How to objectively understand the Confucian classics represented by the Analects is an important issue that needs serious study in the Chinese academic circle and also an unavoidable problem in Eastern and Western communication. Is it possible to use an axiomatic method to establish an objectified system of propositions for the Analects and find a clarified logic system in the Confucian thought reflected in the Analects as in Spizona’s The Ethics? The axiomatic method is a mathematical and philosophical method, which is originally used in Euclid geometry. It is to deduce various meaningful propositions (or theorems) on the basis of a few definitions, basic assumptions and axioms, and they can in general form a deductive system. Clarified concepts and strict logic are the advantages of the axiomatic approach which help it gradually infiltrate into disciplines other than mathematics. By reviewing Euclid's Geometry and the axiomatic approach and their evolution, We expound the systematic construct of the axiomatic interpretation of the Analects, and adopt an axiomatic approach to establish a deductive system built upon the fundamentals of the Analects. That is, after giving some definitions and making some basic assumptions, we formulate some axioms, and prove the series of propositions contained in the Analects by reasoning. In this way, the logical system of Confucius’ thought implied in the Analects can be brought to light. It is concluded that the inherent logic and thoughts of Confucius can be systematized and there is a logic system in the Analects.
Published in | International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 6, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18 |
Page(s) | 244-250 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Euclid's Geometry, The Axiomatic Approach, The Analects of Confucius, Logical System, The Exchange of Different Civilizations
[1] | Zhang Xiping. International Sinology, Vol. 16. Daxiang Publishing House, 2007, pp. 4. |
[2] | Hegel. Lectures on History of Philosophy, Vol. 1. The Commercial Press. 1981, pp. 119-120. |
[3] | Gan Xiaoqing & Li Ningning. A Systematic Analysis and Axiomatic Interpretation of the Analects. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 2013 (3). pp. 32. |
[4] | Translated by Lan Jizheng etc, Euclid's Elements, Shanxi People’s Publishing House, 2003. |
[5] | Isaac Newton, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, Higher Education Publishing House, 2003. |
[6] | Hilbert, The foundations of Geometry, Beijing University Publishing House, 2009. |
[7] | Gan Xiaoqing et al. translated by Sang Longyang et al.. Analects of Confucius: An Axiomatic Interpretation. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2014. pp. 73. |
[8] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 291. |
[9] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 51. |
[10] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 15, 57, 217. |
[11] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 25. |
[12] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 353, 55, 155. |
[13] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 57, 11, 293. |
[14] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 11, 113-115. |
[15] | Confucius The Analects. Translated by Yang Bojun (Modern Chinese), D. C. Lau (English). Zhonghua Book Company, 2011. pp. 11, 53, 227. |
[16] | Yang Shuzi. The Delightful Exploration of the Axiomatic Interpretation on Traditional Classics--- Thoughts on the Axiomatic Interpretation of the Analects of Confucius. Higher Education Research, 2011 (11). pp. 15-19. |
APA Style
Xiao Qing Gan, Long Yang Sang. (2021). The New Vision of Axiomatic Method and It’s Interpretation for The Analects of Confucius. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 6(6), 244-250. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18
ACS Style
Xiao Qing Gan; Long Yang Sang. The New Vision of Axiomatic Method and It’s Interpretation for The Analects of Confucius. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2021, 6(6), 244-250. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18
AMA Style
Xiao Qing Gan, Long Yang Sang. The New Vision of Axiomatic Method and It’s Interpretation for The Analects of Confucius. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2021;6(6):244-250. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18
@article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18, author = {Xiao Qing Gan and Long Yang Sang}, title = {The New Vision of Axiomatic Method and It’s Interpretation for The Analects of Confucius}, journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society}, volume = {6}, number = {6}, pages = {244-250}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20210606.18}, abstract = {How to objectively understand the Confucian classics represented by the Analects is an important issue that needs serious study in the Chinese academic circle and also an unavoidable problem in Eastern and Western communication. Is it possible to use an axiomatic method to establish an objectified system of propositions for the Analects and find a clarified logic system in the Confucian thought reflected in the Analects as in Spizona’s The Ethics? The axiomatic method is a mathematical and philosophical method, which is originally used in Euclid geometry. It is to deduce various meaningful propositions (or theorems) on the basis of a few definitions, basic assumptions and axioms, and they can in general form a deductive system. Clarified concepts and strict logic are the advantages of the axiomatic approach which help it gradually infiltrate into disciplines other than mathematics. By reviewing Euclid's Geometry and the axiomatic approach and their evolution, We expound the systematic construct of the axiomatic interpretation of the Analects, and adopt an axiomatic approach to establish a deductive system built upon the fundamentals of the Analects. That is, after giving some definitions and making some basic assumptions, we formulate some axioms, and prove the series of propositions contained in the Analects by reasoning. In this way, the logical system of Confucius’ thought implied in the Analects can be brought to light. It is concluded that the inherent logic and thoughts of Confucius can be systematized and there is a logic system in the Analects.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The New Vision of Axiomatic Method and It’s Interpretation for The Analects of Confucius AU - Xiao Qing Gan AU - Long Yang Sang Y1 - 2021/12/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18 T2 - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JF - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society JO - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society SP - 244 EP - 250 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3363 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20210606.18 AB - How to objectively understand the Confucian classics represented by the Analects is an important issue that needs serious study in the Chinese academic circle and also an unavoidable problem in Eastern and Western communication. Is it possible to use an axiomatic method to establish an objectified system of propositions for the Analects and find a clarified logic system in the Confucian thought reflected in the Analects as in Spizona’s The Ethics? The axiomatic method is a mathematical and philosophical method, which is originally used in Euclid geometry. It is to deduce various meaningful propositions (or theorems) on the basis of a few definitions, basic assumptions and axioms, and they can in general form a deductive system. Clarified concepts and strict logic are the advantages of the axiomatic approach which help it gradually infiltrate into disciplines other than mathematics. By reviewing Euclid's Geometry and the axiomatic approach and their evolution, We expound the systematic construct of the axiomatic interpretation of the Analects, and adopt an axiomatic approach to establish a deductive system built upon the fundamentals of the Analects. That is, after giving some definitions and making some basic assumptions, we formulate some axioms, and prove the series of propositions contained in the Analects by reasoning. In this way, the logical system of Confucius’ thought implied in the Analects can be brought to light. It is concluded that the inherent logic and thoughts of Confucius can be systematized and there is a logic system in the Analects. VL - 6 IS - 6 ER -