The problem of the dualism of properties of quantum objectsis still one of the constantly debated problems of physics. To solve this problem, Wheeler proposed a thought experiment with a change in diffraction conditions for a separately flying particle. Interpretation of real experiments on the diffraction scattering of microparticles suggests that their behavior is determined by both their past and their future state. The purpose of this paper is to explain the obtained paradoxical result by the methods of classical physics. The concept of the temporal state of an object is introduced, which is equal to the square root of the pulse, analogous to the wave function in quantum mechanics. The novelty of the adopted approach is to describe the interaction of the current temporary state, both with the past and with the future temporary states. In this case, the interaction forces are proportional to the product of neighboring temporary states and inversely proportional to the time interval between these temporary states. The range of applicability of the proposed model is limited by speeds that are significantly lower than the speed of light, as well as by the condition of relatively small (compared to speed) temporal velocity increments. On the basis of the adopted method, formulas of classical dynamics for uniformly accelerated motion and motion along a circle are derived. In the framework of new ideas, the principle of equality of action and reaction is justified for the force of inertia.
| Published in | Engineering Mathematics (Volume 2, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15 |
| Page(s) | 86-88 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wheeler's Problem, Dynamic Laws, Inertia Force
| [1] | R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. L. Sands, Lectures on Physics (Addison Wesley, 1963). |
| [2] | J. A. Wheeler, pp. 182-213 in Quantum Theory and Measurement, J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek edit., (Princeton University Press, 1984). Figure 4, page 18. |
| [3] | P. Grangier, Th`ese d’ ́etat (1986), Institud’Optique et Universit ́e Paris 11; available online at http://tel.ccsd.cnrs.fr/tel-0000943 |
| [4] | N. Bohr, pp. 9-49 in Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, 1984). |
| [5] | G. Greenstein and A. G. Zajonc, The Quantum Challenge (Jones and BartlettPublishers, 1997) |
| [6] | C. O. Alley, O. G. Jacubowicz, and W. C. Wickes, in Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Tokyo (1986), H. Narani ed. |
| [7] | Ma, X. S., Kofler, J. & Zeilinger, A. Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015005 (2016). |
| [8] | Jacques, V. et al. Experimental realization of Wheeler’s delayed-choice gedanken experiment. Science 315, 966–968 (2007). |
| [9] | Kim, Y.-H., Yu, R., Kulik, S. P., Shih, Y. & Scully, M. O. Delayed choice quantum eraser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1 (2000). |
| [10] | Ma, X. S. et al. Quantum erasure with causally disconnected choice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 1221 (2013). |
| [11] | Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S. & Steinberg, A. M. Super-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state. Nature 429, 161–164 (2004). |
| [12] | Kim, H., Lee, S. M. & Moon, H. S. Generalized quantum interference of correlated photon pairs. Sci. Rep. 5, 9931 (2015). |
| [13] | won, O., Ra, Y. S. & Kim, Y. H. Observing photonic de Broglie waves without the maximally-path-entangled |N, 0〉 + |0, N〉 state. Phys. Rev. A 81, 063801 (2010). |
| [14] | Manning A. G., Khakimov R. I., Dall R, G., Truscott A. G. Wheeler's delayed-choice gedanken experiment with a single atom. Nature Physics volume 11, pages 539–542 (2015). |
| [15] | Zhong-Xiao Man, Yun-Jie Xia, Nguyen Ba An Simultaneous observation of particle and wave behaviors of entangled photonsScientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 42539 (2017). |
| [16] | Parfentev N. A. On the nature of the inertia force. Science of Europe. Vol. 1 №30 p. 54-56 2018. |
APA Style
Parfentev Nikolay Andreevich. (2018). Interpretation of the Results of the Real Wheeler’s Experience. Engineering Mathematics, 2(2), 86-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15
ACS Style
Parfentev Nikolay Andreevich. Interpretation of the Results of the Real Wheeler’s Experience. Eng. Math. 2018, 2(2), 86-88. doi: 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15,
author = {Parfentev Nikolay Andreevich},
title = {Interpretation of the Results of the Real Wheeler’s Experience},
journal = {Engineering Mathematics},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {86-88},
doi = {10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.engmath.20180202.15},
abstract = {The problem of the dualism of properties of quantum objectsis still one of the constantly debated problems of physics. To solve this problem, Wheeler proposed a thought experiment with a change in diffraction conditions for a separately flying particle. Interpretation of real experiments on the diffraction scattering of microparticles suggests that their behavior is determined by both their past and their future state. The purpose of this paper is to explain the obtained paradoxical result by the methods of classical physics. The concept of the temporal state of an object is introduced, which is equal to the square root of the pulse, analogous to the wave function in quantum mechanics. The novelty of the adopted approach is to describe the interaction of the current temporary state, both with the past and with the future temporary states. In this case, the interaction forces are proportional to the product of neighboring temporary states and inversely proportional to the time interval between these temporary states. The range of applicability of the proposed model is limited by speeds that are significantly lower than the speed of light, as well as by the condition of relatively small (compared to speed) temporal velocity increments. On the basis of the adopted method, formulas of classical dynamics for uniformly accelerated motion and motion along a circle are derived. In the framework of new ideas, the principle of equality of action and reaction is justified for the force of inertia.},
year = {2018}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Interpretation of the Results of the Real Wheeler’s Experience AU - Parfentev Nikolay Andreevich Y1 - 2018/11/14 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15 DO - 10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15 T2 - Engineering Mathematics JF - Engineering Mathematics JO - Engineering Mathematics SP - 86 EP - 88 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-088X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.engmath.20180202.15 AB - The problem of the dualism of properties of quantum objectsis still one of the constantly debated problems of physics. To solve this problem, Wheeler proposed a thought experiment with a change in diffraction conditions for a separately flying particle. Interpretation of real experiments on the diffraction scattering of microparticles suggests that their behavior is determined by both their past and their future state. The purpose of this paper is to explain the obtained paradoxical result by the methods of classical physics. The concept of the temporal state of an object is introduced, which is equal to the square root of the pulse, analogous to the wave function in quantum mechanics. The novelty of the adopted approach is to describe the interaction of the current temporary state, both with the past and with the future temporary states. In this case, the interaction forces are proportional to the product of neighboring temporary states and inversely proportional to the time interval between these temporary states. The range of applicability of the proposed model is limited by speeds that are significantly lower than the speed of light, as well as by the condition of relatively small (compared to speed) temporal velocity increments. On the basis of the adopted method, formulas of classical dynamics for uniformly accelerated motion and motion along a circle are derived. In the framework of new ideas, the principle of equality of action and reaction is justified for the force of inertia. VL - 2 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: