The world is witnessing tremendous and rapid technological development, making modern technology indispensable in life. The infusion of technologies into the educational practice has significantly improved and modernised established educational systems. The quest to ascertain whether the infusion is a necessity is considered. This paper, therefore, sought to review whether developing HEI needs to infuse technology in learning and teaching. Thus, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework will be adopted to support and strengthen this review paper. TPACK was adopted for this article because of the need to enhance content knowledge. The framework is a recommendation for 21st-century learning to develop technological and digital literacy. Learning is directed at technology utilisation to increase the effectiveness and quality of education. This contributed to the successful infusion of technology with content. The theoretical framework for this study and materials were sourced from journals, websites, and other academic materials. The present study also explores the policy, benefits, and barriers involved in the infusion of technologies in developing HEIs. A systematic approach was applied in the methodology for this study through sources such as e-journals, peer-reviewed books, google scholar, and other resource articles. The gap this study sought to fill centred on the influence, effectiveness, and barriers associated with the infusion of technology to developing HEIs in learning and teaching for positive educational outcomes. Hence, this paper recommends resolving the obstacles encountered in the infusion of technology in learning and teaching. Suggestions for future research will be centred on the infusion and implementation of information technology in the curriculum of the HEIs.
Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13 |
Page(s) | 369-377 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Academia, Education Delivery, Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs), Learning and Teaching
[1] | Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher education studies, 10 (3), 16-25. |
[2] | Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53 (3), 575-590. |
[3] | Barnes, J. L. (2015). Fanfiction as imaginary play: What fan-written stories can tell us about the cognitive science of fiction. Poetics, 48, 69-82. |
[4] | Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2011, December). Digital literacies workshop. In JISC learning literacies workshop. |
[5] | Bozalek, V., & Ng’ambi, D. (2015). The context of learning with technology. Moving beyond the hype: A contextualised view of learning with technology in higher education, 3-6. |
[6] | Brown, B. (2012). Motion picture and video lighting. Routledge. |
[7] | Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of computer-assisted learning, 26 (5), 357-369. |
[8] | Campbell, P. F., Nishio, M., Smith, T. M., Clark, L. M., Conant, D. L., Rust, A. H., & Choi, Y. (2014). The relationship between teachers' mathematical content and pedagogical knowledge, teachers' perceptions, and student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45 (4), 419-459. |
[9] | Coman, C., Țîru, L. G., Meseșan-Schmitz, L., Stanciu, C., & Bularca, M. C. (2020). Online teaching and learning in higher education during the coronavirus pandemic: Students’ perspective. Sustainability, 12 (24), 10367. |
[10] | Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9 (3), 295-320. |
[11] | Cronje, F. (2012). Extreme Blogging as Teaching Methodology. In eMerge Conference, Cape Town, South Africa. |
[12] | Dabner, N. (2012). ‘Breaking Ground’in the use of social media: A case study of a university earthquake response to inform educational design with Facebook. The Internet and Higher Education, 15 (1), 69-78. |
[13] | Davies, R. S., & West, R. E. (2014). Technology integration in schools. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 841-853). Springer, New York, NY. |
[14] | Giebelhausen, M., Robinson, S. G., Sirianni, N. J., & Brady, M. K. (2014). Touch versus tech: When technology functions as a barrier or a benefit to service encounters. Journal of Marketing, 78 (4), 113-124. |
[15] | Gloria, R., & Benjamin, A. E. (2018). Attitude of teachers towards techno-pedagogy. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 5 (4), 87-89. |
[16] | Goodfellow, R., & LEA, M. R. (2013). Introduction: literacy, the digital, and the university. In Literacy in the Digital University (pp. 15-28). Routledge. |
[17] | Harzing, A. W., & Giroud, A. (2014). The competitive advantage of nations: An application to academia. Journal of Informetrics, 8 (1), 29-42. |
[18] | Heleta, S., & Bagus, T. (2021). Sustainable development goals and higher education: leaving many behind. Higher Education, 81 (1), 163-177. |
[19] | Hidayah, I., Permanasari, A. E., & Ratwastuti, N. (2013, October). Student classification for academic performance prediction using neuro-fuzzy in a conventional classroom. In 2013 international conference on information technology and electrical engineering (ICITEE) (pp. 221-225). IEEE. |
[20] | Jackson, D. (2018). Developing graduate career readiness in Australia: shifting from extra-curricular internships to work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19 (1), 23-35. |
[21] | Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and challenges for teaching successful online courses in higher education: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46 (1), 4-29. |
[22] | Kemp, A. T., Preston, J., Page, C. S., Harper, R., Dillard, B., Flynn, J., & Yamaguchi, M. (2014). Technology and teaching: A conversation among faculty regarding the pros and cons of technology. Qualitative Report, 19, 6. |
[23] | Khan, M. S. H., Hasan, M., & Clement, C. K. (2012). Barriers to the introduction of ICT into education in developing countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction, 5 (2). |
[24] | Kornberger, H. (2009). Telling the first of tales. Early Years Educator, 11 (4), 20-22. |
[25] | Krauskopf, K., & Forssell, K. (2013, March). I have TPCK!–What does that mean? Examining the External Validity of TPCK Self-Reports. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 2190-2197). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). |
[26] | Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). How should the higher education workforce adapt to advancements in technology for teaching and learning? The Internet and Higher Education, 15 (4), 247-254. |
[27] | Maphalala, M. C., & Adigun, O. T. (2021). Academics' Experience of Implementing E-Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution. International Journal of Higher Education, 10 (1), 1-13. |
[28] | Maycock, K. W. (2019). Chalk and talk versus flipped learning: A case study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35 (1), 121-126. |
[29] | Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2008, March). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. In the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Vol. 1, p. 16). |
[30] | Morkel, J. (2011). Facebook-enhanced face-to-face learning: The architecture studio. |
[31] | Murillo, R. E. (2017). The 21st Century Elementary Music Classroom and the Digital Music Curriculum: A Synergism of Technology and Traditional Pedagogy. Texas Music Education Research, 14, 27. |
[32] | Ndzinisa, N., & Dlamini, R. (2022). Responsiveness vs accessibility: pandemic-driven shift to remote teaching and online learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-16. |
[33] | Ng'ambi, D. (2013). Effective and ineffective uses of emerging technologies: Towards a transformative pedagogical model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (4), 652-661. |
[34] | Niess, M., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2013). Advancing K-8 teachers’ STEM education for teaching interdisciplinary science and mathematics with technologies. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 32 (2), 219-245. |
[35] | Noakes, T. M. (2012). Online portfolio curricular appropriation, Visual Arts classroom changes and conversations. DDR 2012, 266. |
[36] | Nora, A., & Snyder, B. P. (2008). Technology and higher education: The impact of e-learning approaches on student academic achievement, perceptions and persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10 (1), 3-19. |
[37] | Northall, T., Ramjan, L. M., Everett, B., & Salamonson, Y. (2016). Retention and academic performance of undergraduate nursing students with advanced standing: A mixed-methods study. Nurse education today, 39, 26-31. |
[38] | Peansupap, V., & Walker, D. H. (2009). Exploratory factors influencing design practice learning within a Thai context. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. |
[39] | Powell, L., & McGrath, S. (2014). 7 Exploring the Value of the Capability Approach for Vocational Education and Training Evaluation: Reflections from South Africa. In Education, Learning, Training (pp. 126-148). Brill Nijhoff. |
[40] | Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44 (4), 544-561. |
[41] | Romansky, R. P., & Parvanova, E. I. (2009). Evaluation of the information servicing in a distributed learning environment using monitoring and stochastic modelling. International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 1 (1), 33-42. |
[42] | Rossing, J. P., Miller, W., Cecil, A. K., & Stamper, S. E. (2012). iLearning: The future of higher education? Student perceptions on learning with mobile tablets. |
[43] | Rowe, M. (2012). The use of a wiki to facilitate collaborative learning in a South African physiotherapy department. South African Journal of Physiotherapy, 68 (2), 11-16. |
[44] | Setiawati, L. (2013). Portraying teacher-students interaction in EFL classes: a case study in 7th and 8th efl-clt based classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). |
[45] | Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International journal of education and development using ICT, 3 (2), 57-67. |
[46] | Stoltenkamp, J., Kabaka, M., & Braaf, N. (2014). Lessons learnt: support interventions during a blended course for teacher-educators from urban and rural settings. |
[47] | Thakur, N. (2015). A study on the implementation of techno-pedagogical skills, its challenges and role to release at a higher level of education. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 9 (2), 182-186. |
[48] | Thinyane, H. (2010). Are digital natives a worldwide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first-year students' use and experience with technology. Computers & Education, 55 (1), 406-414. |
[49] | Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59 (1), 134-144. |
[50] | Tularam, G. A. (2018). Traditional vs Non-traditional Teaching and Learning Strategies-the case of E-learning! International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 19 (1), 129-158. |
[51] | Woolf, B. P., Arroyo, I., & Zualkernan, I. A. (2011, October). Education technology for the developing world. In 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (pp. 493-498). IEEE. |
[52] | Yot-Domínguez, C., & Marcelo, C. (2017). University students’ self-regulated learning using digital technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14 (1), 1-18. |
APA Style
Oluwayemi IbukunOluwa Odularu. (2022). The Necessity for Developing Higher Educational Institutions to Infuse Technology in Learning and Teaching. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(6), 369-377. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13
ACS Style
Oluwayemi IbukunOluwa Odularu. The Necessity for Developing Higher Educational Institutions to Infuse Technology in Learning and Teaching. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10(6), 369-377. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13
@article{10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13, author = {Oluwayemi IbukunOluwa Odularu}, title = {The Necessity for Developing Higher Educational Institutions to Infuse Technology in Learning and Teaching}, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {6}, pages = {369-377}, doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20221006.13}, abstract = {The world is witnessing tremendous and rapid technological development, making modern technology indispensable in life. The infusion of technologies into the educational practice has significantly improved and modernised established educational systems. The quest to ascertain whether the infusion is a necessity is considered. This paper, therefore, sought to review whether developing HEI needs to infuse technology in learning and teaching. Thus, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework will be adopted to support and strengthen this review paper. TPACK was adopted for this article because of the need to enhance content knowledge. The framework is a recommendation for 21st-century learning to develop technological and digital literacy. Learning is directed at technology utilisation to increase the effectiveness and quality of education. This contributed to the successful infusion of technology with content. The theoretical framework for this study and materials were sourced from journals, websites, and other academic materials. The present study also explores the policy, benefits, and barriers involved in the infusion of technologies in developing HEIs. A systematic approach was applied in the methodology for this study through sources such as e-journals, peer-reviewed books, google scholar, and other resource articles. The gap this study sought to fill centred on the influence, effectiveness, and barriers associated with the infusion of technology to developing HEIs in learning and teaching for positive educational outcomes. Hence, this paper recommends resolving the obstacles encountered in the infusion of technology in learning and teaching. Suggestions for future research will be centred on the infusion and implementation of information technology in the curriculum of the HEIs.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Necessity for Developing Higher Educational Institutions to Infuse Technology in Learning and Teaching AU - Oluwayemi IbukunOluwa Odularu Y1 - 2022/11/29 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 369 EP - 377 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221006.13 AB - The world is witnessing tremendous and rapid technological development, making modern technology indispensable in life. The infusion of technologies into the educational practice has significantly improved and modernised established educational systems. The quest to ascertain whether the infusion is a necessity is considered. This paper, therefore, sought to review whether developing HEI needs to infuse technology in learning and teaching. Thus, the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework will be adopted to support and strengthen this review paper. TPACK was adopted for this article because of the need to enhance content knowledge. The framework is a recommendation for 21st-century learning to develop technological and digital literacy. Learning is directed at technology utilisation to increase the effectiveness and quality of education. This contributed to the successful infusion of technology with content. The theoretical framework for this study and materials were sourced from journals, websites, and other academic materials. The present study also explores the policy, benefits, and barriers involved in the infusion of technologies in developing HEIs. A systematic approach was applied in the methodology for this study through sources such as e-journals, peer-reviewed books, google scholar, and other resource articles. The gap this study sought to fill centred on the influence, effectiveness, and barriers associated with the infusion of technology to developing HEIs in learning and teaching for positive educational outcomes. Hence, this paper recommends resolving the obstacles encountered in the infusion of technology in learning and teaching. Suggestions for future research will be centred on the infusion and implementation of information technology in the curriculum of the HEIs. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -