The principal aim of this investigation was to explore articulatory properties of two fricatives in Uyghur, in order to gain insight the differences of place of articulation and the influences of surrounding vowel. To this end, articulatory effects of adjacent vowel [a, i, u] were measured at four different time points in CV syllable. Linguopalatal contact patterns derived from electropalatographic recordings were used in this study. The articulatory mechanisms of sibilant fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ in Uyghur were investigated in this paper, so as to find that /s/ was alveolar while /ʃ/ was alveopalatal in constriction place formed in oral cavity. In terms of coarticulatory effect of following vowel on the production of fricatives, the former was affected by rounded, back vowel/ u / while the latter was affected by front, high vowel/i/. In terms of front-back dimension, articulatory movement of both fricatives in alveolar region was most stable while it was vulnerable to articulatory effect of vowels in palatal region. In terms of different articulatory times (phases), the point of maximum contact was the most stable one for both fricatives.
Published in | International Journal of Language and Linguistics (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12 |
Page(s) | 6-11 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
EPG, Fricative Consonants, Place of Articulation, Uyghur
[1] | Dart, S. N. (1991). Articulatory and Acoustic Properties of Apical and Laminal Articulations. University of California, Los Angeles. |
[2] | Ali, A. M. A., Spiegel, J. V. D., & Mueller, P. (1999). An Acoustic-Phonetic Feature-Based System for the Automatic Recognition of Fricative Consonants. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Vol. 2, pp. 961-964 vol. 2). IEEE. |
[3] | Fant, G. (1970). Acoustic Theory of Speech Production (No. 2). Walter de Gruyter. pp. 274-275. |
[4] | Heinz, J. M., & Stevens, K. N. (1961). On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33 (5), 589-596. |
[5] | Shadle, C. H. (1985). "The Acoustics of Fricative Consonants," Tech. Rep. 506, MIT Res Lab. Elect., Cambridge, MA. |
[6] | Shadle, C. H., Tiede, M., Masaki, S., Shimada, Y., & Fujimoto, I. (1996). An MRI Study of the Effects of Vowel Context on Fricatives. PROCEEDINGS-INSTITUTEOF ACOUSTICS, 18, 187-194. |
[7] | Shadle, C., Proctor, M. I., & Iskarous, K. (2008). An MRI study of the effect of vowel context on English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123 (5), 3735. |
[8] | Yoshinaga, T., Maekawa, K., & Iida, A. (2021). Aeroacoustic Differences between the Japanese Fricatives [ɕ] and [ç]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 149 (4), 2426-2436. |
[9] | Tabain, M. (2001). Variability in Fricative Production and Spectra: Implications for the Hyper-and Hypo-and Quantal Theories of Speech Production. Language and speech, 44 (1), 57-93. |
[10] | Fletcher, S. G., & Newman, D. G. (1991). [s] and [∫] as a Function of Linguapalatal Contact Place and Sibilant Groove Width. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89 (2), 850-858. |
[11] | Brunner, J., & Hoole, P. (2012). Motor Equivalent Strategies in the Production of German/∫/under Perturbation. Language and speech, 55 (4), 457-476. |
[12] | Hahn, R. F. (2006). Spoken Uyghur. Ewha Womans University Press. pp. 72-90. |
[13] | Aziz Ablimit & Harnud, H. (2020). Acoustic Phonetics of Uyghur [M]. Beijing: SOCIAL SCIENCES ACADEMIC PRESS (CHINA). |
[14] | Fontdevila, J., Pallarès, M. D., & Recasens, D. (1994). The Contact Index Method of Electropalatographic Data Reduction. Journal of Phonetics, 22 (2), 141-154. |
[15] | Byrd, D. M. (1994). Articulatory Timing in English Consonant Sequences. University of California, Los Angeles. |
[16] | Soli, S. D. (1981). Second Formants in Fricatives: Acoustic Consequences of Fricative‐vowel Coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70 (4), 976-984. |
[17] | Boersma, P. (2006). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. http://www. praat.org/. |
APA Style
Aziz Ablimit, Aziza Abaidulla. (2023). EPG Study of the Fricative Consonants [s] and [ʃ] in Uyghur. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12
ACS Style
Aziz Ablimit; Aziza Abaidulla. EPG Study of the Fricative Consonants [s] and [ʃ] in Uyghur. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2023, 11(1), 6-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12
AMA Style
Aziz Ablimit, Aziza Abaidulla. EPG Study of the Fricative Consonants [s] and [ʃ] in Uyghur. Int J Lang Linguist. 2023;11(1):6-11. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12, author = {Aziz Ablimit and Aziza Abaidulla}, title = {EPG Study of the Fricative Consonants [s] and [ʃ] in Uyghur}, journal = {International Journal of Language and Linguistics}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {6-11}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijll.20231101.12}, abstract = {The principal aim of this investigation was to explore articulatory properties of two fricatives in Uyghur, in order to gain insight the differences of place of articulation and the influences of surrounding vowel. To this end, articulatory effects of adjacent vowel [a, i, u] were measured at four different time points in CV syllable. Linguopalatal contact patterns derived from electropalatographic recordings were used in this study. The articulatory mechanisms of sibilant fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ in Uyghur were investigated in this paper, so as to find that /s/ was alveolar while /ʃ/ was alveopalatal in constriction place formed in oral cavity. In terms of coarticulatory effect of following vowel on the production of fricatives, the former was affected by rounded, back vowel/ u / while the latter was affected by front, high vowel/i/. In terms of front-back dimension, articulatory movement of both fricatives in alveolar region was most stable while it was vulnerable to articulatory effect of vowels in palatal region. In terms of different articulatory times (phases), the point of maximum contact was the most stable one for both fricatives.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - EPG Study of the Fricative Consonants [s] and [ʃ] in Uyghur AU - Aziz Ablimit AU - Aziza Abaidulla Y1 - 2023/01/31 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12 T2 - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JF - International Journal of Language and Linguistics JO - International Journal of Language and Linguistics SP - 6 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-0221 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20231101.12 AB - The principal aim of this investigation was to explore articulatory properties of two fricatives in Uyghur, in order to gain insight the differences of place of articulation and the influences of surrounding vowel. To this end, articulatory effects of adjacent vowel [a, i, u] were measured at four different time points in CV syllable. Linguopalatal contact patterns derived from electropalatographic recordings were used in this study. The articulatory mechanisms of sibilant fricatives /s/ and /ʃ/ in Uyghur were investigated in this paper, so as to find that /s/ was alveolar while /ʃ/ was alveopalatal in constriction place formed in oral cavity. In terms of coarticulatory effect of following vowel on the production of fricatives, the former was affected by rounded, back vowel/ u / while the latter was affected by front, high vowel/i/. In terms of front-back dimension, articulatory movement of both fricatives in alveolar region was most stable while it was vulnerable to articulatory effect of vowels in palatal region. In terms of different articulatory times (phases), the point of maximum contact was the most stable one for both fricatives. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -