Maize is the most extensively produced crop in both Africa and Ethiopia in terms of both land area and production. However, low soil fertility, non-agronomic methods, disease, pests, weeds, and insufficient water, negatively affect its yield. Although there are a lot of maize farming in the Jimma Zone, the yield is very low. The variability of rainfall is one of the causes of the low production, and it has to be supplemented through irrigation. This study was initiated with the objective of determining the effect of supplementary irrigation on the production and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) under rain-fed agriculture. The field experiment was carried out for three consecutive years, from 2020 to 2022, on the maize (Zea mays L.) crop at the Jimma agricultural research center. The plots were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) consisting of eight treatments in three replications. The results of the analysis of variance showed that, the different levels of supplementary irrigation had a highly significant (P < 0.05) effect on ear height, but there was no significant difference on plant height. Grain yield and 100 seed weight were significantly (p<0.05) influenced by the application of different levels of supplementary irrigation. The pooled mean analysis indicated that the highest grain yield of 10623.1 kg ha-1 and 100 seed weight of 56.19 gm/plot were recorded from the application of full irrigation (100% ETc). However, the plot with rain fed has given the lowest grain yield (5216.5 kg ha-1) and the lowest 100-seed weight (41.97 gm /plot). In this study, there was a 49.1% yield increment between the fully supplied and the rain-fed maize. The result of partial budget analysis of maize showed that, the highest marginal rate of return and maximum net benefit of 16118 % and 255465 ETB were recorded from one SI at flowering stage and full Supplementary irrigation, respectively. The lowest net benefit (125984 ETB) was obtained at a rain fed treatment. Even though the marginal rate of return was lower, for a sustainable production of maize a full supply irrigation can be recommended.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12 |
Page(s) | 135-142 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Full Supply, Maize, Rain Fed, Supplementary Irrigation, Water Productivity
[1] | Admasu, R., Asefa, A., & Tadesse, M. (2019). Effect of Growth Stage Moisture Stress on Common Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) Yield and Water Productivity at Jimma, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental Sciences & Natural Resources, 16 (1), 25–32. |
[2] | Bray, R. H. and Kurtz, L. T., (1945). Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil science, 59 (1), pp. 39-46. |
[3] | Buchaillot, M. L., Gracia-Romero, A., Vergara-Diaz, O., Zaman-Allah, M. A., Tarekegne, A., Cairns, J. E., Prasanna, B. M., Araus, J. L., & Kefauver, S. C. (2019). Evaluating maize genotype performance under low nitrogen conditions using RGB UAV phenotyping techniques. Sensors, 19 (8), 1815. |
[4] | CIMMYT (International maize & wheat improvement Center), Economics Training Manual, Mexico City, Mexico, 1998. |
[5] | CSA. (2018). Agricultural Sample Survey 2017/18 (2010 E.C). Report on Area and Production of Major Crops Volume I. Statistical Bulletin 586. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[6] | CSA. (2019). Area and production of major crops. Agricultural Sample Survey 2018/19 (2011 E.C.). V1. Statistical Bulletin. 589. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[7] | Gebreigziabher, E. T., 2020. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of maize at Selekleka District, Ethiopia. Journal of Nepal Agricultural Research Council, 6, pp. 127-135. |
[8] | FAOSTAT. (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization Statistics Data Base, Agricultural production indices. FAO, Rome, Italy. |
[9] | Festo Richard Silungwe, Jans Bobert, Henry Mahoo and Japhet J. Kashaigili, (2022). Maize Yield and Water Productivity under Strategic Supplemental Deficit Irrigation during short rainy seasons, Global scientific journal (GSJ): Volume 10, Issue 4, April 2022, Online: ISSN 2320-9186. |
[10] | Feyisa, F. A., Abraham, T., & Ashagre, H. (2019). Influence of plant population and NPSB blended fertilizer rates on yield parameters and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in Bako, Ethiopia. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12 (4), 345–349. |
[11] | Gebeyehu, L., Emana, B., & Mitiku, F. (2020). Impact of agricultural credit on maize productivity among smallholder farmers in Hababo Guduru district, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 11 (1), 23–35. |
[12] | Grant, R. F., Jackson, B. S., Kiniry, J. R., & Arkin, G. F. (1989). Water deficit timing effects on yield components in maize. Agronomy Journal, 81 (1), 61–65. |
[13] | Guelloubi, R., Hamdy, A., & Sardo, V. (2005). Maize production under two water saving techniques. El Gamal F.(Ed.), Lamaddalen a N. (Ed.), Bogliotti C. (Ed.), Guelloubi R.(Ed.). Non-Conventional Water Use: WASAMED Project. Bari: CIHEAM/EU DG Research, 77–91. |
[14] | IPCC, W. G. (2014). Fifth Assessment Report-Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. |
[15] | Kumar, A., Jat, S. L., Kumar, R., & Yadav, O. P. (2013). Maize production systems for improving resource-use efficiency and livelihood security. Directorate of Maize Research. |
[16] | Oweis, T., & Hachum, A. (2009). Supplemental irrigation for improved rainfed agriculture in WANA region. In Rainfed agriculture: Unlocking the potential (pp. 182–196). CABI Wallingford UK. |
[17] | Pasuquin, J. M., Pampolino, M. F., Witt, C., Dobermann, A., Oberthür, T., Fisher, M. J., & Inubushi, K. (2014). Closing yield gaps in maize production in Southeast Asia through site-specific nutrient management. Field Crops Research, 156, 219–230. |
[18] | Rathor, P. S. (2005). Techniques and management of field crop production. India: Agro-bios. 524-536. |
[19] | SAS, S. A. S. (2002). User′s Guide, Version 9.0 SAS Institute Inc. Cary. NY. |
[20] | Seckler, D., Barker, R., & Amarasinghe, U. (1999). Water scarcity in the twenty-first century. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15 (1–2), 29–42. |
[21] | Sharma, S. K. (2005). Techniques and Management of Field Crop Production. Editor PS Rathore. Agrobios (India). |
[22] | Sileshi, G., Akinnifesi, F. K., Debusho, L. K., Beedy, T., Ajayi, O. C., & Mongomba, S. (2010). Variation in maize yield gaps with plant nutrient inputs, soil type and climate across sub-Saharan Africa. Field Crops Research, 116 (1–2), 1–13. |
[23] | Statistics, F. A. O. (2018). World Food and Agriculture Statistical Pocketbook. FAO: Rome, Italy. |
[24] | Zeleke, Z. A. (2020.). Effect of Different Levels of Supplementary Irrigation on Yield and Yield Component of Maize (zea mays L) at Teppi, South West Ethiopia. |
APA Style
Etefa Tilahun, Minda Tadesse, Addisu Asefa, Huluhager Ayanawu, Robel Admassu. (2023). Response of Maize (Zea Mays L.) to Supplementary Irrigation Under Rain Fed Agriculture at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, South West Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 9(5), 135-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12
ACS Style
Etefa Tilahun; Minda Tadesse; Addisu Asefa; Huluhager Ayanawu; Robel Admassu. Response of Maize (Zea Mays L.) to Supplementary Irrigation Under Rain Fed Agriculture at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, South West Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2023, 9(5), 135-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12
AMA Style
Etefa Tilahun, Minda Tadesse, Addisu Asefa, Huluhager Ayanawu, Robel Admassu. Response of Maize (Zea Mays L.) to Supplementary Irrigation Under Rain Fed Agriculture at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, South West Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2023;9(5):135-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12, author = {Etefa Tilahun and Minda Tadesse and Addisu Asefa and Huluhager Ayanawu and Robel Admassu}, title = {Response of Maize (Zea Mays L.) to Supplementary Irrigation Under Rain Fed Agriculture at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, South West Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {9}, number = {5}, pages = {135-142}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20230905.12}, abstract = {Maize is the most extensively produced crop in both Africa and Ethiopia in terms of both land area and production. However, low soil fertility, non-agronomic methods, disease, pests, weeds, and insufficient water, negatively affect its yield. Although there are a lot of maize farming in the Jimma Zone, the yield is very low. The variability of rainfall is one of the causes of the low production, and it has to be supplemented through irrigation. This study was initiated with the objective of determining the effect of supplementary irrigation on the production and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) under rain-fed agriculture. The field experiment was carried out for three consecutive years, from 2020 to 2022, on the maize (Zea mays L.) crop at the Jimma agricultural research center. The plots were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) consisting of eight treatments in three replications. The results of the analysis of variance showed that, the different levels of supplementary irrigation had a highly significant (P -1 and 100 seed weight of 56.19 gm/plot were recorded from the application of full irrigation (100% ETc). However, the plot with rain fed has given the lowest grain yield (5216.5 kg ha-1) and the lowest 100-seed weight (41.97 gm /plot). In this study, there was a 49.1% yield increment between the fully supplied and the rain-fed maize. The result of partial budget analysis of maize showed that, the highest marginal rate of return and maximum net benefit of 16118 % and 255465 ETB were recorded from one SI at flowering stage and full Supplementary irrigation, respectively. The lowest net benefit (125984 ETB) was obtained at a rain fed treatment. Even though the marginal rate of return was lower, for a sustainable production of maize a full supply irrigation can be recommended.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Response of Maize (Zea Mays L.) to Supplementary Irrigation Under Rain Fed Agriculture at Jimma Agricultural Research Center, South West Ethiopia AU - Etefa Tilahun AU - Minda Tadesse AU - Addisu Asefa AU - Huluhager Ayanawu AU - Robel Admassu Y1 - 2023/09/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 135 EP - 142 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20230905.12 AB - Maize is the most extensively produced crop in both Africa and Ethiopia in terms of both land area and production. However, low soil fertility, non-agronomic methods, disease, pests, weeds, and insufficient water, negatively affect its yield. Although there are a lot of maize farming in the Jimma Zone, the yield is very low. The variability of rainfall is one of the causes of the low production, and it has to be supplemented through irrigation. This study was initiated with the objective of determining the effect of supplementary irrigation on the production and productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) under rain-fed agriculture. The field experiment was carried out for three consecutive years, from 2020 to 2022, on the maize (Zea mays L.) crop at the Jimma agricultural research center. The plots were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) consisting of eight treatments in three replications. The results of the analysis of variance showed that, the different levels of supplementary irrigation had a highly significant (P -1 and 100 seed weight of 56.19 gm/plot were recorded from the application of full irrigation (100% ETc). However, the plot with rain fed has given the lowest grain yield (5216.5 kg ha-1) and the lowest 100-seed weight (41.97 gm /plot). In this study, there was a 49.1% yield increment between the fully supplied and the rain-fed maize. The result of partial budget analysis of maize showed that, the highest marginal rate of return and maximum net benefit of 16118 % and 255465 ETB were recorded from one SI at flowering stage and full Supplementary irrigation, respectively. The lowest net benefit (125984 ETB) was obtained at a rain fed treatment. Even though the marginal rate of return was lower, for a sustainable production of maize a full supply irrigation can be recommended. VL - 9 IS - 5 ER -