Agriculture has played a crucial role in the economy and the development of many countries. Moreover, the basic needs for human survival are; food, shelter and cloth are link on agricultural production. Most developed countries see that agriculture provides them with food and raw materials for different goods such as (shelter, medicine, fuel and clothing) which has led to increase in incomes, livelihoods and standard of living. This study aimed at analysing the relationship between International competitiveness of agricultural products, with area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, exchange rate and inflation rate in Latin America during the period of 1991-2019. In this study, panel data econometric method was used, as well as cross-section dependence (Pesaran test), unit root (cross-section Augumented Dickey Fuller and Cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin tests), cointergration (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests), and heterogeneous causality (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests) (Hurlin and Dumitrescu test). The results reveal that the model has cross-sectional dependency and that they are integrated at one I (1). The "fully modified OLS and dynamic OLS estimators" were used to examine the existence of a long-term relationship and it was found that a long-term relationship existed between the selected variables. The study revealed a positive significant relationship between International Competitiveness of the agricultural raw material and area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, while international competitiveness has negative relationship with exchange rate, and inflation. The economy policy recommendations deducted from this investigation is that Foreign Direct Investment and labour force have a positive contribution to the increase of International Competitiveness of agricultural products.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 8, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13 |
Page(s) | 121-132 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Revealed Comparative Advantage, Agricultural Products, Area, Fertilizer, Economic Growth, Granger Causality, Panel Unit Root
[1] | Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and ‘revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School, Vol. 33, Pp. 99-123. |
[2] | Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies. |
[3] | Balassa, B. (1977). Revealed' Comparative Advantage Revisited: An Analysis of Relative Export Shares of the Industrial Countries, 1953-1971. The Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, Vol. 45 (Issue 4), Pp 327-44. |
[4] | Bonelli, B., & Pinheiro, A. C. (2015). New Export Activites in Brazil: Comparative Advantage, Policy or Self Discovery? Originally published by Ipea, Discussion Paper. |
[5] | Cakmak, E. (2004). Structural Change and Market Opening in Turkish Agriculture, EU-Turkey Forum. Working Papers, No: 10. Obtenido de www.ceps.be |
[6] | Cruz-López, D. F., Caamal-Cauich, I., Pat-Fernández, V. G., & Salgado, J. R. (2022). Competitiveness of Mexico’s Hass avocado exports in the world market. Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas, Vol. 13 (num. 2). |
[7] | Dumitrescu, E., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogenous panels. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 29, Pp. 1450-1460. |
[8] | Echeverría, J. (2008). Apropiación social de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad - CTS,, Vol. 4, (núm. 10,), pp. 171-182. Obtenido de https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/924/92441011.pdf |
[9] | Erkan, B., & Saricoban, K. (2014). Comparative Analysis of the Competitiveness in the Export of Science-Based goods regarding Turkey and the Eu+13 Countries. Istanbul University 2nd World Conference On Technology, Innovation And Entrepreneurship. |
[10] | Ferman, M., S., A., & Yüksel, A. (2004). Export Competitive Power and Sustainability of Turkey: Competitor Countries in EU Market and Comparison for Turkey, SPO, Turkish Economics Congress, Development. Strategies and Macroeconomic Policies, Proceedings II, Ankara (in Turkish). |
[11] | Fertö, I., & Hubbard, L. (2003). Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness in Hungarian Agri- Food Sectors,. The Journal of World Economy, Vol. 26, (No. 2). |
[12] | González Catalán, S. (2021). Regional Competitiveness in Latin America: A Comparative Study of the Key Elements for Regional Performance. Journal of Regional Research / Investigaciones Regionales, Vol. 2 (num. 50), pp. 125-146, 2021. |
[13] | Gorton, M., Davidova, S., & Ratinger, T. (2000). The Competitiveness of Agriculture in Bulgaria and the Czech Republic Vis- à- vis the European Union (CEEC and EU Agricultural Competitiveness),. Comparative Economic Studies, XLII, (No. 1), Pp. 59- 86. |
[14] | Hausmann, R., & Klinger, B. (2007). The Structure of the Product Space and the Evolution of Comparative Advantage. CID Working Papers 146, Center for International Development at Harvard University. |
[15] | Hausmann, R., & Klinger, B. (s.f.). Growth Diagnostics in Peru. CID Working Paper No. 181, Centre for Internation Development Harvard University. |
[16] | Im, K., Pesaran, M., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit root tests in heterogenous panels. J. Econom., Vol. 115, Pp. 53-74. |
[17] | Jayadi, A., & Aziz, H. (2017). Comparative Advantage Analysis and Products Mapping of Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam Export Products. Journal of Developing Economies. doi: 10.20473/jde.v2i1.5119. |
[18] | Kharlamova, G., & Vertelieva, O. (2013). The International Competitiveness of Countries: Economic-Mathematical Approach. Economics & Sociology, Vol. 6, (No 2), pp. 39-52. doi: 10.14254/2071-789X.2013/6-2/4. |
[19] | Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, No. 30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5km91nkdt6d6-en |
[20] | Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 104, Pp. 1–24. |
[21] | Lindberg, E., & Surry, Y. (2005). An Analysis of Trade Performance and TradeFlows for Fruits and Vegetables in Mediterranean Countries,. EAAE, XI. Congress. Poster Presentation Copenhagen. |
[22] | Mehmood, S., Ahmad, M., Ahmad, Z., & Bokhari, I. (2012). Patterns of comparative advantage in chemicals sectors: a study on trade potential among major saarc countries,. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research Business, Vol. 4 (2), Pp. 91-101. |
[23] | Montaño Méndez, L. E., Valenzuela Patrón, I. N., & Villavicencio López, K. V. (2021). Competitiveness of the Mexican red tomato in the international market: analysis 2003-2017. Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas, Vol. 12 (num. 7). Obtenido de http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/remexca/v12n7/2007-0934-remexca-12-07-1185-en.pdf |
[24] | Muaz, S., Jabarin, A., Assaf, L., Sahawneh, M., El- Roudan, O., Al- Saeed, A.,... Saleh, A. (2004). The Impact of EuroMediterranean Partnership on the Agricultural Sectors of Jordan, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt (The Case of Horticultural Exports to EU Markets). Forum Euro- Mediterranean Des Instituts Economiqes (FEMISE). |
[25] | OECD. (2016). Agricultural trade. Retrieved from The changing landscape of agricultural markets and trade:. Obtenido de https://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/agricultural-trade/ |
[26] | OECD/FAO. (2019). Latin American Agriculture: Prospects And Challenges. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2019-2028. |
[27] | Organic World. (2019). Organic Agriculutre in Latin America. |
[28] | Organic World. (2019). The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics and Emerging Trends 2019. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM Organics International, Frick and Bonn. 20 edition. Obtenido de https://shop.fibl.org/chde/2020-organic-world-2019.html |
[29] | Osamor, I. P., Akinlabi, H., & Osamor, V. C. (2013). An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Globalisation on Performance of Nigerian Commercial Banks in Post-Consolidation Period. European Journal of Business and Management, Vol 5 (5), pp. 37 – 45. |
[30] | Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J. Appl. Econom, Vol. 22, Pp. 265-312. |
[31] | Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: John Murray. |
[32] | Sachhithra, K., & Sajeev, G. (. (2014). Comparative advantage in international trade: A study Based on leading Exports in Sri Lanka. doi: DOI: 10.4038/KJM.V112.6453 Corpus ID: 59025062. |
[33] | Serin, V., & Civan, A. (2008). “Revealed Comparative Advantage and Competitiveness: A Case Study for Turkey towards the EU. Journal of Economic and Social Research, Vol. 10 (2), pp 25-41. |
[34] | Thamiem, S., Weerahewa, J., Pushpakumara, D., & Singh, V. (2011). Trade Competitiveness of Agro forestry Crop Sector in Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research, Vol. 22 (4), Pp. 338 – 347. |
[35] | Utkulu, U., & Seymen, D. (2004). Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness: Evidence for Turkey vis-a` -vis the EU 15. paper presented at the European Study Group 6th Annual Conference, Nottingham. |
[36] | Valenzo, M., Galeana, E., & Martínez, J. (2015). Competitividad y Supply Chain Management en la Industria Exportadora de Aguacates en Mexico. Revista Internacional Administracion & Finanzas, Vol. 8 (2), pp. 1-19. |
[37] | Vollrath, T. (1991). A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Vol. 127 (2), Pp. 265-280. doi: 10.1007/BF02707986. |
[38] | Widodo, T. (2010). Comparative advantage: Theory, Empirical Measures and Case Studies. Reviews of Economics and Business studies. doi: Corpus ID; 22740470. |
[39] | William, W. G., & Malaga, J. (2010). La Competitividad de México en la Exportación de Productos Agrícolas. Revisita Mexicana de agronegocios, VL-XIV. |
[40] | WITS. (2022). The World Integrated Trade Solution. World Bank. Obtenido de https://wits.worldbank.org/ |
[41] | World Bank. (2019). Ending Poverty, Investing in Opportunity. World Bank Annual Report. Obtenido de file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/9781464814709.pdf |
[42] | Yu-Jie, F. (2008). Evaluating the Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in International Trade based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Processes. doi: 1473-8031 print DOI 10.5013/IJSSST.a.17.16.08. |
APA Style
Oluwasefunmi Eunice Irewole, Enrique Armas Arévalos. (2022). Factors That Determine International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Latin America 1990-2020. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 8(3), 121-132. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13
ACS Style
Oluwasefunmi Eunice Irewole; Enrique Armas Arévalos. Factors That Determine International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Latin America 1990-2020. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2022, 8(3), 121-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13
AMA Style
Oluwasefunmi Eunice Irewole, Enrique Armas Arévalos. Factors That Determine International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Latin America 1990-2020. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2022;8(3):121-132. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13, author = {Oluwasefunmi Eunice Irewole and Enrique Armas Arévalos}, title = {Factors That Determine International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Latin America 1990-2020}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {8}, number = {3}, pages = {121-132}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20220803.13}, abstract = {Agriculture has played a crucial role in the economy and the development of many countries. Moreover, the basic needs for human survival are; food, shelter and cloth are link on agricultural production. Most developed countries see that agriculture provides them with food and raw materials for different goods such as (shelter, medicine, fuel and clothing) which has led to increase in incomes, livelihoods and standard of living. This study aimed at analysing the relationship between International competitiveness of agricultural products, with area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, exchange rate and inflation rate in Latin America during the period of 1991-2019. In this study, panel data econometric method was used, as well as cross-section dependence (Pesaran test), unit root (cross-section Augumented Dickey Fuller and Cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin tests), cointergration (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests), and heterogeneous causality (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests) (Hurlin and Dumitrescu test). The results reveal that the model has cross-sectional dependency and that they are integrated at one I (1). The "fully modified OLS and dynamic OLS estimators" were used to examine the existence of a long-term relationship and it was found that a long-term relationship existed between the selected variables. The study revealed a positive significant relationship between International Competitiveness of the agricultural raw material and area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, while international competitiveness has negative relationship with exchange rate, and inflation. The economy policy recommendations deducted from this investigation is that Foreign Direct Investment and labour force have a positive contribution to the increase of International Competitiveness of agricultural products.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Factors That Determine International Competitiveness of Agricultural Products in Latin America 1990-2020 AU - Oluwasefunmi Eunice Irewole AU - Enrique Armas Arévalos Y1 - 2022/05/31 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 121 EP - 132 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20220803.13 AB - Agriculture has played a crucial role in the economy and the development of many countries. Moreover, the basic needs for human survival are; food, shelter and cloth are link on agricultural production. Most developed countries see that agriculture provides them with food and raw materials for different goods such as (shelter, medicine, fuel and clothing) which has led to increase in incomes, livelihoods and standard of living. This study aimed at analysing the relationship between International competitiveness of agricultural products, with area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, exchange rate and inflation rate in Latin America during the period of 1991-2019. In this study, panel data econometric method was used, as well as cross-section dependence (Pesaran test), unit root (cross-section Augumented Dickey Fuller and Cross-sectional Im, Pesaran, and Shin tests), cointergration (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests), and heterogeneous causality (Pedroni and Fisher-Johansen tests) (Hurlin and Dumitrescu test). The results reveal that the model has cross-sectional dependency and that they are integrated at one I (1). The "fully modified OLS and dynamic OLS estimators" were used to examine the existence of a long-term relationship and it was found that a long-term relationship existed between the selected variables. The study revealed a positive significant relationship between International Competitiveness of the agricultural raw material and area, fertilizer, labour force, economic growth, foreign direct investment, while international competitiveness has negative relationship with exchange rate, and inflation. The economy policy recommendations deducted from this investigation is that Foreign Direct Investment and labour force have a positive contribution to the increase of International Competitiveness of agricultural products. VL - 8 IS - 3 ER -