Kainji Dam is located in the north western part of Nigeria. The river flood plain downstream the dam has rich alluvial soils with great agricultural potentials and this has been the major pull factor for several local communities that settled in the area and engaged in farming as a means of livelihood. However, these downstream communities in Yauri Emirate are exposed to flooding and other forms of vulnerability related to their livelihood activities and living pattern. An assessment of changing vulnerability from kainji dam is therefore conducted in Yauri Emirate. The objectives of the study are to examine the different forms of vulnerability of the people to flood in the study area, characterize the factors that influence vulnerability in the study area and examine the changing nature of vulnerability in the area. The study employed direct field survey using oral interview, questionnaire and field measurements for data collection. Findings of the study revealed that flood hazard is the most common hazard applicable to the study area. 80% of the respondents believed building made from clay are most affected by flood disaster, this is because such buildings were built with poor construction material and requires varying major repairs after flood disasters. The study further shows that 55% of the respondents revealed they have been involved in the planning/activities aimed at reducing flood disaster measures but they found the strategy to be non-effective due to non-sustainability of the flood disaster risk management program within the community, clearing of blocked drainages was their only contribution to flood reduction. The impact of the previous flood experienced 60-65% of destruction to physical infrastructure, to be more common between 2008 to 2017, 65% of the respondents houses were severely destroyed during the year 2008 to 2017. From the data analysis, the respondents agreed on the fact that 2018 was the most affected year where people were rendered jobless, this distortion affected the community’s occupation of farming & fishing therefore, having a negative effect on their income streams. This study revealed that Yauri Emirate has been exposed to a wide variety of hazards which need urgent attention. The establishment of the dam has impacted both negatively and positively on the inhabitants of the area. Negative effects seem to outweigh the advantages of the dam. This is because what is required to take full advantage of the dam to assist the local people is lacking.
Published in | International Journal of Engineering Management (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12 |
Page(s) | 9-19 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Assessment, Vulnerability, Dam and Yauri
[1] | International Commission on Large Dams [ICOLD] 1998 Conference; 10th, British Dam Society: The prospect for reservoirs in the 21st century; proceedings of the tenth conference of the BDS held at the University of Wales, Bangor on 9-12 September 1998; 1998; Bangor. |
[2] | WCD (2000). Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. Retrieved February 29, 2009 from World Commission on Dams. |
[3] | International Commission on Large Dams. Spanish National Committee. L Berga et al: Dams and reservoirs, societies and environment in the 21st century: proceedings of the International Symposium on Dams in the Societies of the 21st Century, ICOLD-SPANCOLD, 18 June 2006, Barcelona, Spain. |
[4] | Kuti I. Abayomi, Animashaun I. Murtala, Olawale Babatunde and Abdullahi Suleiman (2015), Trend Analysis of Hydro-meteorological Data for River Kaduna at Shiroro Dam Site, Niger State Nigeria, Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 8 (5): 1-12. |
[5] | Olujimi Olanrewaju Olusoji, Fatoki Olalekan S, Odendaal JP, Okonkwo JO. 2010. A review of endocrine disrupting chemicals (phenol and phthalates) in the South African environment: a need for more monitoring. Water SA 36: 671–682. |
[6] | Ologunorisa, Temi E.; Abawua, M. J. Flood Risk Assessment: A Review. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2005, pp. 57-63. |
[7] | Simon John Higgins on Flotation structure for buoyant flood protection barrier and barrier incorporating, such a structure 2010. |
[8] | Bariweni, Perekibina A., Tawari, C. C. and Abowei, J. F. N. (2012) Some Environmental Effects of Flooding in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. International Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1, 35-46. |
[9] | Birkmann, Joern (2006). Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. |
[10] | Vogel & O’Brien 2004 Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. |
[11] | Kasperson & Archer 2005 Integrated Regional Assessment of Global Climate Change. |
[12] | United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction; International Day for Disaster Reduction 13 October 2004. |
[13] | Connor & Hiroki 2005; Development of a method for assessing flood vulnerability - Water science and technology: a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research. |
[14] | Anne Vander Veen and Christiaan Logtmeijer, (2005), Economic Hotspots: Visualizing Vulnerability to Flooding, Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, 36, (1), 65-80. |
[15] | Kidokoro, Tetsuo 2008; T1 - Community-based Approach for Improving Vulnerable Urban Space. |
[16] | Creswell, John W. (2014). Book Review Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
[17] | Christian Kuhlicke 2011; Social Capacity Building for Natural Hazards Toward more resilient societies. |
[18] | Zoran Vojinovic, Multi-objective rehabilitation of urban drainage systems under uncertainties; Journal of Hydroinformatics (2014) Volume 16, Issue 5 September 2014. |
[19] | UNESCO «Natural Sciences» Environment «Water» WWAP «World Water Development Report» WWDR1 (2003). |
[20] | Yang Heloisa, Haynes Matt., Winzenread Stephen., & Okada Kevin. (1999). History of Dams: Examples of Dam Types, Diagrams. Retrieved February 28, 2009 from University of California Davis. |
[21] | Rothfeder Jeffrey; (2001). Every Drop for Sale: Our Desperate Battle over Water in a World About to Run Out. New York, NY: Penguin Putnam. |
[22] | Davidson Frank Paul. & Brooke Kathleen Lusk. (2006). Building the World: An Encyclopedia of the Great Engineering Projects in History Volume Two. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. |
[23] | Clarkin, Thomas (2000). Boulder Dam. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues Volume I. Pasadena, CA: Salem Press, Inc. |
[24] | International Water Power (1998). Needle valves replaced at Hoover Dam. Water Power Magazine. Retrieved March 28, 2009 from IWP&DC. |
[25] | Pitzl, Gerald R. (2007). Colorado River. In Encyclopedia of Environment and Society Volume I. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. |
[26] | USBR (2008). Hoover Dam Frequently Asked Questions and Answers: The Dam. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from Reclamation Managing Water in the West: Lower Colorado Region Web site: http://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/faqs/damfaqs.html |
[27] | CIA (2009) The World Fact Book. Retrieved April 1, 2009, from the Central Intelligence Agency Web Site: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html |
[28] | Thompson, D. J (2000). Aswan High Dam. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues Volume I. Pasadena, CA; Salem Press, Inc. |
[29] | George, A. (2009). Friction flows over Nile waters. Water Power Magazine. Retrieved. |
[30] | Ford Neville (2007). Facing up to the challenges of the Nile. International Water Power and Dam Construction. Retrieved March 28, 2009 from IWPC. |
[31] | Nkwunonwo, Ugonna C. etal: A review and critical analysis of the efforts towards urban flood reduction in the Lagos 3 region of Nigeria. |
[32] | Ibidun O Adelekan; Vulnerability of poor urban coastal communities to flooding in Lagos, Nigeria. Environment and Urbanization, vol. 22, 2: pp. 433-450., First Published October 25, 2010. |
[33] | Olajuyigbe Ayo Emmanuel, Rotowa Olukayode O., and Durojaye, E.: An assessment of flood hazard in Nigeria: the case of mile 12, Lagos, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 367–375, 2012. |
[34] | Ugwu, Leonard I. and Ugwu, Dorothy I.: Gender, floods and mental health: the way forward, International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3, 1030–1042, 2013. |
[35] | Adigun Folasade, Abolade Olajoke, and Yusuf Abdullahi: Incidence of flood and its impacts: empirical evidence from Ajeromi-Ifeledun, Lagos State, Nigeria, International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies, 2, 239–254, 2013. |
[36] | Ajibola, M. Olusola, Izunwanne, E. M., and Ogungbemi, Afolarin O.: Assessing the effects of flooding on residential property values In Lekki Phase I, Lagos, Nigeria, International Journal of Asian Social Science, 2, 271–282, 2012. |
[37] | Aderogba Kofo, Martins Oscar M., Oderinde Soji. and Afelumo Toun: Challenges of poor drainage systems and floods in Lagos metropolis, Nigeria, International Journal of Social Science and Education, 2, 412–427, 2012. |
[38] | Huq, Saleemul. and Alam, M.: Flood management and vulnerability of Dhaka City. Building Safer Cities: The Future of Disaster Risk, Washington, D. C., 121–135, 2003. |
[39] | Adam Anokye M. (2020). Sample Size Determination in Survey Research. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26 (5), 90-97. |
[40] | Birkmann Joern, 2007, ‘Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications’, Environmental Hazards 7, 20–31. |
[41] | Adger W. N., Brooks N., Bentham G., Agnew M. & Eriksen S, 2004, New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity, vol. 122, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich. |
[42] | Mustafa Daanish, Ahmed Sara, Saroch Eva & Bell H, 2011, ‘Pinning down vulnerability: From narratives to numbers’, Disasters 35, 62–86. |
[43] | Wisner Ben & Birkmann Jorn, 2006, Self-assessment of coping capacity: Participatory, proactive, and qualitative engagement of communities in their own risk management, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, Japan. |
[44] | Creswell John W & Plano Clark VL 2007. Designing and conducting mixed method sresearch. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
[45] | Brouwer Roy, Akter Sonia, Brander Luke & Haque Enamul (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis, 27 (2), 313–326. |
[46] | Mark Pelling Adaptation to Climate Change: From Resilience to Transformation Routledge, London (2011). |
[47] | Patrick S. Ward, Gerald E Shively Disaster risk, social vulnerability, and economic development- Journal (2017) Vol 41 Issue 1 Pages 342-351. |
[48] | Rumbach Andrew & Shirgaokar Manish 2017; ‘Predictors of household exposure to monsoon rain hazards in informal settlements’, Natural Hazards 85, 709–728. |
APA Style
Jibrin Ahmadu, Abarshi Musa, Eze Ogechukwu Franca, Bessie Hanis, Akubo Joseph Idoko, et al. (2022). Assessment of Changing Vulnerability from Kainji Dam in Yauri Emirate - Kebbi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Management, 6(1), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12
ACS Style
Jibrin Ahmadu; Abarshi Musa; Eze Ogechukwu Franca; Bessie Hanis; Akubo Joseph Idoko, et al. Assessment of Changing Vulnerability from Kainji Dam in Yauri Emirate - Kebbi State, Nigeria. Int. J. Eng. Manag. 2022, 6(1), 9-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12, author = {Jibrin Ahmadu and Abarshi Musa and Eze Ogechukwu Franca and Bessie Hanis and Akubo Joseph Idoko and Andy Anyalewachi Ukah}, title = {Assessment of Changing Vulnerability from Kainji Dam in Yauri Emirate - Kebbi State, Nigeria}, journal = {International Journal of Engineering Management}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {9-19}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijem.20220601.12}, abstract = {Kainji Dam is located in the north western part of Nigeria. The river flood plain downstream the dam has rich alluvial soils with great agricultural potentials and this has been the major pull factor for several local communities that settled in the area and engaged in farming as a means of livelihood. However, these downstream communities in Yauri Emirate are exposed to flooding and other forms of vulnerability related to their livelihood activities and living pattern. An assessment of changing vulnerability from kainji dam is therefore conducted in Yauri Emirate. The objectives of the study are to examine the different forms of vulnerability of the people to flood in the study area, characterize the factors that influence vulnerability in the study area and examine the changing nature of vulnerability in the area. The study employed direct field survey using oral interview, questionnaire and field measurements for data collection. Findings of the study revealed that flood hazard is the most common hazard applicable to the study area. 80% of the respondents believed building made from clay are most affected by flood disaster, this is because such buildings were built with poor construction material and requires varying major repairs after flood disasters. The study further shows that 55% of the respondents revealed they have been involved in the planning/activities aimed at reducing flood disaster measures but they found the strategy to be non-effective due to non-sustainability of the flood disaster risk management program within the community, clearing of blocked drainages was their only contribution to flood reduction. The impact of the previous flood experienced 60-65% of destruction to physical infrastructure, to be more common between 2008 to 2017, 65% of the respondents houses were severely destroyed during the year 2008 to 2017. From the data analysis, the respondents agreed on the fact that 2018 was the most affected year where people were rendered jobless, this distortion affected the community’s occupation of farming & fishing therefore, having a negative effect on their income streams. This study revealed that Yauri Emirate has been exposed to a wide variety of hazards which need urgent attention. The establishment of the dam has impacted both negatively and positively on the inhabitants of the area. Negative effects seem to outweigh the advantages of the dam. This is because what is required to take full advantage of the dam to assist the local people is lacking.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Assessment of Changing Vulnerability from Kainji Dam in Yauri Emirate - Kebbi State, Nigeria AU - Jibrin Ahmadu AU - Abarshi Musa AU - Eze Ogechukwu Franca AU - Bessie Hanis AU - Akubo Joseph Idoko AU - Andy Anyalewachi Ukah Y1 - 2022/05/12 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12 T2 - International Journal of Engineering Management JF - International Journal of Engineering Management JO - International Journal of Engineering Management SP - 9 EP - 19 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1568 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20220601.12 AB - Kainji Dam is located in the north western part of Nigeria. The river flood plain downstream the dam has rich alluvial soils with great agricultural potentials and this has been the major pull factor for several local communities that settled in the area and engaged in farming as a means of livelihood. However, these downstream communities in Yauri Emirate are exposed to flooding and other forms of vulnerability related to their livelihood activities and living pattern. An assessment of changing vulnerability from kainji dam is therefore conducted in Yauri Emirate. The objectives of the study are to examine the different forms of vulnerability of the people to flood in the study area, characterize the factors that influence vulnerability in the study area and examine the changing nature of vulnerability in the area. The study employed direct field survey using oral interview, questionnaire and field measurements for data collection. Findings of the study revealed that flood hazard is the most common hazard applicable to the study area. 80% of the respondents believed building made from clay are most affected by flood disaster, this is because such buildings were built with poor construction material and requires varying major repairs after flood disasters. The study further shows that 55% of the respondents revealed they have been involved in the planning/activities aimed at reducing flood disaster measures but they found the strategy to be non-effective due to non-sustainability of the flood disaster risk management program within the community, clearing of blocked drainages was their only contribution to flood reduction. The impact of the previous flood experienced 60-65% of destruction to physical infrastructure, to be more common between 2008 to 2017, 65% of the respondents houses were severely destroyed during the year 2008 to 2017. From the data analysis, the respondents agreed on the fact that 2018 was the most affected year where people were rendered jobless, this distortion affected the community’s occupation of farming & fishing therefore, having a negative effect on their income streams. This study revealed that Yauri Emirate has been exposed to a wide variety of hazards which need urgent attention. The establishment of the dam has impacted both negatively and positively on the inhabitants of the area. Negative effects seem to outweigh the advantages of the dam. This is because what is required to take full advantage of the dam to assist the local people is lacking. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -