A multi location trial was conducted across the highlands of Southwestern (SW) Ethiopia from 2020 to 2022 during main cropping seasons to evaluate grain yield and yield related traits of food barley varieties across the different locations to identify and recommend high yielding and stable food barley varieties to farmers for large scale planting using AMMI and GGE biplot models. A total of eight food barley varieties were obtained from the Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) for use in this study. Varieties were evaluated in three environments, over three growing seasons. The experiments were conducted at Dedo, Yem and Gechi districts of SW part of Ethiopia during the main cropping seasons. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications. The experimental plot for each variety consisted of six rows of 2.5m length and rows were spaced 20cm apart. Spacing between rows, plots and replications 25cm, 30cm and 1m respectively. Data for all relevant agronomic traits were collected, but only plot yield data converted to t/ha was subjected to statistical analysis. The combined ANOVA showed highly significant differences (P<0.001) among E, G and GEI for grain yield. The environmental variance was more accountable (68.2%) to the total variance as compared to the genetic variance (3.16%) and the interaction variance (19.13%) for grain yield. Dedo 2022 was the highest yielding (4.1 t/ha) while Gechi 2022 was the lowest yielding (1.5 t/ha) environment. The mean grain yield of the varieties across eight environments was 3 t/ha. The GGE biplot identified two barley growing mega-environments. The first mega environment consisted of environments E5, E8, E1 with a vertex genotype T4. E6, E4, E3, E2 and E7 were found in the second mega environment with the winning genotype of T8. It was also noted that no mega-environments fell into sectors where genotype T2 and T7 were the vertex genotypes, did not fit in any of the mega-environments. According to both AMMI and GGE biplot analysis, food barley varieties T3, T7 and T5 were found to be benchmarks/ideal genotypes and could be used as checks to evaluate the performance of other genotypes and also can be recommended for wider cultivation in the highland environments of Southwestern Ethiopia.
Published in | International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13 |
Page(s) | 126-132 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
AMMI, Food Barley Varieties, GGE Biplot, Southwestern, Stability
[1] | Akar, t., Avci, m., Dusunceli, F. 2004. Barley: Post-harvest operations. |
[2] | Bantayehu, M., 2013. Study on malting barley genotypes under diverse agro-ecologies of North Western Ethiopia. African journal of plant science, 7 (11), pp. 548-557. |
[3] | Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).2014. Food Balance Sheets. FAO STAT. Rome. |
[4] | Central Statistical Agency agricultural sample survey 2020/21 (2013 E. C.) Area and Production of Major Crops (Private peasant holdings, meher season). |
[5] | Berhane L., Hailu G. and Fekadu A., 1996. Barley Production and Research. pp 1-8. In: Hailu Gebre and Joob Van luer (eds). Barley Research in Ethiopia: Past work and Future Prospects. Proceedings of the First Barley Research Review Workshop 16-19, |
[6] | Gauch, H. G., Jr., and Zobel, R. W. 1996. AMMI analysis of yield trials. In “Genotype-by-environment interaction” (M. S. Kang and H. G. Gauch, Jr., eds.), pp. 85-122. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. |
[7] | Becker, H. C. 1981. Correlations among some Statistical Measures of Phenotypic Stability. Euphytica, 30, 835-840. |
[8] | Gauch, H. G. 1998. MATMODEL Version 2.1: AMMI and related analyses for two-way data matrices. Microcomputer Power, Ith- aca, NY. |
[9] | Yan, W., L. A. Hunt, Q. Sheng and Z. Szlavnics, 2000. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci., 40: 597-605. |
[10] | Gauch HG. 1992. Statistical analysis of regional trials. AMMI analysis of factorial design. 1st edn. Elsevier, New York. |
[11] | Yan, W. and N. A. Tinker, 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications. Can. J. Plant Sci., 86: 623-645. |
[12] | Farshadfar E. and Sutka J. 2003. Locating QTLs controlling adaptation in wheat using AMMI model. Cereal Res Commun 31: 249-254. |
[13] | Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R. and Lefkovitch, L. P. 1986. Stability Analysis: Where Do We Stand? Crop Science, 26, 894-900. |
[14] | IPGRI. Descriptors for barley. Rome: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute; 1994. |
[15] | GenStat. 2015. GenStat for Windows (18th Edition) Introduction. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead. |
[16] | Pacheco, Á., Vargas, M., Alvarado, G., Rodríguez, F., Crossa, J., Burgueño, J., 2015. GEA-R (Genotype x Environment Analysis with R for windows) Version 2.0", International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center V13 [Version]. CIMMYT. |
[17] | Gauch H. G. 2006: Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science 46: 1488–1500. |
[18] | Cross, J., Gauch, H., and Zobel, R. 1990. Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Science, 30: 493-500. |
[19] | Gadissa. A, Alemu D, Tafesse S. Negash G, Abebe D., Ruth D, Demeke Z., Habtemariam Z., Dawit A., Bayissa and Abebe G. 2020. Performance Evaluation and yield stability of Advanced Bread wheat genotypes in Ethiopia. Results of crop improvement and management research for 2019/20. |
[20] | Amare, K. and Tamado, T. 2014. Genotype by Environment interaction and stability of pod yield of elite breeding lines of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Eastern Ethiopia. Star Journal, 3 (1): 43-46. |
[21] | Temesgen B, Sintayew A & Zerihun T. 2015. Genotype X environment interaction and yield stability of bread wheat (Triticum Eastivum L.) genotype in Ethiopia using the AMMI Analysis. J. Bio, Agri and Healthcare, 5 (11): 129-139. |
[22] | Yan W, and M S Kang. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists. CRC Press LLC. |
[23] | Farshadfar E, Mohammadi R, Aghaee M, Vaisi Z. 2012. GGE biplot analysis of genotype x Environment interaction in wheat-barley disomic addition lines. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6: 1074-1079. |
[24] | Kaya Y, Akcura M, Taner S. 2006. GGE-biplot analysis of Multi-Environment yield trials in bread wheat. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 30: 325-337. |
[25] | Yan W. 2001. GGE biplot-A Windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data. Agronomy Journal 93: 1111-1118. |
APA Style
Belete, T. (2023). Evaluation of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties at Highlands of Southwestern Part of Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Stability Models. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 11(4), 126-132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13
ACS Style
Belete, T. Evaluation of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties at Highlands of Southwestern Part of Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Stability Models. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2023, 11(4), 126-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13
AMA Style
Belete T. Evaluation of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties at Highlands of Southwestern Part of Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Stability Models. Int J Genet Genomics. 2023;11(4):126-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13, author = {Tegegn Belete}, title = {Evaluation of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties at Highlands of Southwestern Part of Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Stability Models}, journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {126-132}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20231104.13}, abstract = {A multi location trial was conducted across the highlands of Southwestern (SW) Ethiopia from 2020 to 2022 during main cropping seasons to evaluate grain yield and yield related traits of food barley varieties across the different locations to identify and recommend high yielding and stable food barley varieties to farmers for large scale planting using AMMI and GGE biplot models. A total of eight food barley varieties were obtained from the Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) for use in this study. Varieties were evaluated in three environments, over three growing seasons. The experiments were conducted at Dedo, Yem and Gechi districts of SW part of Ethiopia during the main cropping seasons. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications. The experimental plot for each variety consisted of six rows of 2.5m length and rows were spaced 20cm apart. Spacing between rows, plots and replications 25cm, 30cm and 1m respectively. Data for all relevant agronomic traits were collected, but only plot yield data converted to t/ha was subjected to statistical analysis. The combined ANOVA showed highly significant differences (P<0.001) among E, G and GEI for grain yield. The environmental variance was more accountable (68.2%) to the total variance as compared to the genetic variance (3.16%) and the interaction variance (19.13%) for grain yield. Dedo 2022 was the highest yielding (4.1 t/ha) while Gechi 2022 was the lowest yielding (1.5 t/ha) environment. The mean grain yield of the varieties across eight environments was 3 t/ha. The GGE biplot identified two barley growing mega-environments. The first mega environment consisted of environments E5, E8, E1 with a vertex genotype T4. E6, E4, E3, E2 and E7 were found in the second mega environment with the winning genotype of T8. It was also noted that no mega-environments fell into sectors where genotype T2 and T7 were the vertex genotypes, did not fit in any of the mega-environments. According to both AMMI and GGE biplot analysis, food barley varieties T3, T7 and T5 were found to be benchmarks/ideal genotypes and could be used as checks to evaluate the performance of other genotypes and also can be recommended for wider cultivation in the highland environments of Southwestern Ethiopia. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Food Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Varieties at Highlands of Southwestern Part of Ethiopia Using AMMI and GGE Biplot Stability Models AU - Tegegn Belete Y1 - 2023/12/08 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13 T2 - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JF - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JO - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics SP - 126 EP - 132 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7359 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.13 AB - A multi location trial was conducted across the highlands of Southwestern (SW) Ethiopia from 2020 to 2022 during main cropping seasons to evaluate grain yield and yield related traits of food barley varieties across the different locations to identify and recommend high yielding and stable food barley varieties to farmers for large scale planting using AMMI and GGE biplot models. A total of eight food barley varieties were obtained from the Sinana Agricultural Research Center (SARC) for use in this study. Varieties were evaluated in three environments, over three growing seasons. The experiments were conducted at Dedo, Yem and Gechi districts of SW part of Ethiopia during the main cropping seasons. The experiment was laid out in RCBD with three replications. The experimental plot for each variety consisted of six rows of 2.5m length and rows were spaced 20cm apart. Spacing between rows, plots and replications 25cm, 30cm and 1m respectively. Data for all relevant agronomic traits were collected, but only plot yield data converted to t/ha was subjected to statistical analysis. The combined ANOVA showed highly significant differences (P<0.001) among E, G and GEI for grain yield. The environmental variance was more accountable (68.2%) to the total variance as compared to the genetic variance (3.16%) and the interaction variance (19.13%) for grain yield. Dedo 2022 was the highest yielding (4.1 t/ha) while Gechi 2022 was the lowest yielding (1.5 t/ha) environment. The mean grain yield of the varieties across eight environments was 3 t/ha. The GGE biplot identified two barley growing mega-environments. The first mega environment consisted of environments E5, E8, E1 with a vertex genotype T4. E6, E4, E3, E2 and E7 were found in the second mega environment with the winning genotype of T8. It was also noted that no mega-environments fell into sectors where genotype T2 and T7 were the vertex genotypes, did not fit in any of the mega-environments. According to both AMMI and GGE biplot analysis, food barley varieties T3, T7 and T5 were found to be benchmarks/ideal genotypes and could be used as checks to evaluate the performance of other genotypes and also can be recommended for wider cultivation in the highland environments of Southwestern Ethiopia. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -