Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts

Leonard Kiwelu; Philip Damas; Zena Mpenda

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts

Leonard Kiwelu, Philip Damas, Zena Mpenda

Published in International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 27 November 2020 Accepted: 5 January 2021 Published: 2 February 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has released 19 Arabica coffee hybrid varieties that combine high yields with resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD). The high yield attribute of these improved varieties and reduced fungicide costs would normally motivate smallholder farmers to adopt them. However, their level of adoption by smallholders and factors influencing it have not been studied in detail. This study aimed at assessing smallholder farmers’ perception of the varieties and determine factors influencing their adoption in Mbinga and Mbozi districts. Data were collected from a sample of 218 adopters and 102 non-adopters making a total of 320 farmers using household survey questionnaire. The perception of smallholder farmers on attributes of those coffee varieties was gauged using five-point Likert scale. A logistic regression model was employed to determine factors influencing their adoption. Findings from the study revealed that the improved coffee varieties are positively perceived by many smallholder coffee farmers for their high yields, good beverage quality and disease resistance. Coefficient of socio-economic characteristics, attributes of improved coffee varieties and institutional factors were found to be significant (P≤0.01) and positively related to likelihood of adoption of improved coffee varieties. Among the major adoption impediments identified, low access to improved seedlings topped the list. Coffee farmers should be encouraged to adopt the improved coffee varieties and undertake gradual rehabilitation of their old coffee trees either by total replacement of the traditional coffee varieties or by grafting improved scions onto the old healthy rootstocks. The coffee industry should strengthen extension services so as to speed up dissemination of research technologies, including the seedlings of improved varieties to farmers and training them on good agricultural practices; while the government should invest more resources to assist the coffee industry stakeholders in that direction.

Published in	International Journal of Agricultural Economics (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
Page(s)	21-32
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Adoption, Improved Coffee Varieties, Perception, Smallholder Farmers

References

[1]	ICO, “Total production by all exporting countries,” International Coffee Organization, 2018. http://www.ico.org/new_historical.asp?section=Statistics.
[2]	BOT, “Annual Reports for the Year Ended 30 June 2018,” Bank of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Annual Report 2017/2018, 2018.
[3]	BOT, “Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2017,” Bank of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Annual Report 2016/2017, 2017.
[4]	D. G. Mhando and N. S. Mdoe, “Why Do Smallholder Famers In Four Tanzanian Districts Continue With Coffee Production Despite Fluctuating Prices?,” J. Agric. Life Sci., vol. 5, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.30845/jals.v5n2p3.
[5]	ICO, “Country Coffee Profile: Kenya,” Int. Coffee Counc., no. 7, p. 29, 2019.
[6]	R. Bickford, “Ethiopia Coffee Annual Coffee Annual Report,” Annual Report ET1904, 2019.
[7]	I. Nzeyimana, “Optimizing Arabica coffee production systems in Rwanda: a multiple-scale analysis,” Wageningen University, 2018.
[8]	ICO, “Country Coffee Profile: Uganda,” Int. Coffee Counc., no. 8, p. 47, 2019.
[9]	D. L. Kilambo, D. J. Mtenga, N. Ng’homa, R. Ng’omuo, J. Teri, and B. Mlwilo, “A Decade of Contributing to a Profitable and Sustainable Coffee Industry in Tanzania: The Arabica and Robusta Improvement Programmes,” Am. J. Res. Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 31–35, 2015.
[10]	E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed. New York: Free Press, 1995.
[11]	M. M. Jeremiah, J. M. Theodosy, and L. R. Cornel, “Effect of seedling fibrous roots on field performance of hybrid coffee varieties,” Afr. J. Agric. Res., vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 627–634, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.5897/AJAR2017.12900.
[12]	E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, Third Edition. New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.
[13]	URT, “2012 Population and Housing Census,” National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance Dar es Salaam and Office of Chief Government Statistician President’s Office, Finance, Economy and Development Planning Zanzibar, Dar es Salaam, Census General Report, 2013.
[14]	MDC, “Investment Plan for Sunflower Production in Mbozi District,” Mbozi, 2010, p. 29.
[15]	K. A. Levin, “Study design III: Cross-sectional studies,” Evid. Based Dent., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 24–25, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375.
[16]	A. Omair, “Selecting the appropriate study design for your research: Descriptive study designs,” J. Health Spec., vol. 3, no. 3, p. 153, 2015, doi: 10.4103/1658-600X.159892.
[17]	M. Setia, “Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies,” Indian J. Dermatol., vol. 61, no. 3, p. 261, 2016, doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.182410.
[18]	R. V. Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities,” Educ. Psychol. Meas., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, Sep. 1970, doi: 10.1177/001316447003000308.
[19]	M. O. Bushara, K. M. Elami, and E. E. Elnagarabi, “Adoption and Impact Assessment of Improved Technologies of Potato Crop Production Systems in Khartoum State, Sudan (2009-2010),” Int. J. Econ. Manag. Sci., vol. 07, no. 03, 2018, doi: 10.4172/2162-6359.1000527.
[20]	M. J. Mariano, R. Villano, and E. Fleming, “Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines,” Agric. Syst., vol. 110, pp. 41–53, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.010.
[21]	BOT, “Bank of Tanzania Annual Reports for the Year ended on 30 June 2019,” Bank of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, 2019.
[22]	ICO, “Gender Equality in the Coffee Sector: An insight report from the International Coffee Organization,” Int. Coffee Counc., vol. 122, no. 11, p. 45, 2018.
[23]	Lyon, “Business Anthropology’s Lens into Gender Equity: Assessing the Impact of ‘Smart Economics’ in the Coffee Sector.,” Int. J. Bus. Anthropol., vol. 9, no. 3, p. 18, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.33423/ijba.v9i2.2581.
[24]	D. K. Imron and A. R. A. Satrya, “Women and Coffee Farming: Collective Consciousness towards Social Entrepreneurship in Ulubelu, Lampung,” J. Ilmu Sos. Dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 22, no. 3, p. 216, May 2019, doi: 10.22146/jsp.35366.
[25]	U. E. Udensi et al., “Adoption of selected improved cassava varieties among smallholder farmers in South-Eastern Nigeria,” p. 8, 2011.
[26]	A. Mwakatwila, “Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties in Northern and Eastern Zones of Tanzania,” A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Agricultural and Applied Economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture., Morogoro, Tanzania, 2016.
[27]	D. J. Mtenga, “Diversity, Combining Ability and Coffee Berry Disease (Colletotrichum Kahawae) Resistance among Ethiopian and Tanzanian Arabica Coffee Genotypes,” p. 117, 2016.
[28]	D. L. Kilambo, S. O. W. M. Reuben, and D. P. Mamiro, “Responses of Compact Coffee Clones Against Coffee Berry and Coffee Leaf Rust Diseases in Tanzania,” J. Plant Stud., vol. 2, no. 2, p. p81, May 2013, doi: 10.5539/jps.v2n2p81.
[29]	E. Wale, K. Holm-Müller, J. Mburu, and M. Zeller, “Economic analysis of farmers’ preferences for coffee variety attributes: lessons for on-farm conservation and variety adoption in Ethiopia,” no. 2, p. 20, 2005.
[30]	D. G. Mhando and N. S. Mdoe, “Tanzania Coffee Industry Development Strategy,” BACAS - Sokoine University of Agriculture, Moshi, Kilimanjaro, Mid-term Evaluation Report 2011-2021, 2017.
[31]	G. Maro, “Economic Optimization of Nutrient Application to Coffee in Northern Tanzania Using SAFERNAC,” Int. J. Plant Soil Sci., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1096–1111, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.9734/IJPSS/2014/8361.
[32]	TCB, “Tanzania coffee industry development startegy.” Tanzania Coffee Board, 2012.
[33]	J. Lemchi, M. Tshiunza, and A. Tenkouano, “Factors driving the intensity and rate of cooking banana adoption in Nigeria,” J. Agric. Soc. Res. JASR, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 135–166, 2004, doi: 10.4314/jasr.v3i2.2801.
[34]	A. Asfaw and A. Admassie, “The role of education on the adoption of chemical fertilizer under different socio-economic environments in Ethiopia,” Agric. Econ., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 215–228, 2004.
[35]	C. R. Doss and M. L. Morris, “How does gender affect the adoption of agricultural innovations? The case of improved maize technology in Ghana,” Agric. Econ., vol. 25, pp. 27–29, 2001.
[36]	A. Teferi, D. Philip, and M. Jaleta, “Factors that affect the adoption of improved maize varieties by smallholder farmers in Central Oromia, Ethiopia.,” p. 10, 2015.
[37]	A. R. Kaliba, K. Mazvimavi, T. L. Gregory, F. M. Mgonja, and M. Mgonja, “Factors affecting adoption of improved sorghum varieties in Tanzania under information and capital constraints,” Agric. Food Econ., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 18, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s40100-018-0114-4.
[38]	D. B. Mignouna, “Adoption and Impact of Improved Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries: The Case of Imazapyr-Resistant Maize in Western Kenya,” A Thesis Submitted in Fulfilment of The Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Sokoine University of Agriculture., Morogoro, Tanzania, 2016.
[39]	M. K. Mohammed, “Analysis of Adoption of Improved Coffee Technologies in Major Coffee Growing Areas of Southern Ethiopia,” p. 9, 2018.
[40]	S. Diro and B. Erko, “Impacts of Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties on Farmers’ Coffee Yield and Income in Jimma Zone,” Agric. Res., vol. 24, no. 4, p. 10, 2019, doi: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2019.21.556169.
[41]	H. Luzinda, M. Nelima, A. Wabomba, P. C. Musoli, and A. Kakuru, “Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Robusta Coffee Technologies in Uganda,” Uganda J. Agric. Sci., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 33–41, 2018, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ujas.v18i1.3.
[42]	F. E. Mmbando and L. J. S. Baiyegunhi, “Socio-economic and Institutional Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties in Hai District, Tanzania,” J. Hum. Ecol., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2016, doi: 10.1080/09709274.2016.11906955.
[43]	P. H. Nyanga, “Factors Influencing Adoption and Area under Conservation Agriculture: A Mixed Methods Approach,” Sustain. Agric. Res., vol. 1, no. 2, p. 27, 2012, doi: 10.5539/sar.v1n2p27.
[44]	R. Ghimire, H. Wen-chi, and R. B. Shrestha, “Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties among Rural Farm Households in Central Nepal,” Rice Sci., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.05.006.
[45]	S. Lugandu, Factors Influencing the Adoption of Conservation Agriculture by Smallholder Farmers in Karatu and Kongwa Districts of Tanzania, Issue 13. Tanzania: REPOA, 2013.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Leonard Kiwelu, Philip Damas, Zena Mpenda. (2021). Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Leonard Kiwelu; Philip Damas; Zena Mpenda. Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 6(1), 21-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Leonard Kiwelu, Philip Damas, Zena Mpenda. Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. Int J Agric Econ. 2021;6(1):21-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13,
  author = {Leonard Kiwelu and Philip Damas and Zena Mpenda},
  title = {Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-32},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20210601.13},
  abstract = {Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has released 19 Arabica coffee hybrid varieties that combine high yields with resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD). The high yield attribute of these improved varieties and reduced fungicide costs would normally motivate smallholder farmers to adopt them. However, their level of adoption by smallholders and factors influencing it have not been studied in detail. This study aimed at assessing smallholder farmers’ perception of the varieties and determine factors influencing their adoption in Mbinga and Mbozi districts. Data were collected from a sample of 218 adopters and 102 non-adopters making a total of 320 farmers using household survey questionnaire. The perception of smallholder farmers on attributes of those coffee varieties was gauged using five-point Likert scale. A logistic regression model was employed to determine factors influencing their adoption. Findings from the study revealed that the improved coffee varieties are positively perceived by many smallholder coffee farmers for their high yields, good beverage quality and disease resistance. Coefficient of socio-economic characteristics, attributes of improved coffee varieties and institutional factors were found to be significant (P≤0.01) and positively related to likelihood of adoption of improved coffee varieties. Among the major adoption impediments identified, low access to improved seedlings topped the list. Coffee farmers should be encouraged to adopt the improved coffee varieties and undertake gradual rehabilitation of their old coffee trees either by total replacement of the traditional coffee varieties or by grafting improved scions onto the old healthy rootstocks. The coffee industry should strengthen extension services so as to speed up dissemination of research technologies, including the seedlings of improved varieties to farmers and training them on good agricultural practices; while the government should invest more resources to assist the coffee industry stakeholders in that direction.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts
AU  - Leonard Kiwelu
AU  - Philip Damas
AU  - Zena Mpenda
Y1  - 2021/02/02
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 21
EP  - 32
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
AB  - Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has released 19 Arabica coffee hybrid varieties that combine high yields with resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD). The high yield attribute of these improved varieties and reduced fungicide costs would normally motivate smallholder farmers to adopt them. However, their level of adoption by smallholders and factors influencing it have not been studied in detail. This study aimed at assessing smallholder farmers’ perception of the varieties and determine factors influencing their adoption in Mbinga and Mbozi districts. Data were collected from a sample of 218 adopters and 102 non-adopters making a total of 320 farmers using household survey questionnaire. The perception of smallholder farmers on attributes of those coffee varieties was gauged using five-point Likert scale. A logistic regression model was employed to determine factors influencing their adoption. Findings from the study revealed that the improved coffee varieties are positively perceived by many smallholder coffee farmers for their high yields, good beverage quality and disease resistance. Coefficient of socio-economic characteristics, attributes of improved coffee varieties and institutional factors were found to be significant (P≤0.01) and positively related to likelihood of adoption of improved coffee varieties. Among the major adoption impediments identified, low access to improved seedlings topped the list. Coffee farmers should be encouraged to adopt the improved coffee varieties and undertake gradual rehabilitation of their old coffee trees either by total replacement of the traditional coffee varieties or by grafting improved scions onto the old healthy rootstocks. The coffee industry should strengthen extension services so as to speed up dissemination of research technologies, including the seedlings of improved varieties to farmers and training them on good agricultural practices; while the government should invest more resources to assist the coffee industry stakeholders in that direction.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Leonard Kiwelu

School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies (SAEBS), Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Morogoro, Tanzania
Philip Damas

School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies (SAEBS), Department of Food and Resource Economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Morogoro, Tanzania
Zena Mpenda

School of Agricultural Economics and Business Studies (SAEBS), Department of Food and Resource Economics, Sokoine University of Agriculture (SUA), Morogoro, Tanzania

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Leonard Kiwelu, Philip Damas, Zena Mpenda. (2021). Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. International Journal of Agricultural Economics, 6(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Leonard Kiwelu; Philip Damas; Zena Mpenda. Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 6(1), 21-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Leonard Kiwelu, Philip Damas, Zena Mpenda. Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts. Int J Agric Econ. 2021;6(1):21-32. doi: 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13,
  author = {Leonard Kiwelu and Philip Damas and Zena Mpenda},
  title = {Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts},
  journal = {International Journal of Agricultural Economics},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-32},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijae.20210601.13},
  abstract = {Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has released 19 Arabica coffee hybrid varieties that combine high yields with resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD). The high yield attribute of these improved varieties and reduced fungicide costs would normally motivate smallholder farmers to adopt them. However, their level of adoption by smallholders and factors influencing it have not been studied in detail. This study aimed at assessing smallholder farmers’ perception of the varieties and determine factors influencing their adoption in Mbinga and Mbozi districts. Data were collected from a sample of 218 adopters and 102 non-adopters making a total of 320 farmers using household survey questionnaire. The perception of smallholder farmers on attributes of those coffee varieties was gauged using five-point Likert scale. A logistic regression model was employed to determine factors influencing their adoption. Findings from the study revealed that the improved coffee varieties are positively perceived by many smallholder coffee farmers for their high yields, good beverage quality and disease resistance. Coefficient of socio-economic characteristics, attributes of improved coffee varieties and institutional factors were found to be significant (P≤0.01) and positively related to likelihood of adoption of improved coffee varieties. Among the major adoption impediments identified, low access to improved seedlings topped the list. Coffee farmers should be encouraged to adopt the improved coffee varieties and undertake gradual rehabilitation of their old coffee trees either by total replacement of the traditional coffee varieties or by grafting improved scions onto the old healthy rootstocks. The coffee industry should strengthen extension services so as to speed up dissemination of research technologies, including the seedlings of improved varieties to farmers and training them on good agricultural practices; while the government should invest more resources to assist the coffee industry stakeholders in that direction.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Influencing Adoption of Improved Coffee Varieties Among Smallholder Farmers in Mbinga and Mbozi Districts
AU  - Leonard Kiwelu
AU  - Philip Damas
AU  - Zena Mpenda
Y1  - 2021/02/02
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
T2  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JF  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
JO  - International Journal of Agricultural Economics
SP  - 21
EP  - 32
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3843
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijae.20210601.13
AB  - Tanzania Coffee Research Institute (TaCRI) has released 19 Arabica coffee hybrid varieties that combine high yields with resistance to Coffee Leaf Rust (CLR) and Coffee Berry Disease (CBD). The high yield attribute of these improved varieties and reduced fungicide costs would normally motivate smallholder farmers to adopt them. However, their level of adoption by smallholders and factors influencing it have not been studied in detail. This study aimed at assessing smallholder farmers’ perception of the varieties and determine factors influencing their adoption in Mbinga and Mbozi districts. Data were collected from a sample of 218 adopters and 102 non-adopters making a total of 320 farmers using household survey questionnaire. The perception of smallholder farmers on attributes of those coffee varieties was gauged using five-point Likert scale. A logistic regression model was employed to determine factors influencing their adoption. Findings from the study revealed that the improved coffee varieties are positively perceived by many smallholder coffee farmers for their high yields, good beverage quality and disease resistance. Coefficient of socio-economic characteristics, attributes of improved coffee varieties and institutional factors were found to be significant (P≤0.01) and positively related to likelihood of adoption of improved coffee varieties. Among the major adoption impediments identified, low access to improved seedlings topped the list. Coffee farmers should be encouraged to adopt the improved coffee varieties and undertake gradual rehabilitation of their old coffee trees either by total replacement of the traditional coffee varieties or by grafting improved scions onto the old healthy rootstocks. The coffee industry should strengthen extension services so as to speed up dissemination of research technologies, including the seedlings of improved varieties to farmers and training them on good agricultural practices; while the government should invest more resources to assist the coffee industry stakeholders in that direction.
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download