Sulphur is an essential Key macronutrient among others for plant growth, quality and crop production for many cereals. It has great role for the primary structure of proteins and functioning of enzymes, by being a constituent of the amino acids cysteine (Cys) and methionine (Met). It also important for sugar production, carbon dioxide assimilation and fixation of other nutrients in plant function. There for Sulphur fertilizer should be apply adequate amount for different crop specie. The rate of Sulphur fertilizer may vary from crop to crop and depending on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer. The N: S ratio is determined the application rate of Sulphur. This review of the literature focuses on the function, importance and management of Sulphur (S) for wheat production. These information sources are selected to assist advisers and growers to improve their understanding of S to provide the basis for improved decision making for managing S nutrition. The selected research and extension literature focuses at the basic universal principles of S nutrition provided by cornerstone journal articles and texts. Literature may be in the form of conference papers, fact sheets, and technical reports. Based on this reviewed sulphur fertilizer application is recommended for wheat production the rate of 15-20 kg/ha for nitosol and vertisol area while on saline-sodic soil 50 kg/ha is recommended.
| Published in | Advances in Applied Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17 |
| Page(s) | 79-83 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bread Wheat, Quality, Rate of Sulphur
| [1] | Abdulkadir, B., S. Kassa, T. Desalegn, K. Tadesse, and M. Haileselassie. 2016. Soil fertility management studies on wheat in Ethiopia: A review. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources 16: 1–2. |
| [2] | Ali A, Iqbal Z, Hassan SW, Yasin M, Khaliq T, Ahmad S. Effect of nitrogen and sulphur on phenology, growth and yield parameters of maize crop. Sci. Int. 2013 Jun 1; 25 (2): 363-6. |
| [3] | Ali, R., M. J. Khan and R. A. Khattak. 2008. Response e o f rice to different sources of Sulfur (S) at various levels and its residual effect on wheat in rice-wheat cropping system. Soil and Environ. Sci. 27 (1): 131-137. |
| [4] | Anjum, N. A.; Gill, S. S.; Umar, S.; Ahmad, I.; Duarte, A. C.; Pereira, E. Improving Growth and Productivity of Oleiferous Brassicas Under Changing Environment: Significance of Nitrogen and Sulphur Nutrition, and Underlying Mechanisms. Sci. World J. Vol. 2012. Available online: http: www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj (accessed on 3 March 2020). [CrossRef] [PubMed]. |
| [5] | Assefa S, Haile W, Tena W. Effects of phosphorus and sulfur on yield and nutrient uptake of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) on Vertisols, North Central, Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2021 Mar 1; 7 (3): e06614. |
| [6] | Babalola, O. O.; Glick, B. R. The Use of Microbial Inoculants in African Agriculture: Current Practice and Future Prospects. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 540–549. |
| [7] | Barczak b. Sulfur as a nutrient determining the yield and quality of selected crop species. Habilitation thesis 144. Wyd. UTP Bydgoszcz, 2010. |
| [8] | Bavec M. Relationships among yield, it's quality and yield components, in winter wheat (Tritirum aestivum L.) cultivars affected by seeding rates. Bodenkultur. 2002; 53: 143-51. |
| [9] | Bouyoucos J. 1962. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soil. Agronomy Journals. Vol 54: 464- 465. |
| [10] | Chapman D. 1965. Cation-exchange capacity. In: C. A. Black (ed.) Methods of soil analysis–Chemical and microbiological properties. Agronomy 9: 891-901. |
| [11] | CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre) (1988) From agronomic data to farmer recommendation: an economics training manual completely revised edition. CIMMYT, Mexico. |
| [12] | Clarkson dt, saker lr, purves jv. Depression of nitrate and ammonium transport in barley plants with diminished sulphate status. Evidence of co-regulation of nitrogen and sulphate intake. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1989 Sep 1; 40 (9): 953-63. |
| [13] | Clarkson, D. T.; Hanson, J. B. The mineral nutrition of higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1980, 31, 239–298. [CrossRef]. |
| [14] | Clarkson, D. T.; Saker, L. R.; Purves, J. V. Depression of nitrate and ammonium influx in barley plants with diminished sulphate-status. Evidence for co-regulation in nitrogen and sulphate intake. J. Exp. Bot. 1989, 40, 953–963. [CrossRef]. |
| [15] | Cottenie, A. 1980. Soil and plant testing as a basis of fertilizer recommendations. FAO soil bulletin 38/2, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. |
| [16] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency. 2021. Agricultural Sample Survey 2020/2021 (2013 E. C Agricultural Sample Survey. Volume I: Report on area and production of major crops private peasant holdings, Meher season). Statistical Bulletin 143, Addis Ababa. |
| [17] | Edis, R.; Norton, R. Sulphur Nutrition and Fluid Fertilisers. 2012 Victorian Liquid Fertiliser Forum. 2012; p. 4. Available online: http://www.ipni.net/ (accessed on 12 February 2020). |
| [18] | Etesami, H.; Emami, S.; Alikhani, H. A. Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): Mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2017, 17, 897–911. [CrossRef]. |
| [19] | Fismel, S.; Vong, P. C.; Guckert, A.; Frossard, E. ‘Influence of sulfur on apparent N-uses efficiency, yield and quality of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) grown on a calcareous soil. Eur. J. Agron. 2000, 12, 127–141. [CrossRef]. |
| [20] | Fotyma E. Effect of sulfur on N utilization of mineral fertilizers by field crops. Nawozy Nawoż.-Fert. Fertil. 2003; 4 (17): 117. |
| [21] | Fageria NK. Nitrogen harvest index and its association with crop yields. Journal of plant nutrition. 2014 May 12; 37 (6): 795-810. |
| [22] | Gupta, V. K., S. Kumar, and A. K. Singh. 2004 Yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by sulfur nutrition and weed management. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 74 (5): 254-256. |
| [23] | Habtegebrial K, Singh BR. Response of wheat cultivars to nitrogen and sulfur for crop yield, nitrogen use efficiency, and protein quality in the semiarid region. Journal of plant nutrition. 2009 Sep 17; 32 (10): 1768-87. |
| [24] | Hejazirad, P.; Gholami, A.; Pirdashty, H.; Abbasiyan, A. Evaluation of Thiobacillus bacteria and mycorrhizal symbiosis on yield and yield components of garlic (Allium sativum) at different levels of sulphur. Agroecology 2017, 9, 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9803-0 |
| [25] | Ibrahim M, Ullah H, Ahmad B, Malik Mf. Effect of incremental dose of phosphorous and sulphur upon yield and protein content of wheat. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 2012; 5 (3): 76-81. |
| [26] | Jamal A, Moon YS, Zainul Abdin M. Sulphur-a general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2010 Jan 1; 4 (7): 523-9. |
| [27] | Jamal, A.; Moon, Y.; Abdin, M. Z. Sulphur—A general overview and interaction with nitrogen. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2010, 4, 523–529. [CrossRef]. |
| [28] | Järvan M, Edesi L, Adamson A, Lukme L, Akk A. The effect of sulphur fertilization on yield, quality of protein and baking properties of winter wheat. Agronomy research. 2008; 6 (2): 459-69. |
| [29] | Johansson, E., and G. Svensson. 1999. Influence of yearly weather variation and fertilizer rate on bread-making quality in Swedish grown wheats containing HWM glutenin subunits cultivated during the period 1990-96. J. Agri. Sci. 132: 13-22. |
| [30] | Klikocka H, Cybulska M, Nowak A. Efficiency of Fertilization and Utilization of Nitrogen and Sulphur by Spring Wheat. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies. 2017 Sep 1; 26 (5). |
| [31] | London, J. R. 1991. Booker Tropical soil manual; a hand book for soil survey and Agricultural land evaluation in the tropic and subtopic. Longman scientific and technical, Essax, New York P. 474. |
| [32] | Ma, W.; Penrose, D. M.; Glick, B. R. Strategies used by rhizobia to lower plant ethylene levels and increase nodulation. Can. J. Microbiol. 2002, 48, 947–954. [CrossRef]. |
| [33] | artin RJ. Uptake and distribution of nitrogen and sulphur in two Otane wheat crops. InProceedings Agronomy Society of New Zealand 1997 (Vol. 27, pp. 19-26). |
| [34] | Menna A. Assessment of sulfur deficiency in soils through plant analysis in three representative areas of the central highlands of Ethiopia-IV. J. Agric. Ecol. Res. Int. 2017; 12: 1- 3. |
| [35] | Menna A. Sulphur status of soils and wheat plants in three representative areas of the central highlands of Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, sokoine univesity of agriculture. Morogoro, tanzania). |
| [36] | Menna, A. 2016. Sulphur status of soils and wheat plants in three representative areas of the central highlands of Ethiopia, 162. Morogoro, Tanzania: University of agriculture. |
| [37] | Minot, N., J. Warner, S. Lemma, L. Kassa, A. Gashaw, and S. Rashid. 2015. The Wheat Supply Chain in Ethiopia: Patterns, trends, and policy options. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). |
| [38] | Pereyra, M. A.; Creus, C. M. Modifying the rhizosphere of agricultural crops to improve yield and sustainability: Azospirillum as a model rhizotroph. In Rhizotrophs: Plant Growth Promotion to Bioremediation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 15–37. |
| [39] | Pourbabaee, A. A.; Koohbori Dinekaboodi, S.; Seyed Hosseini, H. M.; Alikhani, H. A.; Emami, S. Potential application of selected sulphur-oxidizing bacteria and different sources of sulphur in plant growth promotion under different moisture conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Analy. 2020, 51, 735–745. [CrossRef]. |
| [40] | Q. S. Sun, J. Huang, X. J. Wu, H. D. Jiang, Q. Zhou, Effect of different acidities of acid rain on nitrogen and sulfur metabolism and grain protein levels in wheat after anthesis, Acta Ecol. Sin. 36 (2016) 190–199 (in Chinese with English abstract). |
| [41] | Rashid S, Tefera N, Minot N, Ayele G. Fertilizer in Ethiopia: An assessment of policies, value chain, and profitability. 2013. |
| [42] | Reinbold J, Rychlik M, Asam S, Wieser H, Koehler P. 2008. Concentrations of total glutathione and cysteine in wheat flour as affected by sulphur deficiency and correlation to quality parameters. J Agr Food Chem. 56: 6844–6850. |
| [43] | Reussi N, Echeverría H, Rozas HS. Diagnosing sulfur deficiency in spring red wheat: plant analysis. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2011 Feb 2; 34 (4): 573-89. |
| [44] | Saha, B.; Saha, S.; Roy, P. D.; Padhan, D.; Pati, S.; Hazra, G. C. Microbial transformation of sulphur: An approach to combat the sulphur deficiencies in agricultural soils. In Role of Rhizospheric Microbes in Soil; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 77–97. |
| [45] | Salvagiotti, F.; Miralles, D. J. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28, 282–290. [CrossRef]. |
| [46] | Shah S, Hussain M, Jalal A, Khan MS, Shah T, Ilyas M, Uzair M. Nitrogen and sulfur rates and timing effects on phenology, biomass yield and economics of wheat. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2018 Sep 1; 34 (3): 671-9. |
| [47] | Shahen Shah, Manzoor Hussain, Arshad Jalal, Mohammad Sayyar Khan, Tariq Shah, Muhammad Ilyas and Muhammad Uzair, Nitrogen and Sulfur Rates and Timing Effects on Phenology, Biomass Yield and Economics of Wheat. |
| [48] | Wani, S. A.; Chand, S.; Wani, M. A.; Ramzan, M.; Hakeem, K. R. Azotobacter chroococcum—A potential biofertilizer in agriculture: An overview. In Soil Science: Agricultural and Environmental Prospectives; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 333–348. |
| [49] | Wieser H, Gutser R, von Tucher S. 2004. Influence of sulphur fertilization on quantities and proportions of gluten protein types in wheat flour. J Cereal Sci. 40: 239–244. |
| [50] | Withers, P. J. A., A. R. J. Tytherleigh, and F. M. Odonnell. 1995. Effect of sulfur fertilizers on the grain yield and sulfur content of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science 225 (3): 317–324. |
| [51] | Xie Yx, Zhang H, Zhu Yj, Li Zh, Yang Jh, Cha Fn, Cao Li, Wang Cy, Guo Tc. Grain yield and water use of winter wheat as affected by water and sulfur supply in the North China Plain. Journal of integrative agriculture. 2017 Mar 1; 16 (3): 614-25. |
| [52] | Zhao FJ, Hawkesford MJ, McGrath SP. 1999a. Sulphur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. J Cereal Sci. 30: 1–17. |
| [53] | Zhiqiang Tao, Xuhong Chang, Demei Wang, Yanjie Wang, Shaokang Ma, Yushuang Yang, Guangcai Zhao, Effects of sulfur fertilization and short-term high temperature on wheat grain production and wheat flour proteins, the crop journal 6 (2018) 43-425. |
| [54] | Van der Pol, F. 1992. Soil mining: an unseen contributor to farm income in southern Mali. Bulletin 325. Royal Tropical Institute, Amsterdam, 47 pp. |
APA Style
Almaz Admasu Terefie. (2022). Role of Sulphur for Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Production. Advances in Applied Sciences, 7(3), 79-83. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17
ACS Style
Almaz Admasu Terefie. Role of Sulphur for Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Production. Adv. Appl. Sci. 2022, 7(3), 79-83. doi: 10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17,
author = {Almaz Admasu Terefie},
title = {Role of Sulphur for Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Production},
journal = {Advances in Applied Sciences},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {79-83},
doi = {10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aas.20220703.17},
abstract = {Sulphur is an essential Key macronutrient among others for plant growth, quality and crop production for many cereals. It has great role for the primary structure of proteins and functioning of enzymes, by being a constituent of the amino acids cysteine (Cys) and methionine (Met). It also important for sugar production, carbon dioxide assimilation and fixation of other nutrients in plant function. There for Sulphur fertilizer should be apply adequate amount for different crop specie. The rate of Sulphur fertilizer may vary from crop to crop and depending on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer. The N: S ratio is determined the application rate of Sulphur. This review of the literature focuses on the function, importance and management of Sulphur (S) for wheat production. These information sources are selected to assist advisers and growers to improve their understanding of S to provide the basis for improved decision making for managing S nutrition. The selected research and extension literature focuses at the basic universal principles of S nutrition provided by cornerstone journal articles and texts. Literature may be in the form of conference papers, fact sheets, and technical reports. Based on this reviewed sulphur fertilizer application is recommended for wheat production the rate of 15-20 kg/ha for nitosol and vertisol area while on saline-sodic soil 50 kg/ha is recommended.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Role of Sulphur for Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Production AU - Almaz Admasu Terefie Y1 - 2022/08/17 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17 DO - 10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17 T2 - Advances in Applied Sciences JF - Advances in Applied Sciences JO - Advances in Applied Sciences SP - 79 EP - 83 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1514 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aas.20220703.17 AB - Sulphur is an essential Key macronutrient among others for plant growth, quality and crop production for many cereals. It has great role for the primary structure of proteins and functioning of enzymes, by being a constituent of the amino acids cysteine (Cys) and methionine (Met). It also important for sugar production, carbon dioxide assimilation and fixation of other nutrients in plant function. There for Sulphur fertilizer should be apply adequate amount for different crop specie. The rate of Sulphur fertilizer may vary from crop to crop and depending on the amount of nitrogen fertilizer. The N: S ratio is determined the application rate of Sulphur. This review of the literature focuses on the function, importance and management of Sulphur (S) for wheat production. These information sources are selected to assist advisers and growers to improve their understanding of S to provide the basis for improved decision making for managing S nutrition. The selected research and extension literature focuses at the basic universal principles of S nutrition provided by cornerstone journal articles and texts. Literature may be in the form of conference papers, fact sheets, and technical reports. Based on this reviewed sulphur fertilizer application is recommended for wheat production the rate of 15-20 kg/ha for nitosol and vertisol area while on saline-sodic soil 50 kg/ha is recommended. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: