Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Received: 19 December 2024     Accepted: 3 January 2025     Published: 21 January 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Introduction: Endometrial carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer for females in the world and the seventh most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. The values of platelet indices (MPV, PDW) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are associated with different stages of endometrial and cervical carcinoma. Thus, this study aimed to determine the relation of MPV, PDW, and RDW with endometrial carcinoma. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2022 to July 2023. This study included 61 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma (FIGO stage I to IV) as cases and 122 women with histopathologically confirmed benign endometrial disease as the control group. Result: This study found that the case group had a higher mean age (55.62 years vs. 43.75 years). Blood parameter findings showed higher mean MPV (10.46 vs. 9.96) and RDW (46.64 vs. 43.05) in cases. PDW mean was lower in cases (11.33 vs. 14.39). MPV correlated positively with the FIGO stage and histological type, while PDW had a negative correlation. ROC analysis of MPV yielded an AUC of 0.645, with a cut-off of 10.50 showing sensitivity 58%, specificity 72%, and accuracy 57%. ROC analysis of PDW yielded an AUC of 0.789, with a cut-off of 13.50 showing sensitivity 44%, specificity 97%, and accuracy 61%. Multivariant regression revealed MPV to be the strongest factor of endometrial carcinoma (OR-6.20, p=0.039). Conclusion: This study showed that the mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are potential markers for detecting endometrial carcinoma.

Published in Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research (Volume 13, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11
Page(s) 1-9
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Platelet Indices, Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), Endometrial Carcinoma, Uterine Bleeding

1. Introduction
Endometrial carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer for females in the world and the seventh most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. The strongest known risk factor for endometrial cancer is unopposed estrogen exposure which includes obesity, sedentary working, and hormone replacement therapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important because patients with endometrial carcinoma have a favorable prognosis if diagnosed early. Because of the high disease death rate and increasing number of new diagnoses, endometrial cancer has a substantial impact on women's health. Most endometrial malignancies are carcinomas, while sarcomas account for the remaining proportion. Endometrial carcinomas can be classified into histological subtypes including endometrioid, serous, and clear cell carcinomas. Histological subtyping is currently routinely used to guide prognosis and treatment decisions . Cancer is widely accepted as both a cause and result of chronic inflammation. Platelets are important for both blood coagulation and tumor angiogenesis. They contain both pro and anti-angiogenetic molecules and are sequestered in intracellular granules. Thus, platelets play an important role in tumor angiogenesis. Secreted angiogenic molecules from platelets increase their secretion by autocrine pathways.
Platelets play roles in tumor growth and invasion with some other molecules such as cytokines, growth factors, and local mediators. PDW represented the changes in morphological shape and reactivity of platelets. An increased PDW always indicates a change in platelet activity by some factors. MPV was the marker indicating platelet activity and its increase in value mostly was associated with evaluated inflammatory process and malignancy. Platelets with larger MPV are supposed to carry more mediators, thus to some extent contributing to cancer development and progress. MPV can be regarded as an easy predictive factor in judging the severity of disease and selecting further options before endometrial biopsy and pathology result in higher-risk patients. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is a routinely examined parameter in complete blood count (CBC), which is a quantitative measure of the variation of circulating red blood cell size and is routinely assessed in the differential diagnosis of anemia . RDW reflects chronic inflammation, and increased levels of circulatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-alfa, and hepcidin . RDW has also been reported as an inflammatory marker in patients with inflammatory conditions. There are no specific tumor markers for endometrial carcinoma till now. For early detection and monitoring of high-risk patients, it is necessary to find some markers.
Therefore, this study was done to find out the relation of platelet indices (MPV, PDW) and red cell distribution width (RDW) with endometrial carcinoma among patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (intermenstrual bleeding, menorrhagia, and postmenopausal bleeding).
2. Methodology & Materials
This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh during the period from July 2022 to July 2023. In our study, we took 61 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma (FIGO stage I to IV) as cases and 122 women with histopathologically confirmed benign endometrial disease as the control group. So, a total of 183 patients were included in this study.
These are the following criteria to be eligible for enrollment as our study participants: a) Patients aged more than 18 years; b) Patients with abnormal uterine bleeding during admission; c) Patients with histopathologically confirmed endometrial cancer; d) Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I-IV disease; e) Patients with histopathologically confirmed benign endometrial disease; f) Patients who were willing to participate were included in the study And a) Patients with other primary cancer with or without metastasis; b) Patients with history of using recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor or taking corticosteroids; c) Patients with prior radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy; d) Patients with known hematological disease & inflammatory disease; e) Patients with local or systemic infection; f) Patients with any history of acute illness (e.g., Uncontrolled DM, renal or pancreatic diseases, ischemic heart disease, asthma, COPD etc.) were excluded from our study.
Data collection: After obtaining verbal consent from the patients following the introduction and informing the study's purpose and objectives, data was collected through face-to-face interviews ensuring privacy and confidentiality using the questionnaire. All other required data was collected from history sheets, investigation papers, per-operative findings, and follow-up records. After that, all data was compiled, modified, and finalized. All data were recorded systematically in the preformed data collection form.
Statistical Analysis: Quantitative data was expressed as mean and standard deviation and qualitative data was expressed as frequency distribution and percentage. The differences between groups were analyzed with an independent t-test, Pearson’s chi-square (X2) test, Fisher’s exact test, etc. ROC curves were compared to test the statistical significance of the difference between areas. The area under the curve (AUCs) was measured using the MedCalc statistical Software, revealing the sensitivity and specificity of a single or combined diagnosis. A p-value <0.05 was considered as significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows version 10. Ethical approval was taken from the ethical review committee of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University.
3. Results
Table 1. Distribution of the participants according to sociodemographic characteristics (n=183).

Variables

Cases (61)

Control (122)

P value

Age

24-43

7 (11.5%)

59 (48.4%)

b0.001s

44-63

40 (65.6%)

63 (51.6%)

≥64

15 (23%)

0

Mean±SD

55.62±10.24

43.75±6.63

c0.001s

Mean±SD

47.70±9.76

Median (min-max)

46 (24-72)

Educational Qualification

Illiterate

13 (21.3%)

4 (3.3%)

b0.001s

Primary pass

19 (31.1%)

21 (17.2%)

Secondary pass

10 (16.4%)

38 (31.1%)

Higher Secondary

18 (29.5%)

45 (36.9%)

Graduate

1 (1.6%)

14 (11.5%)

Marital status

Married

40 (26.1%)

113 (73.9%)

a0.001s

Widow/widower

21 (70%)

9 (30%)

Associated disease

HTN

30 (93.8%)

2 (6.2%)

b0.001s

DM

31 (88.6%)

4 (11.4%)

No comorbidity

0

116 (100%)

BMI kg/m2

Normal (18.5-24.9)

1 (1.6%)

105 (86.1%)

b0.001s

Overweight (25-29.9)

23 (37.7%)

12 (9.8%)

Obesity (>30)

37 (60.7%)

38 (4.1%)

a= chi square test, b= Fisher’s Exact test, c= independent t-test, s= significant
Table 1 shows that age between 44-63 years was more prevalent in both groups (65.6% vs 51.6%) but the mean distribution showed that patients in the case group (55.62±10.24) had higher mean age than the control group (43.75±6.63). In the case group, the highest prevalence of education was up to the primary level where whereas the control group was more educated than them (31.1% 36.9%). An important finding is that co-morbidity was highly prevalent (both DM and HTN; 88.6% and 93.8%) in the cases group than the control group. The majority of the control group was free of comorbidities. While studying the BMI of the patients, it was observed that obesity was most prevalent among the case group (60.7%) even overweight was prevalent too (37.7%) whereas most of the participants of the control group had normal BMI.
Table 2. Distribution of the participants according to reproductive history.

Variables

Cases (61)

Control (122)

P value

Menstrual history

Menorrhagia

3 (3.1%)

94 (96.9%)

b0.001s

Menorrhagia+

dysmenorrhea

0

14 (100%)

Intermenstrual bleeding

12 (85.7%)

2 (14.3%)

Post-menopausal bleeding

30 (100%)

0

Menorrhagia+ Intermenstrual bleeding

16 (57.1%)

12 (42.9%)

Parity

Nullipara

6 (9.8%)

19 (15.6%)

b0.001s

Para (1-2)

22 (36.1%)

14 (11.5%)

Miltipara

33 (54.1%)

89 (73%)

Contraceptive use

OCP

27 (27.8%)

70 (72.2%)

b0.001s

OCP+IUCD

0

1 (100%)

OCP+Implanon

0

4 (100%)

IUCD

0

1 (100%)

Implanon

0

15 (100%)

Tubal ligation

2 (15.3%)

11 (84.61%)

Nothing

27 (51.9%)

25 (48.70%)

History of HRT

Yes

2 (100%)

0

No

0

0

a= chi square test, b= Fisher’s Exact test, c= independent t-test, s= significant
Table 2 shows that patients with a high count of intermenstrual bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, and menorrhagia + intermenstrual bleeding were in the case group (3.1%, 85.7%, 100%, 57.1%). This distribution was also significant (p<0.001). Multiparous patients were mostly affected by endometrial carcinoma (54.1%, p<0.001).
Table 3. Distribution of the participants according to malignancy history.

Variables

Cases (61)

Control (122)

P value

Family member suffering from endometrial cancer

Yes

4 (100%)

0

a0.004s

No

57 (31.8%)

122 (68.2%)

Duration of symptoms (months)

mean±SD

6.31±2.16

23.25±8.02

c0.001s

mean±SD

17.61±10.41

Median (min-max)

18 (2-48)

a= chi square test, c= independent t-test, s= significant
Table 3 shows that 4 patients in the case group had a family history of endometrial carcinoma but most of the participants in the control group (68.2%) had no such family history. The mean duration of symptoms was 6.31±2.16 months in the case group and 23.25±8.02 months in the control group.
Figure 1. Distribution of the participants according to histological grade.
The pie chart shows the percentages of different grades of endometrial cancer in the participants. Here about 51% of patients presented with grade 3 lesions, 26 % of patients presented with grade 2 lesions, and 23% of patients presented with grade 1 lesions at the time of diagnosis.
Table 4. Distribution of the participants according to MPV, PDW, and RDW.

Variables

Cases (61)

Control (122)

P value

MPV

Mean±SD

10.46±1.26

9.96±1.25

c0.012s

Mean±SD

10.16±1.27

Median (min-max)

10 (5-16)

PDW

Mean±SD

11.33±1.78

14.39±4.62

c0.001s

Mean±SD

13.37±4.16

Median (min-max)

12 (2-53)

RDW

Mean±SD

46.64±6.18

43.05±7.03

c0.001s

Mean±SD

44.26±6.95

Median (min-max)

44 (2-62)

Data presented as n (%), mean±SD, median (min-max), a= chi-square test, c= independent sample t-test, s= significant
Table 4 shows that in MPV, RDW, and PDW, there are statistically significant differences between cases (endometrial cancer) and controls. The p-values for these variables are less than the conventional significance level of 0.05, indicating that the differences are unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Table 5. Correlation of the MPV, PDW, and RDW with clinicopathological characteristics.

Variables

MPV

P value

Correlation coefficient

FIGO stage

0.334

d0.009s

Histological grade

0.166

d0.204ns

PDW

Age

-0.357

d0.001s

FIGO stage

-0.202

d0.122ns

Histological grade

-0.284

d0.028s

RDW

FIGO stage

0.031

d0.815ns

d= Spearman’s correlation, s=significant, ns=not significant
Table 5 shows that MPV has a positive correlation with the FIGO stage and histological grade, indicating that as the FIGO stage increases, MPV tends to increase. PDW has a strong negative correlation with age, FIGO staging, and histological grade indicating as histological grade and FIGO grade increases, PDW tends to decrease significantly. RDW has no significant but positive correlation with the FIGO stage.
Table 6. Logistic regression of FIGO staging of cases group.

Variables

Univariate regression (OR)

P value

Multivariate logistic regression (OR)

P value

PDW

1.68 (1.37-2.07)

e0.001s

MPV

4.27 (1.72-10.58)

e0.002s

6.20 (1.09-35.1)

f0.039s

Histological grade

1.0

e0.001s

Age

1.5 (1.15-2.08)

e0.004s

e= univariate logistic regression, f= multivariate logistic regression, s= statistically significant
Table 6 shows that logistic regression (binary regression among the case group and multinomial regression among FIGO stages of endometrial carcinoma) revealed MPV, PDW, histological type, and age were strong influencers of endometrial carcinoma. However, through multivariant analysis, only MPV came through as the strongest influencer of endometrial carcinoma (OR- 6.20, p=0.039).
Figure 2. ROC for MPV.
ROC analysis of MPV to predict endometrial carcinoma found an AUC value of 0.645 (95% CI 0.565-0.724) which was statistically significant (P <0.0.001).
Figure 3. ROC for PDW.
ROC analysis of PDW to predict endometrial carcinoma found an AUC value of 0.789 (95% CI 0.722-0.856) which was statistically significant (P <0.0.001).
Figure 4. ROC for RDW.
ROC analysis of RDW to predict endometrial carcinoma found an AUC value of 0.463 (95% CI 0.374-0.552) which was statistically nonsignificant (P =0.414).
Table 7. Determination of cut-off value with Youden index.

Cutoff value

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Accuracy

Youden index (j=sen+spe-1)

MPV

10.50

0.580

0.721

0.42

0.78

0.57

0.230

PDW

13.50

0.443

0.967

0.46

0.96

0.61

0.410

RDW

49.50

0.172

0.902

0.389

0.725

0.233

0.074

Table 7 shows that a cut-off value of MPV of 10.50 showed the highest Youden index (0.230) with a sensitivity of 58%, specificity of 72%, PPV of 42 %, NPV of 78%, and accuracy of 57%. A cut-off value of PDW of 13.50 showed the highest Youden index (0.410) with a sensitivity of 44%, specificity of 97%, PPV of 46%, NPV of 96%, and accuracy of 61%. A cut-off value of RDW of 49.50 showed the highest Youden index (0.074) with a sensitivity of 17%, specificity of 90%, PPV of 39%, NPV of 73%, and accuracy of 23%.
4. Discussion
The age distribution of participants in our study revealed a significant difference between the case and control groups. The majority of participants in both groups were aged between 44 and 63 years (65.6% in the case group vs. 51.6% in the control group). However, the mean age of the case group (55.62 ± 10.24) was notably higher than that of the control group (43.75 ± 6.63). Similar findings of increased age among cancer patients were reported by Yayla Abide et al. (2018).
Our study also highlighted a high prevalence of co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) in the case group, with rates of 88.6% and 93.8%, respectively, compared to the control group, where most participants were disease-free. This aligns with the findings of Yayla Abide et al. (2018), who also noted a significant association between DM, HTN, and endometrial carcinoma. Song et al. (2019) further confirmed that these conditions were most prevalent among patients with malignant cases.
While studying the BMI of our patients, it was observed that obesity was most prevalent among the case group (60.7%) even overweight was prevalent too (37.7%) whereas most of the participants in the control group had normal BMI (86.1%). While Oge et al., (2013) found no significant association of endometrial cancer with BMI.
Multiparous patients were mostly affected by endometrial carcinoma (54.1%, p<0.001) in our study and Yayla Abide et al., (2018) also supported our findings as they have observed the same findings that higher parity showed a highly significant association with endometrial cancer. Our study also observed that IUCD use has a significant association (66.7%, p<0.001) with endometrial carcinoma (66.7%, p<0.001). Gao et al., (2020) found use of HRT and OCP was related to endometrial and cervical carcinoma.
When evaluating hematological parameters, our study found that the mean platelet volume (MPV) was significantly higher in the case group (10.46 ± 1.26) compared to the control group (9.96 ± 1.25). Similarly, the red cell distribution width (RDW) mean was also elevated in cases (46.64 ± 6.18 vs. 43.05 ± 7.03, p < 0.001). However, the platelet distribution width (PDW) mean was significantly lower in the case group (11.33 ± 1.78) than in the controls (14.39 ± 4.62). While Song et al. (2019) reported contrasting findings regarding PDW, our results were supported by studies from Kurtoglu et al. (2015), Oge et al. (2013), and Yayla Abide et al. (2018), who noted higher MPV levels in cancer patients. Zhang et al. (2020) and Kemal et al. (2015) also observed elevated RDW levels in endometrial cancer cases, further supporting our findings. Karateke A (2015) et al found the highest MPV (p<0.001), and PDW (p=0.002) were in the endometrial cancer group, and the lowest levels were in the control group.
This study showed that MPV had positive correlations with the FIGO stage and histological grade, indicating that as the FIGO stage increases, MPV tends to increase. PDW had a strong negative correlation with age, FIGO staging, and histological grade indicating as histological grade and FIGO grade increase, PDW tends to decrease significantly. RDW has a non-significant but positive correlation with the FIGO stage. Shen et al, (2017) found a significant correlation between FIGO staging with MPV. Chen et al., (2020) also found a positive correlation of the FIGO stage with increasing MPV and RDW.
Logistic regression analysis in our study identified MPV, PDW, histological type, and age as significant predictors of endometrial carcinoma. Among these, multivariate analysis revealed MPV as the strongest independent predictor (OR = 6.20, p = 0.039). This is consistent with findings by Petric et al. (2023), who reported age as a significant predictor (OR = 1.02, p < 0.05), and Ji et al. (2013), who highlighted histological type as a key influencer (OR = 3.13, p < 0.05).
Our study also assessed the predictive power of hematological parameters through ROC analysis. MPV showed an AUC of 0.645 (95% CI: 0.565–0.724; p < 0.001), comparable to Yayla Abide et al. (2018), who reported an AUC of 0.587. PDW demonstrated a statistically significant AUC of 0.789 (95% CI: 0.722–0.856; p < 0.001), whereas RDW had a nonsignificant AUC of 0.463 (95% CI: 0.374–0.552; p = 0.414).
5. Limitations of the Study
Our study was a single-center study. We took a small sample size due to our short study period. After evaluating those patients, we did not follow up with them for the long term and did not know other possible interference that may happen in the long term with these patients.
6. Conclusion and Recommendations
In our study, we found that mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) were higher in the case group, while platelet distribution width (PDW) was lower. MPV showed positive correlations with the FIGO stage and histological grade, indicating that more advanced stages of the disease are associated with higher MPV. On the other hand, PDW had a strong negative correlation with age, FIGO staging, and histological grade, suggesting that higher grades and stages were linked to lower PDW. ROC analysis indicated that MPV and PDW could be potential predictors of endometrial carcinoma, with varying sensitivities, specificities, and accuracy rates at different cut-off values.
So further study with a prospective and longitudinal study design including a larger sample size needs to be done to validate the findings of our study.
Abbreviations

BSMMU

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

Ethical Approval
This study was approved by the ethical review committee.
Funding
No funding sources.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Amant F, Moerman P, Neven P, Timmerman D, Limbergen V, Vergote E. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005; 366: 491-505.
[2] Burke WM, Orr J, Leitao M, et al. Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part II. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 134: 393-402.
[3] Cakal B, Akoz AG, Ustundag Y, Yalinkilic M, Ulker A, Ankarali H. Red cell distribution width for assessment of activity of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54: 842-7.
[4] Clarke K, Sagunarthy R, Kansal S. RDW as an additional marker in inflammatory bowel disease/undifferentiated colitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2008; 53: 2521-3.
[5] Candido J, Hagemann T. Cancer related inflammation. J Clin Immunol. 2013; 33: 79-84.
[6] De Gonzalo-Calvo D, De Luxan-Delgado B, Rodriguez-Gonzalez S, Garcia-Macia M, Suarez FM, Solano JJ, et al. Interleukin 6, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor I and red blood cell distribution width as biological markers of functional dependence in an elderly population: a translational approach. Cytokine. 2012; 58: 193-8.
[7] Duffy TP, Kelley WN, Dupont HL, Glick JH, Harris ED, Hathaway DR, et al. Approach to the patient with anemia. In: Kelley’s textbook of internal medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1997. p. 1295-9.
[8] Forhecz Z, Gombos T, Borgulya G, Pozsonyi Z, Prohaszka Z, Janoskuti L. Red cell distribution width in heart failure: prediction of clinical events and relationship with markers of ineffective erythropoiesis, inflammation, renal function, and nutritional state. Am Heart J. 2009; 158: 659-66.
[9] Günay E, Sarınç Ulaşlı S, Akar O, Ahsen A, Günay S, Koyuncu T. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective study. Inflammation. 2014; 37: 374-80.
[10] Gao J, Yang G, Wen W, et al. Impact of known risk factors on endometrial cancer burden in Chinese women. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016; 25: 329-34.
[11] Heng DY, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 5794-9.
[12] Iwasaki A, Hamanaka W, Harnada T, Maekawa S, Enatsu S, Shirakusa T. Significance of platelet counts in patients who underwent surgical treatment for lung metastasis. Int Surg. 2007; 92: 103-9.
[13] Kim DK, Oh SY, Kwon HC, Lee S, Kwon KA, Kim BG, et al. Clinical significances of preoperative serum interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein level in operable gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2009; 9: 155.
[14] Kemal Y, Demirag G, Bas B, et al. The value of red blood cell distribution width in endometrial cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015; 53: 823-7.
[15] Lippi G, Plebani M. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and human pathology: one size fits all. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014; 52: 1247-9.
[16] Urick ME, Bell DW. Clinical actionability of molecular targets in endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019; 19(9): 510-21.
[17] McMillan DC. Systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and survival in patients with cancer. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2009; 12: 223-6.
[18] Sica A, Allavena P, Mantovani A. Cancer related inflammation: the macrophage connection. Cancer Lett. 2008; 267: 204-15.
[19] Nadar S, Blann A, Lip G. Platelet morphology and plasma indices of platelet activation in essential hypertension: effects of amlodipine-based antihypertensive therapy. Ann Med. 2004; 36: 552-7.
[20] Rhodes CJ, Howard LS, Busbridge M, Ashby D, Kondili E, Gibbs JS, et al. Iron deficiency and raised hepcidin in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: clinical prevalence, outcomes, and mechanistic insights. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 300-9.
[21] Suzuki K, Aiura K, Kitagou M, Hoshimoto S, Takahashi S, Ueda M, et al. Platelet counts closely correlate with the disease-free survival interval of pancreatic cancer patients. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004; 51: 847-53.
[22] Yayla Abide C, Bostanci Ergen E, Cogendez E, Kilicci C, Uzun F, Ozkaya E, et al. Evaluation of complete blood count parameters to predict endometrial cancer. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018; 32(6): e22438.
[23] Song C, Cao J, Zhang F, Wang C, Guo Z, Lin Y, et al. Nutritional risk assessment by scored patient-generated subjective global assessment associated with demographic characteristics in 23,904 common malignant tumors patients. Nutr Cancer. 2019; 71(1): 50-60.
[24] Oge T, Yalcin O, Ozalp SS, Isikci T. Platelet volume as a parameter for platelet activation in patients with endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 33(3): 301-4.
[25] Gao L, Nie X, Zhang W, Gou R, Hu Y, Qi Y, et al. Identification of long noncoding RNA RP11-89K21.1 and RP11-357H14.17 as prognostic signatures of endometrial carcinoma via integrated bioinformatics analysis. Cancer Cell Int. 2020; 20: 1-8.
[26] Kurtoglu E, Kokcu A, Celik H, Sari S, Tosun M. Platelet indices may be useful in discrimination of benign and malignant endometrial lesions and early and advanced stage endometrial cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16(13): 5397-400.
[27] Zhang L, Yu CH, Guo KP, Huang CZ, Mo LY. Prognostic role of red blood cell distribution width in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Immunol. 2020; 21: 1-8.
[28] Karateke A, Kaplanoglu M, Baloglu A. Relations of platelet indices with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015; 16(12): 4905-8.
[29] Shen WJ, Fu S, Li N, Li LL, Cao ZG, Li C, et al. Decreased mean platelet volume is associated with cervical cancer development. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017; 18(7): 1769-72.
[30] Chen H, Wu Q, Zhang Y, Li Q, Ma J, Kong F, et al. Nomograms based on the novel platelet index score predict postoperative prognosis in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 158(3): 689-97.
[31] Petric AN, Živadinović R, Mitić D, Stanojević M, Živadinović A, Kostić I. Hematological and biochemical markers in determining the diagnosis and stage prediction of endometrial cancer. Ginekol Pol. 2023; 94(4): 283-90.
[32] Ji M, Lu Y, Guo L, Feng F, Wan X, Xiang Y. Endometrial carcinoma with yolk sac tumor-like differentiation and elevated serum β-hCG: a case report and literature review. Onco Targets Ther. 2013; 1515-22.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Islam, J., Begum, S. A., Amatullah, M., Mahmud, T., Akter, L., et al. (2025). Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research, 13(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Islam, J.; Begum, S. A.; Amatullah, M.; Mahmud, T.; Akter, L., et al. Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J. Cancer Treat. Res. 2025, 13(1), 1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Islam J, Begum SA, Amatullah M, Mahmud T, Akter L, et al. Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J Cancer Treat Res. 2025;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11,
      author = {Jannatul Islam and Shirin Akter Begum and Mehriban Amatullah and Tasfia Mahmud and Latifa Akter and Afroza Khanom and Naznin Akter Zahan and Nasrin Akter},
      title = {Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
    },
      journal = {Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research},
      volume = {13},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-9},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jctr.20251301.11},
      abstract = {Introduction: Endometrial carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer for females in the world and the seventh most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. The values of platelet indices (MPV, PDW) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are associated with different stages of endometrial and cervical carcinoma. Thus, this study aimed to determine the relation of MPV, PDW, and RDW with endometrial carcinoma. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2022 to July 2023. This study included 61 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma (FIGO stage I to IV) as cases and 122 women with histopathologically confirmed benign endometrial disease as the control group. Result: This study found that the case group had a higher mean age (55.62 years vs. 43.75 years). Blood parameter findings showed higher mean MPV (10.46 vs. 9.96) and RDW (46.64 vs. 43.05) in cases. PDW mean was lower in cases (11.33 vs. 14.39). MPV correlated positively with the FIGO stage and histological type, while PDW had a negative correlation. ROC analysis of MPV yielded an AUC of 0.645, with a cut-off of 10.50 showing sensitivity 58%, specificity 72%, and accuracy 57%. ROC analysis of PDW yielded an AUC of 0.789, with a cut-off of 13.50 showing sensitivity 44%, specificity 97%, and accuracy 61%. Multivariant regression revealed MPV to be the strongest factor of endometrial carcinoma (OR-6.20, p=0.039). Conclusion: This study showed that the mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are potential markers for detecting endometrial carcinoma.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pretreatment Platelet Indices and Red Cell Distribution Width as a Predictor of Endometrial Carcinoma Among Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding
    
    AU  - Jannatul Islam
    AU  - Shirin Akter Begum
    AU  - Mehriban Amatullah
    AU  - Tasfia Mahmud
    AU  - Latifa Akter
    AU  - Afroza Khanom
    AU  - Naznin Akter Zahan
    AU  - Nasrin Akter
    Y1  - 2025/01/21
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11
    T2  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    JF  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    JO  - Journal of Cancer Treatment and Research
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 9
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7790
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jctr.20251301.11
    AB  - Introduction: Endometrial carcinoma is the sixth most common cancer for females in the world and the seventh most common gynecological cancer in developing countries. The values of platelet indices (MPV, PDW) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are associated with different stages of endometrial and cervical carcinoma. Thus, this study aimed to determine the relation of MPV, PDW, and RDW with endometrial carcinoma. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Gynecological Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh from July 2022 to July 2023. This study included 61 women with histopathologically confirmed endometrial carcinoma (FIGO stage I to IV) as cases and 122 women with histopathologically confirmed benign endometrial disease as the control group. Result: This study found that the case group had a higher mean age (55.62 years vs. 43.75 years). Blood parameter findings showed higher mean MPV (10.46 vs. 9.96) and RDW (46.64 vs. 43.05) in cases. PDW mean was lower in cases (11.33 vs. 14.39). MPV correlated positively with the FIGO stage and histological type, while PDW had a negative correlation. ROC analysis of MPV yielded an AUC of 0.645, with a cut-off of 10.50 showing sensitivity 58%, specificity 72%, and accuracy 57%. ROC analysis of PDW yielded an AUC of 0.789, with a cut-off of 13.50 showing sensitivity 44%, specificity 97%, and accuracy 61%. Multivariant regression revealed MPV to be the strongest factor of endometrial carcinoma (OR-6.20, p=0.039). Conclusion: This study showed that the mean platelet volume (MPV) and red cell distribution width (RDW) are potential markers for detecting endometrial carcinoma.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information