| Peer-Reviewed

Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4

Received: 28 October 2018     Accepted: 14 November 2018     Published: 19 December 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Modelling and Analysis was carried out using Finite Element to study the behaviour of composite beams according to Euro code 4 with respect to bending, shear and deflection under varying loads, and the ultimate loadings and section capacities corresponding to failure modes was evaluated. In bending the section capacity was found to increase with an increase in both concrete and steel strength however increase in flexural resistance with increase in compressive strength is very small that is 3.2% 3.1% and 3.0% when the concrete strength was increase from 25 N/mm2 to 30, 35 and 40 N/mm2 respectively, compare to the way it increase with increase in the steel strength by 27% and 21% when the strength was increase from 275 to 355 and 460N/mm2 respectively, but the ultimate flexural load capacity of the beams decreases with increase in the beam span for both the three steel strength. However, shear capacity of the sections remain unchanged at constant steel strength and varying length, but increases with increase in ultimate yield strength of the steel sections by 29%, and 67% when the ultimate yield strength was increase from 275 N/mm2 to 355 N/mm2 and 460 N/mm2 respectively, while allowable deflection increases with an increase in the beams span and the ultimate loadings with respect to deflection also decrease with increase in the beams span.

Published in International Journal of Engineering Management (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11
Page(s) 81-87
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Composite Beam, Eurocode, Bending, Shear, Deflection, Section Capacity

References
[1] Al-duri, S. (2015). Structural steel design of composite beam (Tech. Rep.) Memorial University Canada.
[2] Johnson, R. P. & Anderson, D. (2004) Designers’ guide to en 1994-1-1: Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and concrete structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, Thomas Telford.
[3] BS EN (2005). Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures. General rules and rules for bridges. British Adopted Standard.
[4] Mc Cormac J. C., & Csernak, S. F. [Ed] (2012). Structural steel designs (5th ed.) Prentice Hall Ltd New York.
[5] Shuaibu Y. K. A. & Airong (2006). Conceptual design and analysis of steel-concrete composite bridge steel structure vol. 6 pp 393-407.
[6] Hicks, S. J. Lawson, R. M., Rackham, J. W. & Fordham, P. (2004). Comparative structure cost of modern commercial buildings SCI Publication The Steel Construction Institute vol. 7 pp 137- 85.
[7] Ashraf M. M., (2016). Finite element modeling of steel-concrete beam considering double composite action. In shams Engineering Journal vol. 2 pp73-88.
[8] Lawson S. J. R. M., , Rackham J. W., & P. Fordham, (2004). Comparative structure cost of modern commercial buildings SCI Publication The Steel Construction Institute vol. 7 pp 137- 85.
[9] Arya, C. (2009). Design of structural elements. Spon Press London.
[10] Owen G. W., & Davison, B. [Ed.](2003) Steel designer's manual (6th ed.) Blackwell Science Ltd UK.
[11] Kapil G. & Sajshi G. (2016). Flexural capacity of composite beams (steel & concrete). Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) vol. 40 pp 66-72.
[12] Igor, I. A. A. T. Beck, & Malite, M. (2010). Reliability based evaluation of design guidelines for cold-formed steel-concrete composite beam. Journal of Brazilian Society of Mechanical Science & Engineering vol. 32 pp 442-449.
[13] Mosley, B. B. & Hulser, J. R. (2007). Reinforced concrete design to Eurocode 4. Palgrave Macmillan Press. London.
[14] Qia., M. F. Gai, Zhao, J. & Sheng S. (2015). Analysis on time-dependent reliability of steel structural components under fire conditions. International Journal of Smart Home vol. 9 pp 29-36.
[15] Abubakar, A., Mohammed, A., & Duna S. (2017). Mechanical Properties of concrete containing Corn cob ash. International journal of Scientific Research and Engineering studies vol 3 pp 47-51.
[16] Omoniyi, T., Duna, S., & Mohammed A. (2014). Compressive Strength Characteristics of Cow dung Ash Blended Cement Concrete International journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. vol.3 pp770-776
[17] Rajesh, K. & Devi, Ch. (2017). Study on Ordinary Concrete with Waste Plastic as A Fibre International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) Vol. 7 p 2454-4698.
[18] EN 1990 -11 (2002) (English): Eurocode 2 - Basis of Structural Design [Authority: The European Union per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
[19] EN 1992-1-1 (2004) Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings [Authority: The European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
[20] Abubakar I. & Nabade A. M. (2014). “Bending Strength Classification of Some Common Nigerian Timber Species”. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 8 (2) 2014.
[21] Consteel11 (2017). Composite Concrete and Steel Design software according to EC4 Version 11.0 www.consteelsoftware.com.
[22] EN 1993-1-1 (2003) (English): Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures – Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings [Authority: The European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC].
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Abubakar Mamuda, Duna Samson, Idris Abubakar, Ahmad Batari, Nasir Kabir, et al. (2018). Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4. International Journal of Engineering Management, 2(4), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Abubakar Mamuda; Duna Samson; Idris Abubakar; Ahmad Batari; Nasir Kabir, et al. Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4. Int. J. Eng. Manag. 2018, 2(4), 81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Abubakar Mamuda, Duna Samson, Idris Abubakar, Ahmad Batari, Nasir Kabir, et al. Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4. Int J Eng Manag. 2018;2(4):81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11,
      author = {Abubakar Mamuda and Duna Samson and Idris Abubakar and Ahmad Batari and Nasir Kabir and Adamu Umar Chinade},
      title = {Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4},
      journal = {International Journal of Engineering Management},
      volume = {2},
      number = {4},
      pages = {81-87},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijem.20180204.11},
      abstract = {Modelling and Analysis was carried out using Finite Element to study the behaviour of composite beams according to Euro code 4 with respect to bending, shear and deflection under varying loads, and the ultimate loadings and section capacities corresponding to failure modes was evaluated. In bending the section capacity was found to increase with an increase in both concrete and steel strength however increase in flexural resistance with increase in compressive strength is very small that is 3.2% 3.1% and 3.0% when the concrete strength was increase from 25 N/mm2 to 30, 35 and 40 N/mm2 respectively, compare to the way it increase with increase in the steel strength by 27% and 21% when the strength was increase from 275 to 355 and 460N/mm2 respectively, but the ultimate flexural load capacity of the beams decreases with increase in the beam span for both the three steel strength. However, shear capacity of the sections remain unchanged at constant steel strength and varying length, but increases with increase in ultimate yield strength of the steel sections by 29%, and 67% when the ultimate yield strength was increase from 275 N/mm2 to 355 N/mm2 and 460 N/mm2 respectively, while allowable deflection increases with an increase in the beams span and the ultimate loadings with respect to deflection also decrease with increase in the beams span.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Capacity of Composite Concrete-Steel Beams According to Euro Code 4
    AU  - Abubakar Mamuda
    AU  - Duna Samson
    AU  - Idris Abubakar
    AU  - Ahmad Batari
    AU  - Nasir Kabir
    AU  - Adamu Umar Chinade
    Y1  - 2018/12/19
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11
    T2  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    JF  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    JO  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    SP  - 81
    EP  - 87
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1568
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20180204.11
    AB  - Modelling and Analysis was carried out using Finite Element to study the behaviour of composite beams according to Euro code 4 with respect to bending, shear and deflection under varying loads, and the ultimate loadings and section capacities corresponding to failure modes was evaluated. In bending the section capacity was found to increase with an increase in both concrete and steel strength however increase in flexural resistance with increase in compressive strength is very small that is 3.2% 3.1% and 3.0% when the concrete strength was increase from 25 N/mm2 to 30, 35 and 40 N/mm2 respectively, compare to the way it increase with increase in the steel strength by 27% and 21% when the strength was increase from 275 to 355 and 460N/mm2 respectively, but the ultimate flexural load capacity of the beams decreases with increase in the beam span for both the three steel strength. However, shear capacity of the sections remain unchanged at constant steel strength and varying length, but increases with increase in ultimate yield strength of the steel sections by 29%, and 67% when the ultimate yield strength was increase from 275 N/mm2 to 355 N/mm2 and 460 N/mm2 respectively, while allowable deflection increases with an increase in the beams span and the ultimate loadings with respect to deflection also decrease with increase in the beams span.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi, Nigeria

  • Sections