| Peer-Reviewed

Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement

Received: 4 September 2016     Accepted: 13 September 2016     Published: 28 October 2016
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The purpose of this research work is on the strength characterization of the Supaset Portland cement stabilized with laterite soil materials from four different borrow pits locations within Southwest part of Nigeria and the level of their usefulness for highway pavement subbase and basecourse. The four laterite soils after laboratory experiments are classified as A-5(10) silty soil; A-7-5(16) clayey soil; A-4(3) silty soil and A-2-7(1) clayey gravely sandy soil respectively. Stabilization of each laterite soil with the cement at percentages of 0% through 14% at the interval of 2% shows that with the increase in cement content during stabilization process the optimum moisture content of each soil specimen is reducing while the related maximum dry density is increasing. Furthermore, while considering at natural and stabilized states, both unsoaked and soaked California Bearing Ratio, uncured and unconfined compression strengths values of the tested specimens are increasing with increase in cement content with soil A-4(3) having the highest value while soil A-5(10), A-2-7(1) and A-7-5(16) values followed respectively. The coefficient of permeability of each soil specimen stabilized was reducing as the cement content was increasing. The chemical composition tests on Supaset Portland cement revealed CaO and SiO2 are the major components while for those of soils are SiO2 and Al2O3. The significance of this study is that although A-5(10) and A-4(3) silty soils stabilized by Supaset Portland cement of grade 32.5R attained the 750 kN/m2 minimum standard strength requirement for subbase, A-7-5(16) and A-2-7(1) clayey soils did not satisfy same. The justification for this research is that Supaset Portland cement is an economical and valuable material to stabilize silty soils but not cost-effective for the stabilization of clayey soils for highway pavement in order to prevent its incessant and premature failure.

Published in International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 4, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12
Page(s) 89-98
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Research, Stabilization, Coefficients, Sample, Optimization, Scope

References
[1] Akiije, I. (2016): “Stabilization of A-2-7(0) Laterite Soil and Strength Characteristics Using Three Selected Cements Individually”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology Volume 6 No. 4: 125-133.
[2] Akiije, I. (2015): “Chemical Stabilization of Selected Laterite Soils Using Lateralite for Highway Pavement”, International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Volume 5 No. 5, May, 2015, pp 275–282.
[3] Rashid, A. S. A., Zainudin, Z., Noor, N. M., Yaacob, H., (2013): “Effect of Stabilized Laterite on California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS)”, Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 18 [2013], Bund. X 5655-5660.
[4] ICRN (2012): “Nigeria: Lafarge WAPCO launches new products”, International Cement Review Newsroom, http://www.cemnet.com/News/story/149555/nigeria-lafarge-wapco-launches-new-products.html, accessed July 5, 2016.
[5] Marotta, T. W. (2005): “Basic construction materials”, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
[6] Xiaohong, Y. U; Lijun Z. H. U; Baiwei G. U. O; Shouyang H. E. (2008): ‘Adsorption of mercury on laterite from Guizhou Province, China’, Journal of Environmental Sciences, (20): 1328–1334.
[7] Bayewu, O. O., Olountola, M. O., Mosuro G. O., Adeniyi S. A. (2012: “Petrographic and geotechnical properties of Lateritic Soils developed over different parent rocks in Ago-Iwoye area, Southwestern Nigeria”, International Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Research, 1 (4): 584-594.
[8] AASHTO M 85 (2012): “Standard Specification for Portland Cement”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[9] AASHTO T 89 (2013): “Standard Method of Test for Determining the Liquid Limit of Soils”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[10] AASHTO T 90 (2008): “Standard Method of Test for Determining the Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[11] AASHTO T 100 (2010): “Standard Method of Test for Specific Gravity of Soils”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[12] AASHTO T 88 (2013): “Standard Method of Test for Particle Size Analysis of Soils”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[13] AASHTO M 145 (2012): “Standard Specification for Classification of Soils and Soil-Aggregate Mixtures for Highway Construction Purposes”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[14] AASHTO T 99 (2010): “Standard Method of Test for Moisture-Density Relations of Soils”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[15] AASHTO T 193 (2007): “Standard Method of Test for the California Bearing Ratio”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[16] AASHTO T 208 (2010): “Standard Method of Test for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil”, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D. C.
[17] ASTM D7664 (2010): “Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils”, American Society for Testing and Materials, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Isaac Akiije. (2016). Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 4(6), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Isaac Akiije. Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2016, 4(6), 89-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Isaac Akiije. Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2016;4(6):89-98. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12,
      author = {Isaac Akiije},
      title = {Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement},
      journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society},
      volume = {4},
      number = {6},
      pages = {89-98},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20160406.12},
      abstract = {The purpose of this research work is on the strength characterization of the Supaset Portland cement stabilized with laterite soil materials from four different borrow pits locations within Southwest part of Nigeria and the level of their usefulness for highway pavement subbase and basecourse. The four laterite soils after laboratory experiments are classified as A-5(10) silty soil; A-7-5(16) clayey soil; A-4(3) silty soil and A-2-7(1) clayey gravely sandy soil respectively. Stabilization of each laterite soil with the cement at percentages of 0% through 14% at the interval of 2% shows that with the increase in cement content during stabilization process the optimum moisture content of each soil specimen is reducing while the related maximum dry density is increasing. Furthermore, while considering at natural and stabilized states, both unsoaked and soaked California Bearing Ratio, uncured and unconfined compression strengths values of the tested specimens are increasing with increase in cement content with soil A-4(3) having the highest value while soil A-5(10), A-2-7(1) and A-7-5(16) values followed respectively. The coefficient of permeability of each soil specimen stabilized was reducing as the cement content was increasing. The chemical composition tests on Supaset Portland cement revealed CaO and SiO2 are the major components while for those of soils are SiO2 and Al2O3. The significance of this study is that although A-5(10) and A-4(3) silty soils stabilized by Supaset Portland cement of grade 32.5R attained the 750 kN/m2 minimum standard strength requirement for subbase, A-7-5(16) and A-2-7(1) clayey soils did not satisfy same. The justification for this research is that Supaset Portland cement is an economical and valuable material to stabilize silty soils but not cost-effective for the stabilization of clayey soils for highway pavement in order to prevent its incessant and premature failure.},
     year = {2016}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Strength Characterization of Stabilized A-5(10), A-7-5(16), A-4(3) and A-2-7(1) Laterite Soils Individually Using Supaset Cement
    AU  - Isaac Akiije
    Y1  - 2016/10/28
    PY  - 2016
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12
    T2  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society
    SP  - 89
    EP  - 98
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7420
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20160406.12
    AB  - The purpose of this research work is on the strength characterization of the Supaset Portland cement stabilized with laterite soil materials from four different borrow pits locations within Southwest part of Nigeria and the level of their usefulness for highway pavement subbase and basecourse. The four laterite soils after laboratory experiments are classified as A-5(10) silty soil; A-7-5(16) clayey soil; A-4(3) silty soil and A-2-7(1) clayey gravely sandy soil respectively. Stabilization of each laterite soil with the cement at percentages of 0% through 14% at the interval of 2% shows that with the increase in cement content during stabilization process the optimum moisture content of each soil specimen is reducing while the related maximum dry density is increasing. Furthermore, while considering at natural and stabilized states, both unsoaked and soaked California Bearing Ratio, uncured and unconfined compression strengths values of the tested specimens are increasing with increase in cement content with soil A-4(3) having the highest value while soil A-5(10), A-2-7(1) and A-7-5(16) values followed respectively. The coefficient of permeability of each soil specimen stabilized was reducing as the cement content was increasing. The chemical composition tests on Supaset Portland cement revealed CaO and SiO2 are the major components while for those of soils are SiO2 and Al2O3. The significance of this study is that although A-5(10) and A-4(3) silty soils stabilized by Supaset Portland cement of grade 32.5R attained the 750 kN/m2 minimum standard strength requirement for subbase, A-7-5(16) and A-2-7(1) clayey soils did not satisfy same. The justification for this research is that Supaset Portland cement is an economical and valuable material to stabilize silty soils but not cost-effective for the stabilization of clayey soils for highway pavement in order to prevent its incessant and premature failure.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Lagos, Akoka, Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria

  • Sections