Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises

Ernst Pessl; Sabrina Romina Sorko; Barbara Mayer

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises

Ernst Pessl, Sabrina Romina Sorko, Barbara Mayer

Published in International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 5, Issue 6)

Received: 22 August 2017 Accepted: 12 September 2017 Published: 6 November 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The concepts of Industry 4.0 currently challenge manufacturing companies in various divisions such as purchasing, production, intralogistics, sales and human. Therefore, there is great need for a systematic approach to develop and implement industry 4.0 strategies. However, companies show different maturity levels concerning new technologies, processes and organizational aspects. This paper introduces a procedure model enabling companies to analyse their individual maturity level, to identify their own targets and to develop a specific action plan for implementation with an interdisciplinary team. A detailed theoretical as well as practical perspective is given for the procedure model for the field of action human. First application results for an Austrian company are presented showing that organizational changes within this field are still a bottom up driven process instead of a management indicated holistic change process.

Published in	International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 5, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
Page(s)	193-202
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Industry 4.0, Roadmap Industry 4.0, Procedure Model, Capability Maturity Model

References

[1]	Lichtblau, K., Stich, V., Bertenrath, R., Blum, M., Bleider, M., Millack, A., Schmitt, K., Schmitz, E., Schröter, M., (2015), Industrie 4.0-Readiness, Aachen, Köln.
[2]	Schumacher, A., Erol, S., Sihn, W., (2016), A Maturity Model for Assessing Industry 4.0 Readiness and Maturity of Manufacturing Enterprises. Procedia CIRP, 52, pp. 161-166.
[3]	Merz, S. L., (2016), Industrie 4.0–Vorgehensmodell für die Einführung. In: Roth, A., (Edt.): Einführung und Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 83-110.
[4]	Bildstein, A., Seidelmann, J., (2014), Industrie 4.0-Readiness: Migration zur Industrie 4.0-Fertigung. In: Bauernhansl, T., ten Hompel, M. and Vogel-Heuser, B., (Edt.): Industrie 4.0 in Produktion, Automatisierung und Logistik, pp. 580-597. Wiesbaden: Springer Vieweg Verlag.
[5]	Jodlbauer, H., Schagerl M., (2016), Reifegradmodell Industrie 4.0-Ein Vorgehensmodell zur Identifikation von Industrie 4.0 Potentiale, INFORMATIK 2016 Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Klagenfurt, Österreich, pp. 1473-1488.
[6]	Hammer, M., (2007), The Process Audit. Harvard Business Review, April, pp. 111-123.
[7]	Leimeister, J. M., (2012), Dienstleistungsengineering und –management. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Gabler-Verlag.
[8]	Bechtold, J., Kern, A., Lauenstein, C., Bernhofer, L., (2014), Industry 4.0-The Capgemini Consulting View–Sharpening the Picture beyond the Hype.
[9]	Feld, T., Hoffmann, M., Schmidt, R., (2012), Industrie 4.0–Vom intelligenten Produkt zur intelligenten Produktion. In: IM Information Management und Consulting, March, pp. 38-42.
[10]	VDMA Forum Industrie 4.0 (2015), Leitfaden Industrie 4.0–Orientierungshilfe zur Einführung in den Mittelstand, VDMA Verlag, Frankfurt am Main: tredition GmbH.
[11]	Allweyer, T., Knuppertz, T., (2009), EDEN–Reifegradmodell für Prozessmanagement: Prozessorientierung in Unternehmen, White Paper, Deutschland.
[12]	Seiter, M., Bayrle, C., Berlin, S., David, U., Rusch, M., Treusch, O., (2016), Roadmap Industrie 4.0–Ihr Weg zur erfolgreichen Umsetzung von Industrie 4.0, Hamburg.
[13]	Tschandl, M., Mallaschitz, C., (2016), Industrie 4.0: Controller als Treiber einer strategischen Neuausrichtung. In: Der Controlling-Berater, 43, pp. 85-106.
[14]	Erlach, K., (2010), Wertstromdesign–Der Weg zur schlanken Fabrik, Berlin: Springer Verlag.
[15]	Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P., (1997), Strategien erfolgreich umsetzen, aus dem Amerikanischen von Horváth, P., Kuhn-Würfel, B. and Vogelhuber, C., Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl Verlag.
[16]	Rusch, M., Treusch, O., David, U., Seiter, M., (2016), Industrie 4.0 – Controllers Aufgaben. In: Controller Magazin, 3, pp. 70-79.
[17]	Springer Gabler Verlag, (2017), Gabler Wirtschaftslexikon, [13. February 2017].
[18]	Higgins, J. M., Wiese, G., (1996), Innovationsmanagement–Kreativitätstechniken für den unternehmerischen Erfolg, Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
[19]	Horváth & Partner (Edt.), (2001), Balanced Scorecard umsetzen, 2. Auflage, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschl Verlag.
[20]	Spath, D., Ganschar, O., Gerlach, St., Hämmerle, M., Krause, T., Schlund, S., (Edt.), (2013), Studie Produktionsarbeit der Zukunft–Industrie 4.0, Fraunhofer, Stuttgart.
[21]	Ryschka, J., Solga, M., Mattenklott, A., (2011), Personalentwicklung: Gegenstand, Prozessmodell, Erfolgsfaktoren. In: Ryschka, J., Solga, M. and Mattenklott, A., (Edt.): Praxishandbuch Personalentwicklung: Instrumente, Konzepte, Beispiele, pp. 19-30. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
[22]	Sorko, S. R., Rabel, B., Richter, H. M., (2016), The Future of Employment–Challenges in Human Resources through Digitalization. In: International Scientific Journal Industry 4.0, 2/2016, pp. 128-131.
[23]	Ittermann, P., Niehaus, J., Hirsch-Kreinsen, H., (2015), Arbeiten in der Industrie 4.0. Trendbestimmungen und arbeitspolitische Handlungsfelder. Dortmund: Hans-Boeckler-Stiftung.
[24]	Leinweber, S. (2013), Kompetenzmanagement. In: Meifert, M., (Edt.), Strategische Personal¬entwicklung: Ein Programm in acht Etappen, pp. 145–178. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
[25]	Botthof, A., Hartmann, E. A., (Edt.), (2015), Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Berlin: Springer Vieweg.
[26]	World Economic Forum, (2016), The Future of Jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf, [10 März 2017].
[27]	Becker, M., (2011), Systematische Personalentwicklung: Planung, Steuerung und Kontrolle im Funktionszyklus. Stuttgart: Schäffer Poeschl.
[28]	Tschumi, M., (2014), Praxisratgeber zur Personalentwicklung. Zürich: Praxium.
[29]	Lauer, T., (2014), Change Management. Grundlagen und Erfolgsfaktoren, 2. Auflage, Aschaffenburg: Springer Gabler.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ernst Pessl, Sabrina Romina Sorko, Barbara Mayer. (2017). Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5(6), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ernst Pessl; Sabrina Romina Sorko; Barbara Mayer. Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2017, 5(6), 193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ernst Pessl, Sabrina Romina Sorko, Barbara Mayer. Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2017;5(6):193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14,
  author = {Ernst Pessl and Sabrina Romina Sorko and Barbara Mayer},
  title = {Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises},
  journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
  volume = {5},
  number = {6},
  pages = {193-202},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  abstract = {The concepts of Industry 4.0 currently challenge manufacturing companies in various divisions such as purchasing, production, intralogistics, sales and human. Therefore, there is great need for a systematic approach to develop and implement industry 4.0 strategies. However, companies show different maturity levels concerning new technologies, processes and organizational aspects. This paper introduces a procedure model enabling companies to analyse their individual maturity level, to identify their own targets and to develop a specific action plan for implementation with an interdisciplinary team. A detailed theoretical as well as practical perspective is given for the procedure model for the field of action human. First application results for an Austrian company are presented showing that organizational changes within this field are still a bottom up driven process instead of a management indicated holistic change process.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises
AU  - Ernst Pessl
AU  - Sabrina Romina Sorko
AU  - Barbara Mayer
Y1  - 2017/11/06
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
SP  - 193
EP  - 202
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7420
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
AB  - The concepts of Industry 4.0 currently challenge manufacturing companies in various divisions such as purchasing, production, intralogistics, sales and human. Therefore, there is great need for a systematic approach to develop and implement industry 4.0 strategies. However, companies show different maturity levels concerning new technologies, processes and organizational aspects. This paper introduces a procedure model enabling companies to analyse their individual maturity level, to identify their own targets and to develop a specific action plan for implementation with an interdisciplinary team. A detailed theoretical as well as practical perspective is given for the procedure model for the field of action human. First application results for an Austrian company are presented showing that organizational changes within this field are still a bottom up driven process instead of a management indicated holistic change process.
VL  - 5
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Ernst Pessl

Institute Industrial Management, FH JOANNEUM University of Applied Sciences, Kapfenberg, Austria
Sabrina Romina Sorko

Institute Industrial Management, FH JOANNEUM University of Applied Sciences, Kapfenberg, Austria
Barbara Mayer

Institute Industrial Management, FH JOANNEUM University of Applied Sciences, Kapfenberg, Austria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Ernst Pessl, Sabrina Romina Sorko, Barbara Mayer. (2017). Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 5(6), 193-202. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Ernst Pessl; Sabrina Romina Sorko; Barbara Mayer. Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2017, 5(6), 193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Ernst Pessl, Sabrina Romina Sorko, Barbara Mayer. Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2017;5(6):193-202. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14,
  author = {Ernst Pessl and Sabrina Romina Sorko and Barbara Mayer},
  title = {Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises},
  journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
  volume = {5},
  number = {6},
  pages = {193-202},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20170506.14},
  abstract = {The concepts of Industry 4.0 currently challenge manufacturing companies in various divisions such as purchasing, production, intralogistics, sales and human. Therefore, there is great need for a systematic approach to develop and implement industry 4.0 strategies. However, companies show different maturity levels concerning new technologies, processes and organizational aspects. This paper introduces a procedure model enabling companies to analyse their individual maturity level, to identify their own targets and to develop a specific action plan for implementation with an interdisciplinary team. A detailed theoretical as well as practical perspective is given for the procedure model for the field of action human. First application results for an Austrian company are presented showing that organizational changes within this field are still a bottom up driven process instead of a management indicated holistic change process.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Roadmap Industry 4.0 – Implementation Guideline for Enterprises
AU  - Ernst Pessl
AU  - Sabrina Romina Sorko
AU  - Barbara Mayer
Y1  - 2017/11/06
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
SP  - 193
EP  - 202
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-7420
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20170506.14
AB  - The concepts of Industry 4.0 currently challenge manufacturing companies in various divisions such as purchasing, production, intralogistics, sales and human. Therefore, there is great need for a systematic approach to develop and implement industry 4.0 strategies. However, companies show different maturity levels concerning new technologies, processes and organizational aspects. This paper introduces a procedure model enabling companies to analyse their individual maturity level, to identify their own targets and to develop a specific action plan for implementation with an interdisciplinary team. A detailed theoretical as well as practical perspective is given for the procedure model for the field of action human. First application results for an Austrian company are presented showing that organizational changes within this field are still a bottom up driven process instead of a management indicated holistic change process.
VL  - 5
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download