This paper analyses the structural transformation process of ECOWAS economies through an exploratory approach of stylized facts analysis on added value, employment, productivity and intra- and inter-sectoral mobility of labour factor, followed by an econometric approach in balanced panel data from 1991 to 2017 for the 15 countries in the region. The analysis revealed the beginnings of a structural transformation process in some ECOWAS economies, especially Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal, and more or less Burkina Faso and Guinea. The positive effects of the mobility of labour factor, albeit timid and at slow pace, from the agricultural sector to the industrial (manufacturing industry mainly) and services sectors, could be limited, on the one hand, by the low level of human capital development and on the other hand by a reverse itinerary characterized by the hegemony of the activities of the service sector, in terms of the proportion of value added and employment. In this regard, it appears that reforms aimed at strengthening the development of human capital could contribute to the acceleration of the productivities of industrial sector activities in general and manufacturing in particular through the channel of the accumulation of knowledge, know-how and technology. Economies could thus benefit from the growing prospects of attracting FDI in relation to the growing economic and geopolitical interests of foreign investors for Africa in general and ECOWAS in particular.
Published in | Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14 |
Page(s) | 138-156 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Economic Structural Transformation, Productivity, Labor Mobility, Capital Intensity, Economic Complexity
[1] | Adam Szirmai (2012) “Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005”. Journal of structural change and Economic dynamics, p 406-420. |
[2] | Borensztein, E., Gregory, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How Does Foreign Foreign Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Economics (45), 115-135. |
[3] | CEA (2019), " Progrès vers l’atteinte des Objectifs de développement durable des agendas 2030 et 2063 en Afrique de l’Ouest", Commission Economique des Nations Unies pour l’Afrique, Bureau pour l’Afrique de l’Ouest, Juin 2019. |
[4] | Fagerberg J (2000). Technological progress, structural change and productivity growth: A comparative study. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11 (4): 393–411. |
[5] | Farole, T., & Winkler, W. (2014). Making Foreign Direct Investment Work for Sub-Saharan Africa: Local Spillovers and Competitiveness in Global Value Chains. Washington, D. C: World Bank. |
[6] | Hausmann, Ricardo, and Bailey Klinger (2007). “The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage.” CID Working Paper Series 2007.146, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, April 2007. |
[7] | Jean-Claude Berthelemy and Ludvid Söderling (2001), The Role of Capital Accumulation, Adjustment and Structural Change for Economic Take-Off: Empirical Evidence from African Growth Episodes. World Development Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 323-343. |
[8] | Lopes Carlos (2019), “Africa in Transformation: Economic Development in the Age of Doubt”, Palgrave Macmillan. |
[9] | MCMillan Margaret, Rodrik Dani and Verduzco-Gallo Inigo (2014)" Globalization, structural change, and productivity growth, with an update on Africa, World development Vol. 63, pp. 11-32. |
[10] | McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011) “Globalization, structural change and productivity growth”. In M. Bacchetta, & M. Jense (Eds.), Making globalization socially sustainable (pp. 49–84). Geneva: International Labour Organization and World Trade Organization. |
[11] | Moshe Syrquin, (1986). Productivity growth and factor reallocation. In H. Chenery, S. Robinson, & M. Syrquin (Eds.), Industrialization and growth. Acomparative study. New York: Oxford UniversityPress. |
[12] | OECD. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Costs. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. |
[13] | Paus, E., & Gallagher, K. (2008). Missing Links: Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Development in Costa Rica and Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43, 53-80. |
[14] | Radelet, S. (2010), Emerging Africa: How 17 countries are leading the way? Baltimore: Brookings Institution Press. |
[15] | Rodrik, D. (2008). The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brookings papers on Economic Activity. |
[16] | Santigie Mohamed K., (2017), " Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth in Africa”, Thesis Presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY, School of Economics of UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN, April 2017. |
[17] | Sebego, M. et Sanga, D. (2018) " Croissance économique dans la zone de la Communauté Economique des Etats de l’Afrique de l’Ouest: soutenabilité, durabilité et inclusivité". Revue Afrique et Développement, Volume XLIII, No. 2, 2018, pp. 1-34. |
[18] | Sun, Xiaolun, (2002), “Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Development What Do States Need To Do? Paper prepared for the Capacity Development Workshops and Global Forum on Reinventing Government on Globalization, Role of the State and Enabling Environment, Marrakech, Morocco, December 10-13, 2002. |
[19] | Timmer, M. P., de Vries, G. J., (2007) “A cross-country database for sectoral employment and productivity in Asia and Latina America, 1950-2005. Groningen Growth and Development Center Research Memorandum GD-98. Greningen: University of Groningen. Structural change and growth accelerations in Asia and Latin America: a new sectoral data set”. Cliometrica 3 (June (2)), 165–190. |
[20] | Timmer, M. P., de Vries, G. J., (2009) “Structural change and growth accelerations in Asia and Latin America: a new sectoral data set”. Cliometrica 3 (June (2)), 165–190. |
[21] | Timmer, M. P., Szirmai, A., (2000) Productivity in Asian manufacturing: the structural bonus hypothesis examined. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 11 (4), 371–392. |
[22] | Xu, B. (2000). Multinational enterprises, technology diffusion, and host country productivity growth. Journal of Development Economics, 62, 477-493. |
[23] | Yemane Michael, (2018), “The FDI and Economic Growth Controversy in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Springer, May 2018. |
APA Style
Dimitri Sanga, Mamoudou Sebego. (2020). Structural Transformation of Economies of the Economic Community of West African States: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 5(3), 138-156. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14
ACS Style
Dimitri Sanga; Mamoudou Sebego. Structural Transformation of Economies of the Economic Community of West African States: An Empirical Analysis. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2020, 5(3), 138-156. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14
AMA Style
Dimitri Sanga, Mamoudou Sebego. Structural Transformation of Economies of the Economic Community of West African States: An Empirical Analysis. J Bus Econ Dev. 2020;5(3):138-156. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14
@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14, author = {Dimitri Sanga and Mamoudou Sebego}, title = {Structural Transformation of Economies of the Economic Community of West African States: An Empirical Analysis}, journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, pages = {138-156}, doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20200503.14}, abstract = {This paper analyses the structural transformation process of ECOWAS economies through an exploratory approach of stylized facts analysis on added value, employment, productivity and intra- and inter-sectoral mobility of labour factor, followed by an econometric approach in balanced panel data from 1991 to 2017 for the 15 countries in the region. The analysis revealed the beginnings of a structural transformation process in some ECOWAS economies, especially Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal, and more or less Burkina Faso and Guinea. The positive effects of the mobility of labour factor, albeit timid and at slow pace, from the agricultural sector to the industrial (manufacturing industry mainly) and services sectors, could be limited, on the one hand, by the low level of human capital development and on the other hand by a reverse itinerary characterized by the hegemony of the activities of the service sector, in terms of the proportion of value added and employment. In this regard, it appears that reforms aimed at strengthening the development of human capital could contribute to the acceleration of the productivities of industrial sector activities in general and manufacturing in particular through the channel of the accumulation of knowledge, know-how and technology. Economies could thus benefit from the growing prospects of attracting FDI in relation to the growing economic and geopolitical interests of foreign investors for Africa in general and ECOWAS in particular.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Structural Transformation of Economies of the Economic Community of West African States: An Empirical Analysis AU - Dimitri Sanga AU - Mamoudou Sebego Y1 - 2020/08/10 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14 DO - 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14 T2 - Journal of Business and Economic Development JF - Journal of Business and Economic Development JO - Journal of Business and Economic Development SP - 138 EP - 156 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3874 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.14 AB - This paper analyses the structural transformation process of ECOWAS economies through an exploratory approach of stylized facts analysis on added value, employment, productivity and intra- and inter-sectoral mobility of labour factor, followed by an econometric approach in balanced panel data from 1991 to 2017 for the 15 countries in the region. The analysis revealed the beginnings of a structural transformation process in some ECOWAS economies, especially Ghana, Nigeria and Senegal, and more or less Burkina Faso and Guinea. The positive effects of the mobility of labour factor, albeit timid and at slow pace, from the agricultural sector to the industrial (manufacturing industry mainly) and services sectors, could be limited, on the one hand, by the low level of human capital development and on the other hand by a reverse itinerary characterized by the hegemony of the activities of the service sector, in terms of the proportion of value added and employment. In this regard, it appears that reforms aimed at strengthening the development of human capital could contribute to the acceleration of the productivities of industrial sector activities in general and manufacturing in particular through the channel of the accumulation of knowledge, know-how and technology. Economies could thus benefit from the growing prospects of attracting FDI in relation to the growing economic and geopolitical interests of foreign investors for Africa in general and ECOWAS in particular. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -