Living Labs model concentrate its effort to support actors, providing a neutral space in which stakeholders could know and co-develop innovations in real-world contexts and proposes five basic principles for the operations of the aforementioned living labs: courage, openness, realism, influence and sustainability. The objective of this paper is to propose and test a Living Lab and project management model from the actual stakeholders, following the perspective of the Stakeholder Theory and the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). This perspective places the Research - Action model on the basis of the SSM model as an appropriate vehicle for the openness towards worldviews, problems and conflicts solving by the organizations, especially when it involves the formulation of possible cultural changes (structural, process, attitudinal) and "actions for improvement" are established. Therefore, we present the case of the Development Center for Scientific Research which brings together a multidisciplinary group of researchers and the project "Participatory approach with ethnic focus for Community Development of the Maskoy Diez Leguas ethnicity in the Central Chaco of Paraguay".
Published in | Social Sciences (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12 |
Page(s) | 74-79 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Open Innovation, Technology Transfer, Education, Indigenous Communities, Vector Borne Diseases, Living Labs
[1] | Macías-Chapula C. Diseño de un modelo conceptual sobre la transferencia de resultados de investigación en salud pública en Honduras. (Spanish). Salud Pública De México [serial online]. December 2012;54(6):624-631. Available from: MedicLatina, Ipswich, MA. Accessed August 27, 2013. |
[2] | Ståhlbröst, A. A set of key principles to assess the impact of Living Labs. Inter-national Journal Of Product Development, 17(1/2), 60-75, 2012. |
[3] | Katzy, B. R., Baltes, G. H., & Gard, J. Concurrent process coordination of new product development by Living Labs - an exploratory case study. International Journal Of Product De-velopment, 17(1/2), 23-42, 2012. |
[4] | Guzman, J., del Carpió, A., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Velasco de Diego, M. Living Labs for User-Driven Innovation. Research Technology Management,56(3), 29-39. doi:10.5437/08956308X5603087, 2013. |
[5] | Galaso, JA. Metodología de innovación con ciudadanos por el CitiLab de Cornellà. Revista CTS, nº 23, vol. 8, 249-258, 2013. |
[6] | Proenza F, Bastidas, R y Montero, G. Telecentros para el desarrollo socioeconómico y rural en América Latina y el Caribe. Oportunidades de inversión y recomendaciones de diseño con especial referencia a Centroamérica. Disponible en http://www.iadb.org/regions/telecentros/index.htm., 2011. |
[7] | Rutherford, J. Ventanas al mundo de la ciencia: preparación y oportunidad. Revista CTS, nº 1 vol. 1 (pág. 197-208), Septiembre de 2003 |
[8] | Stichweh, R. History of Scientific disciplines 2001, en "International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier, 2001, pags 13727‐ 13731 |
[9] | Stichweh, R. Multiple Publics of science: Inclusion and Popularization, 2003 |
[10] | Pérez C., M. de M. Aproximación a un estudio sobre vulnerabilidad y violencia familiar, Boletín Mexicano de derecho comparado, no. 113, México, pp., 845 – 867, 2005. |
[11] | Organización de las Naciones Unidas, (2010). Departamento de Información Pública. DPI/2551/A, 0964061. Recuperado el 26 de agosto de 2013: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/SOWIP_fact_sheets_ES.pdf. |
[12] | Checkland P. Autobiographical retrospectives: Learning your way to 'action to improve' - the development of soft systems thinking and soft systems methodology. International Journal Of General Systems [serial online]. July 2011;40(5):487-512. Available from: Academic Search Premier, Ipswich, MA. Accessed August 27, 2013. |
[13] | Rojas de Arias A. Ecosistema y Salud. El impacto de las alteraciones ambientales en las enfermedades transmitidas por vectores. En: Biodiversidad del Paraguay. Una aproximación a sus realidades. D. Salas Dueñas & JF Facetti Edts. 1ra ed. Fundación Moisés Bertoni, USAID/GEF/BM. 57-76 pp., 2007. |
[14] | Rojas de Arias A. Control y Vigilancia de Chagas con la participación comunitaria de etnias indígenas: Una perspectiva de la situación. XIIa. Reunión Intergubernamental INCOSUR/Chagas, 120'124 Santiago, Chile, 2003. |
[15] | Rolón M., Vega MC, Román F, Gómez A, Rojas de Arias A. First report of colonies of sylvatic T. infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) in the Paraguayan Chaco, using a trained dog. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5(5): e1026. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001026., 2011. |
APA Style
Antonieta Rojas De Arias, Sergio Duarte Masi, Diego Dorigo, Francisco Arias Rojas, María Celeste Vega, et al. (2014). Living Labs, Spaces for Open Innovation and Technology Transfer. An Alternative to the Solution of Social Problems in Paraguay. Social Sciences, 3(3), 74-79. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12
ACS Style
Antonieta Rojas De Arias; Sergio Duarte Masi; Diego Dorigo; Francisco Arias Rojas; María Celeste Vega, et al. Living Labs, Spaces for Open Innovation and Technology Transfer. An Alternative to the Solution of Social Problems in Paraguay. Soc. Sci. 2014, 3(3), 74-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12
AMA Style
Antonieta Rojas De Arias, Sergio Duarte Masi, Diego Dorigo, Francisco Arias Rojas, María Celeste Vega, et al. Living Labs, Spaces for Open Innovation and Technology Transfer. An Alternative to the Solution of Social Problems in Paraguay. Soc Sci. 2014;3(3):74-79. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12
@article{10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12, author = {Antonieta Rojas De Arias and Sergio Duarte Masi and Diego Dorigo and Francisco Arias Rojas and María Celeste Vega and Miriam Rolon}, title = {Living Labs, Spaces for Open Innovation and Technology Transfer. An Alternative to the Solution of Social Problems in Paraguay}, journal = {Social Sciences}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {74-79}, doi = {10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ss.20140303.12}, abstract = {Living Labs model concentrate its effort to support actors, providing a neutral space in which stakeholders could know and co-develop innovations in real-world contexts and proposes five basic principles for the operations of the aforementioned living labs: courage, openness, realism, influence and sustainability. The objective of this paper is to propose and test a Living Lab and project management model from the actual stakeholders, following the perspective of the Stakeholder Theory and the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). This perspective places the Research - Action model on the basis of the SSM model as an appropriate vehicle for the openness towards worldviews, problems and conflicts solving by the organizations, especially when it involves the formulation of possible cultural changes (structural, process, attitudinal) and "actions for improvement" are established. Therefore, we present the case of the Development Center for Scientific Research which brings together a multidisciplinary group of researchers and the project "Participatory approach with ethnic focus for Community Development of the Maskoy Diez Leguas ethnicity in the Central Chaco of Paraguay".}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Living Labs, Spaces for Open Innovation and Technology Transfer. An Alternative to the Solution of Social Problems in Paraguay AU - Antonieta Rojas De Arias AU - Sergio Duarte Masi AU - Diego Dorigo AU - Francisco Arias Rojas AU - María Celeste Vega AU - Miriam Rolon Y1 - 2014/05/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12 T2 - Social Sciences JF - Social Sciences JO - Social Sciences SP - 74 EP - 79 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2326-988X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ss.20140303.12 AB - Living Labs model concentrate its effort to support actors, providing a neutral space in which stakeholders could know and co-develop innovations in real-world contexts and proposes five basic principles for the operations of the aforementioned living labs: courage, openness, realism, influence and sustainability. The objective of this paper is to propose and test a Living Lab and project management model from the actual stakeholders, following the perspective of the Stakeholder Theory and the Soft Systems Methodology (SSM). This perspective places the Research - Action model on the basis of the SSM model as an appropriate vehicle for the openness towards worldviews, problems and conflicts solving by the organizations, especially when it involves the formulation of possible cultural changes (structural, process, attitudinal) and "actions for improvement" are established. Therefore, we present the case of the Development Center for Scientific Research which brings together a multidisciplinary group of researchers and the project "Participatory approach with ethnic focus for Community Development of the Maskoy Diez Leguas ethnicity in the Central Chaco of Paraguay". VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -