This paper attempts to define internet filtering and outline the purpose of enforcing the filtering policy, and analyze its effect on the use of the Internet resources. This study further examines and evaluates the regulations regarding Internet access in Saudi Arabia, with an emphasis on the problems that people come across during Internet access with limited access to specific web pages due to the policy of filtering. This paper will also examine the case of the Supreme Court of the United States appellant vs. American library association which is similar to that of the Saudi Arabian case with miniscule differences only in term of ritual and cultural aspects. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of using the filtering policy and its influence and application to the culture and religion of Saudi Arabia. The study further enlists some of the rules and regulation, developed about this issue with the reference of the case of the Court of the United States appellant's vs. American library association. Finally, this study discusses the impact of different cultural and tradition on the ways of application of the filtering strategy in both sides.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13 |
Page(s) | 83-89 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Filtering Policy, KSA Internet Filtering, American Library, American Library Association
[1] | U.S. V. American Library Association, 2013. Retrieved at October/24/2013. |
[2] | The American Library Association. (2013). Why is Intellectual Freedom. Retrieved on October/27/2013. |
[3] | The American Library Association. (2002). ALA applauds federal court ruling on the Children's Internet Protection Act. Retrieved on October/27/2013. |
[4] | The American Library Association. (2013). How Do You Guide Children When You Can't Be with Them 24 Hours A Day?. Retrieved on October/27/2013. |
[5] | [5] The American Library Association. (2013). What is Censorship, How Does Censorship. Retrieved on October/27/2013. |
[6] | The American Family Association. (2013). Your Children and the Internet. Retrieved on November/4/2013. |
[7] | Federal Trade Commission.( 1999). Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule--Comment P994504(American Library Association Submission). Retrieved on October/20/2013. |
[8] | Bruening, P& Davidson, A. (2013). Constitutionality of Internet Filtering Mandate Challenged in Court. Retrieved on November/4/2013. |
[9] | The Center for Democracy and Technology. (2000). Free Speech. Retrieved at November/10/2013. |
[10] | Banks, M. (1998). Filtering the net library: the case ( mostly) in favor. Computer in libraries.18(3), 50. |
[11] | Zittrain, J & Edelman, B. ( 2002). Documentation of the Internet Filtering in Saudi Arabia. Berkman center for Internet & society Harvard School. Re-trieved on October/21/2013. |
[12] | Robert H. Burger. ( 1993). Information Policy: A framework for evaluations and policy research. Ablex Publishing. April, 1993. |
[13] | Busha, C. H. (1972.) Intellectual Freedom and censorship: The climate of opinion in midwestern public library. Library Quarterly, 24(3), 283-301. |
[14] | Yam, A. (2002) Saudi Arabia censors the web. It Matters. More then the Bits and Bytes. Retrieved on October/21/2003. |
[15] | Al-Sarami, N. ( 1999). Problems and Possibilities; Internet in the Kingdom. Saudi Gazette, March 13. |
[16] | Al-Rasheed, A. (2001). The Internet in Saudi Arabia ( management view). Communications engineering technical exchange meeting 2001, 30 April- 2may. ARAMCO, Al-dharan. |
[17] | Langland, L. ( 1997). Public libraries, Intellectual freedom, and the internet: To filter or not to filter. PNLA Quarterly 16 (3).14. |
[18] | Al-Adhel, A. (1998). The regulations on ISPs forbid them from establishing any linkage to the Internet except via the KACST. The rules were published in the May 6, 1998. Al-Jazira daily, as reported in FBIS. |
[19] | Network Buyer’s.(1999). Glossary of Industry Terms. Retrieved on October/27/2003. |
[20] | TechTarget Corporate Web Site. (2003). Filtering Definition. the guide to the Tech Target network of industry-specific IT Web sites. Retrieved on Octo-ber/29/2003. |
[21] | Douglas, J. (1999). The Internet's 'Open Sesame' Is Answered Warily," New York Times. March 18. |
[22] | Al-Kdahi, M. (2003).King Abdulaziz City for Science & Technology (KACST). The Internet Services Unit. Retrieved on November10/2013. |
[23] | Whitaker, B. (2000). Saudi claim victory in war for control of web. The Guardian, 11 May. |
[24] | Richtel, M. (1999). Tables Turn on a Filtering Site As It Is Temporarily Blocked. New York Times, March 11. |
[25] | The American Library Association. (1999). American Library Association and ACLU Court Challenge to Children¹s Internet Protection Act (CHIPA)1999. Retrieved on October/5/2013. |
APA Style
Zohair Malki. (2015). Analyzing the Internet Filtering Policies in KSA and USA. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 3(3), 83-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13
ACS Style
Zohair Malki. Analyzing the Internet Filtering Policies in KSA and USA. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2015, 3(3), 83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13
AMA Style
Zohair Malki. Analyzing the Internet Filtering Policies in KSA and USA. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2015;3(3):83-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13, author = {Zohair Malki}, title = {Analyzing the Internet Filtering Policies in KSA and USA}, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {83-89}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20150303.13}, abstract = {This paper attempts to define internet filtering and outline the purpose of enforcing the filtering policy, and analyze its effect on the use of the Internet resources. This study further examines and evaluates the regulations regarding Internet access in Saudi Arabia, with an emphasis on the problems that people come across during Internet access with limited access to specific web pages due to the policy of filtering. This paper will also examine the case of the Supreme Court of the United States appellant vs. American library association which is similar to that of the Saudi Arabian case with miniscule differences only in term of ritual and cultural aspects. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of using the filtering policy and its influence and application to the culture and religion of Saudi Arabia. The study further enlists some of the rules and regulation, developed about this issue with the reference of the case of the Court of the United States appellant's vs. American library association. Finally, this study discusses the impact of different cultural and tradition on the ways of application of the filtering strategy in both sides.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyzing the Internet Filtering Policies in KSA and USA AU - Zohair Malki Y1 - 2015/04/24 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 83 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20150303.13 AB - This paper attempts to define internet filtering and outline the purpose of enforcing the filtering policy, and analyze its effect on the use of the Internet resources. This study further examines and evaluates the regulations regarding Internet access in Saudi Arabia, with an emphasis on the problems that people come across during Internet access with limited access to specific web pages due to the policy of filtering. This paper will also examine the case of the Supreme Court of the United States appellant vs. American library association which is similar to that of the Saudi Arabian case with miniscule differences only in term of ritual and cultural aspects. The paper evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of using the filtering policy and its influence and application to the culture and religion of Saudi Arabia. The study further enlists some of the rules and regulation, developed about this issue with the reference of the case of the Court of the United States appellant's vs. American library association. Finally, this study discusses the impact of different cultural and tradition on the ways of application of the filtering strategy in both sides. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -