The regulatory index in Indonesia from 1966-2017 was very low, being on average (-0.35). Second, regulations formed by the government often overlap, even from 2014-2019 there were 10,180 overlapping regulations, consisting of 131 laws, 526 Government Regulations, 839 Presidential Regulations, and 8,684 ministerial regulations. 2018, President Joko Widodo once complained about the many overlapping regulations, there are 42,000 regulations ranging from laws to regional regulations still overlap. Under these conditions, the omnibus law was formed using the method grand design public policy and revolutionary. The purpose of this research is to examine the principles of public policy with a good governance in omnibus law. The research method used is systematic literature review. The results show that omnibus law is an idea in perspective grand design public policy and neopardigm public policy important in the renewal of the study. However, in professional practice, the omnibus law negates some of the fundamental principles of good governance in relation to public policy, namely participation, accountability, and legal certainty. The conclusion that can be drawn from this study is to grand design public policy and neo-pardigm public policy must remain in accordance with the principles of the good governance paradigm.
Published in | Science Development (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14 |
Page(s) | 86-92 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Omnibus Law, Grand Design Public Policy, Neo-Paradigm Public Policy, Good Governance
[1] | Abidin, Said Zainal. 2004. Kebijakan Publik. Jakarta: Pancar Siwah. |
[2] | Al Mukhollis Siagian. 2020. The Dinamics of Life. Kalimantan: Alra Media. |
[3] | Anderson, J. E. 2003. Public Policymaking: An Introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, pp. 1-34. |
[4] | Buse, K., Mays, N. and Walt, G. 2005. Making Health Policy. New York: Plaza and Janes. |
[5] | Detiknews. Perjalanan UU Cipta Kerja: Disahkan DPR hingga Diteken Jokowi. Selasa, 03 November 2020. |
[6] | Dye, Thomas R. 2008. Understanding Public Policies. 12th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. |
[7] | Evi Etzioni-Halevi. 2011. Demokrasi dan Birokrasi: Sebuah Dilema Politik. Yogyakarta: Total Media. |
[8] | Hayat (Ed.). 2018. Reformasi Kebijakan Publik Perspektif Makro dan Mikro. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group. |
[9] | Kraft, Michael & Furlong, Scott. 2004. Public Policy: Politics, Analysis and Alternatives. Washington D. C.: CQC Press. |
[10] | Kresnaliyska, Gergana. 2015. Monitoring of Public Policies - A Modern Tool of Good Governance. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, Vol. 5, No. 5, hal. 43-47. |
[11] | Lahera Parada, Eugenio. 2002. Introduccion a Las Politicas Publicas, Brevarios Del Fondo De Cultura Economica Chile. Publicacion del Departamento de Gobierno y Gestion Publica del Instituto de Asuntos Publicos de la Universidad de Chile. Chile. |
[12] | Lasswell, H., and Kaplan A. 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press. |
[13] | Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 107/PUU-XVIII/2020 Perihal Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Selasa, 8 Desember 2020. |
[14] | Nugroho, D, Riant. 2003. Kebijakan Publik: Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo. |
[15] | Olavarria Gambi, Mauricio. 2007. Conceptos Basicos en el Analisis de Politicas Publicas en Documentos de Trabajo No 11. Publicacion del Departamento de Gobierno y Gestion Publica del Instituto de Asuntos Publicos de la Universidad de Chile. Chile. |
[16] | Page, Edward C. 2006. The Origins of Policy, In: Moran, Michael, Rein, Martin and Goodin, Robert E., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 207-27. |
[17] | Perez, M. et al. 2006. Analysis of Public Policies. Granada, Espana: Universidad de Granada. |
[18] | Philipus dan Nurul Aini. 2006. Sosilogi dan Politik. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. |
[19] | Ramona. 2015. Public Policy and its Relationship with Local Economic Development. ECORFAN Journal-Republic of Paraguay, 1-1: 61-77. |
[20] | Roth, A. L. 2018. Public Politics: Formulation, Implementation and Evaluation. Bogota, Colombia: Ediciones Aurora. |
[21] | Ruiz Lopez, Domingo, Cardenas Ayala, dan Carlos Eduardo. 2005. Que Son Las Politicas Publicas? Revista Juridica, Universidad Latina de America. Ano V, Numero 18. |
[22] | Salam, Abdul. 2018. Menyoal Omnibus Law. https://www.beritasatu.com/investor/500416-menyoal-omnibuslaw.html 16 Februari 2020. |
[23] | Shahfritz Jay M (ed). 2000. Defining Public Administration. USA: Westview Press. |
[24] | Tamayo Saez, Manuel. 1997. El Analisis de Las Politicas Publicas, en R. Banon y E. Carrillo, (Comps.) La Nueva Administracion Publica. Editorial Alianza, Espana. |
[25] | Tomy Michael. 2020. Bentuk Pemerintahan Perspektif Omnibus Law. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Volume 5 Nomor 1, Halaman 159-176. |
[26] | Utomo, W. 2012. Administrasi Publik Baru Indonesia, Perubahan Paradigma dari Administrasi Negara ke Administrasi Publik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. |
[27] | UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. |
[28] | UUD NKRI 1945. |
[29] | Vedantham V. M., dan Kamruddin S. 2015. Good Governance and Public Policy in India. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, Volume 1 Issue 1, pp. 878-889. |
[30] | Yalmanov N. 2020. Public Policy and Policy-Making, XXIII International Conerence in Culture, Personality. Society in the Conditions of Digitalization: Methodology and Experience of Empirical Research Conference, KnE Social Sciences, pages 558–564. |
APA Style
Al Mukhollis Siagian. (2021). Omnibus Law Work Creation: Grand Design Public Policy and Neo-Paradigm Public Policy in Perspective Good Governance. Science Development, 2(4), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14
ACS Style
Al Mukhollis Siagian. Omnibus Law Work Creation: Grand Design Public Policy and Neo-Paradigm Public Policy in Perspective Good Governance. Sci. Dev. 2021, 2(4), 86-92. doi: 10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14
@article{10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14, author = {Al Mukhollis Siagian}, title = {Omnibus Law Work Creation: Grand Design Public Policy and Neo-Paradigm Public Policy in Perspective Good Governance}, journal = {Science Development}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {86-92}, doi = {10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.scidev.20210204.14}, abstract = {The regulatory index in Indonesia from 1966-2017 was very low, being on average (-0.35). Second, regulations formed by the government often overlap, even from 2014-2019 there were 10,180 overlapping regulations, consisting of 131 laws, 526 Government Regulations, 839 Presidential Regulations, and 8,684 ministerial regulations. 2018, President Joko Widodo once complained about the many overlapping regulations, there are 42,000 regulations ranging from laws to regional regulations still overlap. Under these conditions, the omnibus law was formed using the method grand design public policy and revolutionary. The purpose of this research is to examine the principles of public policy with a good governance in omnibus law. The research method used is systematic literature review. The results show that omnibus law is an idea in perspective grand design public policy and neopardigm public policy important in the renewal of the study. However, in professional practice, the omnibus law negates some of the fundamental principles of good governance in relation to public policy, namely participation, accountability, and legal certainty. The conclusion that can be drawn from this study is to grand design public policy and neo-pardigm public policy must remain in accordance with the principles of the good governance paradigm.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Omnibus Law Work Creation: Grand Design Public Policy and Neo-Paradigm Public Policy in Perspective Good Governance AU - Al Mukhollis Siagian Y1 - 2021/11/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14 DO - 10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14 T2 - Science Development JF - Science Development JO - Science Development SP - 86 EP - 92 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7154 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.scidev.20210204.14 AB - The regulatory index in Indonesia from 1966-2017 was very low, being on average (-0.35). Second, regulations formed by the government often overlap, even from 2014-2019 there were 10,180 overlapping regulations, consisting of 131 laws, 526 Government Regulations, 839 Presidential Regulations, and 8,684 ministerial regulations. 2018, President Joko Widodo once complained about the many overlapping regulations, there are 42,000 regulations ranging from laws to regional regulations still overlap. Under these conditions, the omnibus law was formed using the method grand design public policy and revolutionary. The purpose of this research is to examine the principles of public policy with a good governance in omnibus law. The research method used is systematic literature review. The results show that omnibus law is an idea in perspective grand design public policy and neopardigm public policy important in the renewal of the study. However, in professional practice, the omnibus law negates some of the fundamental principles of good governance in relation to public policy, namely participation, accountability, and legal certainty. The conclusion that can be drawn from this study is to grand design public policy and neo-pardigm public policy must remain in accordance with the principles of the good governance paradigm. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -