceutical Science and Technology JF - Pharmaceutical Science and Technology JO - Pharmaceutical Science and Technology SP - 53 EP - 61 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4540 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.pst.20210502.15 AB - Since the study of microplastics has only emerged in the last few years, there is a gap in research in terms of the analysis and quantification of microplastics in cosmetic pastes. Consequently, the main aim of this project was to develop an optimal analytical method for the separation and quantification of microbeads from cosmetic pastes in order to address this emerging global issue. Liquid solid extraction of microplastics from cosmetic paste through filtration under vacuum was implemented. And quantification with standard addition and characterization via infrared spectroscopy and light microscopy were used. Optimal extraction conditions were established which consists of boiled distilled water and vacuum filtration using Büchner funnel of 125 mm diameter. Recovery from different pastes had 94.64%, 85.09% and 92.30% microbead recovery which indicated that the extraction method proved to be efficient. Repeatability was found to be supportive of findings. The microbeads were analyzed under light microscopy where it was established that the microplastics extracted from the cosmetic pastes were smaller than 1 mm in size. An ideal method was developed for the extraction and quantification of microbeads from pastes. From this research project it was also deduced that paste matrix affects the recovery of microbeads from the product. Thus, standard addition approach must be carried out for each paste for quantification with high trueness. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: