Public culture governance is an important part of the national governance system. It is an important means to lead ideology, regulate cultural production and guide people's life. It plays a vital role in political governance, residents' life and cultural industry. The research in this field should focus on the institutional practice of the government, the cultural life of the residents and the daily operation of the cultural service organizations to clarify the interaction mechanism of the multi-participant subject in the field of public culture governance and provide guidance for the practice of public culture service.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14 |
| Page(s) | 150-154 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Cultural Governance, Ideology, Life of Public Culture, Cultural Industry, Multi-Interactive
| [1] | With China's high degree of economic growth, social differentiation is becoming increasingly serious. There has been a strong "big government" position, making the government to provide public services as the people's ideological habits. The overwhelming government's social responsibility and the apathy of people’s self-service awareness lead to the formation of the plight of the government. The structural tension caused by the lack of endogenous mechanisms of social order and the rapid rise of people's sense of insecurity result in the number and size of mass incidents are increasing year by year. |
| [2] | Wu Yue. The deviation and internal logic of government purchase of public service [J]. Truth Seeking, 2015 (10). |
| [3] | Zhang Huan & Chu Yongqiang. Are Community Services “the Catalysts” of Community Development?——Evidence from 108 Communities in Urban China [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Social Science Edition), 2015 (6). |
| [4] | Chen Yuetang & Xiong Liang. The dilemma and Countermeasures of Non-profit organization participating in the provision of public goods in the community. Social Science In Hunan, 2015 (5). |
| [5] | Michael Mann. The Sources of Social Power [M]. Liu Beicheng, etc. Trans. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe, 2002: page 10. |
| [6] | Charles Taylor. The Malaise of Modernity [M]. Cheng Lian Trans. Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Bureau, 2001: page 4. |
| [7] | Zhou Yi. Strong and Weak Cultural Programs: Reading J. C. Alexander’s Cultural Hermeneutics [J]. Sociological Studies, 2008 (6): 33-53. |
| [8] | Hannah Arendt. The Origins of Totalitarianism [M]. Lin Xianghua Trans. Beijing: SDX Joint Publishing Company, 2008: page 147. |
| [9] | Xu Lianming, Wen Jun. On the perspective of sociology of ideology [J]. Jianghai Academic Journal, 2007 (2): 32-37. |
| [10] | Tao Dongfeng. Reconstruct the political dimension of literary theory [J]. Literary Contention, 2008 (1): 23-27. |
| [11] | Meng Dengying. Political consciousness and identity reflection of cultural studies - Also on how to treat the dilemma of cultural studies in China [J]. Marxism & Reality, 2012 (6): 82-86. |
| [12] | Sun Shicong. Cultural industry and cultural surplus value - from the reflection of Adorno's theory of cultural industry [J]. Dongyue Tribune, 2013 (2): 56-62. |
| [13] | Tan Yang. The influence of cultural factors in the process of modernization - Concurrently on the transformation of politics to culture [J]. Chinese Culture Research, 2014 (2): 74-80. |
| [14] | Engels Engels to Joshua Bloch (21-22 September 1890) [M]. "Selected Works of Marx and Engels", Volume 4, Beijing: People's Publishing House, 1972: p. 249. |
| [15] | Marxism and Reality, 2012 (6): 112-118 [J]. Marxism and Reality, 2012 (6): 112-118. [J]. Marxism and Reality, 2012 (6): 112-118. |
| [16] | Li Lulu & Zhong Zhifeng. “Divided Post-Authoritarianism”: An Analysis of the Political Value and Its Evolution in China’s. Transitional Society. Open Times, 2015 (1). |
| [17] | Douglas Kielner. Cultural Marxism and Modern Culture Research [J]. The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute, 2006 (9): 42-50. |
| [18] | The construction of cultivation mechanism and the system support of the tri-integration ability of society organizations. Study and Practice, 2015 (6). |
| [19] | Max Weber. Weber works (1): Academic and Political [M]. Qian Yongxiang, etc. Trans. Guilin: Guangxi Normal University Press, 2004: p. 190. |
APA Style
Yufan Yan, Yuhui Liang. (2017). The Research Ken of Public Culture Governance: Connotation, Function and Focus. Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14
ACS Style
Yufan Yan; Yuhui Liang. The Research Ken of Public Culture Governance: Connotation, Function and Focus. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2017, 5(4), 150-154. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14
AMA Style
Yufan Yan, Yuhui Liang. The Research Ken of Public Culture Governance: Connotation, Function and Focus. Humanit Soc Sci. 2017;5(4):150-154. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14,
author = {Yufan Yan and Yuhui Liang},
title = {The Research Ken of Public Culture Governance: Connotation, Function and Focus},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {5},
number = {4},
pages = {150-154},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20170504.14},
abstract = {Public culture governance is an important part of the national governance system. It is an important means to lead ideology, regulate cultural production and guide people's life. It plays a vital role in political governance, residents' life and cultural industry. The research in this field should focus on the institutional practice of the government, the cultural life of the residents and the daily operation of the cultural service organizations to clarify the interaction mechanism of the multi-participant subject in the field of public culture governance and provide guidance for the practice of public culture service.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Research Ken of Public Culture Governance: Connotation, Function and Focus AU - Yufan Yan AU - Yuhui Liang Y1 - 2017/08/14 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 150 EP - 154 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20170504.14 AB - Public culture governance is an important part of the national governance system. It is an important means to lead ideology, regulate cultural production and guide people's life. It plays a vital role in political governance, residents' life and cultural industry. The research in this field should focus on the institutional practice of the government, the cultural life of the residents and the daily operation of the cultural service organizations to clarify the interaction mechanism of the multi-participant subject in the field of public culture governance and provide guidance for the practice of public culture service. VL - 5 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: