A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

| Peer-Reviewed

A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta

Published in International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 13 January 2021 Accepted: 19 May 2021 Published: 23 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper examines the negation typology of two Benue Congo languages, Igbo and Etulo. It discusses the similarities and differences evident in the negation marking strategies of both languages. From our findings, it is observed that despite the differences, Etulo and Igbo unanimously make a distinction between the standard negation marker and other types of negation markers such as the prohibitive negation marker as in Igbo and the interrogative negation marker as in Etulo. The distinction made in both languages lends support to the assumption in negation studies that the negative morpheme associated with standard negation often differs from the negative marker used in the negation of other construction types such as the prohibitive, and polar questions. This work adopts a descriptive approach in the analysis of the Igbo and Etulo language data. The Igbo language data presented and analyzed were obtained from the existing grammatical description of negation in Igbo while the Etulo language data were obtained from Etulo language consultants using the elicitation method.

Published in	International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
Page(s)	83-86
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Etulo, Igbo, Negation, Prohibitive, Polar Questions, Standard Negation

References

[1]	Armstrong, G. (1989) Idomoid. In (John Bendor Samuel and Rhonda Hartell, Eds,). The Niger Congo languages. Lanham. Newyork: London.
[2]	Bond, O. (2006). Negative strategies in Eleme. A seminar paper presented at the endangered languages academic programme, SOAS.
[3]	Crystal, M. (2003) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (5th edition). Oxford: Blackwells.
[4]	Ezenwafor C. I (2017) Negation Marking Strategies in Etulo. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Volume 22, Issue 10.
[5]	Ezenwafor C. I. (2011) Negation in Etulo. MA Thesis: Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.
[6]	Dahl, O. (1979) Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 76-106.
[7]	Ejele, P. (1995) The semantics of negation. In(E, Emenanjo and O, Ndimele eds) Issues in African languages and linguistics: Essays in honour of Kay Williamson. NINLAN: Aba. 258- 264.
[8]	Hansen C. (2018) Subordinate and interrogative clause negation in Iquitto. In (Maria Koptsjevskaja-Tamm ed) Linguistic typology. De Gruyter Mouton. Vol. 22 (1) pp 119-163.
[9]	Hewson, J. Yoruba (West Benue Congo). (2006). Retrieved from the internet on 1st March, 2011.
[10]	Kahrel, P. (1996) Aspects of Negation. PHD Thesis: University of Amsterdam.
[11]	Karen C. (2020) Types of Negation. In (Viviane Déprez and M. Teresa Espinal eds.) Oxford Handbook on Negation. Oxford University Press.
[12]	Miestamo, M. (2007). Negation: An overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 552-570.
[13]	Ndimele, O. (2006). Negation marking in Igbo. In (O, Ndimele ed) Language and culture in Nigeria: A Festchrift for Okon Essien. NINLAN: Aba.
[14]	Payne, J. (1985) Negation. In (Shopen, T. Ed.) Language typology and syntactic description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vol. 1. 197- 242.
[15]	Tararova O. (2020) Pragmatic uses of negation in Chipileno Spanish (Mexico) Languages. https://doi.org.10.3390/languages5030028

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. (2021). A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation, 7(3), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. Transl. 2021, 7(3), 83-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. Int J Appl Linguist Transl. 2021;7(3):83-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11,
  author = {Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta},
  title = {A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {83-86},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  abstract = {This paper examines the negation typology of two Benue Congo languages, Igbo and Etulo. It discusses the similarities and differences evident in the negation marking strategies of both languages. From our findings, it is observed that despite the differences, Etulo and Igbo unanimously make a distinction between the standard negation marker and other types of negation markers such as the prohibitive negation marker as in Igbo and the interrogative negation marker as in Etulo. The distinction made in both languages lends support to the assumption in negation studies that the negative morpheme associated with standard negation often differs from the negative marker used in the negation of other construction types such as the prohibitive, and polar questions. This work adopts a descriptive approach in the analysis of the Igbo and Etulo language data. The Igbo language data presented and analyzed were obtained from the existing grammatical description of negation in Igbo while the Etulo language data were obtained from Etulo language consultants using the elicitation method.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo
AU  - Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
JF  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
JO  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
SP  - 83
EP  - 86
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-1271
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
AB  - This paper examines the negation typology of two Benue Congo languages, Igbo and Etulo. It discusses the similarities and differences evident in the negation marking strategies of both languages. From our findings, it is observed that despite the differences, Etulo and Igbo unanimously make a distinction between the standard negation marker and other types of negation markers such as the prohibitive negation marker as in Igbo and the interrogative negation marker as in Etulo. The distinction made in both languages lends support to the assumption in negation studies that the negative morpheme associated with standard negation often differs from the negative marker used in the negation of other construction types such as the prohibitive, and polar questions. This work adopts a descriptive approach in the analysis of the Igbo and Etulo language data. The Igbo language data presented and analyzed were obtained from the existing grammatical description of negation in Igbo while the Etulo language data were obtained from Etulo language consultants using the elicitation method.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta

Department of Linguistics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. (2021). A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation, 7(3), 83-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. Int. J. Appl. Linguist. Transl. 2021, 7(3), 83-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta. A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo. Int J Appl Linguist Transl. 2021;7(3):83-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11,
  author = {Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta},
  title = {A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {83-86},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijalt.20210703.11},
  abstract = {This paper examines the negation typology of two Benue Congo languages, Igbo and Etulo. It discusses the similarities and differences evident in the negation marking strategies of both languages. From our findings, it is observed that despite the differences, Etulo and Igbo unanimously make a distinction between the standard negation marker and other types of negation markers such as the prohibitive negation marker as in Igbo and the interrogative negation marker as in Etulo. The distinction made in both languages lends support to the assumption in negation studies that the negative morpheme associated with standard negation often differs from the negative marker used in the negation of other construction types such as the prohibitive, and polar questions. This work adopts a descriptive approach in the analysis of the Igbo and Etulo language data. The Igbo language data presented and analyzed were obtained from the existing grammatical description of negation in Igbo while the Etulo language data were obtained from Etulo language consultants using the elicitation method.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Comparative Study of Negation in Igbo and Etulo
AU  - Chikelu Ihunanya Ezenwafor-Afuecheta
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
T2  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
JF  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
JO  - International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation
SP  - 83
EP  - 86
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2472-1271
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210703.11
AB  - This paper examines the negation typology of two Benue Congo languages, Igbo and Etulo. It discusses the similarities and differences evident in the negation marking strategies of both languages. From our findings, it is observed that despite the differences, Etulo and Igbo unanimously make a distinction between the standard negation marker and other types of negation markers such as the prohibitive negation marker as in Igbo and the interrogative negation marker as in Etulo. The distinction made in both languages lends support to the assumption in negation studies that the negative morpheme associated with standard negation often differs from the negative marker used in the negation of other construction types such as the prohibitive, and polar questions. This work adopts a descriptive approach in the analysis of the Igbo and Etulo language data. The Igbo language data presented and analyzed were obtained from the existing grammatical description of negation in Igbo while the Etulo language data were obtained from Etulo language consultants using the elicitation method.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download