This paper investigates the research performance of all 29 private universities of Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was conducted by extracting data from 29 universities from the SCOPUS database. A total of 17 universities have indexed their research publications in SCOPUS. The Affiliation search technique was applied to extract the data of all the Private Universities one by one. Data were downloaded in the format as per the requirement of visualization software used for this study. The data were analyzed using bibliometric tools like R, VOSViewer, and MS Excel separately for each university and later data of all universities tabloid in different sheets as per the research questions. There are a total of 12 private universities in Uttar Pradesh India which have no publications indexed in SCOPUS. Among all the Private Universities, Jaypee University has maximum research output and a leading university in the state and received 1st rank. Similarly, Sharda University published 2nd highest publications among the universities of Uttar Pradesh. During the designing of methodology and analysis, there were implications that every university had no research or publications indexed in the SCOPUS database. Even though it was a bulk study and covering maximum private universities of Uttar Pradesh which assembled a huge amount of data for study, managing and arranging the data was difficult. The publications and research results of private universities are taken for the study and data analyzed without any manipulation of fake data. This study can be useful for further study to illustrate the constraints, challenges, and opportunities of the private universities of Uttar Pradesh and policy may be framed to enhance the research activities in the premises of the institutions. It may be helpful to the university authorities to make a policy by evaluating their planning of research and development.
Published in | American Journal of Information Science and Technology (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11 |
Page(s) | 42-51 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Private University, Bibliometrics, Uttar Pradesh, Research Performance, Analytical Study, India
[1] | Ajikeruke, I., Burell, Q. & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative Coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017100 |
[2] | Aksnes, D. W., & Taxt, R. E. (2004). Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university. Research Evaluation, 13 (1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154404781776563 |
[3] | Carpenter, M. P., Gibb, F., Harris, M., Irvine, J., Martin, B. R., & Narin, F. (1988). BIBLIOMETRIC PROFILES FOR BRITISH ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS: AN EXPERIMENT TO DEVELOP RESEARCH OUTPUT INDICATORS Introduction: background to the study. In Scientometrics (Vol. 14). https://akjournals.com/view/journals/11192/14/3-4/article-p213.xml |
[4] | Gautam, V. K., & Mishra, R. (2015). Scholarly research trend of Banaras Hindu University during 2004-2013: A scientometric study based on Indian citation index. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 35 (2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.2.8021 |
[5] | Gumpenberger, C., Wieland, M., & Gorraiz, J. (2012). Bibliometric practices and activities at the University of Vienna. Library Management, 33 (3), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211217199 |
[6] | Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52 (2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342 |
[7] | Huang, M.-H. (2011). A Comparison of Three Major Academic Rankings for World Universities: From a Research Evaluation Perspective. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9 (1), 1–25. |
[8] | KADEMANI, B., KUMAR, V., KUMAR, A., SAGAR, A., MOHAN, L., SURWASE, G., & GADERAO, C. (2005). Publication productivity of the bio-organic division at bhabha atomic research centre : A scientometric study. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 52 (4), 135–146. |
[9] | Kumar, S., Nigam, K., & Malik, R. (2015). Social Science Research Output in State Universities of India: A Study of Kumaun University. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 52 (4), 287. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2015/v52i4/74840 |
[10] | Lawani, S. (1986). Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research. Scientometrics, 9 (1-2), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02016604 |
[11] | Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Research Funding and Research Output: A Bibliometric Contribution to the US Federal Research Roadmap. 1–16. http://users.fmg.uva.nl/lleydesdorff/roadmap/roadmap.pdf%5Cnfile://d/Technology/R&D SET country growth/Rsrh fundg_Rsrch output_blbliomtrc_US RD roadmap.pdf |
[12] | Mukherjee, B. (2017). Research in Indian CSIR Laboratories: A Bibliometric Study. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 54 (4), 165. https://doi.org/10.17821/srels/2017/v54i4/118103 |
[13] | Mukundan, R., & Narayanan, N. (2019). Research performance of Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 21 (1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/PMM-06-2019-0022 |
[14] | Okpe, I. J., Simisaye, A. O., & Otuza, C. E. (2013). Research Output and Pattern of Publication among Faculty in Nigerian Private Universities : Babcock University Experience. 3 (9), 64–72. |
[15] | Pandita, R., Singh, S., & Gaur, R. C. (2014). Research output of some selected Indian Medical Research Institutions (2007-2011). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2014 (1). |
[16] | Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Research Collaboration in Saudi Arabia 1980-2014: Bibliometric Patterns and National Policy to Foster Research Quantity and Quality. Libri, 66 (1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2015-0095 |
[17] | Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science. 6 (1), 33-38. https://worldpece.org/content/subramanyam-k-1983-“bibliometric-studies-research-collaboration-review”-journal-information |
[18] | Tripathi, M., & Kumar, S. (2016). A Quantitative Analysis of Research Output of Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India A Quantitative Analysis of Research Output of. March. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2015.1051908 |
[19] | Van Raan, A. (1999). ADVANCED BIBLIOMETRIC METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITIES. In Budapest Scientometrics (Vol. 45, Issue 3). |
APA Style
Naved Ahmad, Gulam Jilani. (2022). An Analytical Study of Research Performance of Private Universities of Uttar Pradesh, India: A Bibliometric Study. American Journal of Information Science and Technology, 6(3), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11
ACS Style
Naved Ahmad; Gulam Jilani. An Analytical Study of Research Performance of Private Universities of Uttar Pradesh, India: A Bibliometric Study. Am. J. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2022, 6(3), 42-51. doi: 10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11, author = {Naved Ahmad and Gulam Jilani}, title = {An Analytical Study of Research Performance of Private Universities of Uttar Pradesh, India: A Bibliometric Study}, journal = {American Journal of Information Science and Technology}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {42-51}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajist.20220603.11}, abstract = {This paper investigates the research performance of all 29 private universities of Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was conducted by extracting data from 29 universities from the SCOPUS database. A total of 17 universities have indexed their research publications in SCOPUS. The Affiliation search technique was applied to extract the data of all the Private Universities one by one. Data were downloaded in the format as per the requirement of visualization software used for this study. The data were analyzed using bibliometric tools like R, VOSViewer, and MS Excel separately for each university and later data of all universities tabloid in different sheets as per the research questions. There are a total of 12 private universities in Uttar Pradesh India which have no publications indexed in SCOPUS. Among all the Private Universities, Jaypee University has maximum research output and a leading university in the state and received 1st rank. Similarly, Sharda University published 2nd highest publications among the universities of Uttar Pradesh. During the designing of methodology and analysis, there were implications that every university had no research or publications indexed in the SCOPUS database. Even though it was a bulk study and covering maximum private universities of Uttar Pradesh which assembled a huge amount of data for study, managing and arranging the data was difficult. The publications and research results of private universities are taken for the study and data analyzed without any manipulation of fake data. This study can be useful for further study to illustrate the constraints, challenges, and opportunities of the private universities of Uttar Pradesh and policy may be framed to enhance the research activities in the premises of the institutions. It may be helpful to the university authorities to make a policy by evaluating their planning of research and development.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Analytical Study of Research Performance of Private Universities of Uttar Pradesh, India: A Bibliometric Study AU - Naved Ahmad AU - Gulam Jilani Y1 - 2022/07/28 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11 T2 - American Journal of Information Science and Technology JF - American Journal of Information Science and Technology JO - American Journal of Information Science and Technology SP - 42 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-0588 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajist.20220603.11 AB - This paper investigates the research performance of all 29 private universities of Uttar Pradesh, India. The study was conducted by extracting data from 29 universities from the SCOPUS database. A total of 17 universities have indexed their research publications in SCOPUS. The Affiliation search technique was applied to extract the data of all the Private Universities one by one. Data were downloaded in the format as per the requirement of visualization software used for this study. The data were analyzed using bibliometric tools like R, VOSViewer, and MS Excel separately for each university and later data of all universities tabloid in different sheets as per the research questions. There are a total of 12 private universities in Uttar Pradesh India which have no publications indexed in SCOPUS. Among all the Private Universities, Jaypee University has maximum research output and a leading university in the state and received 1st rank. Similarly, Sharda University published 2nd highest publications among the universities of Uttar Pradesh. During the designing of methodology and analysis, there were implications that every university had no research or publications indexed in the SCOPUS database. Even though it was a bulk study and covering maximum private universities of Uttar Pradesh which assembled a huge amount of data for study, managing and arranging the data was difficult. The publications and research results of private universities are taken for the study and data analyzed without any manipulation of fake data. This study can be useful for further study to illustrate the constraints, challenges, and opportunities of the private universities of Uttar Pradesh and policy may be framed to enhance the research activities in the premises of the institutions. It may be helpful to the university authorities to make a policy by evaluating their planning of research and development. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -