A field experiment on sugarcane was carried out during 2012-2013 season at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research Farm, Lucknow (UP), India to assess the effect of weed control methods on growth and development of weeds in sugarcane. The experiment was applied according to the Randomized Complete Block Design RCBD with three replications. Application of weed control methods was made at tiller stage of sugarcane crop (Variety CoSe 92423). All 14 treatments comprising various doses and time of application of sufentrazone alone or in combination with other weed control methods including other herbicides. The results have shown that the weed density and dry matter accumulation were significantly reduced due to different treatments at all the growth stages of the crop in comparison to that of control. Weed growth in terms of weed density was recorded to be the lowest with sulfentrazone (pre-em; 900 g ai/ha) at 60, 90 and 120 Day After Planting. However, the dry matter accumulation by weeds was the lowest with three-hoeing as observed at the same growth stages.
| Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11 |
| Page(s) | 49-54 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sugarcane, Weed Control, Sufentrazone, Atrazine, Trash Mulching, Hoeing
| [1] | Litlle, K. P. Adams, H. Frochet, J. Java, S. Gous, R. A. Lautenschlaget, G. Orlander, K. V. Sankaran, R. G. Wagnet, Run-PengWel, and I. Wiloughby. Reducing herbicide use through integrated forest vegetation management practices. Institute for Commercial Forestry Research, Scotsville, South Africa.2006. |
| [2] | Anonymous. ʽʽControlling Weeds in Sugarcaneʼʼ. Baton Rouge, LA. Louisiana State University AgCenter and Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service. Pub.2314. pp. 2-4.2001. |
| [3] | KanchanNainwal.Weed Infestation in sugarcane.2009(C.F. ONLINE) WWW.atsdr.cdc.gov. |
| [4] | Tomar, P.K., Om.Prakash, and D. Singh. Economical methods of weed management to improve the productivity and sugar recovery in late planted sugarcane. Indian Sugar, LIII (5): 339-342.2003. |
| [5] | Singh, H., N. Kumar, and D.K. Dwivedi. Efficacy of some new herbicides on weed dynamics and yield of sugarcane. Indian Sugar, LVIII (9): 71-74.2008. |
| [6] | Singh,A.K., R.S. Chauhan and T,K. Srivastava . Effect of pre-emergence application of sulfentrazone in spring planted sugarcane under sub-tropical India . International conference on APCHNE. 2012. |
| [7] | Jonathan Siebert.Sugarcane seed response to 2,4-d and alternative herbicides for red morningglory (ipomoea coccinea l.) control .Thesis, Louisiana State University. p: 67.2003. |
| [8] | Krausz, R. F., G. Kapusta, J. L. Matthews. Sulfentrazone for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:684-689.1998. |
| [9] | Stringer, S. J., E. V. Gage, H. G. Hancock, and L. D. Hatfield. Weed control in sugarcane with clomazone. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:219.1998. |
| [10] | Vidrine, P. R., J. L. Griffin, D. L. Jordan and D. B. Reynolds. Broad leaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10: 762 - 765.1996. |
| [11] | Steel, R.G. and J.H.Torrie .Principles and procedures of statistics. MCGraw Hill Book company. Inc USA. Pp 485. 1980. |
| [12] | Srivastava T. K. Bio-efficacy of Sulfentrazone againstNut-sedge (Cyperusrotundus) and Other Weeds in Sugarcane. Indian Journal of Weed ScienceVo( 35): 1&2.pp:82- 86.2003. |
APA Style
Nadir F. Almubarak, T. K. Srivastava. (2015). Effect of Weed Control Methods on Growth and Development of Weeds in Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 1(3), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11
ACS Style
Nadir F. Almubarak; T. K. Srivastava. Effect of Weed Control Methods on Growth and Development of Weeds in Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2015, 1(3), 49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11
AMA Style
Nadir F. Almubarak, T. K. Srivastava. Effect of Weed Control Methods on Growth and Development of Weeds in Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2015;1(3):49-54. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11,
author = {Nadir F. Almubarak and T. K. Srivastava},
title = {Effect of Weed Control Methods on Growth and Development of Weeds in Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields},
journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences},
volume = {1},
number = {3},
pages = {49-54},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20150103.11},
abstract = {A field experiment on sugarcane was carried out during 2012-2013 season at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research Farm, Lucknow (UP), India to assess the effect of weed control methods on growth and development of weeds in sugarcane. The experiment was applied according to the Randomized Complete Block Design RCBD with three replications. Application of weed control methods was made at tiller stage of sugarcane crop (Variety CoSe 92423). All 14 treatments comprising various doses and time of application of sufentrazone alone or in combination with other weed control methods including other herbicides. The results have shown that the weed density and dry matter accumulation were significantly reduced due to different treatments at all the growth stages of the crop in comparison to that of control. Weed growth in terms of weed density was recorded to be the lowest with sulfentrazone (pre-em; 900 g ai/ha) at 60, 90 and 120 Day After Planting. However, the dry matter accumulation by weeds was the lowest with three-hoeing as observed at the same growth stages.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Weed Control Methods on Growth and Development of Weeds in Sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Fields AU - Nadir F. Almubarak AU - T. K. Srivastava Y1 - 2015/07/15 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 49 EP - 54 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20150103.11 AB - A field experiment on sugarcane was carried out during 2012-2013 season at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research Farm, Lucknow (UP), India to assess the effect of weed control methods on growth and development of weeds in sugarcane. The experiment was applied according to the Randomized Complete Block Design RCBD with three replications. Application of weed control methods was made at tiller stage of sugarcane crop (Variety CoSe 92423). All 14 treatments comprising various doses and time of application of sufentrazone alone or in combination with other weed control methods including other herbicides. The results have shown that the weed density and dry matter accumulation were significantly reduced due to different treatments at all the growth stages of the crop in comparison to that of control. Weed growth in terms of weed density was recorded to be the lowest with sulfentrazone (pre-em; 900 g ai/ha) at 60, 90 and 120 Day After Planting. However, the dry matter accumulation by weeds was the lowest with three-hoeing as observed at the same growth stages. VL - 1 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: