| Peer-Reviewed

Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design

Received: 3 October 2021     Accepted: 25 October 2021     Published: 5 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Using modern computer programming resources, a computer code has been developed in the MatLAB programming environment, which allows the use of the McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods for SHORT-CUT distillation design. The McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods are easy to apply, are not time consuming, and allow the easy visualization of the interrelationships among variables. In order to describe all the programming steps of these methods, a combination of different types of MatLAB functions has been used. The optimum reflux ratio is determined by using volume criteria, whichallows minimizing the volume of the distillation column and thereby reducing the total cost of a distillation unit. To evaluate the accuracy of the results, a comparison between the results produced by graphical methods and those calculated by other SHORT-CUT methods and rigorous calculations has been carried out. To perform this, the ChemCAD 7.1.5 simulator has been used. The SHORT-CUT distillation module in this simulator uses the Fenske-Underwood-Gilliland (FUG) method. For rigorous estimation, the SCDS multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module in ChemCAD software environment has been used. SCDS is a rigorous multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module which simulates any single column calculation including distillation columns, absorbers, reboiler and strippers. The results produced by graphical methods are closer to the rigorous-calculation results than to the FUG SHORT-CUT method ones, with respect both to the reflux ratio and to the bottom and top light-key mass fraction.

Published in International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12
Page(s) 263-274
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Distillation, Short-Cut Methods, Computer Simulations, McCabe-Thiele, Ponchon-Savarit

References
[1] Kong L, Maravelias CT (2020). Generalized short-cut distillation column modeling for superstructure-based process synthesis. AIChE J., 66 (2). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16809
[2] Adiche Ch., Vogelpohl A. (2011). Short-cut methods for the optimal design of simple and complex distillation columns. ChERD, 89 (8), 1321-1332.
[3] Zubira M. A. et al. (2019). Economic, Feasibility, and Sustainability Analysis of Energy Efficient Distillation Based Separation Processes. Chem. Eng. Transactions, 72, 109-114.
[4] Gilliland E. R. (1940). Multicomponent Rectification Estimation of the Number of Theoretical Plates as a Function of the Reflux Ratio. Ind. Eng. Chem., 32 (9), 1220-1223.
[5] Erbar J. H., Maddox R. N. (1961). Latest score: reflux vs. Trays. Pet. Ref., 40 (5), 183.
[6] McCabe W. L, Thiele W. E (1925). Graphical Design of Fractionating Columns. Ind. Eng. Chem., 17 (6), 605-611.
[7] Ponchon M. (1921). Graphical study of distillation. Tech. Modern, 13, 20.
[8] Savarit R. (1922). Definition of Distillation, Simple Discontinuous Distillation, Theory and Operation of Distillation Column, and Exhausting and Concentrating Columns for Liquid and Gaseous Mixtures and Graphical Methods for Their Determination. Arts et Metiers, 3, 65.
[9] Mohapatro R. N. et al. (2021). Separation Efficiency Optimisation of Toluene–Benzene Fraction using Binary Distillation Column. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser., D 102, 125–129.
[10] Seedat N., Kauchali Sh., Patel B. (2021). A graphical method for the preliminary design of ternary simple distillation columns at finite reflux. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 37, 99-109.
[11] Taifan G. S. P., Maravelias Ch. T. (2020). Integration of graphical approaches into optimization-based design of multistage liquid extraction. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 143 (5), 107126.
[12] Yeoh K. P., Hui Ch. W. (2021). Rigorous NLP distillation models for simultaneous optimization to reduce utility and capital costs. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 2, 100066.
[13] Kister, R. (1990). Distillation Design, McGraw-Hill.
[14] Wehe A. H., Coates J. (1955). Vapor-liquid equilibrium relations predicted by thermodynamic examinations of activity coefficients. AIChE J., 1 (2), 241-246.
[15] Michalski H., Michalowski S., Serwinski M., Strumillo C. (1961). Vapour - Liquid Equilibria for the System Acetone - n-Butanol. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Lodz. Chem., 10 (36), 73-84.
[16] Milton R., Chandler E., Brown S. F. (2021). Analysing the robustness of multi-stage bioseparations to measurement errors. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 50, 393-398.
[17] Haan A. B., Eral H. B., Schuur B. (2020), Chapter 2. Evaporation and Distillation. Industrial Separation Processes: Fundamentals, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 17-56.
[18] Morgan D. L. (2007), Use of transformed correlations to help screen and populate properties within databanks, Fluid Phase Equilib., 256, 54-61.
[19] Ghosh S., Seethamraju S. (2020). Reactive Distillation for Methanol Synthesis: Parametric Studies and Optimization Using a Non-polar Solvent. Process Integr Optim Sustain, 4, 325–342.
[20] Mahsa K., Abdoli S. M., (2021). The Design and Optimization of Extractive Distillation for Separating the Acetone/n-Heptane Binary Azeotrope Mixture. ACS Omega, 6 (34), 22447–22453.
[21] Wankat, P. C. (2007). Separation Process Engineering, 2nd Ed., Prentice Hall.
[22] Frank O. (1977). Shortcuts for Distillation Design. Chem. Ing. March, 14, 110-124.
[23] Van Winkle M., Todd W. G. (1971), Optimum Fractionation Design by Simple Graphical Methods, Chem. Eng., 136.
[24] Fenske M. R. (1932). Fractionation of Straight-Run Pennsylvania Gasoline. Ind. Eng. Chem., 24 (5), 482-485.
[25] Underwood A. J. V. (1948). Fractional Distillation of Multicomponent Mixtures. Chem. Eng. Proc., 44 (8), 603-614.
[26] Kirkbridge C. G. (1944). Process Design Procedure for. Multicomponent Fractionators. Pet. Ref., 23 (9), 321-336.
[27] Renon H., Prausnitz J. M. (1968). Local Compositions in Thermodynamic Excess Functions for Liquid Mixtures, AIChE J., 14 (1), 135-144.
[28] Maurer G., Prausnitz J. M. (1978). Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2 (2), 91-99.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Chavdar Chilev, Moussa Dicko, Patrick Langlois, Farida Lamari. (2021). Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 9(6), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Chavdar Chilev; Moussa Dicko; Patrick Langlois; Farida Lamari. Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2021, 9(6), 263-274. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Chavdar Chilev, Moussa Dicko, Patrick Langlois, Farida Lamari. Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2021;9(6):263-274. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12,
      author = {Chavdar Chilev and Moussa Dicko and Patrick Langlois and Farida Lamari},
      title = {Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design},
      journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {263-274},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20210906.12},
      abstract = {Using modern computer programming resources, a computer code has been developed in the MatLAB programming environment, which allows the use of the McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods for SHORT-CUT distillation design. The McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods are easy to apply, are not time consuming, and allow the easy visualization of the interrelationships among variables. In order to describe all the programming steps of these methods, a combination of different types of MatLAB functions has been used. The optimum reflux ratio is determined by using volume criteria, whichallows minimizing the volume of the distillation column and thereby reducing the total cost of a distillation unit. To evaluate the accuracy of the results, a comparison between the results produced by graphical methods and those calculated by other SHORT-CUT methods and rigorous calculations has been carried out. To perform this, the ChemCAD 7.1.5 simulator has been used. The SHORT-CUT distillation module in this simulator uses the Fenske-Underwood-Gilliland (FUG) method. For rigorous estimation, the SCDS multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module in ChemCAD software environment has been used. SCDS is a rigorous multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module which simulates any single column calculation including distillation columns, absorbers, reboiler and strippers. The results produced by graphical methods are closer to the rigorous-calculation results than to the FUG SHORT-CUT method ones, with respect both to the reflux ratio and to the bottom and top light-key mass fraction.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Computation Programming of McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit Methods for SHORT-CUT Distillation Design
    AU  - Chavdar Chilev
    AU  - Moussa Dicko
    AU  - Patrick Langlois
    AU  - Farida Lamari
    Y1  - 2021/11/05
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12
    T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    SP  - 263
    EP  - 274
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7420
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20210906.12
    AB  - Using modern computer programming resources, a computer code has been developed in the MatLAB programming environment, which allows the use of the McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods for SHORT-CUT distillation design. The McCabe-Thiele and Ponchon-Savarit methods are easy to apply, are not time consuming, and allow the easy visualization of the interrelationships among variables. In order to describe all the programming steps of these methods, a combination of different types of MatLAB functions has been used. The optimum reflux ratio is determined by using volume criteria, whichallows minimizing the volume of the distillation column and thereby reducing the total cost of a distillation unit. To evaluate the accuracy of the results, a comparison between the results produced by graphical methods and those calculated by other SHORT-CUT methods and rigorous calculations has been carried out. To perform this, the ChemCAD 7.1.5 simulator has been used. The SHORT-CUT distillation module in this simulator uses the Fenske-Underwood-Gilliland (FUG) method. For rigorous estimation, the SCDS multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module in ChemCAD software environment has been used. SCDS is a rigorous multi-stage vapor-liquid equilibrium module which simulates any single column calculation including distillation columns, absorbers, reboiler and strippers. The results produced by graphical methods are closer to the rigorous-calculation results than to the FUG SHORT-CUT method ones, with respect both to the reflux ratio and to the bottom and top light-key mass fraction.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Chemical Engineering, University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, Sofia, Bulgaria

  • Chemical Engineering, CNRS LSPM University Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France

  • Chemical Engineering, CNRS LSPM University Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France

  • Chemical Engineering, CNRS LSPM University Sorbonne Paris Nord, Villetaneuse, France

  • Sections