Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

| Peer-Reviewed

Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael

Published in International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 6, Issue 3)

Received: 31 May 2021 Accepted: 21 July 2021 Published: 28 July 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

In Ethiopia's highlands, land degradation is one of the most significant obstacles to agricultural productivity and environmental quality. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures has been recognized as a requirement for sustaining the dynamism of ecosystems, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and human security for more than five decades. Despite increased attempts by the government and then non-state actors to introduce these technologies and support farmers, adoption rates remained low due to a greater emphasis on individual adoption over collective adoption. The objective of this review study was to evaluate the role of collective action in the adoption of such measures in the Ethiopian highlands prior to COVID-19, in which the factors and challenges of such adoption were highlighted. Following that, the public materials and their arguments were thoroughly scrutinized, and a conceptual framework was contextually changed and implemented. The conclusions of the binary logit model were based on the empirical results of other studies where the dependent variable was dichotomous, and they were employed with pre-arranged and pre-interpreted qualitative and quantitative data. The results of the investigation revealed that as the number of days spent in touch with an extension grows, so does the likelihood of adopting such activities. Participation in non-farm activities, on the other hand, lowers the likelihood of such practices being adopted. Finally, collective action could help to speed up the acceptance of such practices. Extrinsic as well as intrinsic variables, however, may make such behaviors difficult to implement. As a result, policymakers, extension workers, and future researchers should think about the important factors that may influence the adoption of such better techniques. As a result, the regime and non-state actors in Ethiopia's highlands should forfeit attention to adult education and training opportunities focused on the acceptance phase of adoption, as well as the role of collective action focusing on the adoption of such conservation practices.

Published in	International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
Page(s)	126-142
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

COVID-19, Adoption, Collective Action, Intrinsic, Extrinsic, Ethiopian Highlands

References

[1]	Addisu Damtew A., Husen Maru A. and Demeku Mesfin A. 2015. Determinants of adopting techniques of soil and water conservation in Goromti Watershed, Western Ethiopia. Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Management, Vol. 6 (6): 168-177.
[2]	Agere Belachew, Wuletaw Mekuria, and Nachimuthu, K. 2020. Factors influencing adoption of soil and water conservation practices in the northwest tEthiopian highlands. International soil and water conservation research, 8 (2): 80-89.
[3]	Ajzen, I. 2011. The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychology and health, 26 (9): 1113–1127.
[4]	Alem-meta Assefa A. and Singh, K. N. 2019. Factors affecting the adoption of sustainable land management practices at farm level in the northeastern highlands of Ethiopia: the teleyayen watershed cases tudy. Journal of Environ Pollution Manage Vol, 2 (103): 1-12.
[5]	Arslan, A., Floress, K., Lamanna, C., Lipper, L., Solomon Asfaw, and Rosenstock, T. 2020. The adoption of improved agricultural technologies: Ameta-analysis for Africa. ISBN 978-92-9266-032-1. Accessed on 10 March 2021.
[6]	Asnake Mekuriaw, Heinimann, A., Gete Zeleke, and Hurni, H. 2018. Factors influencing the adoption of physical soil and water conservation practices in the Ethiopian highlands. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 6 (2): 23–30.
[7]	Assefa Admassie and Gezahegn Ayele. 2010. Adoption of improved technology in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, Vol, 19 (1): 155-180.
[8]	Belay Asnake and Eyasu Elias. 2017. Challenges and extents of Soil and Water Conservation measures in Guba-Lafto Woreda of North Wollo, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, Vol, 7 (2): 103-110.
[9]	Belete Limani, K. 2017. Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices in the case of Damota watershed, Wolaita zone, Southern, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agricultural Science Research, Vol., 3 (1): 1-9.
[10]	Berhanu Gebremedhin, Pender, J. and Girmay Tesfay. 2002. Collective action for grazing land management in crop-livestock mixed systems in the highlands of northern Ethiopia: Background paper for the CAPRi Workshopon Methods for Studying Collective Action, February 25 March 1, 2002, in Nyeri, Kenya.
[11]	Biniam Teshome, Negash, R. and Shewa, A. 2019. Determinants of adoption of improved Jaleneapota to variety: The case of Chencha Woreda, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, Vol. 11 (7): 170-185.
[12]	Birhan Asmame M. 2014. Farmers’ perception and adoption of soil and water conservation measures: the case of Gidan Wereda, North Wello, Ethiopia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol. 5 (24): 1-9.
[13]	Birhan Asmame M. and Assfa Abegaz Y. 2017. Determinants of farmers’ adoption of land management practices in Gelana sub-watershed of Northern highlands of Ethiopia. Ecological processes (2017): 6-19.
[14]	Birhan Sisay, D. 2009. Factors affecting the adoption of soil and water conservation practices in NE Ethiopia: A case study of Meket Woreda. MA Thesis Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
[15]	Cramb, R. A. 2004. The role of social capital in the promotion of conservation farming: the case of land care in the southern Philippine, University of Queens land, Brisbane, Australia.
[16]	Daniel Asfaw and Mulugeta Neka. 2017. Factors affecting adoption of soil and water conservation practices: The case of Wereillu Woreda, South Wollo Zone, Amhara Region Ethiopia. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 5 (2017): 273–279.
[17]	Daniel Ayalew, M., Gerber, N. and Matz, J. A. 2016. Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia: Working Paper Series No. 235 African Development Bank, Abidjan, Côted’Ivoire.
[18]	Daniel Jaleta, N. 2020. Major constraints of watershed management practices in Ethiopia and ways forward. International journal of environmental protections and policy, Vol, 8 (4): 70-76.
[19]	De Graaff, J., Amsalu, K., Bodna, F., Kessler, A., Posthumus, A. and Tenge, A. 2008. Factors influencing adoption and continued use of long-term soil and water conservation measures in five developing countries. Applied Geography, 28 (2008): 271–280.
[20]	Etenesh Bekele. 2018. Farmers collective action and agricultural transformation in Ethiopia: Degree of PhD. in developmental studies at the University of South Africa.
[21]	Faysse, N. and Ben Mustapha, A. 2017. Finding common ground between theories of collective action: The potential of analyses at a Meso-Scale. International Journal of the commons, Vol. 11 (2): 928-949.
[22]	FDRE (Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia). 1994. Constitution of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, 1994 Ethiopia.
[23]	Feder, G. R., Just, R. E. and Zilberman, D. 1985. Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33 (3): 255–298.
[24]	Fekadu Beyene. 2009. Collective action in water-point management: The case of pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in eastern Ethiopia. Journal Compilation United Nations: Natural Resources Forum, 33 (2): 175–188.
[25]	Fekadu Beyene. 2010. Interclan cooperation in a risky pastoral ecology: Some lessons from Eastern Ethiopia. Springer Science Business Media. Hum Ecol, 38 (3): 555–565.
[26]	Francesco, G. 2012. Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate: Department of economics, University of Milan, 20122, Italy.
[27]	Freeman, J., Baggio, A. J. and Coyle, R. T. 2020. Social and general intelligence improves collective action in a common pool resource system. Sustainability science, PNAS, Vol, 117 (14): 7712–7718.
[28]	Gebrehaweria Gebregziabher, Dereje Assefa A., Girmay Gebresamuel, Giordano, M. and Langan, S. 2016. An Assessment of Integrated Watershed Management in Ethiopia. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IWMI. doi: 10.5337/2016.214. Accessed on 10 December 2020.
[29]	Gebremedhn Tesfaye, Tena Alamirew, Asfaw Kebede and Gete Zeleke. 2018. Institutional functionality in participatory integrated watershed development of Tana Sub-Basin, Ethiopia: Land (5): 1-17.
[30]	Getachew Shambel E., Kibwika, P., Jemal Yousuf, H. and Bernard B. O. 2017. Harnessing social capital for resilience to livelihood shocks: Ethnographic Evidence of indigenous mutual support practices among rural households in Eastern Ethiopia. International Journal of Population Research, Vol, 1 (3): 1-26.
[31]	Getahun Hassen, Amare Bantider, Abiyot Legesse and Malesu Maimbo. 2021. Assessment of design and constraints of physical soil and water conservation structures in respect to these tin the case of Gidabo sub-basin, Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 4 (1): 1-29.
[32]	Gizaw Tesfaye, Kalkidan Fikirie, Yalemtsehay Debebeand Leta Hailu. 2019. Evaluating technical standards of implemented soil and water conservation technologies in Jimma Zone, South-Western Ethiopia. Agri Res and Tech: Open Access J, 19 (4): 166-178.
[33]	Gudeta Kebede A. 2019. Citizens’ trust in public and political institutions in Ethiopia: College of Law and Governance, Jimma University, Ethiopia.
[34]	Gujarati, D. N. 1988. Basic Econometrics. Second Edition. New York: Mc Graw HillInc.
[35]	Haymanot Eshetia. 2018. Factors influencing farmers’ decision in implementing sustainable land management practices in erosion-prone areas of East Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia: A Thesis for MA in environment and sustainable development. Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
[36]	Hiwot Mekonnen M., Ahmed M. H. and Abad, S. 2016. Determinants of multiple groundnut technology adoption in Eastern Ethiopia. Review of Agric and Applied Ecos, 19 (2): 51–60.
[37]	Holzinger, Van K. 2003. The problems of collectiveaction: A new approach, Preprintsausder Max-Planck-Projektgruppe Rechtder Gemeinschaftsguter, Bonn.
[38]	Hurni, H., Berhe Wolde-Aregay, Chadhokar, P., Daniel Danano, Gete Zeleke, Grunder M, Kassaye Goshu. 2016. Soil and water conservation in Ethiopia: Guidelines for Development agents. Second revised edition. Bern, Switzerland: Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern. Accessed on 15 March 2021.
[39]	Hyeoun-Ae, P. 2013. An introduction to logistic regression: From basic concepts to interpretation with particular attention to nursing domain. J. Korean AcadNurs, Vol. 43 (2): 154-164.
[40]	Johann, F. K., Andrew, R. D., Colin, P. and Nick V. 2009. Institutional economics views on African agricultural development: Food policy research institute W. D. C., U. S. A.
[41]	Kalibwani, R. M., Kakuru, M., Kamugisha, R., Twebaze, J., Hilman, E., Tumuheirwe, H., Tenywa, M. M., Nyamwaro, S. O., Mugabo, J., Buruchara, R., Fatunbi, A. O. and Adekunle, A. 2017. Adoption of soil conservation through collective actions in southwestern Uganda. African Crop Science Journal, Vol, 25 (2017): 13–19.
[42]	Kidane Tafa. 2018. Participation in watershed management programs and adoption of sustainable land management practices in Bassona Worana District, Central Highlands of Ethiopia: PhD Dissertation, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
[43]	Kitapc, I. 2016. The changing structure of the concept of capital: Cognitive social capital. Pamukkale university faculty of economics and administrative Sciences department of public finance, Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Eylül, 2 (3): 13-23.
[44]	Lakew Desta, Carucci, V., Asrat Wendem-Ageňehu and Yitayew Abebe. 2005. Community based participatory watershed development: Aguideline, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[45]	Leta Hailu. 2019. Effects of soil and water conservationon selected soil physic chemical properties and its implication on Soil Productivity in Ethiopia. AReview. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, Vol. 9 (5): 14-19.
[46]	Liang, Q., Huang, Z., Luc, H. and Wangd, X. 2015. Social capital, member participation, and cooperative performance: Evidence from China’s Zhejiang. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, Vol. 18 (5): 49-78.
[47]	McElreath, R., Timothy. R., Clutton-Brock, H., Fehr, E., Daniel, M. T., Edward, F., Hagen, H., Hammerstein, P., Kosfeld, M., Milinski, M., Silk, J. B., Tooby, J. and Wilson, M. I. 2003. Groupreport: The role of cognition and emotion in cooperation. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation, (7): 125-152.
[48]	Meijer, S. S., Delia, C. O., Ajayi, G., Gudeta Silesh and Maarten Nieuwenhuis. 2015. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in SSA. International Journal of agricultural sustainability, 13 (1): 40-54.
[49]	Meinzen-Dick, R., Gregorio, M. D. and McCarthy, N. 2004. Methods for studying collective action in rural development: International Food Policy Research Institute 2033 KStreet, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20006, U.S.A.
[50]	Meinzen-Dick, R. and Hellin, J. 2009. Collective action for smallholder access to market. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2008. 10.001. Accessed on 10 September 2020.
[51]	Melesse Bekele. 2018. A review on factors affecting adoption of agricultural new technologies in Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research, 9 (3): 1-4.
[52]	Melkie Erkie. 2016. Assessment of farmers’ awareness and adoption of soil and water conservation practices: the case of Borebor micro watershed, Dera Woreda, Ethiopia: Thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of master in Biology, Addis Ababa University of Ethiopia.
[53]	Melku Dagnachew, Awdenegest Moges, Asfaw Kebede, and Adane Abebe. 2020. Effects of soil and water conservation measures on soil quality indicators: Case of Geshy Subbasin, Gojeb River Catchment, Ethiopia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, (2020): 1-16.
[54]	Meskerem Abi, Kessler, A., Oosterveer, P. and Degefa Tolossa. 2018. How farmers’ characteristics influence spontaneous spreading of stone bunds in the highlands of Ethiopia: a case study in the Girar Jarso woreda. Environment, Development and Sustainability, (2020): 317–335.
[55]	Million Sileshi, Kadigi, R., Mutabazi, K. and Sieber, S. 2019. Determinants for adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures by smallholder farmers in Ethiopia. International soil and water conservation research, (2019): 1-8.
[56]	Mohammed Gedefaw, Denghua, Y., Hao, W., Basaznew Alemu, Mersha Chanie and Genanew Agitew. 2018. Evaluation of adoption behavior of soil and water conservation practices in the Simein mountain national park, Ethiopia. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 4 (1): 1-10.
[57]	Muhammed, M. T., Muhammed, A., Ali, Rehan, A., R., Arshad, A., Maqsood, H., Abbas, F., Mughees-ud-din, M., Shehzad, M. H. and Zafar, M. K. 2020. Land degradation and its management: Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. NatRes. 25 (2): 63-66.
[58]	Mulie Alemu, B. 2012. Adoption of soil and water conservation practices on farmlands: the case of Karita Wuhawatershed, west Belessa district, North Gondar, Ethiopia: Athesis for the partial fulfillment of MA in rural development. Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
[59]	Muluken Gezahegn, W., Okoyo, E. N. and Eliso Erkalo. 2020. Factors influencing adoption of improved structural soil and water conservation measures in Eastern Ethiopia. Environmental systems research, (2020): 1-11.
[60]	Munshi, K. 2011. Labor and Credit Networks in Developing Economies. In Hand book of Social Economics, Volume 1A Chapter 23 Elsevier.
[61]	Negessa Gadisa and Tesfaye Midega. 2021. Soil and water conservation measures in Ethiopia: importance and adoption challenges. World Jol of Agri and Soil Science, Vol, 6 (3): 1-7.
[62]	Njuki, J., Mapila, M. T., Zingore, S. and Delve, R. 2008. The dynamics of social capital in influencing use of soil management options in the Chinyanja Triangle of southern Africa. Ecology and Society, 13 (2): 9-19.
[63]	North, D. C. and Thomas, R. P. 1973. The rise of the western world: A new economic history. New York: Cambridge University press.
[64]	Nyambegera, S. M. and Gicheru, C. N. 2016. Extrinsic and Intrinsic Factors Influencing Employee Motivation: Lessons from AMREF Health Africain Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Research, Vol, 6 (9): 19-31.
[65]	Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[66]	Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. 1994. Rules, games and common-pool resources: The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
[67]	Ostrom, E. 1999. Social capital: Afedor a fundamental concept? In Social capital: A multifaceted perspective. Ed. P. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank.
[68]	Pugel, K., Javernick-Will, A., Walters, J. and Linden, K. 2018. Factor and Actor Networks: Alignment of collective action groups for water sustainability in Ethiopia: Bryan Franz, University of Florida and Iva Kovacic, TU Wien.
[69]	Putnam, R. D. 1993. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13 (3): 35-42.
[70]	Roger, D. 2015. The logic of collective action and beyond: West Virginia University.
[71]	Rogers, E. M. 1983. Diffusion of Innovations: The Free Press, New York; London.
[72]	Roling, N. G. 1992. The emergence of knowledge systems thinking: a changing perception of relationships amid innovation and knowledge process Knowledge and policy, 5 (1): 42–64.
[73]	Samuel Assefa, Kessler, A. and Fleskens, L. 2019. Assessing farmers’ willingness to participate in campaign-based watershed management: Boset District, Ethiopia: The Netherlands.
[74]	Sandler, T. 2015. Collective action: Department of economics, school of economic, political and policy sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W. Campbell Rd., Richardson, USA, openaccessatSpringerlink.com, 164 (2015): 195-216.
[75]	Scherr, S. J. 1992. The role of extension in agroforestry development: evidence from western Kenya. Agro forestry systems, 18 (1): 47-68.
[76]	Shiferaw Bekele, A., Okello, J. and Reddy, R. V. 2009. Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 11 (1): 601-619.
[77]	Stevenson, J., Vanlauwe, B., Macours, K., Johnson, N., Krishnan, L., Place, F., Spielman, D., Hughes, K. and Vlek, P. 2019. Farmeradoptionofplot-and farm-level natural resource management: Between rhetoric and reality. Global Food Security, 20 (2019): 101–104.
[78]	Surry, D. 1997. Diffusion Theory and Instructional Technology: Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology (AECT) www.gsu.edu/wwwitr/docs/diffusion/. Accessedon 15 May 2021.
[79]	Sverker, C. J., Niklas, H., Åsa, L., Martin, S., Francisco, A., Bengt, B., David, L., Andreas, N., Bethanie, C. A., Sam, D. and Will, S. 2019. On the preconditions for large-scale collective action: The centre for University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
[80]	Tesfaye Samuel, S. 2017. Determinants of adoption of sustainable land management practices among Smallholders in Jeldu District, West Shewa Zone, Oromia Region. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: H Environment and Earth Science, 7 (1): 69-83.
[81]	Tesfaye Yaekob, Lulseged Tamene, Solomon G. Gebrehiwot, Solomon S. Demissie, Zenebe Adimassu, Kifle Woldearegay, Kindu Mekonnen, Tilahun Amede, Wuletawu Abera, John W. R., Dawit S. and Thorne, P. 2020. Assessing the impacts of different land uses and SWC interventions on run off and sediment yield at different scales in the central highlands of Ethiopia: Cambridge University.
[82]	Tizazu Toma D. 2017. Determinants of Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Practices at Household Level in Aletawendo District, Sidama Zone, SNNPR, Ethiopia. World Journal of Innovative Research (WJIR), Vol, 3 (4): 1-6.
[83]	UN (United Nations). 2020. Science, technology, and innovation policy review of Ethiopia. UN publication issued by the UN conference on trade and development, Geneva.
[84]	UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). 2017. Community approaches to sustainable land management and agro ecology practices. UNDP, New York.
[85]	Waga Mazengia, Deribe Gamiyo, Tilahun Amede, Daka, M., Mowo, J. and Agric, A. 2007. Challenges of Collective Action in Soil and Water Conservation: The Case of Gununo Watershed, SNNP. African Crop Science Conference Proceedings, Vol. 8 (2): 1541-1545.
[86]	WB (World Bank). 2019. Implementation completion and results report. A grant to the Federal Republic of Ethiopia for sustainable land management project, DOC. 53180/ TF15838/ TF15868/TF15869. Accessed on 3 April 2021.
[87]	WB (World Bank). 2020. Sustainable land management projects I and II: Project performance assessment report in Ethiopia.www.worldbanl.org. Accessed on 10 March 2021.
[88]	Wilson, D. S., John, J. T. and Ralph, R. M. 2004. Cognitive cooperation: When the going gets tough, thank as a group. Human nature, Vol, 15 (3): 1-15.
[89]	Wogayehu Bekele and Drake. L. 2002. Adoption of soil and water conservation measures by subsistence farmers in Eastern Ethiopia. Presented at the 17th World Congress of Soil Science, Bangkok, Thailand.
[90]	Wuletaw Mekuria. 2019. Integrated watershed management practices: Evidences from Tsegur and Kanat Micro-Watersheds of the Ethiopian highlands. Journal of Agric Forest Meteorol Res, 2 (3): 123-125.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. (2021). Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 6(3), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 6(3), 126-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2021;6(3):126-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14,
  author = {Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael},
  title = {Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {126-142},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  abstract = {In Ethiopia's highlands, land degradation is one of the most significant obstacles to agricultural productivity and environmental quality. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures has been recognized as a requirement for sustaining the dynamism of ecosystems, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and human security for more than five decades. Despite increased attempts by the government and then non-state actors to introduce these technologies and support farmers, adoption rates remained low due to a greater emphasis on individual adoption over collective adoption. The objective of this review study was to evaluate the role of collective action in the adoption of such measures in the Ethiopian highlands prior to COVID-19, in which the factors and challenges of such adoption were highlighted. Following that, the public materials and their arguments were thoroughly scrutinized, and a conceptual framework was contextually changed and implemented. The conclusions of the binary logit model were based on the empirical results of other studies where the dependent variable was dichotomous, and they were employed with pre-arranged and pre-interpreted qualitative and quantitative data. The results of the investigation revealed that as the number of days spent in touch with an extension grows, so does the likelihood of adopting such activities. Participation in non-farm activities, on the other hand, lowers the likelihood of such practices being adopted. Finally, collective action could help to speed up the acceptance of such practices. Extrinsic as well as intrinsic variables, however, may make such behaviors difficult to implement. As a result, policymakers, extension workers, and future researchers should think about the important factors that may influence the adoption of such better techniques. As a result, the regime and non-state actors in Ethiopia's highlands should forfeit attention to adult education and training opportunities focused on the acceptance phase of adoption, as well as the role of collective action focusing on the adoption of such conservation practices.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands
AU  - Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael
Y1  - 2021/07/28
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 126
EP  - 142
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
AB  - In Ethiopia's highlands, land degradation is one of the most significant obstacles to agricultural productivity and environmental quality. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures has been recognized as a requirement for sustaining the dynamism of ecosystems, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and human security for more than five decades. Despite increased attempts by the government and then non-state actors to introduce these technologies and support farmers, adoption rates remained low due to a greater emphasis on individual adoption over collective adoption. The objective of this review study was to evaluate the role of collective action in the adoption of such measures in the Ethiopian highlands prior to COVID-19, in which the factors and challenges of such adoption were highlighted. Following that, the public materials and their arguments were thoroughly scrutinized, and a conceptual framework was contextually changed and implemented. The conclusions of the binary logit model were based on the empirical results of other studies where the dependent variable was dichotomous, and they were employed with pre-arranged and pre-interpreted qualitative and quantitative data. The results of the investigation revealed that as the number of days spent in touch with an extension grows, so does the likelihood of adopting such activities. Participation in non-farm activities, on the other hand, lowers the likelihood of such practices being adopted. Finally, collective action could help to speed up the acceptance of such practices. Extrinsic as well as intrinsic variables, however, may make such behaviors difficult to implement. As a result, policymakers, extension workers, and future researchers should think about the important factors that may influence the adoption of such better techniques. As a result, the regime and non-state actors in Ethiopia's highlands should forfeit attention to adult education and training opportunities focused on the acceptance phase of adoption, as well as the role of collective action focusing on the adoption of such conservation practices.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael

School of Rural Development and Agricultural Innovation, Haramaya University, Oromia, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. (2021). Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, 6(3), 126-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. Int. J. Nat. Resour. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 6(3), 126-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael. Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands. Int J Nat Resour Ecol Manag. 2021;6(3):126-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14,
  author = {Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael},
  title = {Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands},
  journal = {International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management},
  volume = {6},
  number = {3},
  pages = {126-142},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnrem.20210603.14},
  abstract = {In Ethiopia's highlands, land degradation is one of the most significant obstacles to agricultural productivity and environmental quality. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures has been recognized as a requirement for sustaining the dynamism of ecosystems, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and human security for more than five decades. Despite increased attempts by the government and then non-state actors to introduce these technologies and support farmers, adoption rates remained low due to a greater emphasis on individual adoption over collective adoption. The objective of this review study was to evaluate the role of collective action in the adoption of such measures in the Ethiopian highlands prior to COVID-19, in which the factors and challenges of such adoption were highlighted. Following that, the public materials and their arguments were thoroughly scrutinized, and a conceptual framework was contextually changed and implemented. The conclusions of the binary logit model were based on the empirical results of other studies where the dependent variable was dichotomous, and they were employed with pre-arranged and pre-interpreted qualitative and quantitative data. The results of the investigation revealed that as the number of days spent in touch with an extension grows, so does the likelihood of adopting such activities. Participation in non-farm activities, on the other hand, lowers the likelihood of such practices being adopted. Finally, collective action could help to speed up the acceptance of such practices. Extrinsic as well as intrinsic variables, however, may make such behaviors difficult to implement. As a result, policymakers, extension workers, and future researchers should think about the important factors that may influence the adoption of such better techniques. As a result, the regime and non-state actors in Ethiopia's highlands should forfeit attention to adult education and training opportunities focused on the acceptance phase of adoption, as well as the role of collective action focusing on the adoption of such conservation practices.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Pre-COVID 19 Pandemic Era Adoption of Soil and Water Conservation Via Collective Action: Meta-Analysis on the Case of the Ethiopian Highlands
AU  - Alemayehu Temesgen Gebremikael
Y1  - 2021/07/28
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
T2  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JF  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
JO  - International Journal of Natural Resource Ecology and Management
SP  - 126
EP  - 142
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3061
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnrem.20210603.14
AB  - In Ethiopia's highlands, land degradation is one of the most significant obstacles to agricultural productivity and environmental quality. Adoption of physical soil and water conservation measures has been recognized as a requirement for sustaining the dynamism of ecosystems, agricultural productivity, biodiversity, and human security for more than five decades. Despite increased attempts by the government and then non-state actors to introduce these technologies and support farmers, adoption rates remained low due to a greater emphasis on individual adoption over collective adoption. The objective of this review study was to evaluate the role of collective action in the adoption of such measures in the Ethiopian highlands prior to COVID-19, in which the factors and challenges of such adoption were highlighted. Following that, the public materials and their arguments were thoroughly scrutinized, and a conceptual framework was contextually changed and implemented. The conclusions of the binary logit model were based on the empirical results of other studies where the dependent variable was dichotomous, and they were employed with pre-arranged and pre-interpreted qualitative and quantitative data. The results of the investigation revealed that as the number of days spent in touch with an extension grows, so does the likelihood of adopting such activities. Participation in non-farm activities, on the other hand, lowers the likelihood of such practices being adopted. Finally, collective action could help to speed up the acceptance of such practices. Extrinsic as well as intrinsic variables, however, may make such behaviors difficult to implement. As a result, policymakers, extension workers, and future researchers should think about the important factors that may influence the adoption of such better techniques. As a result, the regime and non-state actors in Ethiopia's highlands should forfeit attention to adult education and training opportunities focused on the acceptance phase of adoption, as well as the role of collective action focusing on the adoption of such conservation practices.
VL  - 6
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download