Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry

Received: 7 August 2024     Accepted: 3 September 2024     Published: 20 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In mathematics education, students’ beliefs that could take many different forms like students' beliefs about mathematics learning mathematics teaching; and about themselves play a significant role in their learning and achievement. In particular, self-belief (SB) that is students’ evaluation and judgment about themselves in learning solid geometry, which encompassing control belief (CB), goal orientation (GO), self-concept (SC), self-efficacy (SE), and task value (TV), is critical to their success in learning solid geometry. Addressing these SB dimensions can substantially improve students' learning outcomes in solid geometry. Innovative, student-centered instructional approaches like GIBI, especially when combined with variation theory, offer a potential solution for overcoming Ethiopian secondary schools’ educational challenges by promoting active learning and providing varied examples to enhance engagement and achievement. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of this combined approach in Ethiopia context. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the effects of variation theory integrated GIBI on grade ten students' SB in learning solid geometry in Ethiopia. Employing a quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design, 102 students from three public secondary schools in Debre Tabor city, Amhara region were randomly assigned into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (EG1) received GIBI with variation theory, Experimental Group 2 (EG2) received GIBI without variation theory, and the Control Group (CG) received traditional teaching methods. A SB questionnaire was used to measure students' CB, GO, SC, SE, and TV before and after the intervention. The results revealed significant improvements in the SB dimensions among students in EG1 compared to those in EG2 and CG. Specifically, EG1 students showed higher post-test scores in CB (F (2,99)=40.29, p=0.000, η²=0.449); GO (F (2,99)=3.43, p=0.036, η²=0.065); SC (F (2,99)=32.09, p=0.000, η²=0.393); SE (F (2,99)=24.02, p=0.000, η²=0.327); and TV (F (2,99)=5.35, p=0.000, η²=0.097). Tukey post hoc tests indicated that EG1 students' scores were significantly higher than those of the CG in CB and GO, and higher than EG2 and CG in SC, SE, and TV. These findings suggest that the integration of variation theory with GIBI effectively enhances students' SB in learning solid geometry, thereby addressing the educational challenges faced by Ethiopian students. The study recommends adopting this instructional approach more widely to improve student outcomes in mathematics.

Published in International Journal of Secondary Education (Volume 12, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12
Page(s) 56-67
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction, Self-Belief, Solid Geometry, Variation Theory

References
[1] Frederick-Jonah, T. M., Olotu, A. R., Egberifa, T. K. Areas and Reasons for Students' Difficulties in Learning Geometry by Gender in Senior Secondary School Mathematics Curriculum. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development. 2022, 2(6), 55-65.
[2] Tsao, Y., Tung, W. High School Students’ Attitude Towards Their Learning Geometry. US-China Education Review. 2022, 12(3), 77-84.
[3] Herbst, P., Fujita, T., Halverscheid, S., Weiss, M. The Learning and Teaching of Geometry in Secondary Schools: A modeling perspective. Routledge; 2017.
[4] Serin, H. Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry: Teaching and Learning Methods. Journal of Education and Training. 2018, 5(1), 130-137.
[5] Jones, K. Re-imagining geometry education in schools. In Beiträge zum mathematikunterricht 2020 auf der 54. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft fur Didaktik der Mathematik (GDM) H-S. Siller, W. Weigel, and J. Franz Wörler, Eds., Münster: WTM-Verlag; 2020, pp. 31-38.
[6] Fabiyi, T. R. Geometry Concepts in Mathematics Perceived Difficult to Learn by Senior Secondary School Students in Ekiti State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME). 2017, 7(1), 83-90.
[7] Getinet, S. W. The actual status of general secondary school mathematics teaching and learning: The case of Ethiopia. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1176(2019) 042097. IOP Publishing.
[8] Yeshitila, M., Mamo, T. Factor Affecting Student`s Achievement in Mathematics: The Case of Agarfa Secondary School, Ethiopia. Education Journal. 2019, 8(6), 307-319.
[9] Arifin, S., Wahyudin, Herman, T. The Effect of Students’ Mathematics Self-efficacy on Mathematical Understanding Performance. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online. 2021, 20(1), 617-627.
[10] Guo, M., Leung, F. Achievement goal orientations, learning strategies, and mathematics achievement: A comparison of Chinese Miao and Han students. Psychol Schs.. 2020, 1–17. Wiley Periodicals LLC.
[11] Agormor, S., Apawu, J., Aboagye-Agbi, J. J., Hokor, E. K. Prior mathematics achievement and mathematics self-efficacy as indicators for success in pre-service teachers’ achievement in geometry and trigonometry. Journal of Research in Instructional. 2022, 2(2), 115–128.
[12] Jumantini, E., Satriapradja, N., Rahmat, P. S., Amalia, G. The Effect of Guided Discovery Learning Method and Guided Inquiry Learning in Improving Students Critical Thinking Ability with Students' Self-Effication Variable Moderator. UNISET. 2021, December 02, Kuningan, Indonesia.
[13] Jacques, L. What is teaching with variation and is it relevant to teaching and learning mathematics in England? In Research proceedings of the 9th British Congress on mathematics education. J. Golding, N. Bretscher, C. Crisan, E. Geraniou, J. Hodgen, and C. Morgan. Eds. University of Warwick, UK; 2018.
[14] Voon, X. P., Wong, L. H., Looi, C. K., Chen, W. Constructivism-informed variation theory lesson designs in enriching and elevating science learning: Case studies of seamless learning design. J Res Sci Teach. 2020,1–23. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
[15] Ting Jing, J., Tarmizi, R. A., Abu Bakar, K., Aralas, D. The Adoption of Variation Theory in the Classroom: Effect on Students’ Algebraic Achievement and Motivation to Learn. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology. 2017, 15(2), 307-325.
[16] World Bank. Ethiopia Education Public Expenditure Review. The World Bank; 2018.
[17] Adamu, A. Y. Challenges of teaching and learning mathematics in secondary schools in Ethiopia. African Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics and Sciences. 2017, 13(1), 1-12.
[18] Elastika, R. W., Sukono., Dewanto, S. P. Analysis of Factors Affecting Students’ Mathematics Learning Difficulties Using SEM as Information for Teaching Improvement. International Journal of Instruction. 2021, 14(4), 281-300.
[19] Alghadari, F., Herman, T., Prabawanto, S. Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. International electronic journal of mathematics education. 2020, 15(3).
[20] Etang, M. G., Regidor, R. M. Students’ mathematical beliefs and attitudes as predictors to students’ mathematical ability. International Journal of Education and Social Science Research (IJESSR).2022, 5(3), 23-60.
[21] Mohammed, D., Endris, Y. Perceived factors affecting students’ mathematics performance in north showa zone secondary schools in Ethiopia. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2019, 8(5), 21-36.
[22] National Educational Assessment and Examinations Agency [NEAEA]. Ethiopian Third National Learning Assessment of grade 10 and 12 students. 2017. Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
[23] Pajares, M. F. Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research Fall 1992. 1992, 62(3), 307-332.
[24] Pintrich, R. P., Smith, A. F., Garcia, D. T., McKeachie, J. W. (1991). A Manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan; 1991.
[25] Njoki, P. G.; King-White, D.; Kinai, T., Kigen, E. Assessing the Correlation Between Academic Self-Concept and Mathematics Achievement in Secondary Schools in Nairobi County, Kenya. Journal of Education and Learning. 2019, 8(3), 102-111.
[26] Putwain, D, Symes, W, Nicholson, L., Becker, S. Achievement goals, behavioral engagement, and mathematics achievement: a mediational analysis', Learning and Individual Differences. 2018, 68, 12-19.
[27] Wang, J., Rao, N. Classroom goal structures: Observations from urban and rural high school classes in China. Psychology in the Schools. 2019, 56(8), 1211–1229.
[28] Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., Rosenzweig, E. Q. Expectancy-Value Theory and Its Relevance for Student Motivation and Learning. In. The Cambridge Handbook of Motivation and learning, K. A. Renninger, and S. E. Hidi, Eds., Cambridge University Press, 2019, pp. 617-644.
[29] Ryan, V., Fitzmaurice, O., O’Donoghue, J.Student Interest and Engagement in Mathematics After the First Year of Secondary Education. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 2022, 10(4), 436-454.
[30] Mamiala, D., Mji, A., Simelane-Mnisi, S. Students' Interest in Understanding Geometry in South African High Schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2021, 9(3), 487-496.
[31] Aguilar, J. J. High School Students’ Reasons for disliking Mathematics: The Intersection Between Teacher’s Role and Student’s Emotions, Belief and Self-efficacy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education. 2021, 16(3), em0658.
[32] Detera-Recebido, J. Self-concept and Academic Performance in Mathematics of Senior High School Students. International Journal of Advance Research, Ideas and Innovations in Technology. 2022, 8(3), 385-391.
[33] Shimelis, A. T., Demeke, W. A. Assessment on students’ academic self-efficacy, self-concept, goal orientation and academic achievement: the case of Debre Markos higher education preparatory school, Ethiopia. European Journal of Education Studies. 2017, 3(8), 778-792.
[34] Wu, H., Guo, Y., Yang, Y., Zhao, L., Guo, C. A Meta-analysis of the Longitudinal Relationship Between Academic Self-Concept and Academic Achievement. Educational Psychology Review. Springer Science and Business Media, LLC; 2021.
[35] Yunos, N. M., Thangal, T. B. T., Rahmat, N. H., Sharif, N. F. M., Ahmad, S. N., & Latif, N. A. Motivation for Learning Mathematics: A Study Across Disciplines. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 2022, 12(9), 1135-1154.
[36] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman. 1997.
[37] Dang, X. C. The Influence of Students’ and Teachers’ Mathematics-related Beliefs on Students’ Mathematics Performance. PhD. Thesis, Flinders University, 2021.
[38] Weißenfels, M., Hofmann, D., Dörrenbächer‑Ulrich, L., Perels, F. Linking academic buoyancy and math achievement in secondary school students: Does academic self‑efficacy play a role? Current Psychology. 2022.
[39] Arens, A. K., Frenzel, A., Goetz, T. Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy in Math: Longitudinal Interrelations and Reciprocal Linkages with Achievement, The Journal of Experimental Education. 2020.
[40] Wang, Q., Xue, M. The implications of expectancy-value theory of motivation in language education. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13: 992372.
[41] Herges, R. M., Duffield, S., Martin, W., Wageman, J. Motivation and Achievement of Middle School Mathematics Students. The Mathematics Educator. 2017, 26(1), 83-106.
[42] Pitsia, V., Biggart, A., Karakolidis, A. The role of students' self-beliefs, motivation and attitudes in predicting mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment data. Learning and Individual Differences. 2017, 55, 163–173.
[43] Zhang, J., Bohrnstedt, G., Park, B. J., Ikoma, S., Ogut, B., and Broer, M. Mathematics Motivation and the Relationship with Student Performance: Evidence from the HSLS Overlap Sample. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research; 2021.
[44] Pekrun, R., Schukajlow, S., Rakoczy, K. Emotions and motivation in mathematics education: Theoretical considerations and empirical contributions. ZDM: the international journal on mathematics education. 2017, 49(3), 307-322.
[45] Seel, N., Lehmann, T., Blumschein, P., Podolskiy, O. Instructional Design for Learning: Theoretical Foundations. Sense Publishers; 2017.
[46] Nisa, C. C., Astriani, D. Application of the guided inquiry learning model to increase student learning motivation. J. PIJAR MIPA. 2022, 17(4), 475-479.
[47] Borovay, L. A., Shore, B. M., Caccese, C., Yang, E., Hua, O. Flow, Achievement Level, and Inquiry-Based Learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 2019, 30(1),74–106.
[48] Dávila-Acedo, M. A., Sánchez-Martín, J., Airado-Rodríguez, D., Cañada-Cañada, F. Impact of an Active Learning Methodology on Students’ Emotions and Self-Efficacy Beliefs towards the Learning of Chemical Reactions—The Case of Secondary Education Students. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(347).
[49] Kullberg, A., Ingerman, A., Marton, F. Planning and Analyzing teaching: Using the Variation Theory of Learning. Routledge; 2024.
[50] Gu, F., Huang, R., Gu, L. Theory and development of teaching through variation in mathematics in China. In Teaching and learning mathematics through variation. R. Huang & Y. Li. Eds. Sense Publishers; 2017, pp. 13–41.
[51] Lomibao, L. S., Ombay S. O. Does Repetition with Variation Improve Students’ Mathematics Conceptual Understanding and Retention? International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2017, 6(6), 2131-2137.
[52] Berie, K., Liping Ding. The use of variation theory in a problem-based task design study. Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. hal-02423413; 2019.
[53] Handy, J. Theories that Inform the Use of Variation in Mathematics Pedagogy. PhD. Thesis, Alberta University, 2021.
[54] Baskoro, I. Variation theory-based mathematics teaching: The new method in improving higher order thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1957. 2021, 012016. IOP Publishing.
[55] Lo, M. L. Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis; 2012.
[56] Riegle-Crumb, C., Morton, C., Nguyen, U., Dasgupta, N. Inquiry-Based Instruction in Science and Mathematics in Middle School Classrooms: Examining Its Association with Students’ Attitudes by Gender and Race/Ethnicity. AERA Open July-September. 2019, 5(3), 1–17.
[57] Abza, A., Wodaj, H., Edessa, S. Effects of Guided Inquiry-Based Model on Pre-Service Biology Teachers Attitude Towards Invertebrate Zoology Learning. Aquademia. 2022, 6(2), ep22007.
[58] Sulistyani, N., Raharjo, E. P. The Effect of The Implementation of Guided Inquiry-Based Worksheet on The Empire Ability and Self-Efficacy of High School Students. PRISMA. 2022, 11(1), 21-31.
[59] Sabitu, K. A., Lamidi, T. O. Effect of structured and guided investigation techniques on the interest of College students in Mathematics in Nigeria. THE COLLOQUIUM. 2022, 10(1), 83-92.
[60] Pillay, V., Adler, J., Runesson Kempe, U. The sequencing and pairing of examples in the midst of sameness and difference: Opening opportunities to learn. Pythagoras. 2022, 43(1), a667.
[61] Dorier, J., Maass, K. Inquiry-Based Mathematics Education. In Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. S. Lerman, Ed. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.; 2020, pp. 384-389.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yeshanew, A., Belachew, T., Gezahegn, H., Tesfa, T. (2024). Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry. International Journal of Secondary Education, 12(3), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yeshanew, A.; Belachew, T.; Gezahegn, H.; Tesfa, T. Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry. Int. J. Second. Educ. 2024, 12(3), 56-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yeshanew A, Belachew T, Gezahegn H, Tesfa T. Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry. Int J Second Educ. 2024;12(3):56-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12,
      author = {Abebaw Yeshanew and Tesfu Belachew and Habtamu Gezahegn and Tadele Tesfa},
      title = {Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Secondary Education},
      volume = {12},
      number = {3},
      pages = {56-67},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsedu.20241203.12},
      abstract = {In mathematics education, students’ beliefs that could take many different forms like students' beliefs about mathematics learning mathematics teaching; and about themselves play a significant role in their learning and achievement. In particular, self-belief (SB) that is students’ evaluation and judgment about themselves in learning solid geometry, which encompassing control belief (CB), goal orientation (GO), self-concept (SC), self-efficacy (SE), and task value (TV), is critical to their success in learning solid geometry. Addressing these SB dimensions can substantially improve students' learning outcomes in solid geometry. Innovative, student-centered instructional approaches like GIBI, especially when combined with variation theory, offer a potential solution for overcoming Ethiopian secondary schools’ educational challenges by promoting active learning and providing varied examples to enhance engagement and achievement. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of this combined approach in Ethiopia context. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the effects of variation theory integrated GIBI on grade ten students' SB in learning solid geometry in Ethiopia. Employing a quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design, 102 students from three public secondary schools in Debre Tabor city, Amhara region were randomly assigned into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (EG1) received GIBI with variation theory, Experimental Group 2 (EG2) received GIBI without variation theory, and the Control Group (CG) received traditional teaching methods. A SB questionnaire was used to measure students' CB, GO, SC, SE, and TV before and after the intervention. The results revealed significant improvements in the SB dimensions among students in EG1 compared to those in EG2 and CG. Specifically, EG1 students showed higher post-test scores in CB (F (2,99)=40.29, p=0.000, η²=0.449); GO (F (2,99)=3.43, p=0.036, η²=0.065); SC (F (2,99)=32.09, p=0.000, η²=0.393); SE (F (2,99)=24.02, p=0.000, η²=0.327); and TV (F (2,99)=5.35, p=0.000, η²=0.097). Tukey post hoc tests indicated that EG1 students' scores were significantly higher than those of the CG in CB and GO, and higher than EG2 and CG in SC, SE, and TV. These findings suggest that the integration of variation theory with GIBI effectively enhances students' SB in learning solid geometry, thereby addressing the educational challenges faced by Ethiopian students. The study recommends adopting this instructional approach more widely to improve student outcomes in mathematics.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Variation Theory Integrated Guided Inquiry-Based Instruction on Grade Ten Students Self-Belief in Learning Solid Geometry
    
    AU  - Abebaw Yeshanew
    AU  - Tesfu Belachew
    AU  - Habtamu Gezahegn
    AU  - Tadele Tesfa
    Y1  - 2024/09/20
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12
    T2  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    JF  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    JO  - International Journal of Secondary Education
    SP  - 56
    EP  - 67
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2376-7472
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20241203.12
    AB  - In mathematics education, students’ beliefs that could take many different forms like students' beliefs about mathematics learning mathematics teaching; and about themselves play a significant role in their learning and achievement. In particular, self-belief (SB) that is students’ evaluation and judgment about themselves in learning solid geometry, which encompassing control belief (CB), goal orientation (GO), self-concept (SC), self-efficacy (SE), and task value (TV), is critical to their success in learning solid geometry. Addressing these SB dimensions can substantially improve students' learning outcomes in solid geometry. Innovative, student-centered instructional approaches like GIBI, especially when combined with variation theory, offer a potential solution for overcoming Ethiopian secondary schools’ educational challenges by promoting active learning and providing varied examples to enhance engagement and achievement. However, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of this combined approach in Ethiopia context. This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the effects of variation theory integrated GIBI on grade ten students' SB in learning solid geometry in Ethiopia. Employing a quasi-experimental with non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest design, 102 students from three public secondary schools in Debre Tabor city, Amhara region were randomly assigned into three groups: Experimental Group 1 (EG1) received GIBI with variation theory, Experimental Group 2 (EG2) received GIBI without variation theory, and the Control Group (CG) received traditional teaching methods. A SB questionnaire was used to measure students' CB, GO, SC, SE, and TV before and after the intervention. The results revealed significant improvements in the SB dimensions among students in EG1 compared to those in EG2 and CG. Specifically, EG1 students showed higher post-test scores in CB (F (2,99)=40.29, p=0.000, η²=0.449); GO (F (2,99)=3.43, p=0.036, η²=0.065); SC (F (2,99)=32.09, p=0.000, η²=0.393); SE (F (2,99)=24.02, p=0.000, η²=0.327); and TV (F (2,99)=5.35, p=0.000, η²=0.097). Tukey post hoc tests indicated that EG1 students' scores were significantly higher than those of the CG in CB and GO, and higher than EG2 and CG in SC, SE, and TV. These findings suggest that the integration of variation theory with GIBI effectively enhances students' SB in learning solid geometry, thereby addressing the educational challenges faced by Ethiopian students. The study recommends adopting this instructional approach more widely to improve student outcomes in mathematics.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections