The article consists of two parts: On the one hand, a file created by the author with around 450,000 geographical names, which has been freely accessible on the Internet for several months, is presented. The title of this file is Nomina Geographica Europaca. Bibliographische Sammlung zu europäischen Orts-, Elur- und Gewässernamen. It can be reached at the following Internet address: https://adw-verwaltung.uni-goettingen.de/ortsnames/images-lightbox.php/. It took decades to compile the names contained therein. The collection contains water, place and field names, especially from Eastern and Central Europe. The author hopes that it will be useful for further research into the geographical names of Europe.In the second part of the article, a selection of geographical names from Eastern Europe is used to show that Slavic tribes knew and used different terms for geographical objects as they spread north and east. This opens up opportunities to identify older and younger Slavic settlements. Their mapping shows very clearly that older Slavic settlements can mainly be found in the Ukraine, while large areas of what later became Russian territory are primarily known for younger settlements. A comprehensive mapping of the mentioned place names further shows that the Pripyat' area cannot have been the home of the Slavic tribes, but that they must be sought south of it in the fertile areas of the Ukrainian black earth (loess soils). The sharp increase in the Slavic population described by ancient writers can be explained as follows: good arable soil is the basis for good and better harvests than in other areas with less good soil. As a result, the population in the areas with better soil grows faster and their languages and dialects spread more widely than those of other settlers.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16 |
Page(s) | 136-147 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Geographical Names, Slavic Tribes, Eastern Europe, Expansion, Hydronymy, Original Homeland, Soil Quality, Spread of Names
[1] | Bezlaj, F. (1956): Slovenska vodna imena. Ljubljana. |
[2] | Carius, D.; Eichler, E. (2002): “Fallstudie VI: Die slavischen Sprachen”. In: Lexikologie/Lexicology, 1. Halbbd. Berlin, New York, 847-855. |
[3] | Casemir, K. (2003): Die Ortsnamen des Landkreises Wolfenbüttel und der Stadt Salzgitter. Bielefeld. |
[4] | Dickenmann, E. (1970): Rezension von: Russisches Geographisches Namenbuch, Bd. 2-4, 1. In: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge 5 (1970), S. 69-75. |
[5] | Eilers, W. (1982): Geographische Namengebung in und um Iran. Ein Überblick in Beispielen. München. |
[6] | ĖSSJ: Ėtimologicčeskij slovar’ slavjanskich jazykov - praslavjanskij leksičeskij fond, Bd. 1ff., Moskva 1974ff. |
[7] | Frings, Th. (1957): Grundlegung einer Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 3. Auflage, Halle (Saale). |
[8] | Haase, D. et al. (2007): “Loess in Europe - its spatial distribution based on a European Loess Map, scale 1: 2,500,000”, in: Quaternary Science Reviews 26 (9-10). 1301-1312. |
[9] | Halas, K. J. (1957): Iz toponimiky Zakarpattja, in: Dopovidi ta povidomlennja Užhorodskoho Deržavnoho Universytetu. Serija istoryko-fololohična (1), S. 81-83. |
[10] | Hrabec, S. (1950): Nazwy geograficzny Huculszczyzny. Krakow. |
[11] | Jankuhn, H. (1977) (Hrsg.): Das Dorf der Eisenzeit und des frühen Mittelalters. Siedlungsform - wirtschaftliche Funktion - soziale Struktur. Göttingen. |
[12] | Jakus-Borkowa, E.; Nowik, K. (2010): Nazwy miejscowości w Polsce. Układ a tergo. Opole. |
[13] | Jaškin, I. Ja. (1971): Belaruskija heahrafičnyja nazvy, Tapahrafija, Hidralohija. Minsk. |
[14] | Jurkowski. M. (1971): Ukraińska terminologia hydrograficzna. Wrocław et al. |
[15] | Krahe, H. (1949/1950): “Alteuropäische Flussnamen”, in: Beiträge zur Namenforschung (1), 24-51. |
[16] | Łapicz, Cz. (1981): Terminologia geograficzna w ruskich gwarach Bialostoccyzny na tle wschodniosłowianskim. Warszawa et al. |
[17] | Lebedeva, I. A. (1959): “Leksiko-semantičeski sostav nazvanij naselennych punktov Pskovskoj oblasti”, in: Movoznavstvo (15), 99-107. |
[18] | Leibniz, G. (1768): “Dissertatio de origine germanorum...”. In: Ders., Opera omnia, Bd. 4, Teil 2. Genevae, 198-205. |
[19] | Lemtjugova, V. P. (1983): Vostočnoslavjanskaja ojkonimija apeljativnogo proischoždenija. Minsk. |
[20] | Nazwy miejscowe Polski, Bd. 1ff. Hrsg. K. Rymut. Krakow 1996ff. |
[21] | Pokorny, J. (1959): Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern, München. |
[22] | Register der Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Bd. 1-16. Heidelberg 1969. |
[23] | RGN: Russisches Geographisches Namenbuch. Begr. von M. Vasmer, Hrsg. H. Bräuer. Bd. 1-10. Wiesbaden 1964-1981. |
[24] | Schmid, W. P. (1977): “Sprachwissenschaftliche Bemerkungen zu den Wörtern für Bauer und Dorf im Slavischen.” In: Jankuhn et al. (Hrsg.) (1977), 41-61. |
[25] | Schütte, L. (1976): Wik. Eine Siedlungsbezeichnung in historischen und sprachlichen Bezügen. Köln, Wien. |
[26] | Slovnyk staroukraïns’koī movy XIV-XVst. u dvoch tomach. Kyīv 1977-1978. |
[27] | Słownik Geograficzny: Słownik Geograficzny Królestwa Polskiego i innych krajów słowiańskich, Band 1-15. Warszawa. 1880-1902. |
[28] | Słownik staropolskich nazw osobowych, Bd. 1-6 und Suplement. Hrsg. W. Taszycki, Wrocław usw. 1965-1987. |
[29] | Sreznevskij, I. I. (1955-1956) [1893-1912]: Materialy dlja slovarja drevnerusskogo jazyka po pismennym pamjatnikam. Band 1-3. Sankt-Peterburg, Nachdruck Graz. Band 1, Sp. 47. |
[30] | SRNG: Slovar’ russkich narodnych govorov. Bd. 1ff., Moskva 1965ff. |
[31] | Udolph, J. (1979): Studien zu slavischen Gewässernamen und Gewässerbezeichnungen. Ein Beitrag zur Frage nach der Urheimat der Slaven. Heidelberg. |
[32] | Udolph, J. (1994): Namenkundliche Studien zum Germanenproblem. Berlin, New York. |
[33] | Udolph, J. (1997): “Zogen die Hamelner Aussiedler nach Mähren? Die Rattenfängersage aus namenkundlicher Sicht”, in: Niedersächsisches Jahrbuch für Landesgeschichte (69), 125-183. |
[34] | Udolph, J. (2015): “Rezension zu: W. Wenzel, Namen und Geschichte. Orts- und Personennamen im deutsch-slavischen Sprachkontaktraum als historische Zeugnisse, Hamburg 2014”, in: Beiträge zur Namenforschung, Neue Folge 51, 242-252. |
[35] | Udolph, J. (2000a): “Der Weserraum im Spiegel der Ortsnamenforschung”. In: Die Weser. EinFluss in Europa. Leuchtendes Mittelalter. Holzminden, 24-37. |
[36] | Udolph, J. (2000b): “A. L. Schlözer und die slavische Namenforschung”, in: Onomastické Práce (4), 459-481. (= Festschrift Ivan Lutterer). |
[37] | Udolph, J. (2016): “Heimat und Ausbreitung indogermanischer Stämme im Lichte der Namenforschung”, in: Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 76, S. 173-249. |
[38] | Udolph, J. (2021): Nomina Geographica Europaea. Bibliographische Sammlung zu europäischen Orts-, Flur- und Gewässernamen. https://adw-verwaltung. uni-goettingen.de/ortsnamen/images_lightbox.php [22.07.2022] |
[39] | Udolph (2021a): “Eine neue bibliographische Sammlung zu europäischen Orts-, Flur- und Gewässernamen - Hinweise zur Benutzung”, in: Onomastica 65/1, 83-98. |
[40] | Vasmer, M. (1971): Schriften zur slavischen Altertumskunde und Namenkunde, Bd. 1-2. Berlin, Wiesbaden. |
[41] | Vasmer, M. (1953-1958): Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, Bd. 1-3. Heidelberg. |
[42] | Wauer, S. (1989): Die Ortsnamen der Prignitz. Weimar. |
[43] | WdrG: M. Vasmer (1961-1973) (Hrsg.): Wörterbuch der russischen Gewässernamen, Bd. 1-5 und Nachtrag. Berlin, Wiesbaden. |
[44] | Zaimov, J. (1967): Zaselvane na bŭlgarskite slavjani na Balkanskija poluostrov. Sofija. |
[45] | Žučkevič, V. A. (1974): Kratkij toponimičeskij slovar’Belorussii. Minsk. |
APA Style
Jürgen Udolph. (2023). Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collection. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 11(4), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16
ACS Style
Jürgen Udolph. Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collection. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2023, 11(4), 136-147. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16
AMA Style
Jürgen Udolph. Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collection. Int J Lang Linguist. 2023;11(4):136-147. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16, author = {Jürgen Udolph}, title = {Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collection}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {136-147}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20231104.16}, abstract = {The article consists of two parts: On the one hand, a file created by the author with around 450,000 geographical names, which has been freely accessible on the Internet for several months, is presented. The title of this file is Nomina Geographica Europaca. Bibliographische Sammlung zu europäischen Orts-, Elur- und Gewässernamen. It can be reached at the following Internet address: https://adw-verwaltung.uni-goettingen.de/ortsnames/images-lightbox.php/. It took decades to compile the names contained therein. The collection contains water, place and field names, especially from Eastern and Central Europe. The author hopes that it will be useful for further research into the geographical names of Europe.In the second part of the article, a selection of geographical names from Eastern Europe is used to show that Slavic tribes knew and used different terms for geographical objects as they spread north and east. This opens up opportunities to identify older and younger Slavic settlements. Their mapping shows very clearly that older Slavic settlements can mainly be found in the Ukraine, while large areas of what later became Russian territory are primarily known for younger settlements. A comprehensive mapping of the mentioned place names further shows that the Pripyat' area cannot have been the home of the Slavic tribes, but that they must be sought south of it in the fertile areas of the Ukrainian black earth (loess soils). The sharp increase in the Slavic population described by ancient writers can be explained as follows: good arable soil is the basis for good and better harvests than in other areas with less good soil. As a result, the population in the areas with better soil grows faster and their languages and dialects spread more widely than those of other settlers.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Home and Spread of the Slavs and a New Bibliographical Collection AU - Jürgen Udolph Y1 - 2023/08/31 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 136 EP - 147 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231104.16 AB - The article consists of two parts: On the one hand, a file created by the author with around 450,000 geographical names, which has been freely accessible on the Internet for several months, is presented. The title of this file is Nomina Geographica Europaca. Bibliographische Sammlung zu europäischen Orts-, Elur- und Gewässernamen. It can be reached at the following Internet address: https://adw-verwaltung.uni-goettingen.de/ortsnames/images-lightbox.php/. It took decades to compile the names contained therein. The collection contains water, place and field names, especially from Eastern and Central Europe. The author hopes that it will be useful for further research into the geographical names of Europe.In the second part of the article, a selection of geographical names from Eastern Europe is used to show that Slavic tribes knew and used different terms for geographical objects as they spread north and east. This opens up opportunities to identify older and younger Slavic settlements. Their mapping shows very clearly that older Slavic settlements can mainly be found in the Ukraine, while large areas of what later became Russian territory are primarily known for younger settlements. A comprehensive mapping of the mentioned place names further shows that the Pripyat' area cannot have been the home of the Slavic tribes, but that they must be sought south of it in the fertile areas of the Ukrainian black earth (loess soils). The sharp increase in the Slavic population described by ancient writers can be explained as follows: good arable soil is the basis for good and better harvests than in other areas with less good soil. As a result, the population in the areas with better soil grows faster and their languages and dialects spread more widely than those of other settlers. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -