Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability

Jesús María Garayo Urruela

doi:doi:10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability

Jesús María Garayo Urruela

Published in Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5)

Received: 28 August 2021 Accepted: 14 October 2021 Published: 29 October 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Since the entry into force of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) on 9 June 1994, the Natura 2000 Network has become the tool conceived by the Community authorities to lead the implementation of the environmental commitments on European territory, to which they were bound in application of their accession to international conventions. Natura 2000 pursues the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by harmonizing the conservation of natural heritage with the support and promotion of traditional human activities. The Habitats Directive formulated the principles, objectives, management measures and procedures to preserve, maintain or, where appropriate, restore biological diversity, which each State was subsequently responsible for transferring to the jurisdiction. The standard does not impose any specific method to be used in the designation of the sites, the type of management to be developed or the measures to be implemented, but it does establish control mechanisms over their application. The designation of a Natura 2000 site provides an invaluable opportunity to stimulate the sustainable rural development of the area and to promote plans and activities compatible with the conservation of habitats and protected species. Dialogue and concertation are the mechanisms to be put into practice when it comes to resolving conflicts arising from the design of management models that articulate the recovery of the environmental heritage. The model by which the Natura 2000 Network has been implemented so far in Spain, and specifically in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, has been based on technocratic-formal processes. The inclusion of the area in the Natura 2000 network tends to be perceived by the inhabitants of the rural world as a bureaucratized process, disconnected from local plans and collective projects. The considerable delay in the designation of areas protected by the Natura 2000 network has contributed to the delay in adopting appropriate measures to promote biodiversity and achieve the objective of halting biodiversity loss in Europe in the short term. Despite having redoubled efforts in favor of conservation, the processes of environmental degradation have been increasing.

Published in	Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
Page(s)	225-233
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Sustainable Development, Nature Conservation, Protected Sites, Basque Country, Spain, EEC

References

[1]	SADELER, N. (1993). La Directive 92/43/CEE concernant le conservation des hábitats naturels ainsi que de la faune et de la flore sauvages: vers le reconnaisssance d´un patrimoine naturel de la Communauté Européenne (Directive 92/43/EEC concerning the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora: towards the recognition of a natural heritage of the European Community). Revue du Marché commun et de l´Union européenne, 364, 24-32.
[2]	EEC (1995). Wise use and conservation of wetlands, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. COM (95) 189 final, 29 May 1995.
[3]	EEC (1988). Environment and Agriculture, COM (88) 338 final, Brussels, 16.08.1988.
[4]	EEC (1989). The Common Agricultural Policy and the conservation and recovery of the vegetation cover, Memorandum of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers of Agriculture, Luxembourg, June 19-20, 1989/ La Política Agraria Común y la conservación y recuperación de la cubierta vegetal. NOVAS GARCÍA, A. (ed.). El sector forestal y la CEE, Madrid: ICONA, 385-387.
[5]	EEC (1991). The development and future of the CAP. Reflections paper of the Commission. Communication of the Commission to the Council. COM (91) 100 final, 1 February 1991.
[6]	EEC (1997). Council Directive 97/62/EC, of October 27 adapting adapting to technical and scientific progress Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, Official Journal of the European Communities, No 305, November 8, 1997, 42-65.
[7]	EEC (2000). Managing Natura 2000 sites. The Provisions of article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
[8]	EEC (2019). Managing Natura 2000 sites. The Provisions of article 6 of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC (2019/C 33/01), Official Journal of the European Union, January 25, 2019.
[9]	EEC (2002). Assessment of plans and projects significantly affecting Natura 2000 sites. Methodological guidance on the provisions of Article 6 (3) and 6 (4) of the Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
[10]	TRAÏNI, C. (2005). Les stratégies d’accréditation des acteurs locaux et les jeux de légitimité dans la mise en œuvre de la directive Natura 2000 (Accreditation strategies for local actors and legitimacy games in the implementation of the Natura 2000 directive). DUBOIS, J. y MALJEAN-DUBOIS, S., (dirs.). De l´in-jonction européenne aux négociations locales, Paris: La Documentation française, 129-148.
[11]	PINTON, F., ALPHANDÉRY, P., BILLAUD, J-P., DEVERRE, CH., FORTIER, A. Y LEFEBVRE, C. (2006). (The construction of the Natura 2000 network in France. A European biodiversity conservation policy put to the test), Paris: La Documentation française.
[12]	GUHA, R. y GADGIL, M. (1993). Los hábitats en la historia de la humanidad (Habitats in the history of mankind). Ayer, 11, 49-110.
[13]	PRIEUR, M (2003). La tutela comunitaria degli habitat naturali (Community protection of natural habitats). AMIRANTE, D. (ed.), La conservazione della natura in Europa. La Direttiva Habitat ed il processo di costruzione della rete “Natura 2000”, Milano: Franco Angelli, 13-29.
[14]	PARRA, F. (2005) La cultura del territorio (La naturaleza contra el campo) (The culture of the territory. Nature against the countryside). Ecología política, 29, 7-15.
[15]	GARAYO URRUELA, J. Mª (2001) Los espacios naturales protegidos entre la conservación y el desarrollo (Protected natural spaces between conservation and development). Lurralde, 24, 271-293.
[16]	LEPART, J. y MARTY, P. (2006). Des réserves de nature aux territoires de la biodiversité. L´example de France (From nature reserves to areas of biodiversity. The example of France). Annales de géographie, No 651, 485-507.
[17]	FORTIER, A. y ALPHANDÉRY, P. (2005). Négociations autour de la biodiversité: la mise en oeuvre de Natura 2000 en France (Negotiations around biodiversity: the implementation of Natura 2000 in France). MARTY, P., VIVIEN, F-D., LEPART, J. y LARRÉRE, R. (coords.). Les Biodiversités. Objets, Théories, Practiques, Paris: CNRS éditions, 227-240.
[18]	FABIANI, J. L. (1985): Science des écosystémes et protection de la nature (Ecosystem science and nature protection). CADORET, A. C. Protection de la nature: histoire et ideologie. De la nature a l'environnement, Paris: L'Harmattan, 75-93.
[19]	PIPIEN, G. (2005). La directive “hábitats”, une avancée en faveur du patrimoine naturel (The habitats directive, a step forward in favor of natural heritage). DUBOIS, J. y MALJEAN-DUBOIS, S., (dirs.). De l´injonction européenne aux négociations locales, Paris: La Documentation française, 225-239.
[20]	GARDE, L. (2005). Faut-il sauver Natura 2000? (Should we save Natura 2000?). DUBOIS, J. y MALJEAN-DUBOIS, S., (dirs.). De l´injonction européenne aux négociations locales, Paris: La Documentation française, 161-182.
[21]	LARRÉRE, R. y FLEURY, P. (2004). Malentendus, incompréhensions et accords dans la gestion de la biodiversité (Misunderstandings, lack of understanding and agreements in the management of biodiversity). Fourrages, 179, 307-318.
[22]	LEPART, J. y MARTY, P. (2005). La mise en oeuvre du Réseau Natura 2000: questions á l´ecologie scientifique (La mise en oeuvre du Réseau Natura 2000: questions à l´écologie scientifique). DUBOIS, J. y MALJEAN-DUBOIS, S., (dirs.). De l´in-jonction européenne aux négociations locales, Paris: La Documentation française, 27-44.
[23]	EEC (1992). Council Directive 92/43/ EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora, Official Journal of the European Communities, No 206, July 22, 1992, 7-50.
[24]	UICN (CNPPA) (1994): Guidelines for Protected Area Management Categories. Lignes directrices pour les catégories de gestion des aires protégées. Directrices para las Categorías de Manejo de Áreas Protegidas, Gland (Suiza).
[25]	GARAYO URRUELA, J. Mª (1996). Concepción integrada de la conservación de la naturaleza y categorías de espacios naturales y protegidos (Integrated conception of nature conservation and categories of natural and protected areas). Lurralde, 19, 251-234.
[26]	MILIAN, J. (2001). Le projet Natura 2000 et la protection du patrimoine naturel. L’exemple des sites expérimentaux pyrénéens (The Natura 2000 project and the protection of the natural heritage. The example of Pyrenean experimental sites). Etudes rurales, 157-158, 173-194.
[27]	DUBOIS, J. y MALJEAN-DUBOIS, S., (dirs.) (2005). De l´injonction européenne aux négociations locales (From European injunction to local negotiations), Paris: La Documentation française.
[28]	MARQUETTE, A. (2007). La gestión française des sites classés “Natura 2000” (French management of sites classified as Natura 2000), Lyon: Institute d´Etudes Politiques (Université Lumiére Lyon II), Mémoire de fin d´etudes.
[29]	EEC (2004). Report from the Commission on the implentation of the Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, COM (2003) 845 final, Brussels, 5.1.2004.
[30]	EEC (2009). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. Composite Report on the Conservation Status of Habitat Types and Species as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive, COM (2009) 358 final, Brussels, 13.07.2009.
[31]	EEC (2015). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. The State of Nature in the European Union. Report on the status of and trends for habitat types and species covered by the Birds and Habitats Directives for the 2007-2012 period as required under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive and Article 12 of the Birds Directive, Brussels, 20.5.2015, COM (2015) 219 final.
[32]	EEC (2004). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament - Financing of Natura 2000 {SEC (2004)770} {SEC (2004)771}/COM/ 2004/0431 final /.
[33]	WWF/Adena (2008). Mitos sobre la red Natura 2000: Respuestas a las dudas más importantes sobre la red europea de espacios protegidos (Myths about the Natura 2000 network: Answers to the most important questions about the European network of protected areas), Madrid.
[34]	EEC (1998). A European Community biodiversity strategy, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (98) 42 final, Brussels, 04.02.1998.
[35]	EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2009). Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe, Technical report No 11/2007.
[36]	EEC (2001). Biodiversity Action Plans in the areas of Conservation of Natural Resources, Agriculture, Fisheries, and Development and Economic Co-operation, Communication from the Commission to the European Council and Parliament, COM (2001) 162 final, Brussels, 27.3.2001.
[37]	EEC (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020 {SEC (2011)540 final} {SEC (2011)541 final}/COM/ 2011/0244 final /, Brussels, 3.06.2011.
[38]	EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (2015). The state of nature in the EU. Reporting under tue EU Habitats and Birds Directives 2007-2012, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
[39]	EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS (2017). More effort is needed to fully implement the Natura 2000 Network (submitted in accordance with Article 287 TFEU, paragraph 4, second subparagraph), accompanied by the Commission's responses, Luxembourg, Special Report No 1/2017.
[40]	EEC (2018) Natura 2000. Nature Information Bulletin, 44, February.
[41]	GARCÍA FERNÁNDEZ-VELILLA, S., JIMÉNEZ LUQUIN, A. y ALONSO SEMINARIO, C. (2011). Decidir juntos para gestionar mejor. Manual de planificación participativa en áreas protegidas (Decide together to better manage. Manual of participatory planning in protected areas), Vitoria-Gasteiz: Departamento de Medio Ambiente, Planificación territorial y Agricultura.
[42]	GARAYO URRUELA, J. Mª (2016). Zona Especial de Conservación Arkamo-Gibijo-Arrastaria (Inacaba implementación de los fines de Natura 2000). (Arkamo-Gibijo-Arrastaria Special Conservation Zone (Unfinished implementation of Natura 2000 goals), 100 páginas, memoria inédita.
[43]	ETXANO GANDARIASBEITIA, I. (2009). Desarrollo rural en Espacios Naturales Protegidos. El caso del Parque Natural de Gorbeia (1994-2008). (Rural development in Protected Natural Areas. The case of the Gorbeia Natural Park (1994-2008). Lurralde, 32, 197-226.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. (2021). Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sciences, 10(5), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(5), 225-233. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sci. 2021;10(5):225-233. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14,
  author = {Jesús María Garayo Urruela},
  title = {Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {225-233},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211005.14},
  abstract = {Since the entry into force of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) on 9 June 1994, the Natura 2000 Network has become the tool conceived by the Community authorities to lead the implementation of the environmental commitments on European territory, to which they were bound in application of their accession to international conventions. Natura 2000 pursues the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by harmonizing the conservation of natural heritage with the support and promotion of traditional human activities. The Habitats Directive formulated the principles, objectives, management measures and procedures to preserve, maintain or, where appropriate, restore biological diversity, which each State was subsequently responsible for transferring to the jurisdiction. The standard does not impose any specific method to be used in the designation of the sites, the type of management to be developed or the measures to be implemented, but it does establish control mechanisms over their application. The designation of a Natura 2000 site provides an invaluable opportunity to stimulate the sustainable rural development of the area and to promote plans and activities compatible with the conservation of habitats and protected species. Dialogue and concertation are the mechanisms to be put into practice when it comes to resolving conflicts arising from the design of management models that articulate the recovery of the environmental heritage. The model by which the Natura 2000 Network has been implemented so far in Spain, and specifically in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, has been based on technocratic-formal processes. The inclusion of the area in the Natura 2000 network tends to be perceived by the inhabitants of the rural world as a bureaucratized process, disconnected from local plans and collective projects. The considerable delay in the designation of areas protected by the Natura 2000 network has contributed to the delay in adopting appropriate measures to promote biodiversity and achieve the objective of halting biodiversity loss in Europe in the short term. Despite having redoubled efforts in favor of conservation, the processes of environmental degradation have been increasing.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability
AU  - Jesús María Garayo Urruela
Y1  - 2021/10/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 225
EP  - 233
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
AB  - Since the entry into force of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) on 9 June 1994, the Natura 2000 Network has become the tool conceived by the Community authorities to lead the implementation of the environmental commitments on European territory, to which they were bound in application of their accession to international conventions. Natura 2000 pursues the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by harmonizing the conservation of natural heritage with the support and promotion of traditional human activities. The Habitats Directive formulated the principles, objectives, management measures and procedures to preserve, maintain or, where appropriate, restore biological diversity, which each State was subsequently responsible for transferring to the jurisdiction. The standard does not impose any specific method to be used in the designation of the sites, the type of management to be developed or the measures to be implemented, but it does establish control mechanisms over their application. The designation of a Natura 2000 site provides an invaluable opportunity to stimulate the sustainable rural development of the area and to promote plans and activities compatible with the conservation of habitats and protected species. Dialogue and concertation are the mechanisms to be put into practice when it comes to resolving conflicts arising from the design of management models that articulate the recovery of the environmental heritage. The model by which the Natura 2000 Network has been implemented so far in Spain, and specifically in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, has been based on technocratic-formal processes. The inclusion of the area in the Natura 2000 network tends to be perceived by the inhabitants of the rural world as a bureaucratized process, disconnected from local plans and collective projects. The considerable delay in the designation of areas protected by the Natura 2000 network has contributed to the delay in adopting appropriate measures to promote biodiversity and achieve the objective of halting biodiversity loss in Europe in the short term. Despite having redoubled efforts in favor of conservation, the processes of environmental degradation have been increasing.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jesús María Garayo Urruela

Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, University of Deusto (Bilbao), Basque Country, Spain

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. (2021). Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sciences, 10(5), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(5), 225-233. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jesús María Garayo Urruela. Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability. Earth Sci. 2021;10(5):225-233. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14,
  author = {Jesús María Garayo Urruela},
  title = {Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {225-233},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211005.14},
  abstract = {Since the entry into force of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) on 9 June 1994, the Natura 2000 Network has become the tool conceived by the Community authorities to lead the implementation of the environmental commitments on European territory, to which they were bound in application of their accession to international conventions. Natura 2000 pursues the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by harmonizing the conservation of natural heritage with the support and promotion of traditional human activities. The Habitats Directive formulated the principles, objectives, management measures and procedures to preserve, maintain or, where appropriate, restore biological diversity, which each State was subsequently responsible for transferring to the jurisdiction. The standard does not impose any specific method to be used in the designation of the sites, the type of management to be developed or the measures to be implemented, but it does establish control mechanisms over their application. The designation of a Natura 2000 site provides an invaluable opportunity to stimulate the sustainable rural development of the area and to promote plans and activities compatible with the conservation of habitats and protected species. Dialogue and concertation are the mechanisms to be put into practice when it comes to resolving conflicts arising from the design of management models that articulate the recovery of the environmental heritage. The model by which the Natura 2000 Network has been implemented so far in Spain, and specifically in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, has been based on technocratic-formal processes. The inclusion of the area in the Natura 2000 network tends to be perceived by the inhabitants of the rural world as a bureaucratized process, disconnected from local plans and collective projects. The considerable delay in the designation of areas protected by the Natura 2000 network has contributed to the delay in adopting appropriate measures to promote biodiversity and achieve the objective of halting biodiversity loss in Europe in the short term. Despite having redoubled efforts in favor of conservation, the processes of environmental degradation have been increasing.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Natura 2000: The European Way Towards Sustainability
AU  - Jesús María Garayo Urruela
Y1  - 2021/10/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 225
EP  - 233
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.14
AB  - Since the entry into force of the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC) on 9 June 1994, the Natura 2000 Network has become the tool conceived by the Community authorities to lead the implementation of the environmental commitments on European territory, to which they were bound in application of their accession to international conventions. Natura 2000 pursues the conservation of biodiversity in Europe by harmonizing the conservation of natural heritage with the support and promotion of traditional human activities. The Habitats Directive formulated the principles, objectives, management measures and procedures to preserve, maintain or, where appropriate, restore biological diversity, which each State was subsequently responsible for transferring to the jurisdiction. The standard does not impose any specific method to be used in the designation of the sites, the type of management to be developed or the measures to be implemented, but it does establish control mechanisms over their application. The designation of a Natura 2000 site provides an invaluable opportunity to stimulate the sustainable rural development of the area and to promote plans and activities compatible with the conservation of habitats and protected species. Dialogue and concertation are the mechanisms to be put into practice when it comes to resolving conflicts arising from the design of management models that articulate the recovery of the environmental heritage. The model by which the Natura 2000 Network has been implemented so far in Spain, and specifically in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, has been based on technocratic-formal processes. The inclusion of the area in the Natura 2000 network tends to be perceived by the inhabitants of the rural world as a bureaucratized process, disconnected from local plans and collective projects. The considerable delay in the designation of areas protected by the Natura 2000 network has contributed to the delay in adopting appropriate measures to promote biodiversity and achieve the objective of halting biodiversity loss in Europe in the short term. Despite having redoubled efforts in favor of conservation, the processes of environmental degradation have been increasing.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download