Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa

Kachilei Levy; Timothy Sulo; Vincent Ngeno

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa

Kachilei Levy, Timothy Sulo, Vincent Ngeno

Published in American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 6, Issue 6)

Received: 20 August 2021 Accepted: 2 September 2021 Published: 27 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper analyses factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technology. That is: improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques in East Africa. The endogenous switching regression (ESR) framework was modeled where the farmer's choice of alternative technologies was estimated using a multinomial logit selection (MNLS) model accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. There were four major joint multiple technologies that were adopted by households in East Africa for the production of the crop that are; improved beans variety, grafted fruit trees, biofortified maize variety, and use of garden vegetables techniques. The results show that the only factor that affects the probability of adoption of the four joint multiple agricultural technology combinations apart from education level was the regional diffusion of technology in comparison to base category. A household located in the East Africa region increases the chances of adopting the four joint technology innovation by TC1 (21%), TC2 (31%), TC3 (30%), and TC4 (23%). The factors that were found to be positive and significantly influenced the adoption of a combination of three joint technologies were the education level of the household head, the general participation in community meetings, and barazas and diseases that cause problems. Given region there may be a variety of economic and political factors with different relevant agronomic characteristics that might be specific in adopting technologies. The results from the study generally conclude that theirs a potential subsistence-oriented factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies through the link of the household’s own production and, therefore recommended that more households be encouraged and influenced to embrace this factors.

Published in	American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management (Volume 6, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
Page(s)	95-104
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Household Adoption, Improved Beans Variety, Soil Carbon Management, Integrated Pest Control, Compost Manure, and East Africa

References

[1]	Alcacer, J., Chung, W., Hawk, A., Pacheco-de-Almeida, G. (2013). Applying random coefficient models to strategy research: testing for firm heterogeneity, predicting firm-specific coefficients, and estimating Strategy Trade-Offs. Working Paper, No. 14-022. Harvard Business School Unit.
[2]	Alderman H. 1987. Cooperative dairy development in Karnataka, India: An assessment. Research Report 64. IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute), Washington, DC, USA. 60 pp.
[3]	Alston JM, Marra MC, Pardey PG, Wyatt TJ. Research returns redux: a meta-analysis of the returns to agricultural R&D. Environment and Production Technology Division Discussion Paper No. 38. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 1998.
[4]	Beran, R., Millar, P. W. (1994). Minimum distance estimation in random coefficient regression models. The Annals of Statistics 22 (4): 1976-1992.
[5]	Binswanger H. P. and von Braun J. 1991. Technological change and commercialisation in agriculture. The World Bank Research Observer 6 (1): 57–80.
[6]	Chelliah, N. (1998). A new covariance estimator in random coefficient regression model. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 60 (3): 433-436.
[7]	Cheng, J., Yue, R. X., Liu, X. (2013). Optimal Designs for Random Coefficient Regression Models with Heteroscedastic Errors. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 42 (15): 2798-2809.
[8]	Conniffe, D. (1982a). A note on seemingly unrelated regressions. Econometrica 50 (1): 229-233.
[9]	Conniffe, D. (1985). Estimating regression equations with common explanatory variables but unequal numbers of observations. Journal of Econometrics 27: 179-196.
[10]	Cooley, T. F., Prescott, E. C. (1973). Systematic (non-random) variation models: varying parameter regression: a theory and some applications. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 2 (4): 463-473.
[11]	Dwivedi, T. D., Srivastava, V. K. (1978). Optimality of least squares in the seemingly unrelated regression equation model. Journal of Econometrics 7: 391-395.
[12]	Ehlers, T. (2010). Silent looms: Women and production in a Guatemalan town. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
[13]	Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: springer.
[14]	Forster, M. (2001). “The meaning of death: Some numerical simulations of a model of healthy and unhealthy consumption”. Journal of Health Economics, 20 (4): 613638.
[15]	Ganster, D. C., and Schaubroeck, J. (2017). “Work stress and employee health”. Journal of Management, 17 (2): 235- 271.
[16]	Hendrickson, C. (1995). Weaving identities: Construction of dress and self in highland Guatemala, TX.
[17]	Kadiyala, S., Harris, J., Headey, D., Yosef, S., & Gillespie, S. (2014). Agriculture and nutrition in India: mapping evidence to pathways. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1331.
[18]	Kassie, J. R. "Multivariate Error Components Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Regression Models by Maximum Likelihood." J. Econometrics.
[19]	Khoury, C. K., Bjorkman, A. D., Dempewolf, H., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Guarino, L., Jarvis, A., et al. (2014). Increasing homogeneity in global good supplies and the implications for food security.
[20]	Kluve, J., Schneider, H., Uhlendorff, A., and Zhao, Z. 2012. Evaluating Continuous Training.
[21]	Kimenta, J. and Gilbert, R. F. (2010). Small sample properties of alternative estimators of seemingly unrelated regressions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 63 (324): 1180-1200.
[22]	Malapit, H. J. L., & Quisumbing, A. R. (2014). What dimensions of women’s empowerment in agriculture matter for nutrition-related practices and outcomes in Ghana? IFPRI discussion paper. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
[23]	Masset, E., Haddad, L., Cornelius, A., & Isaza-Castro, J. (2012). Effectiveness of agricultural interventions that aim to improve nutritional status of children: BMJ, 344, d8222.
[24]	Mundlak, S., J. H. Rah., J. D. Sugimoto., F. F. Roos., K. Kraemer., and R. E. Black. 2013.
[25]	Nayga, R. M., Jr. (1996). “Determinants of consumers' use of nutritional information on food packages”. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 28 (2): 303-312.
[26]	Olwande, J., M. Smale, M. K. Mathenge, F. Place, and D. Mithöfer. 2015. Agricultural.
[27]	Omore, A. & Baker, D. (2011). Integrating in formal actors into the formal dairy industry in Kenya through training and certification. In International Livestock Research Institute, Towards priority actions for market development for African farmers.
[28]	Popkin, B. M., and L. S. Adair. 2012. Global Nutrition Transition and the Pandemic Preoccupation with Staple Grains. Food Security 7 (3): 583–591. Production and Dietary Diversity Link.
[29]	Remans, R., F. A. J. DeClerck., G. Kennedy, and J. Fanzo. 2015. Expanding the View.
[30]	Rose, D., J. P. Habicht, and B. Devaney. "Household Participation in the Food Stamp and WIC Programs Increases the Nutrient Intakes of Preschool Children." J. Nutr. 128 (March 1997): 548-5.
[31]	Sadoulet E. and Janvry A. 1995. Quantitative development policy analysis. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, USA.
[32]	Stanek, E. J., III and Koch, G. G. (1985). The equivalence of parameter estimates from growth curve models and seemingly unrelated regression models. The American Statistician 39 (2): 149-152.
[33]	Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 175 (2): 587-617.
[34]	Von Braun, J., K. Johm, and D. Puetz. 1994. "Nutritional effects of commercialization of a women's crop: Irrigated rice in the Gambia." Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. 343-364.
[35]	Walker T, Ryan J. Village and household economies in India’s semi-arid tropics. Baltimore, Md, USA: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991.
[36]	World Bank. World Bank. (2018). The Hesitant Recovery and Prospects for Sustained Growth, Trade and Pricing Policies in World Agriculture. New York: Oxford University Press. World Bank. 2004. Saving Fish and Fishers. Report No 29090-GLB.
[37]	Wooldrige, A. (2010). Estimators for seemingly unrelated regression equations: some exact finite sample results. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58 (304): 977-992
[38]	You, W., and Nayga, R. M., Jr. (2005). “Household fast expenditures and children's television viewing: Can they really significantly influence children's dietary quality?” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 30 (2): 302- 314.
[39]	Zellner, A. (1962). An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 57 (298): 348-368.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kachilei Levy, Timothy Sulo, Vincent Ngeno. (2021). Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 6(6), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kachilei Levy; Timothy Sulo; Vincent Ngeno. Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2021, 6(6), 95-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kachilei Levy, Timothy Sulo, Vincent Ngeno. Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2021;6(6):95-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12,
  author = {Kachilei Levy and Timothy Sulo and Vincent Ngeno},
  title = {Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa},
  journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {95-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  abstract = {This paper analyses factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technology. That is: improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques in East Africa. The endogenous switching regression (ESR) framework was modeled where the farmer's choice of alternative technologies was estimated using a multinomial logit selection (MNLS) model accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. There were four major joint multiple technologies that were adopted by households in East Africa for the production of the crop that are; improved beans variety, grafted fruit trees, biofortified maize variety, and use of garden vegetables techniques. The results show that the only factor that affects the probability of adoption of the four joint multiple agricultural technology combinations apart from education level was the regional diffusion of technology in comparison to base category. A household located in the East Africa region increases the chances of adopting the four joint technology innovation by TC1 (21%), TC2 (31%), TC3 (30%), and TC4 (23%). The factors that were found to be positive and significantly influenced the adoption of a combination of three joint technologies were the education level of the household head, the general participation in community meetings, and barazas and diseases that cause problems. Given region there may be a variety of economic and political factors with different relevant agronomic characteristics that might be specific in adopting technologies. The results from the study generally conclude that theirs a potential subsistence-oriented factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies through the link of the household’s own production and, therefore recommended that more households be encouraged and influenced to embrace this factors.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa
AU  - Kachilei Levy
AU  - Timothy Sulo
AU  - Vincent Ngeno
Y1  - 2021/11/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
T2  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
JF  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
JO  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
SP  - 95
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1441
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
AB  - This paper analyses factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technology. That is: improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques in East Africa. The endogenous switching regression (ESR) framework was modeled where the farmer's choice of alternative technologies was estimated using a multinomial logit selection (MNLS) model accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. There were four major joint multiple technologies that were adopted by households in East Africa for the production of the crop that are; improved beans variety, grafted fruit trees, biofortified maize variety, and use of garden vegetables techniques. The results show that the only factor that affects the probability of adoption of the four joint multiple agricultural technology combinations apart from education level was the regional diffusion of technology in comparison to base category. A household located in the East Africa region increases the chances of adopting the four joint technology innovation by TC1 (21%), TC2 (31%), TC3 (30%), and TC4 (23%). The factors that were found to be positive and significantly influenced the adoption of a combination of three joint technologies were the education level of the household head, the general participation in community meetings, and barazas and diseases that cause problems. Given region there may be a variety of economic and political factors with different relevant agronomic characteristics that might be specific in adopting technologies. The results from the study generally conclude that theirs a potential subsistence-oriented factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies through the link of the household’s own production and, therefore recommended that more households be encouraged and influenced to embrace this factors.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Kachilei Levy

Department of Economics, Alupe University College, Alupe, Kenya
Timothy Sulo

Department of Agricultural Economics & Resource Management, Moi University, Mombasa, Kenya
Vincent Ngeno

Department of Agricultural Economics & Resource Management, Moi University, Mombasa, Kenya

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Kachilei Levy, Timothy Sulo, Vincent Ngeno. (2021). Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 6(6), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Kachilei Levy; Timothy Sulo; Vincent Ngeno. Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. Am. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2021, 6(6), 95-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Kachilei Levy, Timothy Sulo, Vincent Ngeno. Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa. Am J Eng Technol Manag. 2021;6(6):95-104. doi: 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12,
  author = {Kachilei Levy and Timothy Sulo and Vincent Ngeno},
  title = {Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa},
  journal = {American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {6},
  pages = {95-104},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajetm.20210606.12},
  abstract = {This paper analyses factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technology. That is: improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques in East Africa. The endogenous switching regression (ESR) framework was modeled where the farmer's choice of alternative technologies was estimated using a multinomial logit selection (MNLS) model accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. There were four major joint multiple technologies that were adopted by households in East Africa for the production of the crop that are; improved beans variety, grafted fruit trees, biofortified maize variety, and use of garden vegetables techniques. The results show that the only factor that affects the probability of adoption of the four joint multiple agricultural technology combinations apart from education level was the regional diffusion of technology in comparison to base category. A household located in the East Africa region increases the chances of adopting the four joint technology innovation by TC1 (21%), TC2 (31%), TC3 (30%), and TC4 (23%). The factors that were found to be positive and significantly influenced the adoption of a combination of three joint technologies were the education level of the household head, the general participation in community meetings, and barazas and diseases that cause problems. Given region there may be a variety of economic and political factors with different relevant agronomic characteristics that might be specific in adopting technologies. The results from the study generally conclude that theirs a potential subsistence-oriented factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies through the link of the household’s own production and, therefore recommended that more households be encouraged and influenced to embrace this factors.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing the Household Adoption of Multiple Agricultural Technologies in East Africa
AU  - Kachilei Levy
AU  - Timothy Sulo
AU  - Vincent Ngeno
Y1  - 2021/11/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
T2  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
JF  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
JO  - American Journal of Engineering and Technology Management
SP  - 95
EP  - 104
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1441
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajetm.20210606.12
AB  - This paper analyses factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technology. That is: improved beans variety, biofortified maize variety, grafted fruit trees, and garden vegetable techniques in East Africa. The endogenous switching regression (ESR) framework was modeled where the farmer's choice of alternative technologies was estimated using a multinomial logit selection (MNLS) model accounting for unobserved heterogeneity. There were four major joint multiple technologies that were adopted by households in East Africa for the production of the crop that are; improved beans variety, grafted fruit trees, biofortified maize variety, and use of garden vegetables techniques. The results show that the only factor that affects the probability of adoption of the four joint multiple agricultural technology combinations apart from education level was the regional diffusion of technology in comparison to base category. A household located in the East Africa region increases the chances of adopting the four joint technology innovation by TC1 (21%), TC2 (31%), TC3 (30%), and TC4 (23%). The factors that were found to be positive and significantly influenced the adoption of a combination of three joint technologies were the education level of the household head, the general participation in community meetings, and barazas and diseases that cause problems. Given region there may be a variety of economic and political factors with different relevant agronomic characteristics that might be specific in adopting technologies. The results from the study generally conclude that theirs a potential subsistence-oriented factors that influence the adoption of multiple agricultural technologies through the link of the household’s own production and, therefore recommended that more households be encouraged and influenced to embrace this factors.
VL  - 6
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download