| Peer-Reviewed

Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System

Received: 10 February 2022     Accepted: 3 March 2022     Published: 12 March 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The view that society is an organic whole has been widely accepted that society is not a collection of individual individuals or a simple sum, but a community of various groups linked by specific relationships and ties. In the social organism, the elements that make up the society depend on and coordinate with each other, at the same time, there are contradictions and conflicts. Social conflict is a characteristic "morbidity" of modern industrial society, therefore, the ability to reconcile various contradictions and conflicts of interest is an important condition for the sound functioning and development of a society, and any society is faced with the task of social integration. In Western societies, social integration is regarded as the process of social integration or the ultimate state of this process. The British philosopher Herbert Spencer introduced the concept of social integration, arguing that at a late stage of social evolution, society had become so complex that it was impossible for each sector to adjust itself, and that "social integration" was needed to perform the function of coordination and control within society. Social integration is a state of differentiation and unification of different sectors of a country, which includes the social coordination of differences. Emile Durkheim systematically studies social integration, distinguishing two types of social integration, namely mechanical solidarity based on socio-cultural homogeneity and organic solidarity based on complementary roles and mutual commitment. In the light of the Anomie of social order in the development of human society, social scientists and Marxism used different methods and tools to investigate and put forward solutions to the problem. Comte advocates the use of science and natural law to achieve social integration. Durkheim highlights and emphasizes social consensus. Coser advocates releasing hostility through social safety valves. Parsons proposes to maintain the basic values and norms shared by members of society to avoid socially divisive conflicts. The use of ideology for social integration has worked well in some cases and has not been effective in others. Ultimately, the root causes of conflict must be analyzed through socio-economic relationships, drawing on various integration theories and tailoring the remedy to the specific situation in order to achieve the goal of effective social integration.

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13
Page(s) 53-57
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Social System, Social Organism, Conflict, Integration

References
[1] Wu Zengji et al. Modern sociology [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House, 2005: 66.
[2] Selected Works of Marx and Engels (Vol. 1) [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1995: 344.
[3] Selected Works of Marx and Engels (Vol. 2) [M]. Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1995: 2.
[4] Jia Chunzeng. History of foreign sociology [M]. Beijing: People's University of China Press, 2000: 91.
[5] Lewis Coser. The function of social conflict [M]. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 1989: preface.
[6] Song Linfei. Western sociological theory [M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2005: 348.
[7] Jia Chunzeng. History of foreign sociology [M]. Beijing: People's University of China Press, 2000: 283-284.
[8] Encyclopedia of China Editorial Committee. Encyclopedia of China (Sociology Volume) [M]. Beijing: Encyclopedia of China Press, 2004: 351.
[9] Xie Lizhong. The summary of Western sociological works [M]. Nanchang: Jiangxi People's Publishing House, 1998: 14-15.
[10] CiHai (color illustrated and reduced version) [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Dictionary Publishing House, 1999: 1859.
[11] Song Linfei. Western sociological theory [M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2005: 15.
[12] Song Linfei. Western sociological theory [M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2005: 36.
[13] Song Linfei. Western sociological theory [M]. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 2005: 335.
[14] Lewis Coser. The function of social conflict [M]. Beijing: Huaxia Publishing House, 1989: 26.
[15] Yu Hai: History of Western Social Thought [M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press, 2005: 397.
[16] Thomas J. Bernard. Conflict and the strife of agreement [M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983: 194.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Jianjun Yao, He Huang, Yu Han. (2022). Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System. Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(2), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Jianjun Yao; He Huang; Yu Han. Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2022, 10(2), 53-57. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Jianjun Yao, He Huang, Yu Han. Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System. Humanit Soc Sci. 2022;10(2):53-57. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13,
      author = {Jianjun Yao and He Huang and Yu Han},
      title = {Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System},
      journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {53-57},
      doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20221002.13},
      abstract = {The view that society is an organic whole has been widely accepted that society is not a collection of individual individuals or a simple sum, but a community of various groups linked by specific relationships and ties. In the social organism, the elements that make up the society depend on and coordinate with each other, at the same time, there are contradictions and conflicts. Social conflict is a characteristic "morbidity" of modern industrial society, therefore, the ability to reconcile various contradictions and conflicts of interest is an important condition for the sound functioning and development of a society, and any society is faced with the task of social integration. In Western societies, social integration is regarded as the process of social integration or the ultimate state of this process. The British philosopher Herbert Spencer introduced the concept of social integration, arguing that at a late stage of social evolution, society had become so complex that it was impossible for each sector to adjust itself, and that "social integration" was needed to perform the function of coordination and control within society. Social integration is a state of differentiation and unification of different sectors of a country, which includes the social coordination of differences. Emile Durkheim systematically studies social integration, distinguishing two types of social integration, namely mechanical solidarity based on socio-cultural homogeneity and organic solidarity based on complementary roles and mutual commitment. In the light of the Anomie of social order in the development of human society, social scientists and Marxism used different methods and tools to investigate and put forward solutions to the problem. Comte advocates the use of science and natural law to achieve social integration. Durkheim highlights and emphasizes social consensus. Coser advocates releasing hostility through social safety valves. Parsons proposes to maintain the basic values and norms shared by members of society to avoid socially divisive conflicts. The use of ideology for social integration has worked well in some cases and has not been effective in others. Ultimately, the root causes of conflict must be analyzed through socio-economic relationships, drawing on various integration theories and tailoring the remedy to the specific situation in order to achieve the goal of effective social integration.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Cognition and Thinking of Conflict and Integration in the Operation of Social System
    AU  - Jianjun Yao
    AU  - He Huang
    AU  - Yu Han
    Y1  - 2022/03/12
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13
    T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
    SP  - 53
    EP  - 57
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8184
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20221002.13
    AB  - The view that society is an organic whole has been widely accepted that society is not a collection of individual individuals or a simple sum, but a community of various groups linked by specific relationships and ties. In the social organism, the elements that make up the society depend on and coordinate with each other, at the same time, there are contradictions and conflicts. Social conflict is a characteristic "morbidity" of modern industrial society, therefore, the ability to reconcile various contradictions and conflicts of interest is an important condition for the sound functioning and development of a society, and any society is faced with the task of social integration. In Western societies, social integration is regarded as the process of social integration or the ultimate state of this process. The British philosopher Herbert Spencer introduced the concept of social integration, arguing that at a late stage of social evolution, society had become so complex that it was impossible for each sector to adjust itself, and that "social integration" was needed to perform the function of coordination and control within society. Social integration is a state of differentiation and unification of different sectors of a country, which includes the social coordination of differences. Emile Durkheim systematically studies social integration, distinguishing two types of social integration, namely mechanical solidarity based on socio-cultural homogeneity and organic solidarity based on complementary roles and mutual commitment. In the light of the Anomie of social order in the development of human society, social scientists and Marxism used different methods and tools to investigate and put forward solutions to the problem. Comte advocates the use of science and natural law to achieve social integration. Durkheim highlights and emphasizes social consensus. Coser advocates releasing hostility through social safety valves. Parsons proposes to maintain the basic values and norms shared by members of society to avoid socially divisive conflicts. The use of ideology for social integration has worked well in some cases and has not been effective in others. Ultimately, the root causes of conflict must be analyzed through socio-economic relationships, drawing on various integration theories and tailoring the remedy to the specific situation in order to achieve the goal of effective social integration.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Marxism School, Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong, China

  • Marxism School, Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong, China

  • Marxism School, Taiyuan University of Technology, Jinzhong, China

  • Sections