This study was set up try to address some of the problems which the Parastatal organizations have been facing in their operations. Corporate governance is seen as being critical in the leadership of Parastatal organizations. One of the motivating reasons for establishing Parastatal organizations in Zambia is to facilitate social and economic development in sectors that are not considered expedient for private sector investment by foreign and local investors. However, the Parastatal organizations established by the government to fill this vacuum have been faced with challenges that constrain their ability to perform optimally. The Board of Directors are key in the success of the Parastatal organizations. Primary methodology used in this study is Qualitative field research. Sampling was based on non-probability which is purposive sampling. After initial participants were selected using purposive sampling, Snowball sampling was used to select subsequent participants. In this study, opinions, perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and beliefs were sought through face-to-face informant interviews supplemented by the desk research. The study population were former Government leaders, Board of Directors, and senior management members who had been involved in Parastatal organizations. In-depth interview methodology was used where each person interviewed shared with the interviewer’s understanding on the subject of the role of leadership in Parastatal organizations in Zambia. Government Leaders, Board of Directors and Senior management leaders who were appointed to run these organizations were the main target groups for this study. A total of 40 respondents (comprising of 30 males and 10 females) belonging to the existing and past Parastatal organizations were systemically interviewed within their setting. Leadership in these organizations is led by the Board of directors were appointed by the minister. The board then have a responsibility of appointing and overseeing the senior management to hold them responsible for the success of the organization. Most of the participants were quick to point out that the leadership in parastatal organizations are mostly constrained by political interests whereby what is actualized within organizations is not the vision of Parastatal leaders but the interests of the politicians running the country. Parastatal organizations are supposed to be contributing to domestic revenue, employment creation and economic growth. Unfortunately, Parastatal organizations in Zambia had in the past been marred with inefficiencies, high liabilities and poor financial management. This has been mainly attributed to the interferences of Government in the Board of Directors.
Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14 |
Page(s) | 86-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Corporate Governance, Leadership, Parastatal Organizations in Zambia
[1] | Bernard, R. H. (1995) Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
[2] | Black, B., Hasung J., Woochan K. (2006) Does Corporate Governance Affect Firms’ Market Values? Evidence from Korea, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 22, 366-413. |
[3] | Chanda, S., Burton, B. and Dunne, T. (2017). “The nature and potential of corporate governance in developing countries Zambian perceptions”. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 30 No. 6, 2017, pp. 1257-1287. Emerald Publishing Limited 0951-3574. DOI 10.1108/AAAJ-08-2015-2208. |
[4] | Chang, Eric C. & Wong, Sonia M. L., (2004) “Political Control and Performance in China's Listed Firms”. Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 32, No. 4, December 2004. |
[5] | Chang, Eric C. & Wong, Sonia M. L., (2002) Corporate Governance, Political Interference and Corporate Performance of China’s litsted Companies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228946311 |
[6] | Chirwa, Ephraim W. (2004) "Industry and firm effects of privatization in Malawian oligopolistic manufacturing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52 (2), pages 277-289, June. |
[7] | Clarke, T. (2007) The Evolution of Directors’ Duties: Bridging the Divide between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of General Management, 32 (3): 1–27. |
[8] | Cornett, M. M., Jamie J. M. & Hassan T. (2009) The financial crisis, internal corporate governance, and the performance of publicly-traded U. S. bank holding companies. Working Paper, Social Science Research Network. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1476969. |
[9] | Frankel, N. and Gage, A. 2007. Monitoring and Evaluation Fundamentals: A Self-Guided Mini course. Washington DC. MEASURE Evaluation. |
[10] | Gage A and Dunn M. 2009. Monitoring and Evaluating Gender-Based Violence Prevention and Mitigation Programs. Washington DC: MEASURE Evaluation. |
[11] | ILO (2018). World Employment Social Outlook. Available at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_615594.pdf |
[12] | Hejazi, S. (2006) Sampling and its variants: Introduction to Research Methodology in Medical Sciences. Tehran: Islamic Azad University. |
[13] | Hendrike, J. and Hendrike, L. (2004) Business Governance Handbook, Principles and Practice. Cape Town, Juta &Co. Ltd. |
[14] | Kaluwa, B. and Lawson, C. (1996) The efficiency and effectiveness of Malawian parastatals. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199611)8:6<747::AID-JID266>3.0.CO;2 |
[15] | Kowalewski, O. (2012) Does Corporate Governance Determine Corporate Performance and Dividends During Financial Crisis: Evidence from Poland Wharton Financial Institutions Center Working Paper No. 12-14. |
[16] | Mazikana, T. (2019) Corporate Governance as a Strategy for Business Viability in Parastatal Organizations in Harare. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3476540. |
[17] | Miles M. B, & Huberman A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis. (2nd Edition); Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications. |
[18] | Mpedzisi, P. (2021) Corporate Governance: the case of Parastatals. South Africa International Affairs. www.sivioinstitute.org. |
[19] | Mwanawasa, C. (2016) A Case Analysis of the Viability of the Current Regulation and Enforcement Mechanisms of Corporate Governance in Zambia. M. A Thesis. University of Cape Town. |
[20] | Mwaura, K. (2007) “The Failure of Corporate Governance in State Owned Enterprises and the need for restructured governance in fully and partially privatized enterprises: The case of Kenya.” In Fordham International Law Journal 31 (2007) 34, P 1-31. |
[21] | Mwitwa, P. (2012): Sata’s Firing of ZNBS Boss Signals another Shake up of Key Institutions. https://zambiareports.com/2012/08/16/ |
[22] | Njoloma, Afred, M. (2019) Analysing the financial sustainability determinants of service delivery paraistatals in Malawi. https://oa.mg/work/3194099434 |
[23] | Nellis, J. (1988) “The Institutional Framework: Organization, Management and Supervision of Tanzanian Parastatal organizations.” Unpublished chapter in World Bank report on Tanzanian public enterprises. |
[24] | OECD (2004) OECD Task Force to Coordinate Fight against Spam. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/korea/oecdtaskforcetocoordinatefightagainstspam.htm |
[25] | OECD-DAC. (2004). Glossary of Key Terms in Evaluation and Results Based Management. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/18074294.pdf. |
[26] | Office of the Auditor General (2014) Report of the Auditor General on the Accounts of Parastatal Bodies and Other Statutory Institutions for the Financial Years ended 31st December 2013. Lusaka, Auditor General’s Office. |
[27] | Office of the Auditor General (2013) Report of the Auditor General on the Accounts of Parastatal Bodies and Other Statutory Institutions for the Financial Years ended 31st December 2012. Lusaka, Auditor General’s Office. |
[28] | Office of the Auditor General (2006) Report of the Auditor General on the Accounts of Parastatal Bodies and Other Statutory Institutions for the Financial Years ended 31st December 2005. Lusaka, Auditor General’s Office. |
[29] | Polit-O’Hara D, Beck CT. (2006) Essentials of nursing research: Methods, appraisal, and utilization. 1. Lippincott Williams Wilkins. |
[30] | Policy Monitoring and Research Centre (2018) Report on Parastatal Bodies, Lusaka. |
[31] | Republic of Zambia (2018) Report of the Committee on Parastatal Bodies on the Review of Operations and Management of ZCCM –Investment Holdings and Zambia Telecommunications Company Limited for the Third Session of the Twelfth National Assembly. |
[32] | Republic of Zambia (2012): Report Of The Public Accounts Committee On The Report Of The Auditor-General On The Accounts Of Parastatal Bodies For The Year Ended 31 December 2011. |
[33] | Sandbrook, R. (1988) "Patrimonialism and the Failing of Parastatal organizations: Africa in Comparative Perspective", in Cook, P. & Kirkpatrick, C. (eds), Privatization in Less Developed Countries. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. |
[34] | Stephanie, Lawler. (2014) Identity: Sociological Perspectives. European Journal of Communication, 29 (6), 767–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114545851k |
[35] | World Bank (2008) Zambia: Proposal for Strengthening the Governance and Performance Monitoring of Zambia’s State-Owned Enterprises. Washington. |
APA Style
Patrick Siame, Simona Simona. (2023). Impact of Corporate Governance in the Performance of Parastatal Organizations in Zambia. Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14
ACS Style
Patrick Siame; Simona Simona. Impact of Corporate Governance in the Performance of Parastatal Organizations in Zambia. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2023, 11(3), 86-96. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14
AMA Style
Patrick Siame, Simona Simona. Impact of Corporate Governance in the Performance of Parastatal Organizations in Zambia. Humanit Soc Sci. 2023;11(3):86-96. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14
@article{10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14, author = {Patrick Siame and Simona Simona}, title = {Impact of Corporate Governance in the Performance of Parastatal Organizations in Zambia}, journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences}, volume = {11}, number = {3}, pages = {86-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20231103.14}, abstract = {This study was set up try to address some of the problems which the Parastatal organizations have been facing in their operations. Corporate governance is seen as being critical in the leadership of Parastatal organizations. One of the motivating reasons for establishing Parastatal organizations in Zambia is to facilitate social and economic development in sectors that are not considered expedient for private sector investment by foreign and local investors. However, the Parastatal organizations established by the government to fill this vacuum have been faced with challenges that constrain their ability to perform optimally. The Board of Directors are key in the success of the Parastatal organizations. Primary methodology used in this study is Qualitative field research. Sampling was based on non-probability which is purposive sampling. After initial participants were selected using purposive sampling, Snowball sampling was used to select subsequent participants. In this study, opinions, perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and beliefs were sought through face-to-face informant interviews supplemented by the desk research. The study population were former Government leaders, Board of Directors, and senior management members who had been involved in Parastatal organizations. In-depth interview methodology was used where each person interviewed shared with the interviewer’s understanding on the subject of the role of leadership in Parastatal organizations in Zambia. Government Leaders, Board of Directors and Senior management leaders who were appointed to run these organizations were the main target groups for this study. A total of 40 respondents (comprising of 30 males and 10 females) belonging to the existing and past Parastatal organizations were systemically interviewed within their setting. Leadership in these organizations is led by the Board of directors were appointed by the minister. The board then have a responsibility of appointing and overseeing the senior management to hold them responsible for the success of the organization. Most of the participants were quick to point out that the leadership in parastatal organizations are mostly constrained by political interests whereby what is actualized within organizations is not the vision of Parastatal leaders but the interests of the politicians running the country. Parastatal organizations are supposed to be contributing to domestic revenue, employment creation and economic growth. Unfortunately, Parastatal organizations in Zambia had in the past been marred with inefficiencies, high liabilities and poor financial management. This has been mainly attributed to the interferences of Government in the Board of Directors.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Impact of Corporate Governance in the Performance of Parastatal Organizations in Zambia AU - Patrick Siame AU - Simona Simona Y1 - 2023/06/27 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 86 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20231103.14 AB - This study was set up try to address some of the problems which the Parastatal organizations have been facing in their operations. Corporate governance is seen as being critical in the leadership of Parastatal organizations. One of the motivating reasons for establishing Parastatal organizations in Zambia is to facilitate social and economic development in sectors that are not considered expedient for private sector investment by foreign and local investors. However, the Parastatal organizations established by the government to fill this vacuum have been faced with challenges that constrain their ability to perform optimally. The Board of Directors are key in the success of the Parastatal organizations. Primary methodology used in this study is Qualitative field research. Sampling was based on non-probability which is purposive sampling. After initial participants were selected using purposive sampling, Snowball sampling was used to select subsequent participants. In this study, opinions, perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and beliefs were sought through face-to-face informant interviews supplemented by the desk research. The study population were former Government leaders, Board of Directors, and senior management members who had been involved in Parastatal organizations. In-depth interview methodology was used where each person interviewed shared with the interviewer’s understanding on the subject of the role of leadership in Parastatal organizations in Zambia. Government Leaders, Board of Directors and Senior management leaders who were appointed to run these organizations were the main target groups for this study. A total of 40 respondents (comprising of 30 males and 10 females) belonging to the existing and past Parastatal organizations were systemically interviewed within their setting. Leadership in these organizations is led by the Board of directors were appointed by the minister. The board then have a responsibility of appointing and overseeing the senior management to hold them responsible for the success of the organization. Most of the participants were quick to point out that the leadership in parastatal organizations are mostly constrained by political interests whereby what is actualized within organizations is not the vision of Parastatal leaders but the interests of the politicians running the country. Parastatal organizations are supposed to be contributing to domestic revenue, employment creation and economic growth. Unfortunately, Parastatal organizations in Zambia had in the past been marred with inefficiencies, high liabilities and poor financial management. This has been mainly attributed to the interferences of Government in the Board of Directors. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -