The present study was carried out to estimate the apparent nutrient digestibility of soybean meal and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. Prior to being fed with test diets, the fish were acclimatized on reference diet for about one week. Test diet-1 (soybean meal) and test diet-2 (sunflower meal) was prepared by mixing reference diet and test feed ingredients (soybean meal and sunflower meal) in a 70:30 ratio. Representative samples of feed and feces of fish were analyzed for the dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash and gross energy following AOAC (1990) to determine the apparent digestibility of soybean and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. The outcomes showed that the apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of dry matter was highest (64.50%±3.5) for reference diet followed by soybean meal (34.5%±2.50) and sunflower meal (23.5%±1.50). In case of crude protein, ADC was highest for sunflower meal (77%±3.0) followed by soybean meal (63.5%±2.50) and reference diet (37.5%±0.50) while the apparent crude fat digestibility coefficient was highest for soybean meal (71.50%±3.50) followed by sunflower meal (70.50%±0.50) and reference diet (61.00%±3.0). Percentage value of apparent digestibility for crude fiber was maximum for test diet 2 (31.50%±3.50) followed by test diet 1 (11.50%±0.50) and reference diet (9.50%±0.50). In case of ash, ADC was highest for reference diet (46.50%±2.5) followed by test diet 2 (27.50%±2.5) and test diet 1 (15.50%±1.5). Values for gross energy were (43%±2.0), (42.5%±0.5) and (26.5%±7.5) for test diet 2, test diet 1 and reference diet, respectively. These findings can be sum up as soybean meal and sunflower meal proved as a promising fish feed ingredient being more efficiently utilized and digested in Labeo rohita, thus fish meal can be efficiently replaced with plant ingredients in rohu diets.
Published in | American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12 |
Page(s) | 8-11 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Labeo Rohita, Soybean Meal, Sunflower Meal, ADC (Apparent Digestibility Coefficient)
[1] | J. F. Mokolensang, S. Yamasaki, and Y. Onoue, "Utilization of shochu distillery by-products for culturing the common carp Cyprinus carpio". Int. J. Bio. Sci., vol, 3: 2003, pp. 502–507. |
[2] | B.A. Sheikh and S.A. Sheikh, "Aquaculture and integrated farming system". J. Agri., Agril. Engg. Vet. Sci, vol, 20: 2004, pp. 52–58. |
[3] | M. Abid, and M. Salim, "Efficacy of varying dietary protein levels on growth, feed conversion and body composition of Cirrhinus mrigala fingerlings" Pak. J. Lif. Soc. Sci., vol. 2: 2004, pp. 91–94. |
[4] | P. Siddhuraju, and K. Becker, "Preliminary nutritional evaluation of mucuna seed meal in common carp ;( Cyprinus carpio L.): An assessment by growth performance and feed utilization". Aquaculture, vol. 196: 2001, pp. 105–123. |
[5] | R.W. Hardy, "New developments in aquatic feed ingredients and potential of enzyme supplements". In: Advances en Nutricion Acuicola V. Memorias del V Simposium Internacional de Nutricion Acuicola, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico, 19-22 November (Ed. By L.E. Cruz-Suarez, D. Ricque-Marie, M. Tapia-Salazar, M.A. Olvera-Novoa and R. Civera-cerece-do). 2000, pp. 216–226 |
[6] | D. M. Gatlin, F. T. Barrows, P. Brown, K. Dabrowski, T. G. Gaylord, R. W. Hardy, E. Herman, G. S. Hu, A. krogdahl, R. Nelson, K. Overturf, M. Rust, W. Sealey, D. Skonberg, E. J. Souza, D. Stone, R. Wilson, and E. Wurtele, "Expanding the utilization of sustainable plant products in aquafeeds": a review. Aquacult. Res., vol. 38: 2007, pp. 551–579. |
[7] | R.T. Lovell, "Nutrition and Feeding of Fish", 1989, p. 260. Van Nostrant- Reinhold, New York, USA |
[8] | U. Noreen, and M. Salim, "Determination of nutrient digestibility and amino acid availability of various feed ingredients for Labeo rohita". Int. J. Agri Bio., vol. 10: 2008, pp. 551–555. |
[9] | S. Divakaran, G.O. Leonard, and P.F. Ian, "Note on the methods for determination of chromic oxide in shrimp feeds". J. Agri. Food Chem., vol. 50: 2002, pp. 464–467 |
[10] | L. A. Maynard, and J.K. Loosli, "Apparent digestibility measurement in feedstuffs for rainbow trout". In: Halver, J.E., K. Tiews (Eds.), Fish Nutr. Fish Feed Technology, vol. 2: 1969, pp. 239–47. |
[11] | G.L. Allan, P. Scott, B.A. Mark, S.J.A. David, R.J. Stuart, F. Jane, and S.W. Rebecca, "Replacement of fish meal in diets for Australian silver perch Bidyanus bidyanus": In. Digestibility of alternative ingredients. Aquaculture., vol. 186: 2000, 293–310. |
[12] | W.E. Hajen, R.M.Beams, D.A.Higgs, and B.S. Dosanjh, "Digestibility of various feedstuffs by post-juvenile Chinook salmon (oncorhnchus ishawytscha) in sea water". Aquaculture, vol. 112: 1993, pp. 333–348. |
[13] | A. Laining, A.T. Rachmansyah, and W. Kevin, "Apparent digestibility of selected feed ingredients for humpback grouper, Cromileptes altivelis". Aquacult, vol. 218: 2003, pp. 529–538 |
[14] | S.D. Sugiura, F.M. Dong, C.K. Rathbone, and R.W., Hardy, "Apparent protein digestibility and mineral availabilities in various feed ingredients for salmonid feeds". Aquaculture, vol. 159: 1998, pp. 177–202 |
[15] | T. Shipton, "The protein requirement for the south African abalone, Haliotis midae, Ph.D Dissertation, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa, 2000, p. 146 |
[16] | T. G. Gaylord, S.D. Rawles, and D.M. GATLIN, "Amino acid availability from animal, blended, and plant feedstuffs for hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops × M. saxatilis). Aquacult. Nutr., vol. 10: 2004, pp. 345–352. |
[17] | J. Sales, and P. J. BRITZ, "Apparent and true availability of amino acids from common feed ingredients from south African abalone (Haliotis midae L.)" Aquacult. Nutr., vol. 9: 2003, pp. 55–64. |
[18] | B. Rubbani, M. Afzal, M.S. Mubarik, M. Salim, and S.M., Hussain, "Estimation of apparent digestibility coefficients of soybean meal based diets with different protein levels for Labeo rohita". Pak. J. Agri. Sci., vol. 48: 2011, pp. 231–235 |
[19] | I. Lupatsch, G. Wm. Kissel, "Predicting aquaculture waste from gilthead seabream(Sparus aurata) culture using a nutritional approach". Aquat. Living Resour. Vol. 11: 1998, pp. 265–268. |
[20] | A. Sintayehu, E. Mathies, K.H. Meyer-Burgdorff, H. Rosenow, and K.D. Guenther, "Apparent digestibilities and growth experiments with tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fed soybean meal, Cottonseed meal and sunflower seed meal". J. Applied Ichth., vol. 12: 1996, pp. 125–130. |
[21] | M. Jindal, S.K., Garg, N.K. Yadava, and R.K., Gupta, "Effect of replacement of fishmeal with processed soybean on growth performance and nutrient retention in Channa punctatus (Bloch.) fingerlings". Livestock Res. Rural Develop, vol. 19: 2007, p. 165. |
APA Style
Farkhanda Asad, Tooba Rehman, Noureen Aziz Qureshi, Nimra Tahir. (2013). Estimation of Apparent Digestibility Coefficient of Plant Feed Ingredients (Soybean and Sunflower Meal) for Labeo Rohita. American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences, 1(1), 8-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12
ACS Style
Farkhanda Asad; Tooba Rehman; Noureen Aziz Qureshi; Nimra Tahir. Estimation of Apparent Digestibility Coefficient of Plant Feed Ingredients (Soybean and Sunflower Meal) for Labeo Rohita. Am. J. Biomed. Life Sci. 2013, 1(1), 8-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12
AMA Style
Farkhanda Asad, Tooba Rehman, Noureen Aziz Qureshi, Nimra Tahir. Estimation of Apparent Digestibility Coefficient of Plant Feed Ingredients (Soybean and Sunflower Meal) for Labeo Rohita. Am J Biomed Life Sci. 2013;1(1):8-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12, author = {Farkhanda Asad and Tooba Rehman and Noureen Aziz Qureshi and Nimra Tahir}, title = {Estimation of Apparent Digestibility Coefficient of Plant Feed Ingredients (Soybean and Sunflower Meal) for Labeo Rohita}, journal = {American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {8-11}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbls.20130101.12}, abstract = {The present study was carried out to estimate the apparent nutrient digestibility of soybean meal and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. Prior to being fed with test diets, the fish were acclimatized on reference diet for about one week. Test diet-1 (soybean meal) and test diet-2 (sunflower meal) was prepared by mixing reference diet and test feed ingredients (soybean meal and sunflower meal) in a 70:30 ratio. Representative samples of feed and feces of fish were analyzed for the dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash and gross energy following AOAC (1990) to determine the apparent digestibility of soybean and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. The outcomes showed that the apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of dry matter was highest (64.50%±3.5) for reference diet followed by soybean meal (34.5%±2.50) and sunflower meal (23.5%±1.50). In case of crude protein, ADC was highest for sunflower meal (77%±3.0) followed by soybean meal (63.5%±2.50) and reference diet (37.5%±0.50) while the apparent crude fat digestibility coefficient was highest for soybean meal (71.50%±3.50) followed by sunflower meal (70.50%±0.50) and reference diet (61.00%±3.0). Percentage value of apparent digestibility for crude fiber was maximum for test diet 2 (31.50%±3.50) followed by test diet 1 (11.50%±0.50) and reference diet (9.50%±0.50). In case of ash, ADC was highest for reference diet (46.50%±2.5) followed by test diet 2 (27.50%±2.5) and test diet 1 (15.50%±1.5). Values for gross energy were (43%±2.0), (42.5%±0.5) and (26.5%±7.5) for test diet 2, test diet 1 and reference diet, respectively. These findings can be sum up as soybean meal and sunflower meal proved as a promising fish feed ingredient being more efficiently utilized and digested in Labeo rohita, thus fish meal can be efficiently replaced with plant ingredients in rohu diets.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Estimation of Apparent Digestibility Coefficient of Plant Feed Ingredients (Soybean and Sunflower Meal) for Labeo Rohita AU - Farkhanda Asad AU - Tooba Rehman AU - Noureen Aziz Qureshi AU - Nimra Tahir Y1 - 2013/06/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12 T2 - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JF - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences JO - American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences SP - 8 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-880X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbls.20130101.12 AB - The present study was carried out to estimate the apparent nutrient digestibility of soybean meal and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. Prior to being fed with test diets, the fish were acclimatized on reference diet for about one week. Test diet-1 (soybean meal) and test diet-2 (sunflower meal) was prepared by mixing reference diet and test feed ingredients (soybean meal and sunflower meal) in a 70:30 ratio. Representative samples of feed and feces of fish were analyzed for the dry matter, crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash and gross energy following AOAC (1990) to determine the apparent digestibility of soybean and sunflower meal for Labeo rohita. The outcomes showed that the apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC) of dry matter was highest (64.50%±3.5) for reference diet followed by soybean meal (34.5%±2.50) and sunflower meal (23.5%±1.50). In case of crude protein, ADC was highest for sunflower meal (77%±3.0) followed by soybean meal (63.5%±2.50) and reference diet (37.5%±0.50) while the apparent crude fat digestibility coefficient was highest for soybean meal (71.50%±3.50) followed by sunflower meal (70.50%±0.50) and reference diet (61.00%±3.0). Percentage value of apparent digestibility for crude fiber was maximum for test diet 2 (31.50%±3.50) followed by test diet 1 (11.50%±0.50) and reference diet (9.50%±0.50). In case of ash, ADC was highest for reference diet (46.50%±2.5) followed by test diet 2 (27.50%±2.5) and test diet 1 (15.50%±1.5). Values for gross energy were (43%±2.0), (42.5%±0.5) and (26.5%±7.5) for test diet 2, test diet 1 and reference diet, respectively. These findings can be sum up as soybean meal and sunflower meal proved as a promising fish feed ingredient being more efficiently utilized and digested in Labeo rohita, thus fish meal can be efficiently replaced with plant ingredients in rohu diets. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -