Shattering has a substantial yield reduction in sesame. Sixty-four sesame genotypes were evaluated using 8 x 8 lattice design with two replications at the main research station of Pawe Agricultural Research Center to assess the genetic variability among sesame genotypes for shattering and shattering-related traits. Data were collected on days to first capsule opening, days to 90% maturity, number of opened-capsules plant-1, number of total capsules plant-1, length of cracking on opened-capsule, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1 while the capsule is inverted, and the number of seeds retained opened-capsule-1. In the present study, the mean seed retention and rate of shattering capsule-1 ranged from 22.56% to 73.71% and from 26.20% to 77.78%, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed significance difference (P<0.05) among sesame genotypes for number of days from first capsule-opening up to days to 90% maturity, while the evaluated genotypes showed non-significant difference (P>0.05) for rate of shattering and other shattering-related traits which indicated low scope of improvement for shattering resistance through the evaluation and selection of landraces. Furthermore, low estimates of heritability and genetic advance as percentage of the mean for shattering and its related traits indicated that an environment had a significant influence on these traits, which suggests breeders to evaluate sesame genotypes for shattering resistance based on molecular data rather than phenotypic data for reliable results and valid recommendations.
Published in | International Journal of Genetics and Genomics (Volume 11, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12 |
Page(s) | 119-125 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Days to First Capsule Opening, Phenotypic Coefficient of Variation, Genotypic Coefficient of Variation, Genetic Advance, Heritability
[1] | Bedigian, D. and Harlan, J. R. (1986). Evidence for cultivation of sesame in the ancient world. Economic botany; 40(2): 137-54. |
[2] | Ashri, A. (1998). Sesame breeding. In: Janick, J. (Ed.), Plant breeding review. John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
[3] | Carlsson, A. S., Chanana, N. P., Gudu, S., Suh, M. C. and Were, B. A. I. (2008). Sesame. In Kole and Hall (Eds.), Compendium of transgenic crop plants, Transgenic Oilseed Crops, Texas, USA, Wiley Blackwell. |
[4] | Terefe, G., Wakjira, A., Berhe, M. and Tadesse, H. (2012). Sesame production manual. Ethiopia: Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. |
[5] | Dossa, K., Diouf, D., Wang, L., Wei, X., Zhang, Y., Niang, M., Fonceka, D., Yu, J., Mmadi, M. A., Yehouessi, L. W. and Liao, B. (2017). The emerging oilseed crop Sesamum indicum enters the “Omics” era. Frontiers in plant science; 8: 1154. |
[6] | Abate, M., Mekbib, F., Ayana, A. and Nigussie, M. (2015). Genetic variability and association of traits in mid-altitude sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm of Ethiopia. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture; 9(3): 1-4. |
[7] | IPGRI and NBPGR (2004). Descriptors for Sesame (Sesamum spp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy and National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi, India. |
[8] | Najeeb, U., Mirza, M. Y, Jilani, G., Mubashir, A. K. and Zhou, W. J. (2012). Sesame. In Technological Innovations in Major World Oil Crops. Springer; 1: 131-145. |
[9] | Gebremichael, D. E. (2017). Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) breeding in Ethiopia. International Journal of Novel Research in Life Sciences; 4: 1-11. |
[10] | Shukla, S., Bhargava, A., Chatterjee, A. and Singh, S. P. (2004). Estimates of genetic parameters to determine variability for foliage yield and its different quantitative and qualitative traits in vegetable amaranth (A. tricolor) [India]. Journal of Genetics and Breeding (Italy). |
[11] | Larik, A. S., Malik, S. I., Kakar, A. A. and Naz, M. A. (2000). Assessment of heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield components in Gossypium hirsutum L. Scientific Khyber; 13: 39-44. |
[12] | R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria, URL: http:// www.R-project.org. |
[13] | de Mendiburu, F. (2021). agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3-5, URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae. |
[14] | Syukur, M., Sujiprihati, S., Yunianti, R. and Nida, K. (2010). The estimation of variance component, heritability, and correlation to determine selection criteria in the F5 population of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) population. Jurnal Hortikultura Indonesia; 1: 74-80. |
[15] | Deshmukh, S. N., Basu, M. S. and Reddy, P. S. (1986). Genetic variability, character association and path coefficients of quantitative traits in Virginia bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. |
[16] | Allard, R. W. (1960). Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York. |
[17] | Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. F. and Comstock, R. E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy journal; 47(7): 314-318. |
[18] | Bandila, S., Ghanta, A., Natarajan, S. and Subramoniam, S. (2011). Determination of genetic variation in Indian sesame (Sesamum indicum) genotypes for agro-morphological traits. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science; 7(2): 88-99. |
APA Style
Gedifew, S. (2023). Genetic Variability in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes for Shattering and Shattering-Related Traits. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 11(4), 119-125. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12
ACS Style
Gedifew, S. Genetic Variability in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes for Shattering and Shattering-Related Traits. Int. J. Genet. Genomics 2023, 11(4), 119-125. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12
AMA Style
Gedifew S. Genetic Variability in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes for Shattering and Shattering-Related Traits. Int J Genet Genomics. 2023;11(4):119-125. doi: 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12, author = {Sintayehu Gedifew}, title = {Genetic Variability in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes for Shattering and Shattering-Related Traits}, journal = {International Journal of Genetics and Genomics}, volume = {11}, number = {4}, pages = {119-125}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijgg.20231104.12}, abstract = {Shattering has a substantial yield reduction in sesame. Sixty-four sesame genotypes were evaluated using 8 x 8 lattice design with two replications at the main research station of Pawe Agricultural Research Center to assess the genetic variability among sesame genotypes for shattering and shattering-related traits. Data were collected on days to first capsule opening, days to 90% maturity, number of opened-capsules plant-1, number of total capsules plant-1, length of cracking on opened-capsule, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1 while the capsule is inverted, and the number of seeds retained opened-capsule-1. In the present study, the mean seed retention and rate of shattering capsule-1 ranged from 22.56% to 73.71% and from 26.20% to 77.78%, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed significance difference (PP>0.05) for rate of shattering and other shattering-related traits which indicated low scope of improvement for shattering resistance through the evaluation and selection of landraces. Furthermore, low estimates of heritability and genetic advance as percentage of the mean for shattering and its related traits indicated that an environment had a significant influence on these traits, which suggests breeders to evaluate sesame genotypes for shattering resistance based on molecular data rather than phenotypic data for reliable results and valid recommendations. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Genetic Variability in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) Genotypes for Shattering and Shattering-Related Traits AU - Sintayehu Gedifew Y1 - 2023/11/30 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12 T2 - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JF - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics JO - International Journal of Genetics and Genomics SP - 119 EP - 125 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7359 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijgg.20231104.12 AB - Shattering has a substantial yield reduction in sesame. Sixty-four sesame genotypes were evaluated using 8 x 8 lattice design with two replications at the main research station of Pawe Agricultural Research Center to assess the genetic variability among sesame genotypes for shattering and shattering-related traits. Data were collected on days to first capsule opening, days to 90% maturity, number of opened-capsules plant-1, number of total capsules plant-1, length of cracking on opened-capsule, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1, number of seeds dropped opened-capsule-1 while the capsule is inverted, and the number of seeds retained opened-capsule-1. In the present study, the mean seed retention and rate of shattering capsule-1 ranged from 22.56% to 73.71% and from 26.20% to 77.78%, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed significance difference (PP>0.05) for rate of shattering and other shattering-related traits which indicated low scope of improvement for shattering resistance through the evaluation and selection of landraces. Furthermore, low estimates of heritability and genetic advance as percentage of the mean for shattering and its related traits indicated that an environment had a significant influence on these traits, which suggests breeders to evaluate sesame genotypes for shattering resistance based on molecular data rather than phenotypic data for reliable results and valid recommendations. VL - 11 IS - 4 ER -