Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County

Wang Zhang; Jiadi Peng; Yu’an Liu; Xiaonan Cheng

doi:doi:10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County

Wang Zhang, Jiadi Peng, Yu’an Liu, Xiaonan Cheng

Published in Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5)

Received: 24 September 2021 Accepted: 11 October 2021 Published: 21 October 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Suining County of Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, was used as a suitability evaluation system from two aspects of natural and human factors including 12 indicators. The analytic hierarchy process and multi-factor weighted evaluation model were adopted to carry out the evaluation of the suitability of the spatial expansion of villages and towns for county-level. On this basis, the propensity intensity of three types of land use for villages and towns, agriculture, and ecology was calculated. Then, the high, middle and low grades were classified by the natural break point method, and the land use conflict recognition matrix was listed. Finally, the results of land use conflict identification were obtained. The results showed that: Suining County has significant differences in the suitability of spatial expansion of villages and towns, and the spatial distribution characteristics of different levels were quite different. The areas of the most suitable area, more suitable area, basic suitable area, less suitable area and unsuitable area for spatial expansion of villages and towns were respectively 183.67 km², 699.04 km², 1072.281 km², 1006.79 km² and 576.47 km². The suitability of spatial expansion of each township was obviously different. The predominant land use areas of villages and towns were mainly distributed in Zhaishi Miao and Dong Township and Changpu Town in the south, and Shuikou Township and Jinwutang in the north Towns, etc. Dominant agricultural land areas were mainly distributed in the northeast of Tangjiafang, Huangtu Mine, Hongyan and other towns. The dominant ecological land area was relatively large, and the distribution was relatively scattered. The types of areas with obvious potential land use conflicts were the general conflict areas and intensified conflict areas, among which the general conflict areas were the largest, accounting for nearly half of the total area, and the intense conflict areas were the smallest. The areas of intense conflicts between villages and towns and agriculture, and the areas with intense conflicts between ecology and agriculture were all relatively small.

Published in	Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
Page(s)	214-224
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Mountain, Spatial Expansion of Villages and Towns, Suitability Evaluation, Land Use Conflict, Suining County

References

[1]	Miller W, Collins W M G, Steiner F R, et al. An approach for greenway suitability analysis [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 42 (2/4): 91-105.
[2]	Westman W E. Ecological Impact Assessment and Environmental Planning [M]. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1985.
[3]	Pham Duc Uy, Nobukazu Nakagoshi. Application of land suitability analysis and landscape ecology to urban green space planning in Hanoi, Vietnam [J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2008, 7 (1): 25-40.
[4]	Yang Z S, Wang H, Zhang B S. Study on constructive land suitability evaluation in China’s southwestern mountainous areas: A case in Mangshi, Yunnan province [C]. Research on Land Development & Rearrangement and Building Urban and Industrial Projects on Mountainland in China, 2014.
[5]	Xiao L, Li W, Feng C C, et al. Study on Land Rights and Interests Protection of Landless Farmers Based on the Stakeholder Theory [J]. Areal Research and Development, 2016, 35 (4): 131-136.
[6]	Han H Q, Yang G B, Gao H J, et al. Evaluation on Suitability of Construction Land in Karst Area of Renhuai City [J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2014, 39 (11): 76-79.
[7]	Tan X, Yang X Q, Huang D Q, et al. Suitability Evaluation of Construction Land in Shenyang Metropolitan Area [J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 2017, 53 (5): 559-566.
[8]	Cai C Y, Han N L, Mu X, et al. Suitability Assessment of Construction Lands in the New Area of Jiangdong, Haikou Based on GIS [J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2020, 15 (2): 88-94.
[9]	Yan H M. A Comparative Study on the Evaluation Methods of the Suitability of Land Resources Construction and Development——Taking Fujian Province as an Example [J]. Southern Land and Resources, 2019, (5): 41-44.
[10]	Jiang X L, Yang W. Suitability Evaluation of Urban Construction Land Exploitation Based on Production-Living-Ecology Space [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47 (16): 282-285.
[11]	Hong B T, Ren P. Ecological Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residential Land Based on the Least Cumulative Resistance Model: A Case Study of Dujiangyan City [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28 (6): 1386-1396.
[12]	Qin T T, Qi W, Li Y Q, et al. Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residential Land Based on Niche Theory in mountainous area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32 (16): 5175-5183.
[13]	Xu F, Wang Z Q, Zhang H W, et al. Application of Random Forest Algorithm in Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residential Area [J]. Resources Science, 2018, 40 (10): 2085-2098.
[14]	Tang S, Yu J, Chen Y H, et al. Suitability Evaluation of Rural Residential Land Under the background of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Cili County [J]. Journal of Hubei University (Natural Science), 2020, 42 (5): 531-538.
[15]	Brown G, Raymond C M. Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 122: 196-208.
[16]	Pavón D, Ventura M, Ribas A, et al. Land use change and socio-environmental conflict in the Alt Empordà County (Catalonia, Spain) [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2003, 54 (3): 543-552.
[17]	Iojă C I, Niţă M R, Vânău G O, et al. Using multi-criteria analysis for the identification of spatial land-use conflicts in the Bucharest Metropolitan Area [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2014, 42: 112-121.
[18]	Adam Y O, Pretzsch J, Darr D. Land use conflicts in central Sudan: Perception and local coping mechanisms [J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 1-6.
[19]	Delgado-Matas C, Mola-Yudego B, Gritten D, et al. Land use evolution and management under recurrent conflict conditions: Umbundu agroforestry system in the Angolan Highlands [J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 42: 460-470.
[20]	Tan S K. Research on Concept, Characters and Trigger Factors of Land Conflicts in China [J]. China Land Science, 2008, 22 (4): 4-11.
[21]	Ruan S T, Wu K N. Research of the Land Use Conflict and Mitigation Mechanism During the Urbanization in China [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2013, 23 (11): 388-392.
[22]	Zhou D, Xu J C, Wang L. Progress of Land Use Conflict Research in China During the Past Fifteen Years [J]. China Land Science, 2015, 29 (2): 21-29.
[23]	Yu Z L, Zhang W X, Liang J S, et al. Research Progress on Suitability Evaluation of Territorial Space Development and Construction [J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34 (9): 1107-1122.
[24]	Zeng M, Zhao Y L, Zhang X. Research on the Multi-purpose Suitability Evaluation Method of County Land from the Perspective of Urban: A Case of Jiahe County [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2014. 29 (1): 37-41.
[25]	Lu X L. Land Suitability Evaluation Based on GIS [J]. Beijing Surveying and Mapping, 2015, (6): 13-17.
[26]	Wang Y G, Yin X L, Li G C. Delimitation of Urban Growth Boundary Based on Land Ecological Suitability Evaluation: A Case of Shenshan Special Corporation Zone [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2012, 19 (11): 76-82.
[27]	CARR M H, ZWICK P. Using GIS suitability analysis to identify potential future land use conflicts in North Central Florida. Journal of Conservation Planning, 2005, 1 (1): 89-105.
[28]	Dai Y Q, Chen W Q, Gao H, et al. Research on the Identification of Rural Potential Land Use Conflicts Based on the Evaluation of Land Use Orientation: A Case Study of Dongping Village, Xixia County [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019, 28 (10): 2410-2418.
[29]	Zhao X N, Gong X, Tian F H, et al. Evaluation of Ecological Suitability of Urban Land in Yanlongtu Region [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2017, 32 (05): 778-787.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Zhang, Jiadi Peng, Yu’an Liu, Xiaonan Cheng. (2021). Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sciences, 10(5), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Zhang; Jiadi Peng; Yu’an Liu; Xiaonan Cheng. Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(5), 214-224. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Zhang, Jiadi Peng, Yu’an Liu, Xiaonan Cheng. Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sci. 2021;10(5):214-224. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13,
  author = {Wang Zhang and Jiadi Peng and Yu’an Liu and Xiaonan Cheng},
  title = {Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {214-224},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211005.13},
  abstract = {Suining County of Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, was used as a suitability evaluation system from two aspects of natural and human factors including 12 indicators. The analytic hierarchy process and multi-factor weighted evaluation model were adopted to carry out the evaluation of the suitability of the spatial expansion of villages and towns for county-level. On this basis, the propensity intensity of three types of land use for villages and towns, agriculture, and ecology was calculated. Then, the high, middle and low grades were classified by the natural break point method, and the land use conflict recognition matrix was listed. Finally, the results of land use conflict identification were obtained. The results showed that: Suining County has significant differences in the suitability of spatial expansion of villages and towns, and the spatial distribution characteristics of different levels were quite different. The areas of the most suitable area, more suitable area, basic suitable area, less suitable area and unsuitable area for spatial expansion of villages and towns were respectively 183.67 km2, 699.04 km2, 1072.281 km2, 1006.79 km2 and 576.47 km2. The suitability of spatial expansion of each township was obviously different. The predominant land use areas of villages and towns were mainly distributed in Zhaishi Miao and Dong Township and Changpu Town in the south, and Shuikou Township and Jinwutang in the north Towns, etc. Dominant agricultural land areas were mainly distributed in the northeast of Tangjiafang, Huangtu Mine, Hongyan and other towns. The dominant ecological land area was relatively large, and the distribution was relatively scattered. The types of areas with obvious potential land use conflicts were the general conflict areas and intensified conflict areas, among which the general conflict areas were the largest, accounting for nearly half of the total area, and the intense conflict areas were the smallest. The areas of intense conflicts between villages and towns and agriculture, and the areas with intense conflicts between ecology and agriculture were all relatively small.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County
AU  - Wang Zhang
AU  - Jiadi Peng
AU  - Yu’an Liu
AU  - Xiaonan Cheng
Y1  - 2021/10/21
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 214
EP  - 224
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
AB  - Suining County of Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, was used as a suitability evaluation system from two aspects of natural and human factors including 12 indicators. The analytic hierarchy process and multi-factor weighted evaluation model were adopted to carry out the evaluation of the suitability of the spatial expansion of villages and towns for county-level. On this basis, the propensity intensity of three types of land use for villages and towns, agriculture, and ecology was calculated. Then, the high, middle and low grades were classified by the natural break point method, and the land use conflict recognition matrix was listed. Finally, the results of land use conflict identification were obtained. The results showed that: Suining County has significant differences in the suitability of spatial expansion of villages and towns, and the spatial distribution characteristics of different levels were quite different. The areas of the most suitable area, more suitable area, basic suitable area, less suitable area and unsuitable area for spatial expansion of villages and towns were respectively 183.67 km2, 699.04 km2, 1072.281 km2, 1006.79 km2 and 576.47 km2. The suitability of spatial expansion of each township was obviously different. The predominant land use areas of villages and towns were mainly distributed in Zhaishi Miao and Dong Township and Changpu Town in the south, and Shuikou Township and Jinwutang in the north Towns, etc. Dominant agricultural land areas were mainly distributed in the northeast of Tangjiafang, Huangtu Mine, Hongyan and other towns. The dominant ecological land area was relatively large, and the distribution was relatively scattered. The types of areas with obvious potential land use conflicts were the general conflict areas and intensified conflict areas, among which the general conflict areas were the largest, accounting for nearly half of the total area, and the intense conflict areas were the smallest. The areas of intense conflicts between villages and towns and agriculture, and the areas with intense conflicts between ecology and agriculture were all relatively small.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Wang Zhang

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China
Jiadi Peng

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China
Yu’an Liu

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China
Xiaonan Cheng

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Wang Zhang, Jiadi Peng, Yu’an Liu, Xiaonan Cheng. (2021). Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sciences, 10(5), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Wang Zhang; Jiadi Peng; Yu’an Liu; Xiaonan Cheng. Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(5), 214-224. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Wang Zhang, Jiadi Peng, Yu’an Liu, Xiaonan Cheng. Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County. Earth Sci. 2021;10(5):214-224. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13,
  author = {Wang Zhang and Jiadi Peng and Yu’an Liu and Xiaonan Cheng},
  title = {Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {5},
  pages = {214-224},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211005.13},
  abstract = {Suining County of Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, was used as a suitability evaluation system from two aspects of natural and human factors including 12 indicators. The analytic hierarchy process and multi-factor weighted evaluation model were adopted to carry out the evaluation of the suitability of the spatial expansion of villages and towns for county-level. On this basis, the propensity intensity of three types of land use for villages and towns, agriculture, and ecology was calculated. Then, the high, middle and low grades were classified by the natural break point method, and the land use conflict recognition matrix was listed. Finally, the results of land use conflict identification were obtained. The results showed that: Suining County has significant differences in the suitability of spatial expansion of villages and towns, and the spatial distribution characteristics of different levels were quite different. The areas of the most suitable area, more suitable area, basic suitable area, less suitable area and unsuitable area for spatial expansion of villages and towns were respectively 183.67 km2, 699.04 km2, 1072.281 km2, 1006.79 km2 and 576.47 km2. The suitability of spatial expansion of each township was obviously different. The predominant land use areas of villages and towns were mainly distributed in Zhaishi Miao and Dong Township and Changpu Town in the south, and Shuikou Township and Jinwutang in the north Towns, etc. Dominant agricultural land areas were mainly distributed in the northeast of Tangjiafang, Huangtu Mine, Hongyan and other towns. The dominant ecological land area was relatively large, and the distribution was relatively scattered. The types of areas with obvious potential land use conflicts were the general conflict areas and intensified conflict areas, among which the general conflict areas were the largest, accounting for nearly half of the total area, and the intense conflict areas were the smallest. The areas of intense conflicts between villages and towns and agriculture, and the areas with intense conflicts between ecology and agriculture were all relatively small.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Suitability Evaluation for Spatial Expansion and Identification of Land Use Conflicts in Mountainous Country Villages and Towns: Take for Example Suining County
AU  - Wang Zhang
AU  - Jiadi Peng
AU  - Yu’an Liu
AU  - Xiaonan Cheng
Y1  - 2021/10/21
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 214
EP  - 224
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211005.13
AB  - Suining County of Shaoyang City, Hunan Province, was used as a suitability evaluation system from two aspects of natural and human factors including 12 indicators. The analytic hierarchy process and multi-factor weighted evaluation model were adopted to carry out the evaluation of the suitability of the spatial expansion of villages and towns for county-level. On this basis, the propensity intensity of three types of land use for villages and towns, agriculture, and ecology was calculated. Then, the high, middle and low grades were classified by the natural break point method, and the land use conflict recognition matrix was listed. Finally, the results of land use conflict identification were obtained. The results showed that: Suining County has significant differences in the suitability of spatial expansion of villages and towns, and the spatial distribution characteristics of different levels were quite different. The areas of the most suitable area, more suitable area, basic suitable area, less suitable area and unsuitable area for spatial expansion of villages and towns were respectively 183.67 km2, 699.04 km2, 1072.281 km2, 1006.79 km2 and 576.47 km2. The suitability of spatial expansion of each township was obviously different. The predominant land use areas of villages and towns were mainly distributed in Zhaishi Miao and Dong Township and Changpu Town in the south, and Shuikou Township and Jinwutang in the north Towns, etc. Dominant agricultural land areas were mainly distributed in the northeast of Tangjiafang, Huangtu Mine, Hongyan and other towns. The dominant ecological land area was relatively large, and the distribution was relatively scattered. The types of areas with obvious potential land use conflicts were the general conflict areas and intensified conflict areas, among which the general conflict areas were the largest, accounting for nearly half of the total area, and the intense conflict areas were the smallest. The areas of intense conflicts between villages and towns and agriculture, and the areas with intense conflicts between ecology and agriculture were all relatively small.
VL  - 10
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download