Introduction and objectives: In a context where Ivorian companies are suffering the effects of the crisis situation that the country has gone through and stress factors at work, many workers encounter problems related to mental and physical health. The individual and collective life of the persons at work is then put to the test. In particular, Abidjan workers are increasingly demanding in terms of well-being in their workplace. The present study therefore aims to explain the level of well-being at work by interactional factors such as enmity and respect at work. Method: The study sample consists of 400 workers. These are selected by the quota method. The data collection instrument is a multidimensional questionnaire including a measure of well-being at work: that of the Duke Health Profile (DHP). This questionnaire was subject to a multi-step validation procedure. The data collected from workers are analyzed by T test and Anova techniques. Results: The results show that enmity and respect at work have a significant effect on people's well-being at work. Conclusion: Thus, the level of well-being of workers is high on the one hand when there is no enmity at work and, on the other hand, when there is respect at work. These results suggest to take into account the variables enmity and respect at work when reinforcing people’s well-being at work.
Published in | International Journal of Psychological Science (Volume 3, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11 |
Page(s) | 12-18 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Well-Being, Enmity, Respect, Work, Interaction
[1] | Dortier, J. F. (2017). Pourquoi travaille-t-on? In Ouvrage collectif, La motivation (p. 61-69) Auxerre, Éditions Sciences Humaines. |
[2] | Jauvin, N. (2003). La violence organisationnelle: parcours conceptuel et théorique et proposition d’un modèle compréhensif intégrateur. CLSC CHSLD Haute-ville-des-rivières, Québec. Retrieved from http://www.santecom.qc.ca/BibliothequeVirtuelle/CLSC-CHSLD-Haute-Ville-Des-Rivieres/ViolenceOrganisationnelle.pdf |
[3] | Castellot, A-S. (2019). La reconnaissance au travail. Communication présentée par le GRIEPS. Les berges du Rhône-64, avenu Leclerc, 69007 Lyon: Villeurbanne. https://www.anfh.fr/sites/default/files/fichiers/portfilio_journeeconferance_14.02.19.pdf |
[4] | Ren, D., Stavrova, O. & Loh, W. W. (2021). Nonlinear effect of social interaction quantity on psychological well-being: Diminishing returns or inverted U? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000373 |
[5] | N’Guessan, K. S. P. (2016). Le rôle du bien-être au travail dans l’influence des conditions de travail sur l’absentéisme: Une application aux fonctionnaires de Côte d’Ivoire. Thèse de doctorat en Sciences de Gestion, Bouaké, Université Alassane Ouattara. |
[6] | Bernard, N. (2019): Bien-être au travail et performance de l’entreprise: une analyse par les paradoxes. Thèse de doctorat en Gestion et management, Université Grenoble Alpes. Retrieved from https://theses.hal.science/tel-02461337 |
[7] | Grossen, M. (2018). Interaction ou inter-actions? Deux conceptions de la notion d'interaction. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique, 68, 121-128 http://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/tranel/files/Tranel/68/121-128_Grossen.pdf |
[8] | Marc, E. & Picard, D. (2015). Conflit et relation. Gestalt, 1 (46), 129-142. |
[9] | Errazuriz, J. A. (2020). La notion de l’ennemi dans le discours des philosophes: vers une taxonomie du concept. Scienza et Politica, 32 (62), 141-159. |
[10] | Lignier, W. & Pagis, J. (2014). Inimitiés enfantines: l'expression précoce des distances sociales.Genèse, 3 (96), 35-61. |
[11] | Diep, T. N. N., Teo, S. T. T., Grover S. L. & Nguyen, N. P. (2019). Respect, bullying and public sector work outcomes in Vietnam. Public Management: Review, 21 (6), 863-889. |
[12] | Creusier, J. (2013). Clarification conceptuelle du bien-être au travail. France: Université de Caen Basse-Normandie (France), NIMEC EA 969. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/jordane-Creusier/publication/272301415_Clarification |
[13] | Guillemin, F., Paul-Dauphin, A., Virion, J. M., Bouchet, C. & Briançon, S. (1997), The Duke Health Profile: a generic instrument to measure the quality of life to health. Santé publique, 9 (1), 35-44. |
[14] | Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56 (3), 218-226. |
[15] | Yaich, A. (2004). La courtoisie professionnelle. La Revue Comptable et Financière, n° 65, Retrieved from https://www.larcf.com/edito/edito65.pdf |
[16] | Grover, S. L. (2013). Unraveling respect in organization studies. Human relations, 67 (1) 27-51. |
[17] | Eiguer, A. (2022). Haine par l’autre, de l’autre, par soi, de (pour) soi. In A. Eiguer, La haine de soi et de l’autre, (p. 31-47). Paris, Dunod. |
[18] | Jeantet, A. (2018). Les émotions au travail. Paris, Éditions CNRS. |
[19] | Clarke, N. & Mahadi, N. (2015). Mutual Recognition Respect Between Leaders and Followers: Its Relationship to Follower Job Performance and Well-being. Springer: Journal of Business Ethics, 141 (1), 163-178, |
[20] | Decker, C. & Van, N. Q. (2015). Getting Respect from a Boss You Respect: How Different Types of Respect Interact to Explain Subordinates' Job Satisfaction as Mediated by Self-Determination. Springer: Journal of Business Ethics, 131 (3), 543-556. |
APA Style
Coulibaly, M., Dabone, I. (2023). Enmity, Respect and Well-Being at Work: The Case of Workers in Private Companies in Abidjan. International Journal of Psychological Science, 3(2), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11
ACS Style
Coulibaly, M.; Dabone, I. Enmity, Respect and Well-Being at Work: The Case of Workers in Private Companies in Abidjan. Int. J. Psychol. Sci. 2023, 3(2), 12-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11
AMA Style
Coulibaly M, Dabone I. Enmity, Respect and Well-Being at Work: The Case of Workers in Private Companies in Abidjan. Int J Psychol Sci. 2023;3(2):12-18. doi: 10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11, author = {Mariam Coulibaly and Inoussa Dabone}, title = {Enmity, Respect and Well-Being at Work: The Case of Workers in Private Companies in Abidjan}, journal = {International Journal of Psychological Science}, volume = {3}, number = {2}, pages = {12-18}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijps.20230302.11}, abstract = {Introduction and objectives: In a context where Ivorian companies are suffering the effects of the crisis situation that the country has gone through and stress factors at work, many workers encounter problems related to mental and physical health. The individual and collective life of the persons at work is then put to the test. In particular, Abidjan workers are increasingly demanding in terms of well-being in their workplace. The present study therefore aims to explain the level of well-being at work by interactional factors such as enmity and respect at work. Method: The study sample consists of 400 workers. These are selected by the quota method. The data collection instrument is a multidimensional questionnaire including a measure of well-being at work: that of the Duke Health Profile (DHP). This questionnaire was subject to a multi-step validation procedure. The data collected from workers are analyzed by T test and Anova techniques. Results: The results show that enmity and respect at work have a significant effect on people's well-being at work. Conclusion: Thus, the level of well-being of workers is high on the one hand when there is no enmity at work and, on the other hand, when there is respect at work. These results suggest to take into account the variables enmity and respect at work when reinforcing people’s well-being at work. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Enmity, Respect and Well-Being at Work: The Case of Workers in Private Companies in Abidjan AU - Mariam Coulibaly AU - Inoussa Dabone Y1 - 2023/11/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11 T2 - International Journal of Psychological Science JF - International Journal of Psychological Science JO - International Journal of Psychological Science SP - 12 EP - 18 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7162 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijps.20230302.11 AB - Introduction and objectives: In a context where Ivorian companies are suffering the effects of the crisis situation that the country has gone through and stress factors at work, many workers encounter problems related to mental and physical health. The individual and collective life of the persons at work is then put to the test. In particular, Abidjan workers are increasingly demanding in terms of well-being in their workplace. The present study therefore aims to explain the level of well-being at work by interactional factors such as enmity and respect at work. Method: The study sample consists of 400 workers. These are selected by the quota method. The data collection instrument is a multidimensional questionnaire including a measure of well-being at work: that of the Duke Health Profile (DHP). This questionnaire was subject to a multi-step validation procedure. The data collected from workers are analyzed by T test and Anova techniques. Results: The results show that enmity and respect at work have a significant effect on people's well-being at work. Conclusion: Thus, the level of well-being of workers is high on the one hand when there is no enmity at work and, on the other hand, when there is respect at work. These results suggest to take into account the variables enmity and respect at work when reinforcing people’s well-being at work. VL - 3 IS - 2 ER -