Rainfall data is vital for agricultural planning, water resource management, and climate research in areas like Oromia, Ethiopia, where agriculture supports a large part of the population. However, ground-based observations are often limited and inconsistent. This study assesses how well satellite-derived rainfall estimates match ground observations in Oromia. In the analysis of the ENACT, CHIRPS, and TAMSAT satellite products against ground-based rainfall data, all three exhibited a consistent value sequence but did not accurately reflect the observed declining rainfall trend from 1470 mm to 30 mm. While they showed correlation in pattern, each product indicated an increasing trend that contradicted ground measurements, suggesting issues in remote precipitation sensing due to varied algorithms and data sources. CHIRPS demonstrated a perfect Probability of Detection (POD) and the correlation value (CORR, 0.717), making it preferable despite a higher Mean Absolute Error (MAE, 55.678) compared to ENACT (48.195), which had a smaller Root Mean Square Error (RMSE, 88.753). ENACT (CORR, 0.736) displayed the strongest correlation with ground truth observations in Oromia, proving its reliability for temporal and geographical rainfall patterns, highlighting the need for ongoing validation against ground truth for improved precipitation estimates crucial for hydrological and agricultural purposes. These results imply that satellite products can be reliable alternatives in areas like Oromia, where data is limited, although regional differences in topography and rainfall patterns affect accuracy.
| Published in | Science Futures (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15 |
| Page(s) | 59-66 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Satellite, Rainfall, Performance, JJAS, Oromia
| [1] | M. Teferi, “Geography of Ethiopia and the Horn,” 2019. |
| [2] | M. Tadesse and A. Asefa, “Comparative analysis of wheat yield and water productivity under irrigation and rain-fed conditions across various regions of Ethiopia: a review,” Adv. Biosci. Bioeng., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 6-16, 2025. |
| [3] | V. Levizzani, R. Amorati, and F. Meneguzzo, “A review of satellite-based rainfall estimation methods,” Eur. Comm. Proj. Music Rep., vol. 66, 2002. |
| [4] | C. Change, “Agriculture and food security,” State Food Agric. FAO FAO Rome, Italy, 2016, |
| [5] | T. Regasa, “DETERMINANTS OF SMALL-SCALE IRRIGATION PARTICIPATION AND ITS IMPACT ON HOUSEHOLD FOOD SECURITY: THE CASE OF GOBA DISTRICT, BALE ZONE, OROMIA, ETHIOPIA,” 2023. |
| [6] | H. Messer and O. Sendik, “A new approach to precipitation monitoring: A critical survey of existing technologies and challenges,” IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 110-122, 2015, |
| [7] | D. A. Hughes, “Comparison of satellite rainfall data with observations from gauging station networks,” J. Hydrol., vol. 327, no. 3-4, pp. 399-410, 2006, |
| [8] | J. Sheffield et al., “Satellite remote sensing for water resources management: Potential for supporting sustainable development in data‐poor regions,” Water Resour. Res., vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 9724-9758, 2018, |
| [9] | C. Funk et al., “The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes,” Sci. data, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-21, 2015, |
| [10] | Z. Shen et al., “Recent global performance of the Climate Hazards group Infrared Precipitation (CHIRP) with Stations (CHIRPS),” J. Hydrol., vol. 591, p. 125284, 2020. |
| [11] | M. Asfaw, “GIS BASED SURFACE IRRIGATION POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT IN JIDO RIVER CATCHMENT CENTRAL RIFT VALLEY, ETHIOPIA.” Haramaya University, 2023. |
| [12] | Y.-L. Lin, S. Chiao, T.-A. Wang, M. L. Kaplan, and R. P. Weglarz, “Some common ingredients for heavy orographic rainfall,” Weather Forecast., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 633-660, 2001, |
| [13] | M. Valipour and J. Dietrich, “Developing ensemble mean models of satellite remote sensing, climate reanalysis, and land surface models,” Theor. Appl. Climatol., vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 909-926, 2022. |
| [14] | G. Balsamo et al., “Satellite and in situ observations for advancing global Earth surface modelling: A review,” Remote Sens., vol. 10, no. 12, p. 2038, 2018, |
| [15] | M. van Ginkel and C. Biradar, “Drought early warning in agri-food systems,” Climate, vol. 9, no. 9, p. 134, 2021, |
| [16] | R. S. Pulwarty and M. V. K. Sivakumar, “Information systems in a changing climate: Early warnings and drought risk management,” Weather Clim. Extrem., vol. 3, pp. 14-21, 2014, |
| [17] | P. P. Reddy, “Climate change adaptation,” in Climate resilient agriculture for ensuring food security, Springer, 2014, pp. 223-272. |
| [18] | N. Husen, “The Impact of Gender Relations on Rural Livelihoods: The Case of Two Communities, East Shoa Zone Oromia Regional State.” St. Mary’s University, 2012. |
APA Style
Wakete, M. T., Fana, T. B. (2025). Performance Assessment of Satellite-based Rainfall Product over the Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Science Futures, 2(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15
ACS Style
Wakete, M. T.; Fana, T. B. Performance Assessment of Satellite-based Rainfall Product over the Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Sci. Futures 2025, 2(1), 59-66. doi: 10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15
@article{10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15,
author = {Mesay Tolossa Wakete and Tsige Berhanu Fana},
title = {Performance Assessment of Satellite-based Rainfall Product over the Oromia Region of Ethiopia},
journal = {Science Futures},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {59-66},
doi = {10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scif.20260201.15},
abstract = {Rainfall data is vital for agricultural planning, water resource management, and climate research in areas like Oromia, Ethiopia, where agriculture supports a large part of the population. However, ground-based observations are often limited and inconsistent. This study assesses how well satellite-derived rainfall estimates match ground observations in Oromia. In the analysis of the ENACT, CHIRPS, and TAMSAT satellite products against ground-based rainfall data, all three exhibited a consistent value sequence but did not accurately reflect the observed declining rainfall trend from 1470 mm to 30 mm. While they showed correlation in pattern, each product indicated an increasing trend that contradicted ground measurements, suggesting issues in remote precipitation sensing due to varied algorithms and data sources. CHIRPS demonstrated a perfect Probability of Detection (POD) and the correlation value (CORR, 0.717), making it preferable despite a higher Mean Absolute Error (MAE, 55.678) compared to ENACT (48.195), which had a smaller Root Mean Square Error (RMSE, 88.753). ENACT (CORR, 0.736) displayed the strongest correlation with ground truth observations in Oromia, proving its reliability for temporal and geographical rainfall patterns, highlighting the need for ongoing validation against ground truth for improved precipitation estimates crucial for hydrological and agricultural purposes. These results imply that satellite products can be reliable alternatives in areas like Oromia, where data is limited, although regional differences in topography and rainfall patterns affect accuracy.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Performance Assessment of Satellite-based Rainfall Product over the Oromia Region of Ethiopia AU - Mesay Tolossa Wakete AU - Tsige Berhanu Fana Y1 - 2025/12/26 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15 DO - 10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15 T2 - Science Futures JF - Science Futures JO - Science Futures SP - 59 EP - 66 PB - Science Publishing Group UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scif.20260201.15 AB - Rainfall data is vital for agricultural planning, water resource management, and climate research in areas like Oromia, Ethiopia, where agriculture supports a large part of the population. However, ground-based observations are often limited and inconsistent. This study assesses how well satellite-derived rainfall estimates match ground observations in Oromia. In the analysis of the ENACT, CHIRPS, and TAMSAT satellite products against ground-based rainfall data, all three exhibited a consistent value sequence but did not accurately reflect the observed declining rainfall trend from 1470 mm to 30 mm. While they showed correlation in pattern, each product indicated an increasing trend that contradicted ground measurements, suggesting issues in remote precipitation sensing due to varied algorithms and data sources. CHIRPS demonstrated a perfect Probability of Detection (POD) and the correlation value (CORR, 0.717), making it preferable despite a higher Mean Absolute Error (MAE, 55.678) compared to ENACT (48.195), which had a smaller Root Mean Square Error (RMSE, 88.753). ENACT (CORR, 0.736) displayed the strongest correlation with ground truth observations in Oromia, proving its reliability for temporal and geographical rainfall patterns, highlighting the need for ongoing validation against ground truth for improved precipitation estimates crucial for hydrological and agricultural purposes. These results imply that satellite products can be reliable alternatives in areas like Oromia, where data is limited, although regional differences in topography and rainfall patterns affect accuracy. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -