This paper examines the technological influence of powerful economies exemplified by Germany, the United States and Europe in the shaping technology policy across the globe. These regions have emerged as critical players in establishing norms, standards, and policies that govern technology use and innovation with the rise of digital technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and cyber security issues. Rapid technological developments in quantum computing, biotechnology, AI, and advanced semiconductors raise serious concerns regarding their security, economic and societal implications; this is especially true at a time when the global order is mired in great uncertainty. Therefore, it is important to identify the main contributions of these outstanding regions and the specific ways in which they lead world policy issues in the technological space. It is notable that much is yet to be achieved in understanding the nuanced interactions among Germany, the U.S., and Europe concerning technology governance despite the extensive literature on technology policy and international relations. Therefore, this study took a qualitative research approach to analyse technology policy in the three regions to identify the patterns and trends in how they shape technology governance worldwide. The combined use of constructivist and international relations theories provided a functional theoretical framework through which the delicate balance between technological autonomy and multilateral collaborations is sustained among nations. By examining the relevant policies and interactions among the sampled nations, this study has provided a deeper understanding of how these regions collaboratively address the challenges and opportunities presented by emerging technologies.
| Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 13, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13 |
| Page(s) | 260-274 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Technology, Policy, Global Order, Digital Economy, Germany, The United States, The EU
| [1] |
Bauer, M., Zilli, R., & Pandya, D. (2023). The imperative of international cooperation for EU competitiveness and resilience in technology-driven industries. ECIPE.
https://ecipe.org/publications/international-cooperation-technology-driven-industries/ |
| [2] | Burwell, F. (2024, October 07). Looking ahead to the next chapter of US-EU digital collaboration. Atlantic Council. |
| [3] | Bustamante, C. M. V., & Calidas, D. V. (2024). Unraveling the political dynamics shaping the U.S. strategy for technology leadership. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. |
| [4] | Cronin, A. K. (2023). How private tech companies are reshaping great power. Henry A. Kissinger Center for Global Affairs. |
| [5] |
Diplo. (2021a). German strategy for international digital policy.
https://www.diplomacy.edu/resource/german-strategy-for-international-digital-policy/ |
| [6] | Diplo. (2021b). German strategy for international digital policy. |
| [7] |
Franke, U., & Torreblanca, J. I. (2021, July 15). Geo-tech politics: Why technology shapes European power. ECFR.
https://ecfr.eu/publication/geo-tech-politics-why-technology-shapes-european-power/ |
| [8] | Gavas, M., & Gyude, W. (2024, July 16). The EU’s global role: A third node of power. The Center for Global Development. |
| [9] | Ghezzi, C., Lee, E. A., Prem, E., & Werthner, H. (2021). Perspectives on digital humanism. Springer International Publishing. |
| [10] | Hagebölling, D., & Barker, T. (2022a). Germany's global technology diplomacy: Strengthening technology alliances, partnerships, and norms-setting institutions. In A German digital grand strategy: Integrating digital technology, economic competitiveness, and national security in times of geopolitical change. Berlin: Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik e. V. |
| [11] |
Hagebölling, D., & Barker, T. (2022b). Germany’s role in Europe’s digital regulatory power. DGAP.
https://dgap.org/en/research/publications/germanys-role-europes-digital-regulatory-power |
| [12] |
Hernandez, M. G. (2022, May 19). Global Gateway and the EU’s digital ambitions. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
https://www.csis.org/blogs/development-dispatches/global-gateway-and-eus-digital-ambitions |
| [13] | Kapitonenko, M. (2022). International relations theory. Taylor & Francis. |
| [14] |
Krewer, J. (2024, February 26). Raising the bar for Germany’s tech diplomacy. Open Future Foundation.
https://openfuture.eu/blog/raising-the-bar-for-germanys-tech-diplomacy/ |
| [15] |
Majcin, J. (2021, June 16). EU-US tech cooperation: Strengthening transatlantic relations in data-driven economies. Atlantic Council.
https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/geotech-cues/eu-us-tech-cooperation/ |
| [16] | National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2022). Protecting U.S. technological advantage. |
| [17] | National Quantum Initiative. (2024, May 22). The United States and Germany sign joint statement to enhance cooperation in quantum. |
| [18] |
Smart Networks and Services Joint Undertaking. (2023). EU-US: Beyond 5G/6G roadmap.
https://6g-ia.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/eu-us-aligned-6g-roadmap-joint-paper.pdf |
| [19] |
The European Commission. (n. d.). ICT and standardisation.
https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/ict-and-standardisation |
| [20] |
The European Commission. (2024a, April 05). Joint statement EU-US Trade and Technology Council of 4-5 April 2024 in Leuven, Belgium.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/statement_24_1828 |
| [21] |
The European Commission. (2024b, April 11). EU-US hold fourth Joint Technology Competition Policy Dialogue.
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1952 |
| [22] | The European Parliament. (2023, October 19). Shaping the digital transformation: EU strategy explained. |
| [23] |
The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action. (2022, September 12). Shaping the digital transformation.
https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/EN/Dossier/digitalisierung.html |
| [24] |
The International Trade Administration. (2024, September 20). Digital economy.
https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/germany-digital-economy |
| [25] |
The U.S. State Department. (2024, May 06). Technology and the transformation of U.S. foreign policy.
https://www.state.gov/technology-and-the-transformation-of-u-s-foreign-policy/ |
| [26] | The White House. (2023, March 29). Fact sheet: Advancing technology for democracy. |
| [27] | U.S. Mission in Germany. (2024, March 25). Aspen’s trade and tech conference. |
| [28] | Zuniga, N., Burton, S. D., Blancato, F., & Carr, M. (2024). The geopolitics of technology standards: Historical context for US, EU and Chinese approaches. International Affairs, 100(4), 1635-1652. |
APA Style
Omolo, A. W. (2025). The Role of Germany, the United States, and Europe in Shaping Technology Policy and World Order. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 13(6), 260-274. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13
ACS Style
Omolo, A. W. The Role of Germany, the United States, and Europe in Shaping Technology Policy and World Order. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2025, 13(6), 260-274. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13,
author = {Amos William Omolo},
title = {The Role of Germany, the United States, and Europe in Shaping Technology Policy and World Order
},
journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
pages = {260-274},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20251306.13},
abstract = {This paper examines the technological influence of powerful economies exemplified by Germany, the United States and Europe in the shaping technology policy across the globe. These regions have emerged as critical players in establishing norms, standards, and policies that govern technology use and innovation with the rise of digital technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and cyber security issues. Rapid technological developments in quantum computing, biotechnology, AI, and advanced semiconductors raise serious concerns regarding their security, economic and societal implications; this is especially true at a time when the global order is mired in great uncertainty. Therefore, it is important to identify the main contributions of these outstanding regions and the specific ways in which they lead world policy issues in the technological space. It is notable that much is yet to be achieved in understanding the nuanced interactions among Germany, the U.S., and Europe concerning technology governance despite the extensive literature on technology policy and international relations. Therefore, this study took a qualitative research approach to analyse technology policy in the three regions to identify the patterns and trends in how they shape technology governance worldwide. The combined use of constructivist and international relations theories provided a functional theoretical framework through which the delicate balance between technological autonomy and multilateral collaborations is sustained among nations. By examining the relevant policies and interactions among the sampled nations, this study has provided a deeper understanding of how these regions collaboratively address the challenges and opportunities presented by emerging technologies.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Role of Germany, the United States, and Europe in Shaping Technology Policy and World Order AU - Amos William Omolo Y1 - 2025/12/03 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 260 EP - 274 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251306.13 AB - This paper examines the technological influence of powerful economies exemplified by Germany, the United States and Europe in the shaping technology policy across the globe. These regions have emerged as critical players in establishing norms, standards, and policies that govern technology use and innovation with the rise of digital technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), and cyber security issues. Rapid technological developments in quantum computing, biotechnology, AI, and advanced semiconductors raise serious concerns regarding their security, economic and societal implications; this is especially true at a time when the global order is mired in great uncertainty. Therefore, it is important to identify the main contributions of these outstanding regions and the specific ways in which they lead world policy issues in the technological space. It is notable that much is yet to be achieved in understanding the nuanced interactions among Germany, the U.S., and Europe concerning technology governance despite the extensive literature on technology policy and international relations. Therefore, this study took a qualitative research approach to analyse technology policy in the three regions to identify the patterns and trends in how they shape technology governance worldwide. The combined use of constructivist and international relations theories provided a functional theoretical framework through which the delicate balance between technological autonomy and multilateral collaborations is sustained among nations. By examining the relevant policies and interactions among the sampled nations, this study has provided a deeper understanding of how these regions collaboratively address the challenges and opportunities presented by emerging technologies. VL - 13 IS - 6 ER -