The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of the motivational and instructional self-talk and task complexity on the accuracy of forehand top spin of table tennis in advanced players. The 30 male advanced players were divided into 3 groups (2 experimental and 1 control). The task complexity was determined by color of ball and place of table placement. In other words, sequence sending of the ball were changed after two balls and this trend continues. The keywords for motivational self-talk were "I can do" and " I correctly recognize", and for Instructional self-talk “pay attention” and "Close your paddle". Masters et. al test (2008) was used to measure the accuracy of forehand topspin. After the pre-test, subjects took part in 6 training sessions including 20 trails per session. After 48 hours, they participated in post-test. The data were analyzed by paired-samples t-test, one way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Results showed that there is significant difference between the instructional and motivational self-talk in terms of task complexity. These findings suggested that instructional self-talk is the effective variable in performance of tasks that needs high complex decisions and accuracy.
| Published in | International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12 |
| Page(s) | 16-20 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Instructional Self-Talk, Motivational Self-Talk, Task Complexity, Table Tennis
| [1] | Miller, A. J. (2006). The influence of types and selection of mental preparation statements on collegiate cross-country runners’ athletic performance and satisfaction levels. Miami University. |
| [2] | Goudas, M. (2006). The effects of self-talk on throwing g-and j umping-events performance. Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 3, 105-116. |
| [3] | Papaioannou, A., Theodorakis, Y., Ballon, F., & Auwelle, Y. V. (2004). Combined effect of goal setting and self-talk in performance of a soccer-shooting task. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98 (1), 89-99. |
| [4] | Chroni, S., Perkos, S., & Theodorakis, Y. (2007). Function and preferences of motivational and instructional self-talk for adolescent basketball players. Athletic Insight, 9 (1), 19-29. |
| [5] | Hardy, J., Begley, K., & Blanchfield, A. W. (2015). It's good but it's not right: instructional self-talk and skilled performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 27 (2), 132-139. |
| [6] | Ziegler, S. G. (1987). Effects of stimulus cueing on the acquisition of groundstrokes by beginning tennis players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20 (4), 405-411. |
| [7] | Zinsser, N., Bunker, L., & Williams, J. M. (2006). Cognitive techniques for building confidence and enhancing performance. Applied sport psychology: Personal growth to peak performance, 5, 349-381. |
| [8] | Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H. (2002). Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9 (2), 185-211. |
| [9] | Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance, 21 (5), 1015-1027. |
| [10] | Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn Jr, J. T. (1979). Motor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological review, 86 (5), 415. |
| [11] | Keetch, K. M., & Lee, T. D. (2007). The effect of self-regulated and experimenter-imposed practice schedules on motor learning for tasks of varying difficulty. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 78 (5), 476-486. |
| [12] | Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human Performance. Brooks. Cole, Belmont, CA (5), 7-16. |
| [13] | Xiaopeng, Z. (1998). An experimental investigation into the influence of the speed and spin by balls of different diameters and weights. Science and racket sports II, 206-208. |
| [14] | Rahavi, R., Aslankhani, M., Abdoli, B., & vahabzadeh, A. (2009). The effects of scheduled practices (self-regulated and non–self-regulated) on learning of simple and complex tracking tasks. Development and Motor Learning (Harakat). (2), 65-85. |
| [15] | Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of motor behavior, 36 (2), 212-224. |
| [16] | Masters, R., Poolton, J. M., Maxwell, J. P., & Raab, M. (2008). Implicit motor learning and complex decision making in time-constrained environments. Journal of motor behavior, 40 (1), 71-79. |
| [17] | Zourbanos, N., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Bardas, D., & Theodorakis, Y. (2013). The effects of a self-talk intervention on elementary students’ motor task performance. Early Child Development and Care, 183 (7), 924-930. |
| [18] | Zetou, E., Vernadakis, N., Bebetsos, E., & Makrari, E. (2012). The effect of self-talk in learning the volleyball service skill and self-efficacy improvement. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 7 (4), 794-805. |
| [19] | Chang, Y.-K., Ho, L.-A., Lu, F. J.-H., Ou, C.-C., Song, T.-F., & Gill, D. L. (2014). Self-talk and softball performance: The role of self-talk nature, motor task characteristics, and self-efficacy in novice softball players. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15 (1), 139-145. |
| [20] | Kolovelonis, A., Goudas, M., & Dermitzaki, I. (2011). The effects of instructional and motivational self-talk on students’ motor task performance in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12 (2), 153-158. |
| [21] | Blakeslee, M. L., & Goff, D. M. (2007). The effects of a mental skills training package on equestrians. The Sport Psychologist, 21 (3), 288-301. |
| [22] | Harvey, D., Van Raalte, J., & Brewer, B. (2002). Relationship between self-talk and golf performance. International Sports Journal, 6 (1), 84-91. |
| [23] | Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Zourbanos, N., Mpoumpaki, S., & Theodorakis, Y. (2009). Mechanisms underlying the self-talk–performance relationship: The effects of motivational self-talk on self-confidence and anxiety. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10 (1), 186-192. |
APA Style
Mohammad Reza Sadeghian Shahi, Rosa Rahavi Ezabadi, Najmeh Abootalebi, Parisa Moshiri. (2020). The Effects of the Self-Talk Types and Task Complexity on the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin of Advanced Players. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 5(2), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12
ACS Style
Mohammad Reza Sadeghian Shahi; Rosa Rahavi Ezabadi; Najmeh Abootalebi; Parisa Moshiri. The Effects of the Self-Talk Types and Task Complexity on the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin of Advanced Players. Int. J. Sports Sci. Phys. Educ. 2020, 5(2), 16-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12
AMA Style
Mohammad Reza Sadeghian Shahi, Rosa Rahavi Ezabadi, Najmeh Abootalebi, Parisa Moshiri. The Effects of the Self-Talk Types and Task Complexity on the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin of Advanced Players. Int J Sports Sci Phys Educ. 2020;5(2):16-20. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12,
author = {Mohammad Reza Sadeghian Shahi and Rosa Rahavi Ezabadi and Najmeh Abootalebi and Parisa Moshiri},
title = {The Effects of the Self-Talk Types and Task Complexity on the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin of Advanced Players},
journal = {International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education},
volume = {5},
number = {2},
pages = {16-20},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsspe.20200502.12},
abstract = {The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of the motivational and instructional self-talk and task complexity on the accuracy of forehand top spin of table tennis in advanced players. The 30 male advanced players were divided into 3 groups (2 experimental and 1 control). The task complexity was determined by color of ball and place of table placement. In other words, sequence sending of the ball were changed after two balls and this trend continues. The keywords for motivational self-talk were "I can do" and " I correctly recognize", and for Instructional self-talk “pay attention” and "Close your paddle". Masters et. al test (2008) was used to measure the accuracy of forehand topspin. After the pre-test, subjects took part in 6 training sessions including 20 trails per session. After 48 hours, they participated in post-test. The data were analyzed by paired-samples t-test, one way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Results showed that there is significant difference between the instructional and motivational self-talk in terms of task complexity. These findings suggested that instructional self-talk is the effective variable in performance of tasks that needs high complex decisions and accuracy.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effects of the Self-Talk Types and Task Complexity on the Accuracy of Forehand Topspin of Advanced Players AU - Mohammad Reza Sadeghian Shahi AU - Rosa Rahavi Ezabadi AU - Najmeh Abootalebi AU - Parisa Moshiri Y1 - 2020/09/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12 T2 - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education JF - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education JO - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education SP - 16 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1611 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20200502.12 AB - The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of the motivational and instructional self-talk and task complexity on the accuracy of forehand top spin of table tennis in advanced players. The 30 male advanced players were divided into 3 groups (2 experimental and 1 control). The task complexity was determined by color of ball and place of table placement. In other words, sequence sending of the ball were changed after two balls and this trend continues. The keywords for motivational self-talk were "I can do" and " I correctly recognize", and for Instructional self-talk “pay attention” and "Close your paddle". Masters et. al test (2008) was used to measure the accuracy of forehand topspin. After the pre-test, subjects took part in 6 training sessions including 20 trails per session. After 48 hours, they participated in post-test. The data were analyzed by paired-samples t-test, one way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Results showed that there is significant difference between the instructional and motivational self-talk in terms of task complexity. These findings suggested that instructional self-talk is the effective variable in performance of tasks that needs high complex decisions and accuracy. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: