All existing basic regulator design methods are summarized in this paper and compared concerning their usability and formal algebraic formulations. First the regulators based on state-feedback is discussed. These regulators mostly use pole placement, sometimes with full pole cancellation. The other versions are based on characteristic polynomial design, which is a feedback regulator design method. Another class of the regulators are based on the Youla-parameterization, which is sometimes called Q-parameterization. Then it is shortly summarized how a Youla regulator is computed. Finally it is systematically proved that the best usable method is the Youla-parameterization based regulator design introduced by the authors.
| Published in | American Journal of Computer Science and Technology (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14 |
| Page(s) | 83-89 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Regulator, Design, Performance, Parameterization
| [1] | Åström, K. J. and B. Wittenmark (1984). Computer Controlled Systems. Prentice-Hall, p. 430. |
| [2] | Goodwin, G. C., Graebe S. F. and Salgado M. E. (2001). Control System Design. Prentice-Hall, p. 908. |
| [3] | Horowitz, I. M. (1963). Synthesis of Feedback Systems, Academic Press, New York. |
| [4] | Keviczky, L. (1995). Combined identification and control: another way. (Invited plenary paper.) 5th IFAC Symp. on Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, ACASP'95, 13-30, Budapest, Hungary. |
| [5] | Keviczky, L. and Cs. Bányász (1999). Optimality of two-degree of freedom controllers in H2- and H∞-norm space, their robustness and minimal sensitivity. 14th IFAC World Congress, F, 331-336, Beijing, PRC. |
| [6] | Keviczky, L. and Cs. Bányász (2015). Two-Degree-of-Freedom Control Systems (The Youla Parameterization Approach), Elsevier, Academic Press, p. 512. |
| [7] | Keviczky, L., R. Bars, J. Hetthéssy and Cs. Bányász (2018). Control Engineering. Springer. |
| [8] | Keviczky, L., R. Bars, J. Hetthéssy and Cs. Bányász (2018). Control Engineering: MATLAB Exercises, Springer. |
| [9] | Maciejowski, J. M. (1989). Multivariable Feedback Design, Addison Wesley, p. 424. |
| [10] | Youla, D. C., Bongiorno, J. J. and C. N. Lu (1974). Single-loop feedback stabilization of linear multivariable dynamical plants, Automatica, Vol. 10, 2, pp. 159-173. |
| [11] | Youla, D. C. and J. J. Bongiorno, Jr. (1985). A feedback theory of two-degree-of-freedom optimal Wiener-Hopf design," IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, vol. AC-30, No. 7, pp. 652-665. |
APA Style
László Keviczky, Csilla Bányász. (2021). On the Comparison and Evaluation of Some Basic Regulator Design Methods. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 4(3), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14
ACS Style
László Keviczky; Csilla Bányász. On the Comparison and Evaluation of Some Basic Regulator Design Methods. Am. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2021, 4(3), 83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14
AMA Style
László Keviczky, Csilla Bányász. On the Comparison and Evaluation of Some Basic Regulator Design Methods. Am J Comput Sci Technol. 2021;4(3):83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14,
author = {László Keviczky and Csilla Bányász},
title = {On the Comparison and Evaluation of Some Basic Regulator Design Methods},
journal = {American Journal of Computer Science and Technology},
volume = {4},
number = {3},
pages = {83-89},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcst.20210403.14},
abstract = {All existing basic regulator design methods are summarized in this paper and compared concerning their usability and formal algebraic formulations. First the regulators based on state-feedback is discussed. These regulators mostly use pole placement, sometimes with full pole cancellation. The other versions are based on characteristic polynomial design, which is a feedback regulator design method. Another class of the regulators are based on the Youla-parameterization, which is sometimes called Q-parameterization. Then it is shortly summarized how a Youla regulator is computed. Finally it is systematically proved that the best usable method is the Youla-parameterization based regulator design introduced by the authors.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - On the Comparison and Evaluation of Some Basic Regulator Design Methods AU - László Keviczky AU - Csilla Bányász Y1 - 2021/09/14 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14 T2 - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JF - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology JO - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology SP - 83 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-012X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20210403.14 AB - All existing basic regulator design methods are summarized in this paper and compared concerning their usability and formal algebraic formulations. First the regulators based on state-feedback is discussed. These regulators mostly use pole placement, sometimes with full pole cancellation. The other versions are based on characteristic polynomial design, which is a feedback regulator design method. Another class of the regulators are based on the Youla-parameterization, which is sometimes called Q-parameterization. Then it is shortly summarized how a Youla regulator is computed. Finally it is systematically proved that the best usable method is the Youla-parameterization based regulator design introduced by the authors. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -