Farmers in Serenta irrigation scheme have been irrigating their plots without considering the crop water requirement. This has resulted high loose of water and low water use productivity. This indicates that, the irrigation scheme needs scientific analyzing of water use productivity and irrigation scheduling to proper use of the water for more beneficial impacts. Therefore, the present study was conducted to analyze the water use productivity and irrigation scheduling in Serenta irrigation scheme, Northern Ethiopia. To evaluate the irrigation water use productivity, four farmers’ fields covered with single crop onion from each position (head, middle and tail-end) water users of the irrigation scheme were selected. To determine the amount of water applied by the irrigators to the fields, Parshall flumes were installed at the entrance of test plots and the total yields obtained from each of the selected fields were collected directly from the fields. The results from the water use productivity analysis revealed that, the average water use productivity was found to be 1.3 kg/m3, 1.8kg/m3 and 2.1 kg/m3 for the head, middle and tail-end users, respectively. The results indicated that, the tail-end users those who applied less water than the head and middle users, had the highest return per unit of water applied (2.1 kg/m3). This might be due to the application of irrigation water nearest to gross irrigation water requirement. From the present study, it can be concluded that more water application means not more production. So, water use productivity can be improved by minimizing water losses due to over irrigation and applying water according to crop water requirement.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 7, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11 |
Page(s) | 213-218 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Irrigation Scheduling, Irrigation Water Use Productivity, Onion Farm Land
[1] | Molden D., Oweis T., Steduto P., Bindraban P., Hanjra H. A., Kijne J. Improving agricultural water productivity: Between optimism and caution. Agr. Wat. Manage, 2010, Vol. 97 (4): 528-535. |
[2] | Clement, F., Haileslassie, A., Ishaq, S., Bluemmel, M., Murty, M. R., Samad, M., & Khan, M. A. Enhancing water productivity for poverty alleviation: Role of capitals and institutions in the Ganga Basin. Experimental Agriculture, 2011, 47 (S1), 133-151. |
[3] | FAO. Crop Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 2012, No. 66. FAO, Rome. |
[4] | FAO. Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Surface Irrigation System: Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 1989, No. 45. FAO, Rome. |
[5] | WTARDO (Wereda Tselemti Agriculture and Rural Development Office). Annual Report, Maytsebri, Tigray, Ethiopia, 2018. |
[6] | Araya, A., Stroosnijder, L., Girmay, G., & Keesstra, S. D. Crop coefficient, yield response to water stress and water productivity of teff (Eragrostis teff). Agricultural water management, 2011, 98 (5), 775-783. |
[7] | FAO. Irrigation Scheduling: From theory to practice. Water Reports, 8. FAO, Rome, 1996. |
[8] | Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 1998, 300 (9). |
[9] | Abernethy, C. L. Performance measurement in canal water management: a discussion. Overseas Development Institute (ODI), 1986. |
[10] | Adeniran, K. A., Amodu, M. F., Amodu, M. O., & Adeniji, F. A. Water requirements of some selected crops in Kampe dam irrigation project. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2010, 1 (4), 119. |
[11] | Yusuf, K. Assessment of small scale irrigation using comparative performance indicators on two selected schemes in upper Awash River valley, M.Sc. Thesis, Alemaya University. Alemaya, Ethiopia, 2004. |
[12] | James L. G. (1988). Principles of Farm Irrigation System Design. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1988, 543p. |
[13] | Worku, N. Technical Performance evaluation of Midhegdu small scale irrigation scheme in west Hararge zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. M.Sc. thesis, Haramaya University. Haramaya, Ethiopia, 2013. |
[14] | Gebre G. “Impact of Small Scale Irrigation Development on Farmers’ Livelihood Improvement in Ethiopia: A Review.” Journal of Resources Development and Management 62 (2020): 10-18. |
[15] | Gebre G. "Performance Evaluation of Organizational Arrangement in Irrigation Water Management at Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia." Irrigat DrainageSyEng10 (2021): 273. |
APA Style
Gebre Gidey, Azenaw Kalkay. (2021). Analyzing Irrigation Water Use Productivity and Irrigation Scheduling of Onion Farm Land in Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 7(5), 213-218. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11
ACS Style
Gebre Gidey; Azenaw Kalkay. Analyzing Irrigation Water Use Productivity and Irrigation Scheduling of Onion Farm Land in Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2021, 7(5), 213-218. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11
AMA Style
Gebre Gidey, Azenaw Kalkay. Analyzing Irrigation Water Use Productivity and Irrigation Scheduling of Onion Farm Land in Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2021;7(5):213-218. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11, author = {Gebre Gidey and Azenaw Kalkay}, title = {Analyzing Irrigation Water Use Productivity and Irrigation Scheduling of Onion Farm Land in Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {7}, number = {5}, pages = {213-218}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20210705.11}, abstract = {Farmers in Serenta irrigation scheme have been irrigating their plots without considering the crop water requirement. This has resulted high loose of water and low water use productivity. This indicates that, the irrigation scheme needs scientific analyzing of water use productivity and irrigation scheduling to proper use of the water for more beneficial impacts. Therefore, the present study was conducted to analyze the water use productivity and irrigation scheduling in Serenta irrigation scheme, Northern Ethiopia. To evaluate the irrigation water use productivity, four farmers’ fields covered with single crop onion from each position (head, middle and tail-end) water users of the irrigation scheme were selected. To determine the amount of water applied by the irrigators to the fields, Parshall flumes were installed at the entrance of test plots and the total yields obtained from each of the selected fields were collected directly from the fields. The results from the water use productivity analysis revealed that, the average water use productivity was found to be 1.3 kg/m3, 1.8kg/m3 and 2.1 kg/m3 for the head, middle and tail-end users, respectively. The results indicated that, the tail-end users those who applied less water than the head and middle users, had the highest return per unit of water applied (2.1 kg/m3). This might be due to the application of irrigation water nearest to gross irrigation water requirement. From the present study, it can be concluded that more water application means not more production. So, water use productivity can be improved by minimizing water losses due to over irrigation and applying water according to crop water requirement.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Analyzing Irrigation Water Use Productivity and Irrigation Scheduling of Onion Farm Land in Serenta Irrigation Scheme, Northern Ethiopia AU - Gebre Gidey AU - Azenaw Kalkay Y1 - 2021/10/05 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 213 EP - 218 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20210705.11 AB - Farmers in Serenta irrigation scheme have been irrigating their plots without considering the crop water requirement. This has resulted high loose of water and low water use productivity. This indicates that, the irrigation scheme needs scientific analyzing of water use productivity and irrigation scheduling to proper use of the water for more beneficial impacts. Therefore, the present study was conducted to analyze the water use productivity and irrigation scheduling in Serenta irrigation scheme, Northern Ethiopia. To evaluate the irrigation water use productivity, four farmers’ fields covered with single crop onion from each position (head, middle and tail-end) water users of the irrigation scheme were selected. To determine the amount of water applied by the irrigators to the fields, Parshall flumes were installed at the entrance of test plots and the total yields obtained from each of the selected fields were collected directly from the fields. The results from the water use productivity analysis revealed that, the average water use productivity was found to be 1.3 kg/m3, 1.8kg/m3 and 2.1 kg/m3 for the head, middle and tail-end users, respectively. The results indicated that, the tail-end users those who applied less water than the head and middle users, had the highest return per unit of water applied (2.1 kg/m3). This might be due to the application of irrigation water nearest to gross irrigation water requirement. From the present study, it can be concluded that more water application means not more production. So, water use productivity can be improved by minimizing water losses due to over irrigation and applying water according to crop water requirement. VL - 7 IS - 5 ER -