| Peer-Reviewed

Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening

Received: 13 March 2017     Accepted: 30 March 2017     Published: 27 April 2017
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This article presents the application of a Case-based Reasoning (CBR) in order to define the calculation and verification parameters to design building structures. Each and every calculating variable has to be chosen according to construction criteria from a set up list. These decisions are meant to find a solution that will be the closest possible to a valid one, and this will be verified through calculation. In the optimal scenario, the calculation will just verify that the chosen solution is valid, or that it is completely impossible to implement the strengthening; whereas in the worst scenario, the calculating process will simply correct some previous decision, once the strengthening suitability is confirmed. A case study of timber floor slabs straightening is introduced in which a selection of the necessary parameters for its calculation and verification are defined by CBR. Finally, the same case study is built and calculated by SAP commercial program in order to find out whether the defined parameters can actually envisage a proper solution for the strengthening.

Published in International Journal of Engineering Management (Volume 1, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13
Page(s) 16-26
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Case-Based, Reasoning, Floor-Slab, Strengthening, Timber

References
[1] Huo, D., Li, W. Z., Zuo, Y. Z., Liu, Y. M., & Zhou, L. Y. (2013). “Detection Analysis of Steel Structural Damage Based on CBR”. Journal of Beijing University Technology, 39, 570-575.
[2] RunZhi, J., Sangwon, H., ChangTaek, H., & JiHoon, K. (2014). “Improving accuracy of early stage cost estimation by revising categorical variables in a case-based reasoning model”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 140, 04014025. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO. 1943-7862.0000863.
[3] Clarke, R. (1988) Knowledge Based Expert Systems. Accesible at: http://www.rogerclarke.com/SOS/KBT.htlm
[4] Castro, J. L., Navarro, M., Sánchez, J. M., Zurita & J. M. (2010). “Introducing attributive risk for retrieval in case-based reasoning”. Revista de aplicaciones de sistemas expertos basados en el conocimiento. Especialmente, para los fines que se persiguen en este sistema, 24, 257-268.
[5] Yejun Xu, Qingli Da. (2008). “A method for multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information under uncertain linguistic environment”. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, 837-841.
[6] Yuanping Xu, Zhijie Xu, Xiangqian Jiang, & Scott, P. (2010) “Developing a knowledge-based system for complex geometrical product specification data manipulation”. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 10-22.
[7] J. H. M. TAH, V. CARR, R. HOWES, (1998) "An application of case-based reasoning to the planning of highway bridge construction", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 5 Iss: 4, pp.327 – 338.
[8] EDIZ ALKOC, FUAT ERBATUR, (1998) "SITE EXPERT: a prototype knowledge-based expert system", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 5 Iss: 3, pp.238 – 251.
[9] ShiHai, Z., & JinPing, O. (2013). “BP-PSO-based intelligent case retrieval method for high rise structural form selection”. Science China: Technologies Sciences, 56, 940-944. doi: 10.1007/s11431-013-5167-8.
[10] Konczak, A., & Paslawsky, J. (2013). “Abductive and Deductive Approach in Learning from Examples Method for Technological Decision Making”. Modern Building Material, Structures and Techniques, 57, 583-588.
[11] Jing, D. & Bormann, J. (2014). “Improved similarity Measure in Case-Base Reasoning with Global Sensitivity Analysis: An Example of Construction Quantity Estimating”. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 28, 04014020. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP. 1943-5487.0000267.
[12] Kartelj, A., Surlan, N., & Cekic, Z. (2014). “Case-based reasoning and electromagnetism-like method in construction management”. KYBERNETES, 43, 265-280. doi: 10.1108/K-06-2013-0105.
[13] James D., (1998) "The development of ground floor constructions: part 5 (damp proofing existing ground floors)", Structural Survey, Vol. 16 Iss: 3, pp.136 – 140.
[14] A. Cruden, (1990) "Fort George rehabilitation – Case study on timber strengthening", Structural Survey, Vol. 8 Iss: 1, pp.31 – 43.
[15] Macías Bernal, J. M., Calama Rodríguez, J. M., Chávez de Diego, M. J. (2014). “Modelo de predicción de la vida útil de la edificación patrimonial a partir de la lógica difusa”. Informes de la construcción del Instituto Torroja, 533.
[16] Cárdenas, M., Schanack, F. & Ramos, O. R. (2010). “Design, construction and testing of a composited glued timber-concrete structure to be use in bridges”. Revista de la construcción, 2, 63-65.
[17] European Committee for Standardization., & British Standards Institution. (1994). “Eurocode 5: Design of timber structure”. Brussels: BSI.
[18] Instituto Nacional de Normalización INN-Chile. 1999. NCh 1198. Of91 Madera. Construcciones en madera. Cálculo. INN, Santiago.
[19] EHE. Real Decreto 1247/2008. Ehe-08. Instrucción del Hormigón Estructural. 2008.
[20] CTE CTE. DB-SE. Seguridad Estructural. Ley 38/1999 de 5 de noviembre, de Ordenación de la Edificación (LOE), 2006.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ana Fernández-Cuartero Paramio, Juan Francisco de la Torre Calvo, Antonio Aznar López, José Ignacio Hernando García, Consolación Acha Román, et al. (2017). Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening. International Journal of Engineering Management, 1(1), 16-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ana Fernández-Cuartero Paramio; Juan Francisco de la Torre Calvo; Antonio Aznar López; José Ignacio Hernando García; Consolación Acha Román, et al. Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening. Int. J. Eng. Manag. 2017, 1(1), 16-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ana Fernández-Cuartero Paramio, Juan Francisco de la Torre Calvo, Antonio Aznar López, José Ignacio Hernando García, Consolación Acha Román, et al. Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening. Int J Eng Manag. 2017;1(1):16-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13,
      author = {Ana Fernández-Cuartero Paramio and Juan Francisco de la Torre Calvo and Antonio Aznar López and José Ignacio Hernando García and Consolación Acha Román and Fernando da Casa Martín},
      title = {Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening},
      journal = {International Journal of Engineering Management},
      volume = {1},
      number = {1},
      pages = {16-26},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijem.20170101.13},
      abstract = {This article presents the application of a Case-based Reasoning (CBR) in order to define the calculation and verification parameters to design building structures. Each and every calculating variable has to be chosen according to construction criteria from a set up list. These decisions are meant to find a solution that will be the closest possible to a valid one, and this will be verified through calculation. In the optimal scenario, the calculation will just verify that the chosen solution is valid, or that it is completely impossible to implement the strengthening; whereas in the worst scenario, the calculating process will simply correct some previous decision, once the strengthening suitability is confirmed. A case study of timber floor slabs straightening is introduced in which a selection of the necessary parameters for its calculation and verification are defined by CBR. Finally, the same case study is built and calculated by SAP commercial program in order to find out whether the defined parameters can actually envisage a proper solution for the strengthening.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Case-Based Reasoning for Building Structures: A Case Study of Timber Floor Slabs Strengthening
    AU  - Ana Fernández-Cuartero Paramio
    AU  - Juan Francisco de la Torre Calvo
    AU  - Antonio Aznar López
    AU  - José Ignacio Hernando García
    AU  - Consolación Acha Román
    AU  - Fernando da Casa Martín
    Y1  - 2017/04/27
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13
    T2  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    JF  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    JO  - International Journal of Engineering Management
    SP  - 16
    EP  - 26
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1568
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijem.20170101.13
    AB  - This article presents the application of a Case-based Reasoning (CBR) in order to define the calculation and verification parameters to design building structures. Each and every calculating variable has to be chosen according to construction criteria from a set up list. These decisions are meant to find a solution that will be the closest possible to a valid one, and this will be verified through calculation. In the optimal scenario, the calculation will just verify that the chosen solution is valid, or that it is completely impossible to implement the strengthening; whereas in the worst scenario, the calculating process will simply correct some previous decision, once the strengthening suitability is confirmed. A case study of timber floor slabs straightening is introduced in which a selection of the necessary parameters for its calculation and verification are defined by CBR. Finally, the same case study is built and calculated by SAP commercial program in order to find out whether the defined parameters can actually envisage a proper solution for the strengthening.
    VL  - 1
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Departamento de Construcción y Tecnología Arquitectónica, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Departamento de Estructuras y Física de la Edificación, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Departamento de Estructuras y Física de la Edificación, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Departamento de Estructuras y Física de la Edificación, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Departamento de Construcción y Tecnología Arquitectónica, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Departamento de Arquitectura, área de Construcciones Arquitectónicas, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

  • Sections