This study was conducted to assess the species distributional range, structure, and regeneration status of G. copallifera Benn. A distributional survey was conducted in over 30 villages and communities where claims were made about the presence of this species. At four locations, pairs of large plots measuring 500m x 20m were laid out 400m apart and each subdivided into ten (10) subplots (50m x 20m). For the regeneration studies (Seeds, seedlings and saplings), four quadrats of 5m x 5m were established in each subplot (giving a total of 320 quadrats). A total of 1,294 live individuals from 74 tree species and 12 lianas were recorded, representing 61 genera in 27 families. Guibourtia copallifera has the highest dominance, followed by Nesogordonia papaveriefera (A. Chev.) Capuron ex N. Hallé., Memecylon normandii Jacq.-Fél. and Gmelina arborea Roxb. Species such as Homalium africanum (Hook. f.) Benth. Lindackeria dentata (Oliv.) Gilg, Pentadesma butyracea Sabine. and Santiria trimera (Oliv.) Aubrév. were recorded at low levels. Regarding family dominance, the Leguminosae - Caesalpiniaceae scores the highest, followed by Sterculiaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Melastomataceae and Verbenaceae. The density of regenerating individuals varied significantly between subplots based on the amount of degradation. The regeneration and spatial patterns of the species examined in this study exhibited clear relationships with disturbance intensity. Urgent action is needed to conserve this species, together with other ecologically and economically important tree species, before they are locally exterminated.
| Published in | Journal of Plant Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11 |
| Page(s) | 39-53 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Regeneration, Distribution, Management, Status, Density, Guibourtia
| [1] | Rodríguez-Ramírez EC, Martínez-Falcón AP and Isolda Luna-Vega, I. 2018. Spatial patterns of Mexican beech seedlings (Fagus grandifolia subsp. mexicana (Martínez) AE. Murray): influence of canopy openness and conspecific trees on recruitment mechanisms. Annals of Forest Science (2018) 75: 27. |
| [2] | Gratzer, G and Waagepetersen RP 2018. Seed Dispersal, Microsites or Competition—What Drives Gap Regeneration in an Old-Growth Forest? An Application of Spatial Point Process Modelling. Forests 2018, 9, 230: 1-15. |
| [3] | Urrea-Galeano LA, Andresen E, Coates R, Mora Ardila F, Dı az Rojas A and Ramos-Ferna ́ndez G. 2019. Horizontal seed dispersal by dung beetles reduced seed and seedling clumping, but did not increase short-term seedling establishment. PLoSOne 14 (10): 1-17. |
| [4] | Burton PJ, Jentsch A, and Walker LR. 2020. The Ecology of Disturbance Interactions. BioScience, 70 (10): 854- 870. |
| [5] | Miller, AD, Inamine H, Buckling A, Roxburgh S. H, and Shea K. 2021. How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change. Ecology Letters, 24: 687–697. |
| [6] | McWilliams WH, Westfall JA, Brose PH, Dey DC, Hatfield M, Johnson K, Laustsen KM, Lehman SL, Morin RS, Nelson MD, Ristau TE, Royo AA, Stout SL, Willard T and Woodal CW. 2015. A Regeneration Indicator for Forest Inventory and Analysis: History, Sampling, Estimation, Analytics, and Potential Use in the Midwest and Northeast United States USDA Forest Service. Publications Distribution, 1–82. |
| [7] | Mangueira JRSA, Leandro TA. Vieira B, Thaís N. Azevedo C, Ana Paula S. Sabino D, Kátia MPMB. Ferraz E, Sílvio FB. Ferraz E, Débora C, Rother EF and Rodrigues RR. 2021. Plant diversity conservation in highly deforested landscapes of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 19: 69–80. |
| [8] | Arya N and Ram J. 2011. “Forest disturbance and its impact on species richness and regeneration of Uttarakhand Himalaya” New York Science Journal, 4 (6): 21-27. |
| [9] | Liu H, Chen Q, Chen Y, Xu Z, Dai Y, Liu Y, Jiang Y, Peng X, Li H, Wang J and Liu H. 2020. Effects of biotic/abiotic factors on the seedling regeneration of Dacrydium pectinatum formations in tropical montane forests on Hainan Island, China. Global Ecology and Conservation 24: 1-15. |
| [10] | Munro PG and van der Horst GA. 2012a. The Domestic Trade in Timber and Fuelwood Products in Sierra Leone: Current Dynamics and Issues. Pp: 1–184. |
| [11] | UNCTAD 2020. UN list of least developed countries. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Palais des Nations, 8-14, Av. de la Paix, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. |
| [12] | Fousseni F, Marra D, Wala K, BataWila K, Xiuhai Z, Chunyu Z and Akpagana K. 2014. Basic overview of Riparian Forest in Sudanian savanna ecosystem: case study of Togo. Rev. Écol. (Terre Vie), 69: 1-15. |
| [13] | Savill PS and Fox JED. 1967. Trees of Sierra Leone. Government Printers. PP: 1 – 316. |
| [14] | Case RJ. Tucker AO, MacIarello, MJ and Wheeler KA. 2003. Chemistry and Ethnobotany of Commercial Incense Copals, Copal Blanco, Copal Oro, and Copal Negro, of North America. Economic Botany, 57 (2): pp. 189-202. |
| [15] | Augspurger CK, Franson SE and Cushman KC. 2017. Wind dispersal is predicted by tree, not diaspore, traits in comparisons of Neotropical species. Functional Ecology 31 (4): 808-820. |
| [16] | UNDP 2008. World Database on Protected Areas: Site Information, UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre. https://www.unep-wcmc.org 12 January 2020. |
| [17] | Bowden DJ. 1997. The geochemistry and development of lateritized foot slope benches: The Kasewe Hills, Sierra Leone, Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 120: 295-305. |
| [18] | Lytwyna J, Burkea K and Culver S. 2006. The nature and location of the suture zone in the Rokelide orogen, Sierra Leone: Geochemical evidence, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 46 (5): 439-454. |
| [19] | Paudel P and Mandal RA. 2019. Comparing Growing Stock using Circular, Square and Rectangular Plots Shape in Inventory (A study from Community Forests in Chitwan District, Nepal Journal of Environmental and Soil Science, 4 (1): 1-12. |
| [20] | Gebrewahid Y, Gebre-Egziabhier TB, Teka K and Birhane E. 2018. “Carbon stock potential of scattered trees on farmland along an altitudinal gradient in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia” Ecological Processes 7 (40): 1 – 8. |
| [21] | Molla A, and Kewessa G. 2015. “Woody Species Diversity in Traditional Agroforestry Practices of Dellomenna District, Southeastern Ethiopia: Implication for Maintaining Native Woody Species International Journal of Biodiversity, pp 1-14. |
| [22] | Long W, Zang R, Ding Y and Huang Y. 2013. Effects of Competition and Facilitation on Species Assemblage in Two Types of Tropical Cloud Forest. PLoS ONE 8 (4): 1-10. |
| [23] | Tolangara A, Ahmad H and Liline S. 2019. The Composition and Important Value Index of Trees for Wildlife Feed in Bacan Island, South Halmahera. International Conference on Life Sciences and Technology IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 276: 1 - 7. |
| [24] | Sen UK. 2018. Assessment of diversity, population structure, re-generation and conservation status of tree species in a sacred grove of west Midnapore district, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Botanical Studies 3: 33-42. |
| [25] | Motaleb MA, and Hossain MK. 2011. “Tree species diversity in the Tankawati natural forest of Chittagong South Forest Division,” Journal of Eco-Friendly Agriculture, 4 (2): 542–545. |
| [26] | Tiwari S. 2003. Chittagong Hill Tracts: A Preliminary Study on Gender and Natural Resource Management, IDRC, Ottawa, Canada, pp 1 – 27. |
| [27] | Hossain MK, Hossain M and Alam MK. 1996. “Diversity and structural composition of trees in Bamu reserved forest of Cox’s Bazar Forest division, Bangladesh,” Bangladesh Journal of Forest Science, 25 (1): 31–42. |
| [28] | Jashimuddin M and Inoue M. 2012. “Management of village common forests in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh: Historical background and current issues in terms of sustainability,” Open Journal of Forestry, 2 (3): 118–134. |
| [29] | Semenya SS and Maroyi A. 2020. Assessment of Useful Alien Plant Species Cultivated and Managed in Rural Home Gardens of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Hindawi Scientifica, (2020): 1-11. |
| [30] | Komolafe, OO. and Ige, PO. 2020. Tree species diversity and tree damage assessment in IITA Forest, Ibadan, Nigeria. Forests and Forest Products Journal 20: 1-16. |
| [31] | Gnoumou A, Bognounou F, Hahn K and Thiombiano A. 2011. Woody plant diversity and stand structure in the Comoe -Lerba Reserve, Southwestern Burkina Faso (West Africa). Journal of Biological Sciences 11 (2): 111-123. |
| [32] | Martini F, Zou C and Goodale UM. 2019. Intrinsic biotic factors and microsite conditions drive seedling survival in a species with masting reproduction. Ecology and Evolution, (9): 14261–14272. |
| [33] | Zhao W, Liang W, Han Y and Wei X. 2021. Characteristics and factors influencing the natural regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii seedlings in northern China. Peer J (9): 1-19. |
| [34] | Konig L. A, Mohren F, Schelhaas M, Bugmann H and Nabuurs G. 2022. Tree regeneration in models of forest dynamics – Suitability to assess climate change impacts on European forests. Forest Ecology and Management 520: 1-13. |
| [35] | Debouza NE, Thruppoyil SB, Gopi K, Zain S and Ksiksi T. 2021. Plant and seed germination responses to global change, with a focus on CO: A review. One Ecosystem 6: 1-34. |
| [36] | Sabogal C. 1992. Regeneration of tropical dry forest in Central America with examples from Nicaragua. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3: 407-416. |
| [37] | Brandt M, Tappan G, Diouf AA, Beye G, Mbow C and Fensholt R. 2017. Woody Vegetation Die off and Regeneration in Response to Rainfall Variability in the West African Sahel. Remote Sensing, 9 (39): 1-21. |
| [38] | Sabogal C and Valerio L. 1998. Forest composition, structure, and regeneration in a dry forest of the Nicaraguan Pacific coast. In: International Symposium on Measuring and Monitoring Forest Biological Diversity, Washington, DC, USA, May 1995. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 187-212. |
| [39] | Nuñez M. 2002. Estudio de la Regeneración natural de cuatro especies forestales en el bosque seco de Nandarola, Granada. Nicaragua. Trabajo de diploma, Universidad Nacional Agraria. Managua, Nicaragua, pp 1 – 48. |
| [40] | Archer SR, Andersen EM, Predick KI, Schwinning S, Steidl RJ and Woods SR. 2017. Woody Plant Encroachment: Causes and Consequences. In Rangeland Systems. Processes, Management and Challenges. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer International Publishing, 25-84. |
| [41] | Mensah S, Noulekoun F, Dimobe K, Atanasso J, Salako VK, Assogbadjo A and Kakaï RG. 2020. Revisiting biotic and abiotic drivers of seedling establishment, natural enemies and survival in a tropical tree species in a West Africa semi-arid biosphere reserve. Journal of Environmental Management 276: 1-11. |
| [42] | Castellanos MC and Stevenson PR. 2011. Phenology, seed dispersal and difficulties in natural recruitment of the canopy tree Pachira quinata (Malvaceae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 59 (2): 921-933. |
| [43] | Ray GJ and Brown BJ. 1995. Restoring Caribbean dry forests: Evaluation of tree propagation techniques. Restoration Ecology, 3: 86-94. |
| [44] | Gerhardt E. 1996. Taxonomische Revision der Gattungen Panaeolus und Panaeolina (Fungi, Agaricales, Coprinaceae). Bibliotheca Botanica 147: 1-149. |
| [45] | McLaren KP and McDonald MA. 2003. “Regeneration of a tropical dry limestone forest in Jamaica”. Paper presented at Caribbean Forest Monitoring Network and Urban Forestry Symposium. Ponce, Puert o Rico. Pp 1 – 30. |
| [46] | Maguire AJ and Menges ES. 2011. Post- Fire Growth Strategies of Resprouting Florida Scrub Vegetation. Fire Ecology, 7 (3): 1-14. |
| [47] | Ngole-Jeme VM. 2019. Fire-Induced Changes in Soil and Implications on Soil Sorption Capacity and Remediation Methods. Applied Science, 9 (3447): 1-24. |
| [48] | Antúnez P. 2022. Main environmental variables influencing the abundance of plant species under risk category. Journal of Forest Research. 33: 1209–1217. |
| [49] | González-Rivas B, Tigabu M, Castro-Marín G and Odén PC. 2009. “Regeneration of dry forest species Population dynamics and spatial distribution of seedlings and saplings of four dry forest species in Nicaragua”. oiset forêts destropiques, 302 (4): 21 – 31. |
| [50] | NdangalasiI HJ, Martı ́nez-Garza C, Harjo TCA, Pedigo CA, Wilson RJ and Cordeiro NJ. 2021. Seedling recruitment under isolated trees in a tea plantation provides a template for forest restoration in eastern Africa. PLoS ONE 16 (5): 1 -21. |
| [51] | Oluwole SO and Okusanya OT. 1993. Ecological studies on the seedling growth of the African walnut, Tetracarpidium conophorum Journal of Tropical Forest Science 6 (2): 181-196 181. |
| [52] | Paillet Y, Debaive N, Archaux F, Cateau E, Gilg O and Guilbert E. 2019. Nothing else matters? Tree diameter and living status have more effects than biogeoclimatic context on microhabitat number and occurrence: An analysis in French forest reserves. PLoS ONE 14 (5): 1-16. |
| [53] | Käber Y, Peter Meyer P, Stillhard J, Lombaerde ED, Zell J, Stadelmann G, Bugmann H and Bigler C. 2021. Tree recruitment is determined by stand structure and shade tolerance with uncertain role of climate and water relations. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 12182–12203. |
| [54] | Jaloviar P, Sedmakova D, Pittner J, Danková L. J, Kucbel S, Sedmák R and Saniga M. 2020. Gap Structure and Regeneration in the Mixed Old-Growth Forests of National Nature Reserve Sitno, Slovakia. Forests, 11 (81): 1-25. |
| [55] | Guo Y, Zhao P and Yue M. 2019. Canopy disturbance and gap partitioning promote the persistence of a pioneer tree population in a near-climax temperate forest of the Qinling Mountains, China. Ecology and Evolution, 9: 7676–7687. |
| [56] | Hagemann N, Magdon P, Schnell S and Pommerening A, 2022. Analysing gap dynamics in forest canopies with landscape metrics based on multi-temporal airborne laser scanning surveys – A pilot study. Ecological Indicators 145: 1-11. |
| [57] | Casson N, Downes S, and Harris A. 2019. Native Vegetation Condition Assessment and Monitoring Manual for Western Australia. This project is funded by the Australian Government and the Government of Western Australia. Pp: 1-104. |
| [58] | Miles LS, Breitbart ST, Wagner HH and Johnson MTJ. 2019. Urbanization Shapes the Ecology and Evolution of Plant-Arthropod Herbivore Interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (310): 1-14. |
| [59] | Johnny J, Lebbie A and Wadsworth R. 2022. Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants utilized by forest edge communities in southern Sierra Leone. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 16 (1): 11-25. |
APA Style
Jonathan Johnny, Aiah Lebbie, Richard Wadsworth. (2023). Distribution and Regeneration Status of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. in Sierra Leone. Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(3), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11
ACS Style
Jonathan Johnny; Aiah Lebbie; Richard Wadsworth. Distribution and Regeneration Status of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. in Sierra Leone. J. Plant Sci. 2023, 11(3), 39-53. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11
AMA Style
Jonathan Johnny, Aiah Lebbie, Richard Wadsworth. Distribution and Regeneration Status of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. in Sierra Leone. J Plant Sci. 2023;11(3):39-53. doi: 10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11,
author = {Jonathan Johnny and Aiah Lebbie and Richard Wadsworth},
title = {Distribution and Regeneration Status of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. in Sierra Leone},
journal = {Journal of Plant Sciences},
volume = {11},
number = {3},
pages = {39-53},
doi = {10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jps.20231103.11},
abstract = {This study was conducted to assess the species distributional range, structure, and regeneration status of G. copallifera Benn. A distributional survey was conducted in over 30 villages and communities where claims were made about the presence of this species. At four locations, pairs of large plots measuring 500m x 20m were laid out 400m apart and each subdivided into ten (10) subplots (50m x 20m). For the regeneration studies (Seeds, seedlings and saplings), four quadrats of 5m x 5m were established in each subplot (giving a total of 320 quadrats). A total of 1,294 live individuals from 74 tree species and 12 lianas were recorded, representing 61 genera in 27 families. Guibourtia copallifera has the highest dominance, followed by Nesogordonia papaveriefera (A. Chev.) Capuron ex N. Hallé., Memecylon normandii Jacq.-Fél. and Gmelina arborea Roxb. Species such as Homalium africanum (Hook. f.) Benth. Lindackeria dentata (Oliv.) Gilg, Pentadesma butyracea Sabine. and Santiria trimera (Oliv.) Aubrév. were recorded at low levels. Regarding family dominance, the Leguminosae - Caesalpiniaceae scores the highest, followed by Sterculiaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Melastomataceae and Verbenaceae. The density of regenerating individuals varied significantly between subplots based on the amount of degradation. The regeneration and spatial patterns of the species examined in this study exhibited clear relationships with disturbance intensity. Urgent action is needed to conserve this species, together with other ecologically and economically important tree species, before they are locally exterminated.},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Distribution and Regeneration Status of Guibourtia copallifera Benn. in Sierra Leone AU - Jonathan Johnny AU - Aiah Lebbie AU - Richard Wadsworth Y1 - 2023/05/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11 T2 - Journal of Plant Sciences JF - Journal of Plant Sciences JO - Journal of Plant Sciences SP - 39 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jps.20231103.11 AB - This study was conducted to assess the species distributional range, structure, and regeneration status of G. copallifera Benn. A distributional survey was conducted in over 30 villages and communities where claims were made about the presence of this species. At four locations, pairs of large plots measuring 500m x 20m were laid out 400m apart and each subdivided into ten (10) subplots (50m x 20m). For the regeneration studies (Seeds, seedlings and saplings), four quadrats of 5m x 5m were established in each subplot (giving a total of 320 quadrats). A total of 1,294 live individuals from 74 tree species and 12 lianas were recorded, representing 61 genera in 27 families. Guibourtia copallifera has the highest dominance, followed by Nesogordonia papaveriefera (A. Chev.) Capuron ex N. Hallé., Memecylon normandii Jacq.-Fél. and Gmelina arborea Roxb. Species such as Homalium africanum (Hook. f.) Benth. Lindackeria dentata (Oliv.) Gilg, Pentadesma butyracea Sabine. and Santiria trimera (Oliv.) Aubrév. were recorded at low levels. Regarding family dominance, the Leguminosae - Caesalpiniaceae scores the highest, followed by Sterculiaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Melastomataceae and Verbenaceae. The density of regenerating individuals varied significantly between subplots based on the amount of degradation. The regeneration and spatial patterns of the species examined in this study exhibited clear relationships with disturbance intensity. Urgent action is needed to conserve this species, together with other ecologically and economically important tree species, before they are locally exterminated. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: