Background: Meaning in life is an essential construct in individuals’ lives, related to individuals' overall well-being. Several factors can lead to meaning in life, among them is the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. According to the Self-Determination Theory, the tendency towards achieving meaning in life is innate in individuals’ motivational tendency to understand their surroundings and be a part of it. Moreover, the satisfaction of basic psychological needs is essential for a healthy well-being, and thus can contribute to meaning in life. Research purpose: The research purpose was to measure the relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life levels (general, situational, daily) and dimensions (purpose, significance, coherence) among Chinese undergraduate students. Methods: Basic psychological needs as categorized by the Self-Determination Theory are autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence were measured in this research. Meaning in life levels, general, situational, and daily, and dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence were measured in this research. Three sub-studies were conducted with three different samples of Chinese undergraduate students. Age ranged between 17 and 26 years old, with a majority of females participants across the three sub-studies. Sub-study one included 173 participants and was a correlational study. It measured general basic psychological needs and meaning in life. Sub-study two included 367 participants and was also a correlational study. It measured situational basic psychological needs and meaning in life, as well, as meaning in life dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence. Sub-study three included 61 participants and was a longitudinal study. It measured daily basic psychological needs and meaning in life across seven days. Results: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life at the general, situational, daily levels and meaning in life dimensions. Autonomy predicted meaning in life dimensions (significance, purpose, coherence), competence predicted daily and coherence dimension of meaning in life. Additionally, relatedness predicted significance and coherence dimensions of meaning in life, and beneficence predicted daily and purpose dimension of meaning in life. Conclusions: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life. The research also confirmed the universality of basic psychological needs. There was a difference in basic psychological needs prediction role across meaning in life levels and dimensions. The research presented similar and different results from previous research, which the door to further research on the role of mediators in the BPN – MIL relationship.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12 |
| Page(s) | 188-195 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Meaning in Life, Meaning Dimensions, Self-Determination Theory, Basic Psychological Needs, Undergraduate Students
| [1] | V. E. Frankl, V. E. Man’s search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy, 4th ed., Transl G. W. Allport. Beacon Press, 1992. |
| [2] | M. F. Steger, P. Frazier, S. Oishi, & M. Kaler. The meaning in life questionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 2006, 53 (1), pp. 80–93. |
| [3] | F. Martela, & M. F. Steger. The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2016, 11: 5, pp. 531-545. |
| [4] | F. Martela, & M. F. Steger. The role of significance relative to the other dimensions of meaning in life – an examination utilizing the three dimensional meaning in life scale (3DM). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2022. |
| [5] | D. Borawski. When you are lonely, look inside yourself: The moderating role of reflection in the relationship between loneliness and meaning in life. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 194, 111662. |
| [6] | J. A. Hicks, & L. A. King. Positive mood and social relatedness as information about meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2009, 4 (6), 471–482. |
| [7] | M. Miao, & Y. Gan. The predictive effects of presence of meaning in life on future-oriented coping: the chain mediating role of positive affect and resource accumulation. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 2021, 19 (3), pp. 403-409. |
| [8] | L. A. King, J. A. Hicks, J. L. Krull, & A. K. Del Gaiso. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2006, 90 (1), pp. 179. |
| [9] | D. Macià, G. Cattaneo, J. Solana, & J. M. Tormos. (2021). Meaning in Life: A Major Predictive Factor for Loneliness Comparable to Health Status and Social Connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2021, 12, pp. 627547. |
| [10] | N. M. Lambert, T. F. Stillman, T. F., Hicks, J. A., S. Kamble, R. F. Baumeister, & F. D. Fincham. To Belong Is to Matter. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2013. |
| [11] | R. M. Ryan, W. S. Ryan, S. I. Di Domenico, and E. L. Deci. The nature and conditions of Human autonomy and flourishing: self-determination theory and BPN. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The oxford handbook of human motivation, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, 2019, pp. 165–184. |
| [12] | N. Weinstein, R. M. Ryan, & E. L. Deci. Motivation, meaning, and wellness: A self-determination perspective on the creation and internalization of personal meanings and life goals. In P. T. Wong (Ed.), The human quest for meaning: theories, research, and applications, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2012, pp. 81-106. |
| [13] | M. Vansteenkiste, R. M. Ryan, & B. Soenens. Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 2021, 44, pp. 1-31. |
| [14] | F. Martela, & R. M. Ryan. The benefits of benevolence: BPN, beneficence, and the enhancement of well-being. Journal of Personality, 2016, 84 (6), pp. 750–764. |
| [15] | F. Martela, R. M. Ryan, & M. F. Steger. Meaningfulness as satisfaction of autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence: comparing the four satisfactions and positive affect as predictors of meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018, 19, pp. 1261-1282. |
| [16] | F. Martela, A. Lehmus-Sun, P. D. Parker, A. B. Pessi, & R. M. Ryan. Needs and well-being across Europe: basic psychological needs are closely connected with well-being, meaning, and symptoms of depression in 27 European countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2023, 14 (5), 501-514. |
| [17] | A. M. Eakman. Relationships between meaningful activity, BPN, and meaning in life: test of the meaningful activity and life meaning model. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 2018, 33 (2), 100–109. |
| [18] | A. T. Church, M. S. Katigbak, K. D. Locke, H. Zhang, J. Shen, J. de Jesús Vargas-Flores, J. Ibáñez-Reyes, J. Tanaka-Matsumi, G. J. Curtis, H. F. Cabrera, K. A. Mastor, J. M. Alvarez, F. A. Ortiz, J.-Y. R. Simon, & C. M. Ching. Need satisfaction and well-being: testing self-determination theory in eight cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2013, 44 (4), pp. 507–534. |
| [19] | M. J. N. Nalipay, R. B. King, & Y. Cai. Autonomy is equally important across East and West: testing the cross-cultural universality of self-determination theory. Journal of Adolescence, 2020, 78, pp. 67-72. |
| [20] | B. Chen, M. Vansteenkiste, W. Beyers, L. Boone, E. L. Deci., J. Van der Kaap-Deeder, B. Duries, W. Lens, L. Matos, A. Mouratidis, R. M. Ryan, K. M. Sheldon, B. Soenens, S. Van Petegem, & J. Verstuyf. Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 2015, 39, pp. 216–236. |
| [21] | S. Yu, C. Levesque-Bristol, & Y. Maeda. (2018). General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: a meta-analysis of studies in the US and East Asia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2018, 19, pp. 1863–1882. |
| [22] | S. Zhang, R. Feng, Y. Fu, Q. Liu, Y. He, O. Turel, & Q. He. The bidirectional relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life: a longitudinal study. Personality and Individual Differences, 2022, 197, pp. 111784. |
| [23] | L. T. Hu, & P. M. Bentler. Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995, pp. 77 – 99. |
| [24] | J. Van der Kaap-Deeder, B. Soenens, R. M. Ryan, & M. Vansteenkiste. Manual of the basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration scale (BPNSFS). Ghent University, Belgium, 2020. |
| [25] | J. Morgan, & T. Farsides. Measuring meaning in life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2009, 10 (2), pp. 197–214. |
| [26] | L. S. George, and C. L. Park. The multidimensional existential meaning scale: a tripartite approach to measuring meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2-017, 12 (6), pp. 613-627. |
| [27] | L. A. King, & J. A. Hicks. Detecting and constructing meaning in life events. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2009, 4: 5, pp. 317-330. |
| [28] | A. S. Bryk, & S. Raudenbush. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods, 2nd ed. Sage Publications., 1992. |
| [29] | S. A. Hooker, K. A. Masters, K. M. Vagnini, & C. L. Rush. Engaging in personally meaningful activities is associated with meaning salience and psychological well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2020, 15: 6, pp. 821-831. |
| [30] | V. Costin, & V. L. Vignoles. What do people find most meaningful? How representations of the self and the world provide meaning in life. Journal of Personality, 2021, 90, pp. 541-558. |
APA Style
Marwa, S., Xiaosong, G. (2023). Meaning in Life as Predicted by Basic Psychological Needs: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate Students. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(6), 188-195. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12
ACS Style
Marwa, S.; Xiaosong, G. Meaning in Life as Predicted by Basic Psychological Needs: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate Students. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11(6), 188-195. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12
AMA Style
Marwa S, Xiaosong G. Meaning in Life as Predicted by Basic Psychological Needs: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate Students. Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;11(6):188-195. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12,
author = {Saab Marwa and Gai Xiaosong},
title = {Meaning in Life as Predicted by Basic Psychological Needs: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate Students},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {11},
number = {6},
pages = {188-195},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20231106.12},
abstract = {Background: Meaning in life is an essential construct in individuals’ lives, related to individuals' overall well-being. Several factors can lead to meaning in life, among them is the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. According to the Self-Determination Theory, the tendency towards achieving meaning in life is innate in individuals’ motivational tendency to understand their surroundings and be a part of it. Moreover, the satisfaction of basic psychological needs is essential for a healthy well-being, and thus can contribute to meaning in life. Research purpose: The research purpose was to measure the relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life levels (general, situational, daily) and dimensions (purpose, significance, coherence) among Chinese undergraduate students. Methods: Basic psychological needs as categorized by the Self-Determination Theory are autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence were measured in this research. Meaning in life levels, general, situational, and daily, and dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence were measured in this research. Three sub-studies were conducted with three different samples of Chinese undergraduate students. Age ranged between 17 and 26 years old, with a majority of females participants across the three sub-studies. Sub-study one included 173 participants and was a correlational study. It measured general basic psychological needs and meaning in life. Sub-study two included 367 participants and was also a correlational study. It measured situational basic psychological needs and meaning in life, as well, as meaning in life dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence. Sub-study three included 61 participants and was a longitudinal study. It measured daily basic psychological needs and meaning in life across seven days. Results: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life at the general, situational, daily levels and meaning in life dimensions. Autonomy predicted meaning in life dimensions (significance, purpose, coherence), competence predicted daily and coherence dimension of meaning in life. Additionally, relatedness predicted significance and coherence dimensions of meaning in life, and beneficence predicted daily and purpose dimension of meaning in life. Conclusions: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life. The research also confirmed the universality of basic psychological needs. There was a difference in basic psychological needs prediction role across meaning in life levels and dimensions. The research presented similar and different results from previous research, which the door to further research on the role of mediators in the BPN – MIL relationship.
},
year = {2023}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Meaning in Life as Predicted by Basic Psychological Needs: A Study with Chinese Undergraduate Students AU - Saab Marwa AU - Gai Xiaosong Y1 - 2023/11/13 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 188 EP - 195 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231106.12 AB - Background: Meaning in life is an essential construct in individuals’ lives, related to individuals' overall well-being. Several factors can lead to meaning in life, among them is the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. According to the Self-Determination Theory, the tendency towards achieving meaning in life is innate in individuals’ motivational tendency to understand their surroundings and be a part of it. Moreover, the satisfaction of basic psychological needs is essential for a healthy well-being, and thus can contribute to meaning in life. Research purpose: The research purpose was to measure the relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life levels (general, situational, daily) and dimensions (purpose, significance, coherence) among Chinese undergraduate students. Methods: Basic psychological needs as categorized by the Self-Determination Theory are autonomy, competence, relatedness, and beneficence were measured in this research. Meaning in life levels, general, situational, and daily, and dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence were measured in this research. Three sub-studies were conducted with three different samples of Chinese undergraduate students. Age ranged between 17 and 26 years old, with a majority of females participants across the three sub-studies. Sub-study one included 173 participants and was a correlational study. It measured general basic psychological needs and meaning in life. Sub-study two included 367 participants and was also a correlational study. It measured situational basic psychological needs and meaning in life, as well, as meaning in life dimensions, significance, purpose, and coherence. Sub-study three included 61 participants and was a longitudinal study. It measured daily basic psychological needs and meaning in life across seven days. Results: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life at the general, situational, daily levels and meaning in life dimensions. Autonomy predicted meaning in life dimensions (significance, purpose, coherence), competence predicted daily and coherence dimension of meaning in life. Additionally, relatedness predicted significance and coherence dimensions of meaning in life, and beneficence predicted daily and purpose dimension of meaning in life. Conclusions: The research found a relationship between basic psychological needs and meaning in life. The research also confirmed the universality of basic psychological needs. There was a difference in basic psychological needs prediction role across meaning in life levels and dimensions. The research presented similar and different results from previous research, which the door to further research on the role of mediators in the BPN – MIL relationship. VL - 11 IS - 6 ER -
School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China; Key Laboratory of Modern Teaching Technology (Ministry of Education), Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China
School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China
Information