Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya

Received: 20 September 2024     Accepted: 28 November 2024     Published: 7 December 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The agricultural sector, especially in semi-arid regions like Kitui and Wajir Counties in Kenya, faces challenges of water scarcity and inconsistent agricultural yields due to erratic rainfall patterns. This study was underpinned by Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF). The study assessed how water harvesting techniques contribute to improved water efficiency and agricultural productivity, while also examining the role of value addition in ensuring sustainability. Using a descriptive research design, the sample size for the study comprised of 25 farmers and 34 agricultural extension officers and county government officials. Data was collected using both structured questionnaire and Key Informant Interviews (KII). Quantitative data collected from farmers was analyzed with the aid of SPSS using both descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to assess effect of level of adoption of innovative water harvesting techniques on improvement in water efficiency and agricultural sustainability. The qualitative data collected was analyzed thematically through content analysis. The study's findings, were presented on tables and narrative form, giving analysis of the current state of water harvesting and value addition practices and their role in agricultural sustainability. The findings revealed that cost-efficient value addition practices had significant effect on agricultural sustainability in Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya, with an R-squared value of 0.584, indicating that these practices explain 58.4% of the variation in agricultural sustainability outcomes. Regression coefficients demonstrated a significant positive effect of value addition practices on sustainability, with a coefficient (B = 0.669, p-value = 0.000). The study concludes that cost-efficient value addition practices play a crucial role in improving agricultural sustainability by enhancing resource efficiency, market access, and profitability for farmers in these counties. In view of the findings, the study recommends that government and agricultural stakeholders should implement financial support programs, such as subsidies and grants, to alleviate the initial costs of adopting value addition practices.

Published in International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15
Page(s) 310-327
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Water Harvesting, Value Addition, Agricultural Sustainability, Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF), Kitui County, Wajir County

References
[1] Addai, G., Suh, J., Bardsley, D., Robinson, G., & Guodaar, L. (2024). Exploring sustainable development within rural regions in Ghana: A rural web approach. Sustainable Development.
[2] Adisa, O., Ilugbusi, B. S., Adelekan, O. A., Asuzu, O. F., & Ndubuisi, N. L. (2024). A comprehensive review of redefining agricultural economics for sustainable development: Overcoming challenges and seizing opportunities in a changing world. World Journal Of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(1), 2329-2341.
[3] African Development Bank. (2023). African agricultural transformation report. Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
[4] Animba, A., Onitekun, O., & Olusina, G. (2024). Policy Imperatives for Strengthening Value Addition in Nigeria’s Agricultural Sector. Economic and Policy Review, 22(1), 40-50.
[5] Ashley, C., & Carney, D. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods: Lessons from early experience. DFID.
[6] Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods, and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021-2044.
[7] Carney, D. (2003). Sustainable livelihoods approaches: Progress and possibilities for change. DFID.
[8] Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies.
[9] Chukwu, P. D. E., Onoh, U. A., & Umoh, U. E. (2023). Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme Fund and Agricultural Value Added Growth Rate in Nigeria.
[10] DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. DFID.
[11] Dhillon, R., & Moncur, Q. (2023). Small-scale farming: A review of challenges and potential opportunities offered by technological advancements. Sustainability, 15(21), 15478.
[12] Doost, Z. H., Alsuwaiyan, M., & Yaseen, Z. M. (2024). Runoff management based water harvesting for better water resources sustainability: a comprehensive review. Knowledge-Based Engineering and Sciences, 5(1), 1-45.
[13] Dos-Santos, M. J. P. L. (2020). Value addition of agricultural production to meet the sustainable development goals. In Zero Hunger (pp. 953-960). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
[14] Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
[15] Eludoyin, A. O., Adewole, A. O., Oyinloye, M. E., & Eslamian, S. (2023). Water Harvesting for Rain-Fed Farming. In Handbook of Irrigation Hydrology and Management (pp. 335-346). CRC Press.
[16] Embrapa. (2023). Annual report on agricultural innovation and sustainability. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation.
[17] Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2023). The state of food and agriculture 2023. Rome, Italy.
[18] Global Water Partnership. (2023). Drip irrigation adoption in developing countries: Barriers and opportunities. Stockholm, Sweden.
[19] Guzman, J., Murray, F., Stern, S., & Williams, H. (2024). Accelerating innovation ecosystems: The promise and challenges of regional innovation engines. Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, 3(1), 9-75.
[20] Hejazi, M., Santos Da Silva, S. R., Miralles-Wilhelm, F., Kim, S., Kyle, P., Liu, Y., ... & Clarke, L. (2023). Impacts of water scarcity on agricultural production and electricity generation in the Middle East and North Africa. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1082930.
[21] Ingrao, C., Strippoli, R., Lagioia, G., & Huisingh, D. (2023). Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks. Heliyon.
[22] International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). (2024). Rural development report 2024: Value chains for rural prosperity. Rome, Italy.
[23] Jaramillo, D. E., Arata, L., Mausch, K., Sckokai, P., Fasse, A., Rommel, J., & Chopin, P. (2024). Linking innovations adoption with farm sustainability: Empirical evidence from rainwater harvesting and fertilizer micro-dosing in Tanzania. World Development, 183, 106732.
[24] Kagabo, D. M., Nsabimana, J. D., & Mukamana, L. (2023). Integrated landscape management and water harvesting in Rwanda: Lessons from the Gishwati-Mukura project. Land Degradation & Development, 34(5), 721-735.
[25] Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2024). Economic survey 2024. Nairobi, Kenya.
[26] Kitui County Agricultural Board. (2024). Annual agricultural sector performance report for Kitui County. Kitui, Kenya.
[27] Kitui County Government. (2023). Kitui County integrated development plan 2023-2027. Kitui, Kenya.
[28] Kovalenko, O. (2024). Rainwater harvesting techniques for small-scale farms in Western Ukraine. Water Resources Management, 38(2), 156-172.
[29] Meiguran, M., Ochola, W., & Kemunto, N. A. M. (2024). Impact of Farmers’ Involvement in Agricultural Value Chain on Livelihoods, A Case of Maize Seed Multiplication Programme in Baringo South Sub-County, Kenya. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 69(3), 358-367.
[30] Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, Fisheries and Cooperatives. (2023). Agricultural sector transformation and growth strategy: Mid-term review. Nairobi, Kenya.
[31] Ministry of Agriculture. (2024). Annual agricultural sector performance report. Nairobi, Kenya.
[32] Moyo, S., Ncube, B., & Mutasa, K. (2024). Conservation agriculture and water harvesting techniques in Zimbabwe: An evaluation of the Pfumvudza program. Agricultural Water Management, 266, 107801.
[33] Mwamila, T. B., Kisaka, M. O., & Shemdoe, R. S. (2024). Community-based water harvesting initiatives in semi-arid Tanzania: Impact assessment and sustainability analysis. Journal of Arid Environments, 203, 104812.
[34] National Irrigation Authority. (2023). Galana-Kulalu food security project: Progress report 2023. Nairobi, Kenya.
[35] Patel, A., Kethavath, A., Kushwaha, N. L., Naorem, A., Jagadale, M., Sheetal, K. R., & Renjith, P. S. (2023). Review of artificial intelligence and internet of things technologies in land and water management research during 1991–2021: A bibliometric analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 123, 106335.
[36] Petrov, A., Ivanov, S., & Smirnova, E. (2023). Precision agriculture and water conservation in Southern Russia: A case study of the Stavropol region. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 45(3), 278-295.
[37] Rwanda Development Board. (2024). Annual report on coffee sector development and export performance. Kigali, Rwanda.
[38] Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis. IDS Working Paper 72.
[39] Senge, M. (2023). The development of water harvesting research for agriculture. Reviews in Agricultural Science, 1, 31-42.
[40] Silva, M., & Santos, P. (2024). Value addition in Brazilian soybean industry: Economic impacts and future prospects. Agribusiness Economics Review, 12(1), 45-62.
[41] Singh, R., Minh, T. T., Oguge, N., & Odote, C. (2023). The influence of exogenous elements on technological innovation system development: The case of rainwater harvesting for irrigation in Kenya. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, (2), 397-411.
[42] Srivastava, R. K., Sarangi, P. K., Shadangi, K. P., Sasmal, S., Gupta, V. K., Govarthanan, M., ... & Subudhi, S. (2023). Biorefineries development from agricultural byproducts: Value addition and circular bioeconomy. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 32, 100970.
[43] Surjibhai, A. S., Nath, R., Singh, S., Swarnkar, S., & Patra, B. (2024). Unravelling surface water dynamics in semi-arid central Indian region for sustainable agricultural practices. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(9), 1-22.
[44] Tanzania Agricultural Development Bank. (2023). Value addition in Tanzanian cashew industry: Economic impact assessment. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
[45] Tea Directorate. (2024). Kenya tea industry performance report. Nairobi, Kenya.
[46] Uganda Coffee Development Authority. (2024). Annual report 2023/2024. Kampala, Uganda.
[47] UN Water. (2023). World water development report 2023. United Nations, New York.
[48] United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). (2023). Global land outlook. Bonn, Germany.
[49] Wajir County Government. (2023). Wajir County Integrated Development Plan (CIDP) 2023–2027. Wajir, Kenya
[50] Wang, M., Liu, E., Jin, T., Zafar, S. U., Mei, X., Fauconnier, M. L., & De Clerck, C. (2023). Towards a better understanding of atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) technology. Water Research, 121052.
[51] Water Resources Authority. (2023). Water harvesting and storage programme: Impact assessment report. Nairobi, Kenya.
[52] World Bank. (2023). High and dry: Climate change, water, and the economy. Washington, D. C.
[53] World Food Programme. (2024). Global hunger outlook 2024. Rome, Italy.
[54] World Resources Institute. (2024). Aqueduct water risk atlas. Washington, D. C.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kathula, D. N., Abdinoor, M. (2024). Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 10(6), 310-327. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kathula, D. N.; Abdinoor, M. Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2024, 10(6), 310-327. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kathula DN, Abdinoor M. Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2024;10(6):310-327. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15,
      author = {Domeniter Naomi Kathula and Mohamed Abdinoor},
      title = {Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {310-327},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20241006.15},
      abstract = {The agricultural sector, especially in semi-arid regions like Kitui and Wajir Counties in Kenya, faces challenges of water scarcity and inconsistent agricultural yields due to erratic rainfall patterns. This study was underpinned by Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF). The study assessed how water harvesting techniques contribute to improved water efficiency and agricultural productivity, while also examining the role of value addition in ensuring sustainability. Using a descriptive research design, the sample size for the study comprised of 25 farmers and 34 agricultural extension officers and county government officials. Data was collected using both structured questionnaire and Key Informant Interviews (KII). Quantitative data collected from farmers was analyzed with the aid of SPSS using both descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to assess effect of level of adoption of innovative water harvesting techniques on improvement in water efficiency and agricultural sustainability. The qualitative data collected was analyzed thematically through content analysis. The study's findings, were presented on tables and narrative form, giving analysis of the current state of water harvesting and value addition practices and their role in agricultural sustainability. The findings revealed that cost-efficient value addition practices had significant effect on agricultural sustainability in Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya, with an R-squared value of 0.584, indicating that these practices explain 58.4% of the variation in agricultural sustainability outcomes. Regression coefficients demonstrated a significant positive effect of value addition practices on sustainability, with a coefficient (B = 0.669, p-value = 0.000). The study concludes that cost-efficient value addition practices play a crucial role in improving agricultural sustainability by enhancing resource efficiency, market access, and profitability for farmers in these counties. In view of the findings, the study recommends that government and agricultural stakeholders should implement financial support programs, such as subsidies and grants, to alleviate the initial costs of adopting value addition practices.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Innovative and Cost Effective Water Harvesting and Value Addition in Agriculture for Sustainability: Case Study of Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya
    
    AU  - Domeniter Naomi Kathula
    AU  - Mohamed Abdinoor
    Y1  - 2024/12/07
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15
    T2  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences
    SP  - 310
    EP  - 327
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2469-7885
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.15
    AB  - The agricultural sector, especially in semi-arid regions like Kitui and Wajir Counties in Kenya, faces challenges of water scarcity and inconsistent agricultural yields due to erratic rainfall patterns. This study was underpinned by Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF). The study assessed how water harvesting techniques contribute to improved water efficiency and agricultural productivity, while also examining the role of value addition in ensuring sustainability. Using a descriptive research design, the sample size for the study comprised of 25 farmers and 34 agricultural extension officers and county government officials. Data was collected using both structured questionnaire and Key Informant Interviews (KII). Quantitative data collected from farmers was analyzed with the aid of SPSS using both descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to assess effect of level of adoption of innovative water harvesting techniques on improvement in water efficiency and agricultural sustainability. The qualitative data collected was analyzed thematically through content analysis. The study's findings, were presented on tables and narrative form, giving analysis of the current state of water harvesting and value addition practices and their role in agricultural sustainability. The findings revealed that cost-efficient value addition practices had significant effect on agricultural sustainability in Kitui and Wajir Counties, Kenya, with an R-squared value of 0.584, indicating that these practices explain 58.4% of the variation in agricultural sustainability outcomes. Regression coefficients demonstrated a significant positive effect of value addition practices on sustainability, with a coefficient (B = 0.669, p-value = 0.000). The study concludes that cost-efficient value addition practices play a crucial role in improving agricultural sustainability by enhancing resource efficiency, market access, and profitability for farmers in these counties. In view of the findings, the study recommends that government and agricultural stakeholders should implement financial support programs, such as subsidies and grants, to alleviate the initial costs of adopting value addition practices.
    
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections