This article consists of the exposition of part of the research results focused on the examination of the relations between economic valorization of formal education and social position. The objective of this research is to take the set of social position indicators with information available in official statistics with compatible variables between different countries. Besides the compatibility of the pertinent variables, another inclusion criterion is the existence of information available in continuous values for the amount of income and the number of years of study. Based on this, a set of 13 countries were included (under central and peripheral conditions). Differences in the economic valuation of the amount of education are measured particularly by comparing the average income and years of education for each category of variables under consideration. Of the set of indicators retained with information available from sources, a first block refers more directly to variables linked to occupational categories, status in employment and educational level, in addition to the amount of income. A second block of indicators is more directly linked to the position in center / periphery relations and the conditions of social integration. Finally, a third block of indicators focuses on what is generally considered as social capital. In the present article, due to the lack of space for the total results to be exposed, the focus is on the first set of indicators, relative amount of income, occupational categories, status in employment and educational level Despite the impossibility of exposing the totality of the results in a single article, regarding the included indicators, they are very strong and systematic. The “plus” in valuing formal education is extremely differentiated, with the respective positions of the always analogous or similar categories. This covers either occupational categories or groupings or status in employment and educational attainment. Despite the inclusion of countries in central and peripheral conditions and differences in outcomes, the relative positions of the categories with the highest “plus” in.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 7, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11 |
Page(s) | 78-86 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Returns of Education, Differentiated Value of Education, Social Position, Occupational Categories, Scholarly Titles, Center/Periphery Relations
[1] | Badie, B (1994). Le modèle centre-périphérie. In. Badie, (ed.). Le Développement Politique. Paris: Economica, 111-133. |
[2] | Baudelot et al. (2004). Les Effets de l’Éducation; Rapport à l’Intention du Piref. Paris: Ecole Normale Supérieure. |
[3] | Bourdieu, P (1980). Le Sens Pratique. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. [The Practical Sense. Paris, The Editions of Minuit]. |
[4] | Bourdieu, P (1980b). “Le capital social.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31 (1): 2-3. |
[5] | Bourdieu, P (1984). Homo Academicus. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. |
[6] | Bourdieu, P (1989). La Noblesse d´État; Grandes Écoles et Esprit de Corps. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. |
[7] | Brown, D K (2001). The social sources of educational credentialism: status Cultures, labor markets, and organizations. Sociology of Education 74: 19-34. |
[8] | Coleman, J S (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital The American Journal of Sociology Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure 94: S95-S120. |
[9] | Collins, R (1979). The Credential society: an historical sociology of education and stratification. Cambridge: Academic Press. |
[10] | Erikson R, Goldthorpe J H, and Portocarero L., (1983). Intergenerational Social Mobility and the Convergence Thesis. British Journal of Sociology 34 (3): 303-343. |
[11] | http://www.encup.gob.mx/en/Encup/(Avaiable at 12/08/2017). |
[12] | https://international.ipums.org/international/Minnesota Population Center. (2015). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota (Avaiable at 12/08/2015). |
[13] | Lin, N, Cook, K, and Burt, R S (2008). Social Capital; Theory and Research. (eds.). Brunswick: Aldine Transaction. |
[14] | Putnam, R D (1992). Making Democracy Work; Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
[15] | Putnam, R D (2000). Bowling Alone; The Collapse and Revival of American Communit. New York: Simon & Schuster. |
[16] | Weber, M (1984). Economia y Sociedade; Esbozo de Sociología Comprensiva. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. |
[17] | Weber, M (2002). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge. |
[18] | www.worldvaluessurvey.org (Avaiable at 03/04/2015). |
APA Style
Odaci Luiz Coradini. (2019). Schooling, Income and Social Position in Different Countries. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 7(6), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11
ACS Style
Odaci Luiz Coradini. Schooling, Income and Social Position in Different Countries. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2019, 7(6), 78-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11
AMA Style
Odaci Luiz Coradini. Schooling, Income and Social Position in Different Countries. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2019;7(6):78-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11, author = {Odaci Luiz Coradini}, title = {Schooling, Income and Social Position in Different Countries}, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {7}, number = {6}, pages = {78-86}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20190706.11}, abstract = {This article consists of the exposition of part of the research results focused on the examination of the relations between economic valorization of formal education and social position. The objective of this research is to take the set of social position indicators with information available in official statistics with compatible variables between different countries. Besides the compatibility of the pertinent variables, another inclusion criterion is the existence of information available in continuous values for the amount of income and the number of years of study. Based on this, a set of 13 countries were included (under central and peripheral conditions). Differences in the economic valuation of the amount of education are measured particularly by comparing the average income and years of education for each category of variables under consideration. Of the set of indicators retained with information available from sources, a first block refers more directly to variables linked to occupational categories, status in employment and educational level, in addition to the amount of income. A second block of indicators is more directly linked to the position in center / periphery relations and the conditions of social integration. Finally, a third block of indicators focuses on what is generally considered as social capital. In the present article, due to the lack of space for the total results to be exposed, the focus is on the first set of indicators, relative amount of income, occupational categories, status in employment and educational level Despite the impossibility of exposing the totality of the results in a single article, regarding the included indicators, they are very strong and systematic. The “plus” in valuing formal education is extremely differentiated, with the respective positions of the always analogous or similar categories. This covers either occupational categories or groupings or status in employment and educational attainment. Despite the inclusion of countries in central and peripheral conditions and differences in outcomes, the relative positions of the categories with the highest “plus” in.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Schooling, Income and Social Position in Different Countries AU - Odaci Luiz Coradini Y1 - 2019/11/25 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 78 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20190706.11 AB - This article consists of the exposition of part of the research results focused on the examination of the relations between economic valorization of formal education and social position. The objective of this research is to take the set of social position indicators with information available in official statistics with compatible variables between different countries. Besides the compatibility of the pertinent variables, another inclusion criterion is the existence of information available in continuous values for the amount of income and the number of years of study. Based on this, a set of 13 countries were included (under central and peripheral conditions). Differences in the economic valuation of the amount of education are measured particularly by comparing the average income and years of education for each category of variables under consideration. Of the set of indicators retained with information available from sources, a first block refers more directly to variables linked to occupational categories, status in employment and educational level, in addition to the amount of income. A second block of indicators is more directly linked to the position in center / periphery relations and the conditions of social integration. Finally, a third block of indicators focuses on what is generally considered as social capital. In the present article, due to the lack of space for the total results to be exposed, the focus is on the first set of indicators, relative amount of income, occupational categories, status in employment and educational level Despite the impossibility of exposing the totality of the results in a single article, regarding the included indicators, they are very strong and systematic. The “plus” in valuing formal education is extremely differentiated, with the respective positions of the always analogous or similar categories. This covers either occupational categories or groupings or status in employment and educational attainment. Despite the inclusion of countries in central and peripheral conditions and differences in outcomes, the relative positions of the categories with the highest “plus” in. VL - 7 IS - 6 ER -