From the dawn of time, a child has been viewed as an incomplete person who needs the assistance of adults, usually his parents or those acting in loco parentis, to live and thrive in life. Parental responsibility for a child is seen as an essential instrument for fully realizing children’s rights. However, when it comes to a child’s health, this obligation is sometimes fulfilled to the child’s harm rather than for the child’s benefit. In such a scenario, the government generally intervenes through the courts to prepare the necessary actions in the child’s best interests. Given the stringent and time-consuming procedures connected with some countries’ courts, situations may necessitate immediate action. This study examines parental responsibility under Kenyan law and compares it to the system in the United Kingdom, a nation that occupied Kenya until 1963 and is still the source of many written laws in Kenya. Children may be a divine gift, but even gifts require work and care to preserve their usefulness, beauty, or productivity. Despite the importance of raising children, many parents don’t take their parental responsibility seriously enough, making it difficult for the child and thereby underpinning their rights and interests. This study investigated the child’s right to health in relation to the parental obligation to defend this right in crises. It used a doctrinal approach to the research. It proposed, among other things, that provisions be created in the child’s legislation to allow health providers to consider the child’s best interests in an emergency without resorting to the courts.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11 |
Page(s) | 82-92 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Responsibility of Parents, Children Rights, Health Worker, Courts System, Kenya, Comparative Study
[1] | Aarthun A and Akerjordet K, ‘Parent Participation in Decision-Making in Health-Care Services for Children: An Integrative Review’ (2014) 22 Journal of Nursing Management 177. |
[2] | Black L, ‘Limiting Parents’ Rights in Medical Decision Making’ (2006) 8 AMA Journal of Ethics 676. |
[3] | BLAIR DM and WEINER MH, ‘Resolving Parental Custody Disputes—A Comparative Exploration’ (2005) 39 Family Law Quarterly 247. |
[4] | Dausab Y, ‘The Best Interest of the Child’ 14. |
[5] | DeVille KA and Kopelman LM, ‘Fetal Protection in Wisconsin’s Revised Child Abuse Law: Right Goal, Wrong Remedy’ (1999) 27 Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 332. |
[6] | Ellison Hahlo HR; K, The South African Legal System and Its Background (2nd Edition, Juta Legal and Academic Publishers 1973). |
[7] | Farrugia R, ‘Parental Responsibility and State Intervention Selected Articles and Essays from the Conference on the Present State and Problems of Family Law in the Transformation Period of Post-Communist States’ (2000) 31 California Western International Law Journal 127. |
[8] |
‘Hershman and McFarlane: Children Law and Practice’ (BPRO) |
[9] | Hobcraft J, ‘The Timing and Partnership Context of Becoming a Parent: Cohort and Gender Commonalities and Differences in Childhood Antecedents’ (2008) 19 Demographic Research 1281. |
[10] |
Jarrett T, ‘Children: Child Arrangements Orders – When Agreement Cannot Be Reached on Contact and Residence (Great Britain)’ |
[11] | Leask K, ‘The Role of the Courts in Clinical Decision Making’ (2005) 90 Archives of Disease in Childhood 1256. |
[12] | MAXWELL ME and KELSEY G, ‘SECOND PARENT ADOPTION: SAME-SEX AND THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD’ (2014) 37 Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 260. |
[13] |
Md S and PhD (Cand.), ‘Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance in Kenya: The Role of the Children's Court’ |
[14] | Oti-Onyema LA, ‘Parental Responsibility over Child’s Health: Dispensing with Court Proceedings in Emergency Situations’ (2020) 11 Nnamdi Azikiwe University Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence 170. |
[15] |
Paul Pip Ar, ‘Tega Esabunor & Anor v. Dr. Tunde Faweya & Ors (2019) - SC’ |
[16] |
Professional BB, ‘Hershman and McFarlane: Children Law and Practice’ (Bloomsbury Publishing) |
[17] | Sher EJ, ‘Choosing for Children: Adjudicating Medical Disputes between Parents and the State Note’ (1983) 58 New York University Law Review 157. |
[18] |
Smith J, Swallow V and Coyne I, ‘Involving Parents in Managing Their Child’s Long-Term Condition - a Concept Synthesis of Family-Centred Care and Partnership-in-Care’ [2015] Journal of Pediatric Nursing |
[19] |
‘SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE OF A CHILD BORN OUT OF WEDLOCK AND THE LEGAL POSITION IN KENYA – Action for Children in Conflict’ |
[20] |
‘The Convergence of Legal Systems in Southern Africa |Gardiol van Niekerk| Download’ |
APA Style
Kenneth Kaunda Kodiyo. (2022). The Role of Children’s Court in Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance: A Comparative Study of England and Kenya Children’s Court. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 10(3), 82-92. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11
ACS Style
Kenneth Kaunda Kodiyo. The Role of Children’s Court in Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance: A Comparative Study of England and Kenya Children’s Court. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2022, 10(3), 82-92. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11
AMA Style
Kenneth Kaunda Kodiyo. The Role of Children’s Court in Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance: A Comparative Study of England and Kenya Children’s Court. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2022;10(3):82-92. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11, author = {Kenneth Kaunda Kodiyo}, title = {The Role of Children’s Court in Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance: A Comparative Study of England and Kenya Children’s Court}, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {82-92}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20221003.11}, abstract = {From the dawn of time, a child has been viewed as an incomplete person who needs the assistance of adults, usually his parents or those acting in loco parentis, to live and thrive in life. Parental responsibility for a child is seen as an essential instrument for fully realizing children’s rights. However, when it comes to a child’s health, this obligation is sometimes fulfilled to the child’s harm rather than for the child’s benefit. In such a scenario, the government generally intervenes through the courts to prepare the necessary actions in the child’s best interests. Given the stringent and time-consuming procedures connected with some countries’ courts, situations may necessitate immediate action. This study examines parental responsibility under Kenyan law and compares it to the system in the United Kingdom, a nation that occupied Kenya until 1963 and is still the source of many written laws in Kenya. Children may be a divine gift, but even gifts require work and care to preserve their usefulness, beauty, or productivity. Despite the importance of raising children, many parents don’t take their parental responsibility seriously enough, making it difficult for the child and thereby underpinning their rights and interests. This study investigated the child’s right to health in relation to the parental obligation to defend this right in crises. It used a doctrinal approach to the research. It proposed, among other things, that provisions be created in the child’s legislation to allow health providers to consider the child’s best interests in an emergency without resorting to the courts.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Role of Children’s Court in Parental Responsibility and Child Maintenance: A Comparative Study of England and Kenya Children’s Court AU - Kenneth Kaunda Kodiyo Y1 - 2022/05/07 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 82 EP - 92 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20221003.11 AB - From the dawn of time, a child has been viewed as an incomplete person who needs the assistance of adults, usually his parents or those acting in loco parentis, to live and thrive in life. Parental responsibility for a child is seen as an essential instrument for fully realizing children’s rights. However, when it comes to a child’s health, this obligation is sometimes fulfilled to the child’s harm rather than for the child’s benefit. In such a scenario, the government generally intervenes through the courts to prepare the necessary actions in the child’s best interests. Given the stringent and time-consuming procedures connected with some countries’ courts, situations may necessitate immediate action. This study examines parental responsibility under Kenyan law and compares it to the system in the United Kingdom, a nation that occupied Kenya until 1963 and is still the source of many written laws in Kenya. Children may be a divine gift, but even gifts require work and care to preserve their usefulness, beauty, or productivity. Despite the importance of raising children, many parents don’t take their parental responsibility seriously enough, making it difficult for the child and thereby underpinning their rights and interests. This study investigated the child’s right to health in relation to the parental obligation to defend this right in crises. It used a doctrinal approach to the research. It proposed, among other things, that provisions be created in the child’s legislation to allow health providers to consider the child’s best interests in an emergency without resorting to the courts. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -